No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Henson Park Health & Rehabilitation

203 Bruce Court, Danville, KY 40422 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (859) 236-9292 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Oct 202312 immediate-jeopardy citations$350,786 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Oct 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 12 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $350,786 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-12)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 S 2nd St · (859) 238-9310 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
231 S 2nd St · (859) 236-2314 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.3 mi
909 Hustonville Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
E Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.1%13.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.7%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.6%29.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.4%19.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.5%16.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.7%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%83.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.6%24.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.3%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.321.941.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.472.141.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.5–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 4.9–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
51.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 79.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-17)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's investigative report, and review of the facility's abuse policy, it was determined the facility failed to protect one (1) of three (3) sampled residents from abuse/neglect (Resident #9). During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #33, she stated CNA #35 pushed Resident #9 back into the bed on 10/12/2023 while yelling at the resident and saying, I'm not dealing with your ass tonight. CNA #33 further stated she left the resident's room to report the incident to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 who informed her to call the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated CNA #35 was left alone with Resident #9 while she went to inform the nurse. The facility failed to ensure the facility's abuse policy was implemented, and no action was taken to protect the resident from further potential abuse. The facility's failure to ensure residents were protected from abuse/neglect has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of the facility's investigative report, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its policy was implemented related to completing a thorough investigation, and failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure measures were taken to protect the residents from abuse for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #9). Review of the facility's Initial Report, dated 10/12/2023, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #33 was working in a resident's room when she heard a scream and stepped into the hallway. She then witnessed CNA #35 push Resident #9 in the chest down into Resident #9's bed, and CNA #35 told Resident #9 to keep his/her ass in bed. Review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Meeting Sign-In Sheet, dated 10/13/2023, revealed Resident #9's abuse incident was not discussed at the meeting. The facility's failure to ensure its policies were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policies, review of the facility's investigative report, and review of the Administrator's and Director's of Nursing job descriptions, it was determined the facility failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility also failed to protect residents from abuse; failed to develop and implement policies that prohibited and prevented abuse; and, failed to establish coordination with the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program related to abuse allegations. On 10/12/2023 at 1:53 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #33 witnessed CNA #35 push Resident #9 in the chest while yelling at the resident. There was no documented evidence CNA #35 was immediately removed from Resident #9's room or Resident #9 was placed in a safe location away from CNA #35. During an interview with CNA #33, she stated CNA #35 pushed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident's Advanced Directives, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advanced directive for one (1) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents (Resident #10). Review of the resident's Advanced Directives revealed the resident had an Advanced Directive for Full Code on [DATE]. However, there was no evidence the Advanced Directive was updated to ensure accuracy. Review of Resident #10's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with an Advanced Directive designated as Full Code. Further review revealed the resident's code status had changed on [DATE] to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). However, review of the resident's Face Sheet revealed the facility failed to update the resident's code status to DNR on [DATE]. The facility transferred the resident to the hospital on [DATE] with a Full Code status and the resident was intubated and placed on a ventilator. The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on 10/20/2023, alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/20/2023. Review of the Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan revealed the facility implemented the following: 1. Resident #9 no longer resided in the facility. According to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #33 (witness), CNA #35 immediately left the room of Resident #9 when asked what is going on and exited to the outside of the facility. The Director of Nursing (DON) was immediately called by CNA #33. The DON asked to speak to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 and instructed her to suspend CNA #35 immediately. CNA #35 left the facility grounds without further incident according to LPN #13. 2. Local law enforcement, family, and appropriate officials were notified of the incident by the DON and the Administrator immediately following the allegation on 10/12/2023. 3. Staff interviews were conducted by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator on 10/12/2023. Staff members were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of the facility's investigative report, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its policy was implemented related to completing a thorough investigation, and failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure measures were taken to protect the residents from abuse for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #9). Review of the facility's Initial Report, dated 10/12/2023, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #33 was working in a resident's room when she heard a scream and stepped into the hallway. She then witnessed CNA #35 push Resident #9 in the chest down into Resident #9's bed, and CNA #35 told Resident #9 to keep his/her ass in bed. Review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Meeting Sign-In Sheet, dated 10/13/2023, revealed Resident #9's abuse incident was not discussed at the meeting. The facility's failure to ensure its policies were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident's comprehensive care plan was developed and/or implemented for four (4) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents, (Residents #4, #9, #15, and #13). 1. Record review revealed Resident #4's care plan was not developed and/or implemented to ensure the resident was monitored related to his/her history of stroke and migraine headaches. 2. On 08/31/2023, at approximately 7:00 PM, Resident #9 attempted to exit the facility through the facility's front lobby door and was brought back inside the facility. However, facility staff did not implement Resident #9's care plan intervention for providing one-to-one (1:1) supervision as needed. Therefore, approximately an hour later, Resident #9 was able to exit the facility without staffs' knowledge. 3. Closed record review revealed Resident #15 sustained a femur fracture on 04/16/2022, after he/she rolled out of his/her low air loss mattress while only one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise each resident's Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan for two (2) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents (Resident #10 and Resident #14). 1. On 08/10/2022, the facility failed to revise Resident #10's Care Plan related to a new order to change the resident's code status to Do Not Resuscitate. Record review revealed the facility initiated a Comprehensive Care Plan on 06/29/2022 for a Full Code Advanced Directive. Continued review revealed on 08/10/2022, the resident's medical record included a signed and notarized Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form. However, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Care Plan and Facesheet were revised to update the change in the resident's code status on 08/10/2022. Therefore, the facility transferred Resident #10 to the hospital on [DATE], as a Full Code. The resident was intubated and placed on a ventilator, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to identify and provide needed care and services that were resident centered, in accordance with the resident's preferences, goals for care and professional standards of practice that met each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for two (2) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents (Resident #4 and Resident #10). 1). On [DATE] at approximately 8:30 AM, the facility's Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 and LPN #3 that Resident #4 exhibited signs and symptoms of a stroke. The LPNs; however, failed to assess the resident immediately when staff reported to them the resident had a change in his/her condition. Subsequently, when LPN #2 arrived to Resident #4's room, approximately one-hour and a half (1 1/2) after staff notified the LPN of the resident's condition, the resident was found unresponsive. The resident was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for three (3) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents (Residents #9, #15, and Resident #14). 1. On 08/31/2023 at approximately 7:00 PM, Resident #9 exhibited exit-seeking behaviors and was witnessed attempting to exit the facility by staff. Staff responded to the alarm and assisted Resident #9 back into the facility; however, failed to increase the resident's supervision. Subsequently, Resident #9 followed closely behind the Social Service Director (SSD) and exited the facility without staff's knowledge. 2. On 04/16/2022, Resident #15 sustained a fracture to his/her femur after the resident rolled off of his/her low air loss mattress while only one (1) staff provided his/her care. The resident was care planned to require the extensive assistance of two (2) staff for bed mobility. 3. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (1) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents (Resident #10). On [DATE], the facility admitted Resident #10 and on [DATE], Registered Nurse (RN) #4 discovered Resident #10's admission orders had been transcribed incorrectly. Therefore, Resident #10 was administered the wrong medications from [DATE] to [DATE]. The facility's failure to have an effective system to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors is likely to cause serious harm or serious injury to residents. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] and was determined to exist on [DATE], in the area of 42 CFR §483.45 (F760) Pharmacy Services at the highest Scope and Severity (S/S) of a J. Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was identified at 42 CFR §483.45 (F760) Pharmacy Services. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] and IJ is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policies, review of the facility's investigative report, and review of the Administrator's and Director's of Nursing job descriptions, it was determined the facility failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility also failed to protect residents from abuse; failed to develop and implement policies that prohibited and prevented abuse; and, failed to establish coordination with the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program related to abuse allegations. On 10/12/2023 at 1:53 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #33 witnessed CNA #35 push Resident #9 in the chest while yelling at the resident. There was no documented evidence CNA #35 was immediately removed from Resident #9's room or Resident #9 was placed in a safe location away from CNA #35. During an interview with CNA #33, she stated CNA #35 pushed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary conditions in the facility's kitchen; failed to ensure proper setup of the three-compartment sink; and failed to not have personal items in the food handling area. This had the potential to affect all residents who received nutrition from the kitchen.Findings included: An initial tour of the kitchen was done on 07/15/2025 beginning at 9:20 AM with the Intern Dietary Manager (IDM) and revealed the following:-The floors of the walk-in refrigerator located inside the kitchen were sticky with a black substance on the floor. The IDM agreed the floors were dirty.-Debris and a black substance were visible on the kitchen floor between the dish station and the wall. The IDM agreed the floor was dirty.-Debris and a black substance were visible on the floor between the coffee station and the wall.-Personal sunglasses were observed on the second shelf of the cart that held the coffee, creamer, and sugar.-The tube light above the stove was observed covered with dust, and the light fixture had spots of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 45 resident rooms had a homelike environment. Specifically, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with ceiling tiles bulging downward and with brown stains.Findings included: An observation on 07/16/2025 at 8:38 AM revealed ceiling tiles in room [ROOM NUMBER] were bulging downward, and other ceiling tiles were noted with brown stains. An observation on 07/17/2025 at 10:55 AM revealed ceiling tiles in room [ROOM NUMBER] were bulging downward, and other ceiling tiles were noted with brown stains. An additional ceiling tile in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] was also noted with brown stains. A facility document titled, Work Order #856, dated 04/29/2025, revealed staff reported that room [ROOM NUMBER] had one tile by the bathroom door that needed to be popped back up and one tile near the window had cracks. The Work Order indicated the Maintenance Director updated the status of the Work Order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure supplemental oxygen tubing was dated when changed and the physician-prescribed supplemental oxygen flow rate was followed for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revealed, 5. Turn on the oxygen at the number of liters / [per] minute as ordered by the physician/practitioner. 6. Place appropriate oxygen device on the resident (i.e., [id est, that is] mask, nasal cannula and/or nasal catheter). 7. Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is administered. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 05/28/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pulmonary edema, and obstructive sleep apnea. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow professional standards for proper sanitation practices and maintaining equipment to prevent cross contamination. Observation on 06/10/2024 revealed an ice scoop stored uncovered by an ice machine in the kitchen which is used to provide ice to all residents. Additionally, observations on 06/11/2024, revealed dietary staff towel drying plate covers which were then used to cover the residents lunch meal. The findings include: Review of the 2017 United States Food and Drug Administration Food Code Section 4-903.11 (B)(1) Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles revealed Clean Equipment and Utensils shall be stored in a self-draining positron that allows air drying. Further review of the food code revealed ice scoops may be stored handles up in an ice bin except for an ice machine. Observation during initial kitchen tour on 06/10/2024 at 3:20 PM revealed an ice scooper stored in an uncovered bin by the ice machine which was used for all residents. Observation during lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and facility job descriptions review, it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for four of 46 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]). The findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Homelike Environment Guidance, revised 06/20/2024, revealed it was the policy of the facility to ensure the environment provided for residents was safe, sanitary, functional, and comfortable. Continued review of the facility policy revealed as part of daily guardian angel rounds, as well as, whenever it was noticed, institutional odors will be addressed and eliminated. Additionally, all room contents to include clothes, furniture, devices, linens, bedspreads, privacy curtains, window coverings, wall hangings, wallpaper, and floors should be clean and in good repair. Review of facility's housekeeping job description, undated, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for four days (03/27/2024, 04/24/2024, 05/27/2024, and 06/10/2024) out of 104 days from 03/01/2024 through 06/12/2024. The findings include: During an interview with the Administrator on 06/12/2024 at 3:27 PM, she stated the facility did not have a staffing policy. Additionally, the Administrator stated the facility did not have an RN staffing waiver. Review of the facility's daily schedules dated 03/27/2024, 04/24/2024, 05/27/2024, and 06/10/2024, revealed the facility did not have a Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled to work on these dates. Review of the facility's timecards for all nursing staff, dated 03/27/2024, 04/24/2024, 05/27/2024, and 06/10/2024, revealed the facility did not have an RN working on those dates. During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 on 06/11/2024 at 10:27 AM, he stated he was picking up more shifts in the facility due to either call ins or just short on staff. CNA1 stated he had noticed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures that address and monitor the safe storage and handling of medications for one of three medication storage refrigerators. Observation of the medication storage refrigerator on the A Hall on 06/11/2024 at 10:00 AM revealed the refrigerator was unplugged and the temperature inside the refrigerator registered at 62 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised 11/21/2022, revealed medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacture or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. The policy stated medications shall be stored at temperatures between 36 degrees F and 46 degrees F. On 06/11/2024 at 10:00 AM, a review of the Medication Storage Refrigerator temperature log located on the A Hall revealed it was last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of 35 sampled residents (R) R8. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Infection Prevention and Control Guideline, revised 02/25/2022, revealed it was the policy of the facility to ensure a comprehensive system was in place which prevents, identifies, investigates reports, records and controls infections and prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease processes for residents/care providers, staff, visitors, and others within the facility to include those providing contractual services in an effort to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Continue review of the facility policy revealed the facility would determine the most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's documents, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide or arrange for services or care that adhered to accepted standards of practice for three (3) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents (Residents #59, #14, and #58). The residents' nurse and/or Kentucky Medication Aide (KMA) dispensed the medications from the blister pack into their (nurse/KMA) ungloved hand and then into the medicine cup. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Policy and Procedure, Medication Administration, undated, outlined timeframes for medication administration. However, there was no information on medication distribution. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration Competency, dated 06/2011, revealed it provided instruction on dispensing of medication from blister packs into medication cup. However, it did not instruct staff on how to handle the medication and avoid using the bare hand. Review of the facility's document, Landmark-Clinical Standard and Guideline: Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the security and confidentiality of residents' medical records for two (2) of four (4) medication carts in the facility. Observation on [DATE] of Medication Cart #1 on the B Hall and on [DATE] of Medication Cart #2 on the B Hall revealed unattended computers were open with resident information displayed on the computer screen located on the cart. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medical Records Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Guideline, dated [DATE], revealed Personal Health Information (PHI) would be used and disclosed in accordance with the HIPAA Privacy Standards and other applicable laws. Further review revealed PHI included oral, written, or otherwise recorded information that was created or received by the facility and might relate to an individual's physical or mental health, payment, or health care services provided to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 8 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's documents, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide or arrange for services or care that adhered to accepted standards of practice for three (3) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents (Residents #59, #14, and #58). The residents' nurse and/or Kentucky Medication Aide (KMA) dispensed the medications from the blister pack into their (nurse/KMA) ungloved hand and then into the medicine cup. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Policy and Procedure, Medication Administration, undated, outlined timeframes for medication administration. However, there was no information on medication distribution. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration Competency, dated 06/2011, revealed it provided instruction on dispensing of medication from blister packs into medication cup. However, it did not instruct staff on how to handle the medication and avoid using the bare hand. Review of the facility's document, Landmark-Clinical Standard and Guideline: Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored safely and securely for one (1) of three (3) treatment carts. Observation of the C Hall treatment cart on 10/16/2023 at 2:20 PM revealed various creams and ointments were accessible in the unsecured treatment cart. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Medication Storage in the Facility, revised on 11/21/2022, revealed medications and biologicals should be stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer's or supplier's recommendations. Further review of the policy revealed the medication rooms, medication and treatment carts, and medication supplies should be locked or attended by a person with authorized access. Observation on 10/16/2023 at 2:20 PM of the C Hall Treatment Cart, revealed it was unlocked. Continued observation revealed various creams and ointments were noted in individual zip lock bags with residents' names…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the security and confidentiality of residents' medical records for two (2) of four (4) medication carts in the facility. Observation on [DATE] of Medication Cart #1 on the B Hall and on [DATE] of Medication Cart #2 on the B Hall revealed unattended computers were open with resident information displayed on the computer screen located on the cart. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medical Records Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Guideline, dated [DATE], revealed Personal Health Information (PHI) would be used and disclosed in accordance with the HIPAA Privacy Standards and other applicable laws. Further review revealed PHI included oral, written, or otherwise recorded information that was created or received by the facility and might relate to an individual's physical or mental health, payment, or health care services provided to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for one (1) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents (Resident #13). On 08/09/2023, Resident #13 was observed by staff to be secured to his/her Broda chair (a special chair in which the back of the seat, the buttocks area, dropped into the base of the chair when it was tilted) with the gait belt tied around his/her midsection and secured to the chair, which restricted the resident's movement. Staff interviews revealed the belt restraint was applied to the resident to prevent him/her from falling. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Guidelines for Physical Restraints/Seclusion, revised 05/17/2023, revealed restraints were to be used only as a last resort and only after every alternative was tried and failed, with the required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's documents, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide or arrange for services or care that adhered to accepted standards of practice for three (3) of twenty-three (23) sampled residents (Residents #59, #14, and #58). The residents' nurse and/or Kentucky Medication Aide (KMA) dispensed the medications from the blister pack into their (nurse/KMA) ungloved hand and then into the medicine cup. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Policy and Procedure, Medication Administration, undated, outlined timeframes for medication administration. However, there was no information on medication distribution. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration Competency, dated 06/2011, revealed it provided instruction on dispensing of medication from blister packs into medication cup. However, it did not instruct staff on how to handle the medication and avoid using the bare hand. Review of the facility's document, Landmark-Clinical Standard and Guideline: Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one (1) of twenty-five (25) sampled residents (Resident #10). Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with orders for Tylenol (a pain reliever) 500 milligrams (mg) every six (6) hours as needed for pain, Gabapentin (neurological pain reliever) 600 mg twice a day, Tramadol (a narcotic pain reliever for moderate to severe pain) 50 mg twice a day as needed for Polyosteoarthritis, and Tramadol 50 mg daily for pain. However, review further revealed no documented evidence Resident #10 received those pain medications until 07/01/2022. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Errors dated 11/2017, revealed medications were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored safely and securely for one (1) of three (3) treatment carts. Observation of the C Hall treatment cart on 10/16/2023 at 2:20 PM revealed various creams and ointments were accessible in the unsecured treatment cart. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Medication Storage in the Facility, revised on 11/21/2022, revealed medications and biologicals should be stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer's or supplier's recommendations. Further review of the policy revealed the medication rooms, medication and treatment carts, and medication supplies should be locked or attended by a person with authorized access. Observation on 10/16/2023 at 2:20 PM of the C Hall Treatment Cart, revealed it was unlocked. Continued observation revealed various creams and ointments were noted in individual zip lock bags with residents' names…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's Policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable, for one (1) of four (4) facility medications carts. Observation revealed the back medication cart on the B Unit contained one (1) medication that was opened and not labeled with the open date. The findings include: Review of the facility's Policy, titled Medication Storage in the Facility, undated, revealed medications and biologicals are to be stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Continued review revealed out dated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications are to be removed from stock and disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Observation of the Unit B, back hall medication cart, on 04/16/19 at 3:14 PM, revealed one (1) bottle of Latanoprost eye drops…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$350,786 in federal fines across 16 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
  • $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
  • $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $3,638 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $283,081 — penalty dated 2023-09-29
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-04 for 109 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LYON HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • JML 1836 HOLDINGS LLC — investment firm · 2.50% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ANDERSON, ROBERTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
WORKMAN, TAMMYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KY 10 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2025
KY10 SNF OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
CARVER, DILLIONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LEHMAN, STACIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
GOTTESMAN, DANIELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
LUSTBADER, ANDREWIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
LUSTBADER, JONATHANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
BTF KY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
HIKY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
HVH KY 10 SNF CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ICONTRUST, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
JML 1836 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
JNL 2024 FAM TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
LTC CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LYON HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MJL 2024 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
ROTH & CO, LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SIKY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
SSKY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
ARMSTRONG, TROYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 10%Other / private 22%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$273per resident / day
operating cost
$8,310per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kentucky
$9,718/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,528/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next