Wesley Court Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 167 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 86.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.91 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 29.4 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.483 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 lunch meal tested for nutritive value, flavor, and appearance:The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature and appetizing texture to residents on 07/07/2025.This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk of poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction of the meals served.The findings included: During an observation and interview on 07/07/2025 at 11:01 AM revealed Resident #18 was sitting up in her recliner in her room. Resident #18 stated she had one complaint about the facility, the food. Resident #18 stated the kitchen over cooked the meat. Resident #18 stated the food was dry and tough on numerous occasions. During an observation and interview on 07/07/25 at 12:45 PM the DM joined to taste the food and take the temperature of the food on the test tray. The chicken breast was thin and dry, the temperature was 111 degrees Fahrenheit. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed.The facility failed to ensure that staff utilized proper personal hygiene practices while handling food. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included: Observation in the dining room, on 07/07/2025 between 12:00 PM and 12:45 PM revealed: DA-A entered the dining room to assist with plating the food and donned gloves(put gloves on) without washing her hands. She assisted with placing food on plates and serving to the residents. She went down the hall to the main kitchen with her gloves on, then returned to the dining room with the same gloves still on, did not perform hand hygiene, and continued to serve plates to residents. DA-A went down the hall to the main kitchen a total of 3 times and never washed her hands or changed her gloves. The DM entered the dining room and began assisting with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure completion of a discharge summary including a recapitulation of the resident's stay, and final status at discharge for 2 of 5 (Resident #6 and Resident #29) residents reviewed for discharge summary. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident #6 and Resident #29. This failure could place residents at risk of not having complete records after permanent discharge from the facility and disruption in the continuity of care. Findings included:Resident #6Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 07/09/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 03/20/2025 with the following diagnoses Pneumonia (infection that inflames the lungs), hypertension (high blood pressure), and Dementia (general term for loss of memory). Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section C Cognitive Patterns revealed Resident #6 had a BIMS score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 of 16 (Resident #82) residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to include Resident #82's colostomy and diagnosis of Diabetes Meletus in the baseline care plan within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified.Findings included:Record review of Resident #82's electronic face sheet dated 07/08/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #82's diagnosis included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia (metabolic disease characterized by elevated blood sugars) and Colostomy status (colon diverted to an artificial opening in the abdominal wall).Record review of Resident #82's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician and others participating in the provision of care for 1 (Resident #12) of 14 residents reviewed for hospice services.The facility failed to maintain the required hospice forms and documentation, that included certificate of terminal illness and hospice election form, to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day to ensure Resident #12 received adequate end-of-life care.This failure could place the residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident needs. The findings included: Review of Resident #12's electronic face sheet revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of 4 (Resident #85, Resident #87, Resident #137, and Resident #185) of 4 residents reviewed for baseline care plan completion. The facility failed to complete the social services section in the baseline care plan for Resident #85, Resident #87, Resident #137, and Resident #185 within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified. Findings included: 1. Resident #85 Record review of the resident #85's face sheet dated 06/03/2021 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: unspecified fracture of T11-T12 vertebra (spinal fracture), muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, protein-calorie…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were addressed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review. The facility failed to address the Pharmacist Consultant recommendations for April 2024 and May 2024 for Resident #28 regarding psychotropic medications. These failures could place residents on psychotropic medications at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #28's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: anxiety, prediabetes, and fracture of right lower leg. Review of Resident #28's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed: a BIMS score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS Section N Medications revealed no antianxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 1 (Resident #28) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 had stop dates for PRN hydroxyzine (medicine used to treat the symptoms of anxiety). This failure could place residents at risk for psychotropic medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life, and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included: Review of Resident #28's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: anxiety, prediabetes, and fracture of right lower leg. Review of Resident #28's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed: a BIMS score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS Section N Medications revealed no antianxiety medications taken in the last 7 days during the look back period (assessment period).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an ongoing Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee that included at minimum, the director of nursing services, the Medical Director or his/her designee, and at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the Administrator, owner, a board member, or other individual in a leadership role; and meets at least quarterly for 2 of 4 quarterly meetings (July 2023 & January 2024). The facility failed to ensure they held QAA quarterly meetings and had documentation that the required members were present in the meetings between April 27, 2023, to October 5, 2023, and between October 5, 2023, to March 28, 2024. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk for a reduced quality of care and life due to lack of efficiently identifying and resolving resident and facility issues. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance and Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes sign in sheets from May 2023 to May 2024 revealed one meeting on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 8 (CNA-B and CNA-C) employees whose in-service records were reviewed had not received the required minimum 1-hour annual in-service training for Dementia. The facility failed to provide the required annual Dementia training to CNA-B, and CNA-C. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: - Employee record for CNA-B revealed a hire date of 04/09/2024 and had no evidence of the required minimum 1-hour annual in-service training for Dementia. - Employee record for CNA-C revealed a hire date of 03/27/2024 and had no evidence of the required minimum 1-hour annual in-service training for Dementia . During an interview on 06/4/2024 at 5:25 PM the ADMN stated that the HR and the DON monitored staff trainings. He stated the facility protocols for Dementia training was a yearly 1-hour course but stated he did not know what the policies were. The ADMN stated he did not feel there would have been a negative impact for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $714K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX