Newcastle Place
12600 N Port Washington RD #300, Mequon, WI 53092 · Non profit - Corporation · 47 certified beds · (262) 387-8850 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,740 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-31)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.9% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 2.7% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 39.5% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.8% | 24.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.7% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.0% | 82.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.8% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.8% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
70.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 419 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 70.0%CMS range 65.5–73.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.5%CMS range 10.9–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.5–8.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 44.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.42 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement.R7 was assessed as at risk for elopement and had a WanderGuard on R7's left ankle. R7 lived on the second floor of the facility and had multiple documented attempts of entering the emergency exit stairwell near R7's room. The facility's WanderGuard system did not work with emergency exit stairwell doors. R7 expressed a desire to jump down the stairwell and staff used medical equipment to block the stairwell and divert R7 from the door. On 5/31/25, R7 exited the building via the stairwell and was found outside near an employee parking lot. The facility did not complete an investigation into R7's elopement. The facility also did not update R7's plan of care with person-centered approaches after R7's attempted elopements and actual elopement.The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision for a resident assessed to be at risk for elopement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 6 residents (R) reviewed for accidents (R3, R5, R8, and R7.) R3's and R5's examples rise to the severity/scope level of G. *R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/24/25, facility staff assessed R3 to be at high risk for falls. Facility staff did not initiate resident specific fall interventions for R3. According to facility staff, R3 was confused and wandering during the overnight shift. On 12/25/25 at 6:45 AM, R3 was found lying on the floor in R3's room. R3 was sent to emergency room and diagnosed with bilateral (both sides) subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding into the space surrounding the brain) and a displaced fracture of left clavicle (broken collarbone that is out of alignment.) R3's fall was not thoroughly investigated by the facility to determine an accurate root cause. *R5 sustained a burn from hot soup served by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility. Hand hygiene was not appropriately completed during dishwashing.Food temperatures were not consistently completed.The facility did not have logs for the 3-compartment sink and sanitizing buckets. Bowls in the kitchen were not stored upside down or covered. The stove was not thoroughly cleaned.Findings include:On 5/18/26 at 9:35 AM, Surveyor completed an initial kitchen tour. During the tour, Dietary Manager (DM)-D indicated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code.Hand Hygiene:The Wisconsin Food Code documents at Chapter 2 Personal Cleanliness 2-301.14 When to Wash: Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms as specified under 2-301.12 immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: (E) After…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was served at a palatable and appetizing temperature for 2 residents (R) (R3 and R68) of 3 sampled residents. On 5/18/26, R3 and R68 indicated lunch was served at room temperature and their meals were often not hot. An insulated cart and/or thermal plate warmers were not used to deliver meal trays to R3 and R68's unit. Findings include:Between 5/18/26 and 5/20/26, Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/28/26, stated R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition.Between 5/18/26 and 5/20/26, Surveyor reviewed R68's medical record. R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R68's MDS assessment, dated 5/12/26, had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition.On 5/18/26 at 11:36 AM, Surveyor observed [NAME] (CK)-C temp food in the steamtable for lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (R5 & R4) of 9 residents. *R5 spilled hot soup on R5's right abdomen, right lower breast and left pinky assessment on 1/23/26. There is no evidence the nurse spoke with the physician on 1/23/26, a treatment was not ordered until 1/24/26 and the area was not assessed until 1/26/26 by the physician. *The facility did not obtain R4's admission weight on 12/8/25 and daily weights on 12/9/25 & 12/10/25 according to R4's physician orders. Findings include: 1.) R5's diagnoses includes hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that causes gradual cognitive decline), dementia (loss of cognitive function that interferes with a person's daily life and activities), and anxiety disorder (group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R7 & R1) of 2 residents reviewed for parenteral fluids are administered in accordance with physician orders and comprehensive person-centered care plan.*R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) which is a soft, thin, flexible tube in a vein used to administer IV (Intravenous) medications and fluids. The facility did not obtain physician orders or create a care plan for R7's PICC line until 4/14/26.*Physician orders for R1's PICC line were not followed on 1/29/26, 2/5/26, 2/7/26, 2/11/26, and 2/16/26.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes revised March 2022 under Purpose documents The purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter-related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings. Under General Guidelines documents 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services ensuring medications were available to be administered as ordered by their physician for 1 (R4) of 3 residents.*R4 has an order to receive Potassium Chloride Crys ER (Extended Release) Oral Tablet Extended Release 10 MEQ for Hypokalemia effective 12/9/25. R4 did not receive this medication on 12/27, 12/28, and 12/29/25.Findings Include:The facility policy titled, Providing Pharmacy Products and Services, dated 6/1/24, documents: . Applicability: This policy 1.0 sets forth procedures relating to the provision of Pharmacy Products and Services in accordance with the Pharmacy Services Agreement.Procedure1. Pharmacy will provide facility with the facility-specific pharmacy information placard which details how facility staff can contact pharmacy twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.2. If orders for medications are received from physician/prescriber when pharmacy is closed, facility staff should take the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility did not assess a resident's ability to self-administer medication before leaving medication at the bedside for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for self-administration of medication.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications policy, last revised 4/2019, revealed residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely.Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and hypertension. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15 which indicated R1 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of an Incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration was free from a significant medication error. On 12/29/25, R1 received duplicate doses of prescribed blood pressure medication. This error resulted in R1 experiencing hypotension (low blood pressure) and requiring evaluation in the Emergency Department (ED). Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, last revised 4/2019, revealed medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required timeframes .Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely.Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy and hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 2 residents (R)5 (R1 and R15) of 2 sampled residents.R1 reported that R1 was missing $40 and a silver dollar coin. The facility did not report the allegation of misappropriation to local law enforcement.R15 reported that $280 was taken from R15's room. The facility did not report the allegation of misappropriation to the State Agency (SA) or local law enforcement.Findings include: The facility’s Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, dated 9/20/24, indicates: It is the policy of this community to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property .The Community will develop and implement written policies and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of misappropriation were thoroughly investigated for 2 residents (R) (R1 and R15) of 2 sampled residents. R1 reported that R1 was missing $40 and a silver dollar coin. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of misappropriation.R15 reported that $280 was missing from R15's room. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of misappropriation.Findings include: The facility’s Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy dated 9/20/24 indicates: It is the policy of this Community to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. The Community will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: a. Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property. b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility did not ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for 1 resident (R) (R9) of 9 sampled residents. R9 had medications brought from home that R9 administered independently. The medications were not identified in R9's medical record. This had the potential for staff not to be aware of what medications were being independently administered by R9 which could potentially create a medication error. Findings include: R9's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in R9's electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/5/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R9 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 6/10/25 at 10:00 AM, R9 stated, The first night that I was here, the facility was not ready for me and didn't have my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. The practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Staff did not wear hair or beard restraints in the kitchen and kitchenettes. Staff did not have ensure the dishwasher rinse cycle reached the required temperature. In addition, staff did not document dishwasher surface temperatures to ensure proper sanitization. Staff did not test the quaternary sanitizing solution per manufacturer's instructions. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour that began at 9:11 AM on 2/24/25, Director of Culinary Service (DCS)-D indicated the facility follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. Hair/Beard Restraints: The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 2-402.11: Food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that cover body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement their abuse policy and procedure for 4 of 4 employees reviewed for caregiver background checks. The facility did not complete reference checks for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)-J, CNA-K, CNA-L, and CNA-M. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 9/20/24, indicates: .I. Screening: A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credentials checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic institutions, volunteers, and consultants. Checks include attempting to obtain information from the previous or current employer of potential team members. 2. Screenings may be conducted by the Community itself, a third-party agency, or academic institution. 3. The Community will maintain documentation of proof that the screening occurred On 2/25/25, Surveyor requested background check information, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure vaccinations were offered or administered for 4 residents (R) (R12, R30, R148, and R346) of 5 sampled residents. The facility did not offer R12, R30, R148, or R346 the PCV20 vaccine. Findings include: Abbreviations (www.cdc.gov): PCV13: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar13®) PCV15: 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Vaxneuvance®) PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20®) PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax23®) The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations indicate: For adults 65 years or older who have only received PPSV23, the CDC recommends: Give 1 dose of PCV15 or PCV20. The PCV15 or PCV20 dose should be administered at least 1 year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. Regardless of if PCV15 or PCV20 is given, an additional dose of PPSV23 is not recommended since they already received it. For those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R248) of 1 sampled resident received care and treatment based on the resident's needs and medical orders. R248 was not provided wound care for a right below-the-knee amputation (BKA) as ordered. In addition, staff did not monitor R248's vital signs in accordance with the facility's policy, Findings include: The Facility's Wound Care policy, dated October 2010, indicates: The purpose of this procedure is to provide a guideline for the care of wounds to promote healing. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician order for this procedure .13. Dress wound .Mark tape with initials, time, and date and apply to dressing .Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The type of wound care given. 2. The date and time the wound care was given .6. All assessment data (i.e., wound bed color, size, drainage, etc.) obtained when inspecting the wound. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a fall intervention was implemented for 1 resident (R) (R17) of 2 sampled residents. R17 had a history of falls and a care plan intervention that stated R17's walker should be within reach. The intervention was not consistently followed. Findings include: The facility's Falls-Clinical Protocol policy, dated 2001, indicates: For an individual who has fallen, the staff and practitioner will try to identify possible causes within 24 hours of the fall .The staff and physician will continue to collect and evaluate information until either the cause of the fall is identified, or it is determined that the cause cannot be found or is not correctable .Based on the preceding assessment, the staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and to address the risks of clinically significant consequences of falling .If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, facility did not ensure proper care and treatment for 2 residents (R) (R250 and R148) of 4 sampled residents who received medication through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line. R250 and R148's PICC line dressings and injection caps were not changed as ordered. Findings include: The facility's Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes policy, dated March 2022, indicates: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter-related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings .1. Perform site care and dressing change at established intervals or immediately if the integrity of the dressing is compromised (e.g., damp, loosened, or visibly soiled). 1. On 2/25/25, Surveyor reviewed R250's medical record. R250 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, endocarditis, hypoxia, and diabetes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R12) of 3 sampled residents. R12 had a wound and was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). On 2/24/25 and 2/26/25, staff provided care for R12 without wearing the proper personal protective equipment (PPE). Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, revised 4/5/24, indicates: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of multi-drug resistant organism (MDROs) to staffs' hands and clothing .1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions will be implemented for the following (including new admissions) .Wounds: This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. On 11/4/24, staff witnessed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C verbally abuse R1. The facility did not report the verbal abuse to local law enforcement. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Neglect and Exploitation Policy, revised 9/20/24, indicates: Abuse means the willful infliction of . intimidation .pain or mental anguish, which can include staff and resident abuse .it includes verbal abuse .and mental abuse .Verbal abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability .A. The community will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. On 11/4/24, staff witnessed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C verbally abuse R1. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Neglect and Exploitation Policy, revised 9/20/24, indicates: Abuse .includes verbal abuse .III. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation .D. The identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect .IV. Identification of abuse .Possible indicators of abuse include: .5. Verbal abuse of a resident overheard .V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse .B. Written procedures for investigations include .4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses .6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation .VI. Protection of Resident: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure prescribed medication was available and administered correctly for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents. R1 had an order for heparin sodium injection solution 5000 unit/milliliter (ml) inject 1 ml subcutaneously every 8 hours for blood thinner for 14 days. R1 was not administered heparin as ordered. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medications policy, revised April 2019, indicates: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .6) Medications errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff training .13) Vials labeled as single use are not used on multiple residents, such vials are used only for one resident in a single procedure .21) If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 1 resident observed during the provision of incontinence care. During an observation of perineal care for R8 on 10/28/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-K did not appropriately remove gloves and cleanse hands. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene Policy, revised 6/5/22, indicates: Hand Hygiene is the most effective measure for preventing the spread of infections .Hand hygiene will be practiced by all team members working in a licensed health care entity or health center. Indications for hand hygiene: after any contact with blood or other body fluids-even if gloves are worn; any time a team member removes protective gloves or personal protective equipment (PPE); between performing different procedures on the same resident. Note: Wearing gloves does not replace the need for hand hygiene. On 10/28/24 at 1:08…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement their abuse policy for 3 of 8 employees reviewed for background checks. Registered Nurse (RN)-K did not have a background check completed within the last 4 years. The facility was unable to provide background check information for Dietary Manager (DM)-L and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-M who were contracted employees. Findings include: The facility's Resident Abuse Neglect Exploitation and Reporting Requirements policy, with a review date of 9/8/22, indicates: Lifespace complies with and conducts pre-employment and other background and abuse registry checks as required by local, state, and federal regulation and law. On 5/29/24, Surveyor reviewed RN-K's Background Information Disclosure (BID) form, Department of Justice(DOJ) report, and Integrated Background Information System (IBIS) report. RN-K was hired on 5/6/04. RN-K's BID form was dated 3/6/19. RN-K's DOJ and IBIS reports were dated 3/7/19. Surveyor requested updated BID, DOJ, and IBIS information for RN-K that was completed within the last 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure appropriate care and treatment was provided for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 7 sampled residents. R2 experienced a low irregular heart rate on 5/1/24 and low blood pressure on the morning of 5/3/24. Staff did not notify a physician of R2's change in condition in a timely manner. In addition, staff did not obtain R2's daily weights as ordered. Findings include: The facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, with a revised date of February 2021, indicates: Our community promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition .1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on-call when there has been a(an): .d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; e. need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly .3. Prior to notifying the physician or healthcare provider, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure staff used a gait belt during transfers for 4 residents (R) (R4, R5, R6, and R7) of 5 sampled residents. R6's baseline care plan indicated R6 required assistance with transfers. The facility's practice was to use a gait belt for transfers. On 5/29/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-G transferred R6 from recliner to wheelchair without a gait belt. In addition, R4, R5, and R7 stated staff did not consistently use a gait belt during transfers. Findings include: On 5/29/24, Surveyor requested the facility's transfer policy and was provided a policy titled Back Safety from Life Space Incorporated, with a review date of 12/1/21, that indicated team members should use proper body mechanics when performing daily tasks. A policy for transferring residents was not provided. On 5/29/24, Surveyor reviewed R6's medical record. R6 was admitted to facility on 5/28/24 (the day prior to the survey) and did not have an activated power of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 3 residents (R) (R1, R3, and R5) of 5 sampled residents. R1 had an order for oxycodone (an opioid pain medication) as needed (PRN). R1's narcotic count sheet and medication administration record (MAR) did not match. As a result, R1 did not have follow-up documentation for the effectiveness of the medication. In addition, the facility ran out of R1's oxycodone and staff accepted oxycodone brought from R1's home. R3 did not receive 4 doses of prescribed medication because the medications were not available upon admission. R5 did not receive 2 doses of prescribed medication because the medications were not available upon admission. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, with a review date of 12/1/21, indicates: All medications will be monitored by nursing personnel to determine: .response to drug therapy. Under Controlled Substances: Each medication is to be accounted for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a medication was administered for its intended use for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 5 sampled residents. R1 was prescribed Benadryl (an analgesic medication) as needed (PRN) for itching. R1 requested and was administered Benadryl for reasons other than itching. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, with a review date of 12/1/21, indicates: Medications, dose, route, and frequency should be considered generally reasonable and acceptable therapy for the condition for which they are prescribed. On 5/29/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on 4/30/24 following a fall at home. R1 had diagnoses including fracture of the lower end of the radius, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, insomnia, and low back pain. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/7/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were reported timely to the State Agency (SA) or local law enforcement for 5 residents (R) (R5, R6, R7, R3, and R4) of 8 sampled residents. On 2/27/24, R5 and R6 reported allegations of abuse. The facility did not report the allegations of abuse to the SA in a timely manner. On 3/6/24 between 6:30 AM and 6:45 AM, R7 reported an allegation of abuse with injury. The initial report was not submitted to the SA until 3/7/24 at 1:48 PM. On 3/28/24, the facility discovered R3 had a dislocation of the right humerus head. The facility did not report the injury of unknown origin to the SA in a timely manner. On 2/25/24, R4 reported an allegation of abuse. The facility did not report the allegation of abuse to the SA in a timely manner and did not notify local law enforcement. Findings include: The facility's Resident Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation and Reporting Requirements policy, with a review date of 9/8/22, indicates: Team members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. On 4/23/24, Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, and aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate). On 3/28/24, the facility discovered R3 had a right humerus head dislocation which was an injury of unknown origin. The facility interviewed staff and residents, assessed R3, and sent R3 to the Emergency Department (ED). The facility also notified local law enforcement, R3's family, and R3's physician. The facility did not summarize the investigation or identify the cause of injury for R3. On 4/23/24 at 1:31 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON-B who indicated DON-B was not sure of the cause of injury and thought the injury was due to movement when getting dressed. DON-B indicated the facility did not have a summary or conclusion to the investigation. 5. On 4/23/24, Surveyor reviewed R4's medical record. R4 was admitted to facility on 2/5/24 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R7) of 11 sampled residents was free from abuse. The facility did not ensure interventions were implemented after staff members voiced concerns regarding Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E's interactions with residents on 2/27/24. On 3/13/24, the facility submitted a facility- reported incident (FRI) regarding an allegation of abuse that identified CNA-E as the accused staff member. Findings include: The facility's Resident Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation and Reporting Requirements policy, with a review date of 9/8/22, indicates it is the policy of the facility to provide a safe environment free from all types of resident abuse, by all persons, including team members. The policy indicates team members will receive training on freedom of abuse at time of hire, annually, and on an as needed basis. On 4/23/24, Surveyor reviewed R5's medical record. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for discharge requirements was allowed to return to the facility. On 12/13/23, R2 was evaluated in the emergency room and deemed appropriate to return to the facility. The facility did not allow R2 to return. Findings include: R2's admission Record indicated the facility admitted R2 on 11/22/23 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. R2's admission Record Contacts included Registered Nurse Case Manager (CM)-T who was identified as R2's case worker, and a family member who was identified as R2's Responsible Party (RP). According to R2's admission Record, R2 discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/27/23, indicated R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R2 had intact cognition. According to the MDS, during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health services received a psychiatric evaluation as ordered by the physician. Findings included: The facility's Mood and Behavior Management policy, effective 10/16/17, indicates: .6. Care Coordination. a. The Interdisciplinary Team will initiate and continue care coordination for each resident by reviewing with the resident, resident representative and review of the medical record, making recommendations as applicable for: i. Referrals to behavior management committee; ii. Behavioral health services; iii. Psychological evaluations and clinical evaluations based on assessment . R2's admission Record indicated the facility admitted R2 on 11/22/23 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. R2's admission Record Contacts included Registered Nurse Case Manager (CM)-T who was identified as R2's case worker. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/27/23, indicated R2 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. The kitchen cooler and dry storage area contained multiple open, undated, and/or expired food items. In addition, one food item was stored uncovered and open to air. The facility did not follow safe food cooling protocol. Staff did not follow appropriate hand hygiene procedures when they prepared/served food. Findings include: On 12/12/23, Sous Chef (SC)-M verified the facility follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code as their standard of practice. 1. Food Labeling/Storage: The FDA Food Code 2022 documents at 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except when packaging food using a reduced oxygen packaging method as specified under § 3-502.12, and except as specified in (E) and (F) of this section, refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for food safety food prepared and held in a food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene during the provision of care for 1 (R19) of 2 sampled residents. In addition, staff did not offer hand hygiene prior to meal service for 9 Residents (R) (R7, R14, R21, R25, R26, R28, R192, R194, and R195) of 9 residents. Staff did not appropriately wash or sanitize hands during the provision of perineal care for R19. Staff did not offer or provide hand hygiene to R7, R14, R21, R25, R26, R28, R192, R194 and R195 prior to the lunch meal on 12/11/23 and/or 12/12/23. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure, with a review date of 12/1/21, indicates: Hand Hygiene is the most effective measure for preventing infections. Hand hygiene includes several actions intended to decrease colonization with transient flora. This objective can be achieved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a legal representative for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 5 residents was informed of the risks and benefits of prescribed psychotropic medication and signed consent forms for the medication. R6 was prescribed lorazepam for anxiety and trazadone for depression. (Lorazepam and trazadone are psychotropic medications with a black box warning which is the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) most stringent warning that alerts the public and health care providers to serious side effects, such as injury or death). R6's medical record did not contain medication consent forms signed by R6's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). Findings include: R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including other recurrent depressive disorder and anxiety. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/23/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15 which indicated R6 had severe cognitive impairment. R6 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented for 1 (Culinary Director (CD)-E) of 8 employees reviewed for background checks. CD-E was a contracted staff member. The facility was unable to provide a Background Information Disclosure (BID) form, Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) letter, or Integrated Background Information System (IBIS) letter for CD-E. Findings include: The facility's Resident Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation and Reporting Requirements policy, with a review date of 9/8/22, indicated: (Facility) complies with and conducts pre-employment and other background and abuse registry checks as required by local, state, and federal regulation and law. On 12/12/23, Surveyor requested CD-E's BID, DOJ, and IBIS information for review. On 12/13/23, Surveyor received a general background export for CD-E. Surveyor did not receive CD-E's BID form, DOJ letter, or IBIS letter. On 12/13/23 at 4:11 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A who indicated the facility used a contracted company for dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R19 and R26) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization received a transfer notice that included the date of the transfer, the reason for the transfer, the location of the transfer, appeal rights, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. R26 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to a change in condition. R26 was not provided with a written transfer notice. R19 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] following a fall. R19 was not provided with a written transfer notice. Findings include: The facility's Notice of Transfer with Bedhold/Discharge form, dated 10/29/19, indicated: (Facility) is licensed by the State of Wisconsin, and we are required to comply with their regulations. In order to do so, we must provide a written notice to the resident and/or responsible party whenever the resident is transferred or discharged . Surveyor noted the form had fillable space that included: Resident name,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R19 and R26) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization received the proper bed hold notice when transferred to the hospital. R26 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to a change in conation. R26 was not provided with a written Notice of Transfer with Bedhold/Discharge form. R19 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] after a fall. R19 was not provided with a written Notice of Transfer with Bedhold/Discharge form. Findings include: The facility's Notice of Transfer with Bedhold/Discharge form, dated of 10/29/19, indicated: (Facility) is licensed by the State of Wisconsin, and we are required to comply with their regulations. In order to do so, we must provide a written notice to the resident and/or responsible party whenever the resident is transferred or discharged . Surveyor noted the bed hold portion of the form had spaces to check yes or no for a bed hold. The form also had signature and date lines for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate assistive devices and fall interventions were in place for 1 Resident (R) (R19) of 2 residents reviewed for falls. R19 had a fall on 12/3/23. Fall interventions added to R19's care plan following the fall were not implemented timely. Findings include: R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including weakness and difficulty in walking. R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/4/19, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated R19 had moderate cognitive impairment. R19's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) was activated on 12/7/23. The facility's Falls Prevention and Management Program policy, with a review date of 9/23/19, indicated: ~Evaluation and Care Planning: Development of the Fall interventions Plan is based on results of the Fall Risk Evaluation as well as investigation of all circumstances and related resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure pharmacy recommendations were acted on by a physician for 1 Resident (R) (R6) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Irregularities identified on R6's monthly pharmacist review were not responded to appropriately or timely by the physician. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, dated July 2022, indicated: Resident Re-evaluations: 1. Situations which may prompt an evaluation or re-evaluation of the resident include: g. an irregularity identified in the pharmacist's medication regimen and review. R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and received Hospice services. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/23/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15 which indicated R6 had severe cognitive impairment. R6 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) as of 6/16/23. R6 had a physician's order for as needed (PRN) lorazepam (an anti-anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring for adverse consequences of high-risk medications was completed for 2 Residents (R) (R7 and R6) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R7 was prescribed tramadol (an opioid medication used to help relieve moderate to severe pain). R7's care plan did not contain monitoring for adverse consequences of tramadol. R6 was prescribed tramadol and morphine (an opioid medication used to help relieve moderate to severe pain). R6's care plan did not contain monitoring for adverse consequences of tramadol and morphine. Findings include: The facility's Pain Management policy, effective 10/25/22, indicated: .Monitoring and Modifying Approaches .3. Monitor the following factors to determine if the resident's pain is being adequately controlled: .c. The presence of adverse consequences to treatment .4. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) describes several side effects which prescription opioids can cause even when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not ensure pureed meals were prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 1 Resident (R) (R2) of 1 resident. Kitchen staff did not follow pureed food recipes. Findings include: According to the publication All About Recipes, Part II from the College of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Natural Resources [NAME], A., and [NAME], S. 2021, It is important to follow a recipe to ensure accurate nutrition content, which is important for schools, hospitals, and nursing homes. Modifying a recipe by adding water lowers the nutritional quality of the food. On 12/12/23 at 11:18 AM, Surveyor observed [NAME] (CK)-O use an unmeasured serving spoon to gather cooked and cut potatoes from a container and place them in a food processor. CK-O then added an unmeasured amount of mayonnaise and an unmeasured amount of mustard. CK-O then poured an unmeasured amount of milk into the food processor and pureed the potato salad. On 12/12/23 at 2:45 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,740 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,740 — penalty dated 2025-07-31
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 04/16/2021 |
| STEMM, CHRISTY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| JANTZEN, JESSE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/16/2021 |
| GORMAN, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/11/2022 |
| HARSHFIELD, NICHOLAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/16/2021 |
| POPE, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/25/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525668. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.