Bradford Square Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 87.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-27 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's documents and policies, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer to the appropriate level of care to meet a resident's needs to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility for 1 out of 3 sampled residents (Resident (R) 197). Record review revealed R197 was discharged from the facility to a homeless shelter on 05/01/2023. The resident's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with ketoacidosis (a serious complication of diabetes when too many ketones build up to dangerous levels in the body) and unspecified lack of normal physiologic development in childhood. The resident had a representative/guardian who was not notified of the discharge details and was only informed of the discharge when the resident called her, on 05/09/2023, from the homeless shelter. Further, record review revealed the resident was discharged from the facility without the facility providing education on medications, the necessary diabetic equipment or supplies, a discharge plan, or a discharge summary. According to R197's guardian, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store food items in accordance with professional standards to prevent the use of outdated products and reduce the risk of foodborne illness.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Food brought in from Outside Sources and Personal Food Storage, dated 2019, revealed all foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. Further review revealed all foods will be checked to assure that all foods will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen (where applicable), or discarded.Observation of the kitchen on 03/24/2026 at 12:25 PM revealed an opened box of Sysco baking soda with the top covered in plastic wrap, labeled as opened on 11/18/2023, with a manufacturer's best by date of 09/02/2025.Continued observation revealed a bottle of ground nutmeg labeled as opened on 02/06/2024, with a manufacturer's best by date of 12/01/2025.Further observation of the dry storage area revealed five unopened boxes of Sysco baking soda with a manufacturer's best by date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure resident self-determination by not following its established process for tracking and maintaining scheduled health care appointments, resulting in a missed appointment and the resident's inability to participate in his planned care for 1 of 27 sampled residents, Resident (R) 65.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 08/20/2025, revealed staff will respect the resident's individuality and value their input by providing them with a dignified existence, through self-determination and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility.Review of R65's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/10/2023 with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes, hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and cerebral infarction.Review of R65's quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and control the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 2 of 27 sampled residents, Resident (R) 3 and R28. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Surveillance for Infections, dated 08/20/2025, revealed Infections that will be included in routine surveillance include those with available processes and procedures that prevent or reduce the spread of infection.Review of the facility's policy titled, Transmission Based Precautions, dated 08/20/2025, revealed If a resident is placed on transmission-based precautions and or isolation, appropriate signage is placed on the room entrance so that personnel and visitors are aware of the need for and the type of precautions. Additionally, The signage informs the staff of instructions for use of PPE [personal protective equipment], and/or instructions to see a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, review of a police report, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow its policy for the receipt of a Schedule 4 controlled medication (clonazepam) for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident (R) 32. On 01/02/2025, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 signed the pharmacy's Delivery Receipt for delivery of R32's 15 tablets of clonazepam (a benzodiazepine, used to treat anxiety). However, review of the facility's Narcotic Sheet revealed R32 did not have an entry for the delivery of the clonazepam on 01/02/2025, and review of R32's Medication Administration Record [MAR] revealed R32 missed five doses of clonazepam because the facility did not have that medication. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, 2.0 Receipt of Routine Deliveries, revealed the facility nurse or other facility representative, when routine medication deliveries arrived from the pharmacy, signed the delivery manifest and/or electronic signature pad, noted time of arrival, and took responsibility of the medications. Per the policy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's local health department inspection, and review of the local health department's website, the facility failed to provide education to food handlers related to safe food handling practice to enable food handlers to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department. This deficient practice affected 85 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the local health department's Health Department Inspection, dated 02/05/2024, revealed the facility was cited for improper glove use, hand hygiene, and staff needing food handlers' cards. Further review revealed these citations should be corrected as soon as possible or by the next routine inspection for appropriate employees and the provider to have food handler training and certification. Review of the local county health department's website, https://fchd.org/foodsafetycertification, revealed that all food handlers and managers were required to complete a course in food safety and maintain a valid and current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's documents and policies, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean environment for 46 of 46 residents who resided on the 100 and 200 Halls. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, stated residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Review of the facility's policy titled, Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities, revised March 2017, stated the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Review of the facility's document Daily Cleaning Schedule revealed common area bathrooms and resident bathrooms were to be cleaned daily. However, it was not a sign off sheet for the housekeeping staff to make an entry when the task was completed. Observation on 04/24/2024 at 8:04 AM revealed the communal bathroom on the 200 Hall smelled of urine. The floors and toilets were not clean, and the floor had a black buildup. The toilets had a dark brown/black substance on them. Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the package insert/product label for tubersol tuberculin (TB) purified protein derivative (PPD), and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to have an effective system to ensure open TB PPD skin test solution vials were not expired in 1 of 2 medication refrigerators, with the potential to affect 46 of 46 residents on the 100 and 200 Halls. On 04/23/2024, one expired vial of PPD was found in the 100/200 Hall medication refrigerator. The vial of skin test solution had an opened date of 03/19/2024. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised 02/2023, revealed the nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication and to ensure that outdated medications or biologicals were returned to the pharmacy or destroyed. Per the policy, multi-dose vials that had been opened were dated and discarded within 28 days unless otherwise indicated by the manufacturer. Review of the package insert/product label revealed PPD was used as an aid in the detection of infection with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's document and policies, the facility failed to store food in a safe, clean environment. This affected 85 residents that were provided meals from the kitchen. Observation of the kitchen, on 04/23/2024, revealed ingredient bins were visibly soiled, with a lid left open; utility carts were soiled; and the two spatulas were melted or appeared broken. Observation of the 300 Hall residents' refrigerator, on 04/23/2024, revealed a gelatin salad in a Christmas box and left over salad in a clear container with no resident name, date, or room number. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation and Infection Control, revised 2023, revealed the procedure for cleaning utility carts was to clean with a hot soapy water solution. Per the policy, the process was to brush wheels to remove dirt and then scrub them; wash carts and wheels; rinse; use dry paper towels for drying; and polish carts with stainless steel polish. Review of the facility's policy titled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, dated 2001,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's policy, and review of the Plan of Correction (POC) submitted for the 04/26/2024 survey the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to have an effective process to address systemic failures through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. As a result, the facility failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. This had the potential to affect all 92 current residents. The State Survey Agency (SSA) identified continued non-compliance in the areas of 42 CFR 483.10 Resident Rights (F550); 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (F657); 42 CFR 483.45 Pharmacy Services (F761); and 483.80 Infection Control (F880). Review of the facility's POC revealed the facility's Administration failed to have an effective process…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, review of the manufacturers' directions for use for the glucometer (blood glucose monitoring device) and disinfectant wipes, review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to identify and correct problems related to infection prevention practices for 7 out of 63 sampled residents, Resident (R) 2, R4, R19, R39, R71, R72, and R44. In addition, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents that received enteral nutrition through tube feedings, R45. Observation of R2, in contact precautions, on 04/25/2024 and 04/26/2024 revealed staff failed to properly dispose of R2's contaminated bodily fluids and failed to properly don (put on) and doff (take off) personal protective equipment (PPE), including performing hand hygiene. Observation of R71, R72, and R44, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-04-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY