No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Belmont Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

7300 Woodspoint Drive, Florence, KY 41042 · For profit - Corporation · 151 certified beds · (859) 371-5731 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent Apr 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)6 immediate-jeopardy citations$35,980 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,980 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6900 Houston Rd Ste 39 · (859) 653-4923 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7625 Doering Dr · (859) 282-8833 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.3 mi
5475 Houston Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7340 Burlington Pike · (859) 371-5491 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
25 Cavalier Blvd · (859) 538-1175

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%13.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%6.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.1%17.7%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.9%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.4%29.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.2%19.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.7%16.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.7%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.6%83.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.2%24.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.7%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.331.941.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.552.141.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

30.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF30.2%CMS range 18.0–42.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.7–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.4–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
59.1%
Total nursing turnover
72.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 128.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-24)
32
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2021-05-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to ensure the Physician was notified when there was a significant change in condition and a need to alter treatment for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #110). The facility admitted Resident #110, on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Chronic Pain; Contracture,Thoracic, Thoracolumbar, and Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Disorder. Resident #110 was hospitalized , on [DATE], with Altered Mental Status, Condition Decline, and Respiratory Failure. Prior to the [DATE] acute care hospitalization, the resident was receiving Oxycodone with Acetaminophen (a narcotic opioid pain reliever given for moderate to severe pain) on a every six (6) hour schedule. Review of Resident #110 medical record revealed the resident returned from the hospital to the facility, on [DATE]. The resident's discharge medication and the Physician's Orders included the same narcotic pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Version 3.0, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Comprehensive Care Plans (CCP) for chronic pain and pressure risk with individualized person-centered interventions were followed for four (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents, Resident #110, #114, #36 and #102. The facility identified Resident #110 as at risk for alterations in comfort related to osteoarthritis (OA), muscle weakness, right upper extremity edema, contracture, hemiplegia, obesity, and polyneuropathy. Observation of Resident #110, on 04/21/2021 at 9:05 AM, revealed the resident yelled for a nurse for appoximately two (2) minutes. No one responded to the resident until the State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor alerted staff that the resident needed assistance. Interview with Resident #110, on 04/21/2021 at 9:20 AM, revealed staff did not address his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2021-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Version 3.0, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Comprehensive Care Plans (CCP) were reviewed and revised to address the need for additional interventions to monitor and maintain sufficient respiratory status for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #110). The facility admitted Resident #110, on [DATE] with current diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Asthma, Dysphasia, Heart Failure (HF), and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Resident #110 had been hospitalized , from [DATE] to [DATE] with Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure. In addition, Resident #110 had been sent to the hospital Emergency Department (ED), on [DATE], for edema and was returned to the facility five (5) hours later, on [DATE]. However, there was no documented evidence the facility identified the resident's risks and revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2021-05-14 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary process included reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications, both prescription and over-the-counter, and the resident was discharged with the correct medications for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #81). The facility admitted Resident #81, on 03/12/2021, for short-term rehabilitation. On 05/05/2021, the Physician ordered to discharge Resident #81 home with medications. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, Resident #81's nurse, reviewed the Discharge Instructions/Summary with Resident #81, and sent his/her medications from the medication cart home with the resident on 05/05/2021. On 05/07/2021, Resident #81 informed a family member that the medications he/she received from the facility at discharge included a medication that he/she did not take, Risperdal (an antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders). The resident sent the family member a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were completed to identify/monitor for skin breakdown along pressure ulcer prevention interventions according to standards of practice to prevent further decline for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents, Resident #110. On [DATE], Resident #110 was transferred to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and during the triage period hospital staff and EMS identified a sacral wound. The hospital assessed the resident to have an open right gluteal abscess measuring three (3.0) centimeters (cm) and draining copious amounts of purulent material. There was an unstageable sacral decubitus ulcer measuring eight (8.0) cm (length) by two (2.0) cm (width). Surgical consult revealed the abscess and sacral ulcer would require surgical debridement of necrotic tissue. Review of Infectious Disease (ID) Consult, on [DATE], revealed ID was consulted for evaluation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2021-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to ensure residents' respiratory care needs were consistently met for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #110). The facility admitted Resident #110 on [DATE]. The resident had current diagnoses of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Asthma, Dysphagia, Heart Failure (HF), and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Resident #110 had been hospitalized , from [DATE] to [DATE] with Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure. In addition, Resident #110 had been sent to the hospital Emergency Department (ED), on [DATE], for edema and returned to the facility five (5) hours later, on [DATE]. On [DATE], Resident #110 experienced a change in condition (CIC) with his/her respiratory status. Interview and record review revealed nursing staff did not implement respiratory care interventions for the resident on [DATE], as ordered by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 8. Review of Resident #86's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/28/2020 with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #86's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, dated 02/21/2024, revealed there was no score on the resident's BIMS. The resident was assessed as rarely/never understood. Review of Resident #86's Comprehensive Care Plan, revised 08/11/2023, revealed an intervention that included the skin around the gastrostomy (G-tube) site was monitored, skin care was performed, and dressing placed as ordered. Observation of Resident #86's G-tube insertion site on 02/28/2024 at 8:18 AM, revealed the absence of a gauze dressing. Additional observation revealed the insertion site was not clean, with crusted areas that surrounded the insertion site and a dime-sized amount of dried yellowish-white drainage. No odors were noted. In an interview with LPN #5 on 02/28/2024 at 8:18 AM, she stated she was Agency staff but had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide services to prevent pressure ulcers for one (1) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Resident #3). Resident #3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/09/2023, indicated the resident had no skin breakdown. However, thirty-seven (37) days from admission the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) documented a wound on Resident #3's left ischium (lower part of the hip) as moisture associated breakdown. Additionally, seventy-one (71) days from admission the APRN documented Resident #3's wound as a stage 4 pressure wound. Observation during the survey revealed Resident #3 sat in a heavily soiled brief, which caused the dressing to be displaced. Further observation revealed staff failed to encourage the resident to off-load pressure from the wound for longer than two (2) hours. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Prevention of Pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement its infection prevention and control policies and procedures and identify and correct problems relating to infection prevention practices, for 1 of 27 sampled residents, Resident (R) 84. The facility also failed to provide sanitary storage of residents' supplies to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, which had the potential to affect all of the current 114 residents. 1. Observation of the 200 Hall revealed R84 was seated in his wheelchair self-ambulating down the hall outside of his room with his suprapubic catheter bag anchored to the underside of the seat of the wheelchair. The bag was dragging on the floor as he ambulated. 2. Observation of the Employee Locker Room and the Central Supply Storage Room revealed multiple boxes of resident supplies were stored on the floor. The findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to provide immunization as required or appropriate; to ensure the resident or the resident's representative had the opportunity to refuse immunizations; and failed to ensure the medical record included documentation of the resident's or resident representative's education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of immunizations for 5 of 6 sampled residents, Resident (R) 23, R50, R74, R99, and R103. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization Policy, dated 08/13/2024, revealed to minimize the risk of influenza and pneumococcal disease, the facility ensured that each resident or their representative received education on immunization benefits and potential side effects. Per the policy, residents were offered annual influenza immunization and could refuse it, while pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's Incident Reports, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse and neglect for 3 of 11 sampled residents, Resident (R) 36, R40, and R169. 1. On 02/28/2025, R36 reported to a day shift State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) that the previous night shift SRNA purposefully removed his call device from the wall and replaced it with something plastic so he would be unable to use the call device during the previous night shift. The day shift SRNA observed R36's call device was not plugged in, and a plastic device had been put in the call device port. 2. On 11/15/2024, R169 walked into R40's room. R40 hit R169, causing a nose bleed. R40 fell while hitting R169, injuring her ankle. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, revised 07/01/2019, revealed potential hires were screened for history of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. It also stated potential hires would have a license verification completed, and required background checks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to notify the State Guardian and a representative from the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of its intentions to discharge a resident and the reasons for the discharge in writing for 1 of 27 sampled residents, Resident (R) 219. R219 was transferred to a Behavioral Health (BH) facility on 11/02/2024 from the facility for a psychiatric evaluation. On 11/11/2024, the Discharge Planner (DCP) at the BH facility notified the State Guardian that after discussions with the facility, the facility would not be accepting R219 back. The facility did not communicate this with the State Guardian or obtain the approval of the State Guardian. Additionally, the facility did not provide a written 30-day notification of transfer/discharge to the State Guardian or the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer/Discharge Notice, revised 01/27/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's documents and assessment, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure sufficient numbers of nursing staff, to include nurse aides, on a 24-hour basis to provide necessary nursing care for residents in accordance with their care plans. On 03/03/2024, the facility failed to have a sufficient number of nurse aides on Sunday 03/03/2024, and triggered for low weekend staffing and a 1-star staffing rating on the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ). Residents and staff reported insufficient aides to provide timely incontinence care and insufficient nursing staff to deliver medications timely on the weekends. Additionally, Resident #152 entered the hospital on [DATE], wearing two (2) briefs which were saturated with urine upon arrival. Interview and review of the facility's staffing, revealed staffing had been significantly below the numbers required in the facility's assessment for that day. The findings include: Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service in the kitchen. Observation during the initial kitchen tour on 02/26/2024 revealed one (1) container of thickened orange juice, undated; a pan of chicken thawing out, unlabled and undated; one (1) dumpling bag opened, undated; and sugar cookie dough opened, undated. Further observation of the tray line area in the kitchen revealed a mop container, half filled with brown water sitting next to the tray line; a dirty rag lying on top of the garbage can lid, lying on the floor; and a light fixture over the tray line with dust noted on the fixture. Observation during the follow up kitchen tour on 02/28/2024 revealed canned spaghetti in the pantry with no delivery date; three (3) gnats were observed in the pantry; and the pantry had no thermometer. Further observation of the supply room in the kitchen revealed a sticky substance on the floor; one (1) can of beans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's staffing documents, and review of the facility's Plan of Correction (POC) submitted for the 03/08/2024 survey, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to have an effective process in place to address systemic failures through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. As a result, the facility failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. This had the potential to affect all 129 current residents. The State Survey Agency (SSA) identified continued non-compliance in the areas of 42 CFR 483.10 Resident Rights; 42 CFR 483.24 Quality of Life; 42 CFR 483.35 Nursing Services; and 42 CFR 483.80 Infection Control. (Cross-reference F550, F677, F725, F726, F867, and F880) The findings include: Review of the facility's POC for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's documents, and review of the facility's Plan of Correction (POC) submitted for the 03/08/2024 survey, the facility failed to have an effective process in place to address systemic failures through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. As a result, the facility failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. The facility failed to effectively track staffing patterns and staff failing to provide basic care, including showers. The facility failed to ensure there was an effective system in place to accurately collect and analyze audit data, including data collected under the QAPI program, and act on available data to make improvements, and maintain substantial compliance. This had the potential to affect all 129 current residents. The State Survey Agency (SSA) identified continued non-compliance in the areas of 42 CFR 483.10 Resident Rights; 42 CFR 483.24 Quality of Life; 42 CFR 483.35 Nursing Services; and 42 CFR 483.80 Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines on standard precautions, hand hygiene, and disinfection of shared low-level equipment; review of the manufacturers' directions for use for the Assure Prism Blood Glucose Monitoring System and Sani-Cloth Germicidal Wipes; and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to identify and correct problems related to infection prevention practices for 8 of 104 sampled residents (Residents #24, #31, #114, #117, #120, #154, #103 and #105). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Infection Control, revised in 2018, revealed the policy was intended to facilitate a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to prevent and manage the transmission of disease and infection. Per the policy, all personnel would be trained on infection control policies and practices upon hire and periodically thereafter. Furthermore, the policy stated the policies and procedures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined, the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for six (6) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #71, #101, #5, #105, #1 and #65). 1. On 01/02/2024, the facility was notified Resident #71's wheelchair brake was broken; however, the facility failed to repair his/her wheelchair in a timely manner, placing the resident at risk for falls during transfers. The facility provided Resident #71 an another wheelchair while waiting to have his/her assigned wheelchair repaired, which had brakes that failed to hold the wheelchair in place when applied during transfers. Resident #71 reported he/she did not feel safe transferring in and out of the wheelchair, and stated he/she was concerned a fall would cause him/her more of an injury to his/her already fractured hip. 2. On admission, the facility identified Resident #101 as a non-English speaking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Observations included a strong urine and feces odor throughout the facility; cracked and misshapen ceiling tiles; dirty air intake vents; dirty floors with stains; a loose and warped metal plate in the floor; and clean and dirty items stored together. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, not dated, revealed residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, dated 2001 and revised February 2021, revealed that facility staff and management maximized, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflected a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics included: a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment, with pleasant neutral scents. Observation on 02/26/2024 at 4:40 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's investigation reports, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect for eight (8) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #101, #112, #115, #152, #70, #88, #142, and #43). 1. Staff observed Residents #101 and #112 on two (2) separate occasions on 06/26/2023 engaged in sexual activity. Both residents were cognitively impaired and therefore unable to provide consent. 2. Resident #115 was verbally abused by a housekeeping staff who had not been trained on abuse on 03/27/2023. 3. Resident #152 was sent to hospital wearing two soiled briefs on 01/07/2024, indicating facility neglect. 4. On 12/31/2022, Resident #70 stated his/her roommate (Resident #88) had scratched him/her after both residents had a verbal argument over access to the bathroom. 5. On 04/03/2023, Resident #142 passed by Resident #43 in the 200 Hall and struck Resident #43 in the arm, with no apparent injuries. The findings include: Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's incident report forms and policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from misappropriation of property for six (6) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #11, #42, #65, #122, #148, and #150). Resident #127 took items belonging to the five (5) of the six (6) residents. 1. The facility identified Resident #127 as responsible for multiple allegations of misappropriation of other residents' property which included taking $100 from Resident #148 on [DATE], and $15 from the same resident on [DATE]; and taking $10 from Resident #65 on [DATE]. 2. On [DATE] at 7:00 AM, at shift change it was identified a blister pack containing thirteen (13) pills of Hydrocodone 5/325 mg and three (3) Gabapentin tablets of 100 mg were missing during the shift change narcotic count. The missing medications belonged to Resident #11 and Resident #150. 3. LPN #1 stated in interview Resident #127 came to her with an iPad and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's investigation reports, review of the 135DE Secure Care System Installation Manual, review of google.com/maps, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accident and hazards as possible and failed to identify, evaluate, and implement interventions to reduce hazards and risks for eleven (11) out of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents. The facility failed to have accurate Elopement Binders which had correct or thorough information for ten (10) residents who were at high risk for elopement (Residents #32, #43, #67, #75, #82, #88, #112, #115, #127, and #156). 2. The facility failed to provide appropriate supervision for two (2) residents to prevent elopement (Residents #63 and #112). 3. The facility failed to have an effective alarm system in place to allow for appropriate monitoring and supervision of wandering and elopement risk residents. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. Staff interviewed stated they had not received training in the areas of behavior management, catheter care, and providing for a resident's dignity. In addition, the facility failed to provide training for abuse, neglect and exploitation for one (1) out of thirty-five (35) State Registered Nursing Assistants (SRNA's). SRNA #34 stated in a phone interview that he/she was not given training for abuse neglect, and exploitation when he/she began working at the facility six (6) months ago. The findings include: Review of the facility job description titled, Nursing Assistant, undated, revealed the facility expected nursing assistants to wash their hands before and after resident care. Continued…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective antibiotic stewardship program to monitor antibiotic use as part of the overall infection prevention and control program (IPCP). Furthermore, the facility failed to incorporate monitoring and assessment of antibiotic use for five (5) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #20, #45 #71, #97, and #158). In addition, the facility failed to track antibiotic use in the facility and failed to report regularly on antibiotic use and resistance to the facility's leadership. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Antimicrobial Stewardship, dated December 2016, revealed antibiotics would be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The purpose of the policy was to ensure that the antibiotic stewardship program was used to monitor the use of antibiotics. 1. Review of Resident #20's admission record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/17/2019 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to educate and offer COVID-19 immunization as required or appropriate for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents #126 and #128). In addition, the facility failed to maintain documentation of screening, education, offering, and current COVID-19 vaccination status. The findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) document titled, Vaccines and Immunizations, reviewed 11/16/2023, revealed the CDC recommended all adults sixty-five (65) years of age or older should receive the COVID-19 vaccine unless medically contraindicated by a physician. Review of the facility's policy titled, Vaccination of Residents, revised 10/2019, revealed all residents were to be offered vaccines that aided in preventing infectious disease unless the vaccine was medically contraindicated or the resident had already been vaccinated. Per policy review, before receiving vaccinations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence for two (2) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #105 and #103). Resident #105 was not afforded privacy, as the State Registered Nursing Assistant (SRNA), did not close the curtain before performing catheter care. Additionally, Resident #105 was observed with no dignity bag for his/her catheter on 02/26/2024, 03/05/2024, 03/06/2024, and 03/07/2024. Resident #103 was not provided a privacy bag for his/her catheter in order to afford privacy, prevent embarrassment, and respect and dignity. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights Under Federal Law, dated 11/28/2016, revealed the resident had the right to a dignified existence. 1a) Review of Resident #105's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/15/2024 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (alteration in consciousness due to brain dysfunction), urinary tract infection, and hemiplegia (partial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the rights of the residents or his/her representative were observed for either the resident or the resident's representative to plan and participate in the care planning process for one (1) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Resident #66). Resident #66 stated that he/she was not involved in his/her care planning. Record review revealed there were no notes in Resident #66's chart for the last care plan meeting on 01/11/2024. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, revealed the resident and his/her representatives would be involved in the care planning process. Per policy review, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, developed and implemented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for the resident. Continued review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to follow its policy regarding Advanced Directives for three (3) of one hundred and two (102) sampled residents (Residents #22, #57, and #103). Review of Residents #22's, #57's, and #103's medical records revealed the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to create an Advance Directive concerning their medical care, including the right to accept or refuse treatment. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directive Policy and Record, not dated, revealed the facility would recognize and implement the resident's right under state law to make decisions concerning his/her medical care including the right to accept or refuse medical treatment and the right to create Advance Directives. Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, revised 12/2016 revealed the facility displayed information regarding a resident's advance directive status prominently in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents from involuntary seclusion for one (1) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Resident #112). On 03/03/2024 at 7:45 PM, State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) #26 was observed escorting Resident #112 to his/her room and shutting the door tight, preventing the resident from opening the door and exiting the room. SRNA #26 stated he had not been told by the facility that he was not allowed to close the door on a resident who lacked the ability to open the door at will and/or without the resident asking for the door to be closed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Identifying Type of Abuse, dated 04/2021, revealed abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting harm, pain or mental anguish. Review of Resident #112's Face Sheet, revealed the facility admitted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide a complete and thorough investigation into the allegation of sexual abuse for two (2) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Resident #101, and Resident #112). The facility failed to investigate the report, which involved Resident #101 and Resident #112, who were both severely cognitive impaired, were found in bed together with their hands down each other's pants and; failed to prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress. The facility reported to state agencies on 06/26/2023, that Resident #101 and Resident #112 engaged in inappropriate sexual relations. The facility's report revealed Resident #101 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 and Resident #112 had a BIMS of six (6). Both BIMS scores indicated the residents had severe cognitive impairment and therefore could not consent to sexual encounters of any kind. The facility noted in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two (2) of one hundred four (104) sampled residents (Residents #52 and #55). Resident #55's MDS assessment revealed the resident did not wear oxygen. However, the State Survey Agency (SSA) surveyor observed the resident wearing oxygen. Review of Physician's Orders revealed an order for oxygen. Additionally, the facility failed to assess dental care for Resident #52. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #55's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/04/2021 with diagnoses of asthma, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obstructive sleep apnea, heart failure, and tracheostomy. Review of Resident #55's Physician Orders revealed the resident had an order for oxygen two (2) liters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal, and oral hygiene for one (1) of one hundred four (104) sampled residents (Resident #117). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised March 2018, revealed appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were dependent on staff for assisting with activities of daily living (ADL), with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care. The policy stated appropriate support included assistance from staff for hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); elimination (toileting); dining (meals and snacks); and communication (speech, language, and any functional communication system). Review of Resident #117's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an ongoing program of activities was developed to meet the individual needs of two (2) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #55 and #117). The facility failed to provide individualized activities based on the comprehensive assessment, the care plan, and the personal preferences of each resident. The findings include: The State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor requested a policy on activities for review on 02/29/2024 at 8:54 AM. However, the Activities Director stated the facility did not have one. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, revealed residents had the right to make choices on matters that were significant to the resident, including activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), health care, and providers of heath care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and care plan. Further review revealed residents had the right to participate in community activities inside and outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three (3) of one hundred four (104) sampled residents (Residents #91, #86, and #126). 1. On 03/02/2024, the facility failed to ensure Resident #91's sacral wound dressing was changed as ordered by the physician to be completed on every day shift. 2(a). Observation of Resident #86's jejunostomy tube (J-tube; a soft, plastic tube placed through the skin of the abdomen into the midsection of the small intestine) site revealed the area surrounding the J-tube insertion site was crusted with an approximate dime-sized amount of purulent drainage. Continued observation revealed no visual evidence of the ordered gauze dressing to cover that area. 2(b). Observation of Resident #126's gastrostomy tube (g-tube) site revealed the area surrounding it was excoriated (reddened) and, the upper half portion of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, to include weight, for one (1) of one hundred four (104) residents (Residents #126). The facility failed to ensure physician's orders for Resident #126's enteral tube feedings were followed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Nutrition, and revised 2018, revealed the facility would provide adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition to residents as ordered. Per policy review, residents who were receiving enteral nutrition would have appropriate recommendations for interventions to enhance nutrition. Further review of the policy revealed staff caring for residents with feeding tubes were to be trained on how to recognize and report complications associated with the insertion of the feeding tube such as skin breakdown around the insertion site. Review of Resident #126's medical record revealed the facility readmitted the resident on 12/21/2023, with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less then five percent (5%). Observation during medication administration on 02/28/2024 revealed the nurse made eight (8) medication errors out of thirty (30) opportunities for a medication administration error rate of 26.67%. Observation also revealed Resident #63 and Resident #37 resided in the same room, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 administered eight (8) medications to Resident #63 that were prescribed for Resident #37. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed medications were administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Further review revealed the Director of Nursing supervised and directed all personnel who administered medications and/or had related functions. Continued reviewed revealed medications were administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of the policy also revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the [NAME] website nursing references on medication administration, Nursing Rights of Medication Administration, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure it was free of significant medication errors for one (1) of one hundred four (104) sampled residents (Resident #63). Observation during medication administration on 02/28/2024 revealed the nurse failed accurately identify residents in their room resulting in Resident #63 receiving medications prescribed for Resident #37. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed medications were administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Further review revealed the Director of Nursing supervised and directed all personnel who administered medications and/or had related functions. Continued reviewed revealed medications were administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to ensure the residents' medications were properly labeled for two (2) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #128 and #285). On 02/28/2024, State Registered Nurse Aide/Kentucky Medication Aide (SRNA #12/KMA #1) failed to properly label and store drugs in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. She put Resident #285's and #128's medications in medication cups and put them in the top drawer of the medication cart. There was no label on the medication cups indicating the names of the residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised 02/2023, revealed medications and biologicals were stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems in which they were received. Only the issuing pharmacy was authorized to transfer medications between containers. Per the policy, each resident's medications were assigned to an individual cubical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met the daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for two (2) of one hundred and four (104) residents (Resident #58 and #70). Observation of the tray line service on 02/26/2024, revealed Resident #58 was ordered a controlled carbohydrate (CCHO) diet with large portions of vegetables but only received one (1) small scoop of potato salad and one (1) small scoop of mashed potatoes. In addition, there were no alternative/substitutions for the CCHO diet. Observation of the dinner meal on 03/01/2024, revealed Resident #70 did not receive fish, as identified on the residents list of personal preference for fish at lunch and supper meal. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Therapeutic Diets, revised October 2017, revealed therapeutic diets were prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to follow the menu and provide the required nutritional needs for one (1) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Resident #50). The findings include: Review of the facility's Nutritional Assessment Policy, dated 10/2017, revealed the resident's nutritional assessment identified special food formulations and calorie, protein, fluid needs. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Under Federal Law Policy, dated 11/28/2016, revealed it was required by the facility that each resident be treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life, and recognized each resident's individuality. Review of Resident #50's face sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #50 on 04/10/2015 with diagnoses including traumatic amputation of left lesser toe, end stage renal disease, and Type 2 diabetes. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature for three (3) of one hundred and four (104) sampled residents (Residents #35, #66, and #113). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Policy and Procedure Manual: General Food Preparation and Handling, dated 2019, revealed food items would be prepared to conserve maximum nutritive value, develop and enhance flavor, and keep free of harmful organisms and substances. Review of the facility's policy, Policy and Procedure Manual: HACCP and Food Safety, dated 2019, revealed the Director of Food and Nutrition Services and the Registered Dietician should determine the appropriate temperature ranges for the food service operation. Continued review revealed it was noted the United States Department of Health and Human Services Food Code used the minimum safe temperature requirement of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for cold foods and 135 degrees F for hot foods. 1. Observation of Resident #35's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to provide immunization as required or appropriate; to ensure the resident or the resident's representative had the opportunity to refuse immunizations; and failed to ensure the medical record included documentation of the resident's or resident representative's education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of immunizations for one (1) of one hundred four (104) sampled residents, Resident #128. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Vaccination of Residents, revised 10/2019, revealed all residents would be offered vaccines that aided in preventing infectious disease unless the vaccine was medically contraindicated or the resident had already been vaccinated. Per the policy, before receiving vaccinations, the resident or legal representative would be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccinations, and all education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide a comfortable homelike environment for four (4) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Residents #84, #88, #108, and #114) and three (3) unsampled residents (Residents #41, #59, and #96). Observations conducted, on 04/12/2021 through 04/15/2021; 04/22/2021 through 04/28/2021; and 05/11/2021 through 05/14/2021, revealed strong urine and fecal odors were present upon entering the facility and throughout the areas of the facility where residents resided. Interviews with staff and residents revealed concerns had been voiced to Administration related to odors in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 03/01/2018, revealed residents had the fundamental right to considerate care that safeguarded their personal dignity along with respecting cultural, social, and spiritual values. Further review of the policy revealed the facility complied with and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in an orderly manner and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date for six (6) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Residents #7, #80, #81, #130, #335 and #336). On 05/05/2021 the facility discharged Resident #81 home with medications; however, on 05/07/2021 resident #81 noticed he/she had medication belonging to Resident #80. Observation on 05/13/2021 at 9:30 AM revealed Resident #7's fluticasone 50 microgram nasal spray was in the medication cart drawer with Resident #2's medications. Three (3) other residents' medications, Resident #335, Resident #130, and Resident #336, were also observed in the medication cart drawers that were labeled for other residents' rooms. The findings include: Review of Medication Storage policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biological's, Syringes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to keep food in a safe and sanitary environment as determined by observations during initial and continued tour of the kitchen. Observations on 04/20/2021 and 04/21/2021 revealed a fan in the dish room was covered with a dust-like substance and the floors underneath and behind equipment with food debris. Observation of the resident nourishment refrigerators on three (3) of three (3) resident care units, revealed food products not labeled or dated for expiration. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food: Safe handling for Foods from Visitors, dated 07/2019, revealed the responsible facility staff member, would ensure the food brought to the facility was easily distinguishable from the facility food. Continued review revealed the responsible staff member would ensure the food was in a sealed container to prevent cross contamination and would label the food with the resident's name and the current date. Review of the facility policy titled Snacks, dated 09/2017,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the Director of Nursing's Job Description, review of the Administrator's Job Description, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility's administration failed to ensure it was administered in manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental foe its residents. Observations of the 100, 200, and 300 Units and specific residents' rooms revealed urine and fecal odors on each unit and in residents' rooms throughout the facility. Interviews with residents and staff revealed there were unpleasant, foul odors in the facility and in their rooms which were concerning to them. Interviews with the Administrative staff revealed they were aware of the unpleasant, foul odors, and it was their responsibility to manage them, but they had failed to eliminate the odors. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 03/01/2018, revealed residents had the fundamental right to considerate care that safeguarded their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents from resident-to-resident abuse for four (4) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Residents #24, #68, #71, and #235). On 02/28/2021, Resident #24 slapped Resident #71 for inviting someone into their shared room, and Resident #71 slapped Resident #24 back. On 02/20/2021, Resident #65 struck Resident #235 in their shared room, as Resident #235 was in the room going through Resident #65's possessions. On 03/29/2021, Resident #334 observed Resident #68 taking food from a tray at the nurse's station. Resident #334 thought Resident #68 was stealing his/her food and stabbed Resident #68 with a fork. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated 04/09/2021, revealed physical abuse was prohibited and included hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, as well as controlling behavior through corporal punishment. 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's Policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's recommendation from the monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were received, reviewed, and acted upon by the Attending Physician or Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) for five (5) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Residents #49 #64, #101, #114 and #125). The Pharmacist made monthly MRR reports on each resident and sent the medication irregularities to the facility via email. However, there was no documented evidence the facility regularly provided the reports to the care providers in a timely manner or reviewed the reports in the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings, as per policy. The findings include: Review of the facility's Policy, Medication Regimen Review, effective [DATE] and revised [DATE], revealed that when the MRR Consultant Report was received from the Consultant Pharmacist, the Center Nurse Executive (CNE) would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs and psychotropic drug regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to ensure that medication gradual dose reduction (GDR) recommendations from the consultant pharmacist were received and responded promptly by the care providers, to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary drugs or failed to indicate that the continued use of the drug to be a valid therapeutic intervention for five (5) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #49, #64, #101, #114 and #125). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Medication Regimen Review, (MRR) effective date [DATE], and revised [DATE], revealed that when the MRR Consultant Report was received from the Consultant Pharmacist, the Center Nurse Executive (CNE) would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Kentucky Department for Public Health (Health Department) state guidelines for COVID - 19 it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and control the development and transmission of communicable diseases. Observation, on 04/13/2021, revealed staff failed to properly doff and dispose of personal protective equipment (PPE) and perform hand hygiene after providing resident care. Observation revealed staff failed to empty contaminated linen and trash causing storage barrels to overflow and prevent secure closure. Contaminated trash and linen barrels were stored in a shower room actively used for residents. Continued observation revealed multiple staff failed to redirect a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents from abuse related to Misappropriation of resident property for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #93). On 01/17/2021, Resident #93 reported that he/she did not receive a bag with two (2) candy bars and two hundred forty dollars ($240) which was left for him/her at the front door when staff was not available to receive the items. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated 04/09/2021, revealed misappropriation of resident property was defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 12/18/2021, with diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. Review of Resident #93's Quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal and oral hygiene for three (3) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #114, Resident #36, and Resident #102). Resident #114 was observed to be unshaven with full facial hair, unclean and messy clothing, and an unpleasant body odor. Observation of Resident #36, on 04/21/2021, revealed the resident had greasy uncombed hair. The resident had food stuck between his/her teeth, and they appeared dirty. Further observation noted a strong smell of urine, and the resident stated he/she was wet, with the brief under his/her slacks appearing saturated. Observation of Resident #102, on 04/20/2021, revealed his/her hair was greasy, and the resident smelled of urine. Interview with Resident #102, revealed he/she had issues with the ability of staff to help residents take showers and clean up. The findings include: On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services. The facility failed to ensure pain medication was available to the resident per the Physician's Orders, the Comprehensive Care Plan, and the goals and preferences for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #110). The facility admitted Resident #110, on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Chronic Pain and Thoracic, Thoracolumbar, and Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Disorder. Resident #110 was hospitalized , on [DATE], with Altered Mental Status, Condition Decline, and Respiratory Failure. Prior to the [DATE] acute care hospitalization, the resident was receiving Oxycodone with Acetaminophen (a narcotic opioid pain reliever given for moderate to severe pain) on a every six (6) hour schedule. When Resident #110 returned from the hospital to the facility, on [DATE], the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's Policy, it was determined the facility failed to review medication orders that were written on an as needed basis (PRN) for psychotropic drugs limited to 14 days and for the attending physician or prescribing practitioner to evaluate the resident for the appropriateness of the medication for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents (Resident #84). Resident #84 had a Physician's order, dated 03/16/2021, for Ativan (psychotropic medication) one-half (0.5) milligram (mg) to be administered through the G-tube (gastric/feeding tube) every eight (8) hours as needed for anxiety. The order failed to contain a fourteen (14) day stop date or documentation of rationale in the resident's medical record indicating the appropriateness for the PRN order to be extended beyond the fourteen (14) days and the duration for the PRN order. The findings include: Review of the facility's Policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 11/28/2016, revealed PRN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,980 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
  • $6,682 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
  • $2,258 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $1,748 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-07 for 59 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.6-2.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.5-2.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ENCORE PARENT HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/20/2023
ENCORE INVESTORS 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/20/2023
ENCORE INVESTORS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/20/2023
GRINSPAN, ELIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/20/2023
GRINSPAN, ISAACIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/20/2023
RUBENSTEIN, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/20/2023
7300 WOODSPOINT DRIVE REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
DWIGHT MORTGAGE TRUST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 09/05/2025
FISCHEL, MAYERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS 2 LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
GRAVES, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
SHEMWELL, JOANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
THOMPSON, MONICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/20/2023
BALT M4 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
ENCORE REALTY 2 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
GEFNER FAMILY HOLDING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
J & R FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
J&R KC DERBY KY FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
KC DERBY KY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
KC DERBY KY PARENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
KC DERBY KY PARTNERS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
LANDAU FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
PERIGROVE 1034 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023
BLOOM, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 7%Other / private 3%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$285per resident / day
operating cost
$8,673per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$284per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kentucky
$9,718/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,528/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185090. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next