Friendship Village Of Bloomington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 63.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.17 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.30 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin for 4 of 4 residents (R46, R18, R57, and 30) who had bruises where the injury was not witnessed, the resident could not explain the injury and the bruises were suspicious. The facility's pattern of failure to investigate injuries of unknown origin constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation. The IJ began on 3/26/24, when R46 was identified with a 2.4 centimeter (cm) x 2.6 cm inner thigh bruise and continued 3/27/24 when R18 was identified with a 7 cm x 5 cm facial bruise, 4/2/24 when R30 was identified with a 10 cm calf bruise, and 4/11/24 when R57 was identified with a 5.5 cm x 4 cm wrist bruise. The facility's system failure to identify suspicious injuries and thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin resulted in unverified rationale and lacked implementation of corrective action to protect resident from further sustaining injuries. The administrator, director of nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented appropriate infection prevention and control practices, including proper hand hygiene while feeding residents, maintaining a clean resident care environment when staff were observed standing on a resident's (R6) mattress, and ensuring resident care items were cleanable and disinfected for a resident (R1) who had pool noodles affixed with tape on their bed and windowsill. Findings include: During observation on 5/4/26 at 12:25 p.m. NA-C was assisting two residents with eating at the same time. NA-C stood up from assisting the residents, scratched his face, touched the counter, obtained straws, and pushed one resident's wheelchair closer to the table before returning to assist the residents with eating without performing hand hygiene. The NA-C placed a straw into unidentified Resident 1's drink and assisted Resident 1, who was seated in a Broda chair and appeared asleep, with drinking. NA-C then assisted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of a required annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R7), which had the potential to result in inaccurate assessment data and/or improper care planning.Findings include:R7's most recent MDS assessment, a quarterly assessment dated [DATE], was reviewed. Based on the assessment schedule, an annual MDS assessment was required to be completed following the 12/2/25 quarterly assessment.R7's electronic medical record (EMR) and MDS assessments lacked evidence the required annual MDS assessment was completed within the federally required timeframe. During an interview on 5/5/26 at 12:28 PM, MDS Coordinator and RN-B, stated there was a report in the EMR system that was run monthly on the 15th to track upcoming MDS assessments. After generating the report, a schedule with due dates for nursing staff to gather data and identify ARDs was completed. RN-B further stated he was unsure how R7 fell through the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for BiPAP machine (noninvasive ventilatory device that helps patients breath by delivering two levels of air pressure: higher pressure during inhalation and lower pressure during exhalation).Findings include:R59's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], identified R5 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions. In Section O- Special Treatment, Procedures and Programs, in section G1 Non-invasive mechanical ventilator (to include BiPAP and CPAP in section G2 and G3 below) was not marked with a check mark to indicate use. Under section Z1: none of the above: was marked with a check.During an observation on 5/4/26 at 4:41 p.m., a BiPAP machine was observed sitting on R59's side table by her bed. There was a gallon of water next to the machine. R59 indicated staff assist with her with the machine at night.During a follow up interview on 5/6/26 at 8:16 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and maintained to ensure appropriate care was provided for 3 of 5 residents (R59, R3 and R12) reviewed for comprehensive care plan. Findings include: R12's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 had severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive to total assistance for all activities of daily living. The MDS indicated R12's preferences of books, newspapers, music, animals, news, being with groups of people, going outside, and attending religious services were all very important. R12's activity assessment dated [DATE], indicated R12 would prefer to spend leisure time both individually and in group activities and prioritize therapy, resting, or recovery over leisure activities. The assessment indicated R12 would like to participate in outings such as leisure drives/tours and restaurants. The assessment indicated R12 identified with the Lutheran church and was interested in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan with identified and personalized nonpharmacological pain interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed for pain, failed to update fall interventions for 1 of 2 residents (R5) reviewed for accidents, and failed to update transfer ability for 1 of 1 residents (R6) reviewed who was identified as high risk for falls. Findings include: R3 R3's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], identified R3 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions. Furthermore, the assessment identified R3 received scheduled pain medication, did not receive as needed pain medication and did not receive any non-medication interventions for pain. During an observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 12:19 p.m., R3 stated he suffered from a lot of pain. R3 stated he was seen by a pain doctor and took as needed (PRN) pain medication. R3 stated he wasn't sure if any nonpharmacological interventions were helpful for his pain. R3's care plan, printed 5/6/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a process to ensure coordination with hospice and ensure skin was accurately evaluated/monitored to promote healing and reduce the risk of complications (i.e., worsening) for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for skin alterations. In addition, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive monitoring was developed and completed for 1 of 1 residents (R9) reviewed with extensive, unilateral knee swelling.Findings include:Hospice Collaboration/Skin MonitoringR12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 had severe cognitive impairment and was diagnosed with arthritis, heart failure, and malnutrition. The MDS indicated R12 was receiving hospice services and was dependent/required maximal assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).R12's care plan dated 2/25/26, indicated R12 had potential for/actual impairment to skin integrity related to an open area on her coccyx, a skin tear on her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff were following fall risk interventions for 1 of 1 (R6) resident identified at risk for falls to prevent further falls. Findings include:R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R6 with severe cognitive impairment, delusions, and behaviors directed at others. In addition, R6 had no impairment of upper and lower extremities, required partial to moderate assistance with personal care and dressing. R6's diagnoses include dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, affective disorder (psychiatric condition that affects emotional state), diabetes, and hearing loss.R6's care plan (CP) with date initiated of 9/1/25, identified R6 as Risk for Falls. CP Intervention with date initiated of 1/23/2024 indicated, TRANSFER: The resident is independent for transferring. Also, a CP Intervention with date initiated on 6/30/24, indicated, IF RESIDENT requires a Hoyer Transfer: SLING SIZE IS YELLOW/MEDIUM.R6's Kardex…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper orders were obtained and adequate coordination in place to care for a resident with a suprapubic catheter for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed who used a catheter.Findings include:R3's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], identified R3 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions. Furthermore, indicated R3 had an indwelling catheter.During an interview on 5/4/26 at 12:17 p.m., R3 stated that he had a catheter (foley catheter- a thin, flexible, indwelling tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) prior to admission. R3 stated that since moving to facility, the catheter had been changed to a suprapubic catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted through a small incision in the lower abdomen into the bladder to drain urine) due to the infections he had been getting. R3 verified staff assist with the catheter.R3's care plan, printed 5/6/26, indicated the following:-(R3) is incontinent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate orders, accurate and complete respiratory care documentation and resident-specific ordered settings for the use and management of a BIPAP device (bilevel positive airway pressure device - a non-invasive ventilation machine to help breathing) for 1 of 1 resident (R59) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:R59's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], identified R5 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions. In Section O- Special Treatment, Procedures and Programs, in section G1 Non-invasive mechanical ventilator (to include BiPAP and CPAP in section G2 and G3 below) was not marked with a check mark to indicate use. Under section Z1: none of the above: was marked with a check.During an observation on 5/4/26 at 4:41 p.m., a BiPAP machine was observed sitting on R59's side table by her bed. There was a gallon of water next to the machine. R59 indicated staff assist with her with the machine at night.R59's care plan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the consulting pharmacist recommendations were fully addressed, including providing a rationale in the resident's medical record if no changes in medication were to be made for 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had moderately impaired cognition and was diagnosed with diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety.R5's pharmacist Consultation Report dated 11/5/25, indicated R5 received 6 milligrams (mg) of melatonin at bedtime since 7/21/23 for insomnia. The report indicated that melatonin was not recommended for sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia in adults. The report indicated that melatonin does not induce or maintain sleep but helps to set the hour of sleep and should not be used beyond six weeks. The report indicated the adverse reactions of melatonin include confusion, daytime drowsiness, dizziness, vivid dreams or nightmares,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$99,500 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $99,500 — penalty dated 2024-05-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN