Regency Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
1550 Raydale Drive, Louisvile, KY 40219 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (502) 968-6600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2019
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 10 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,039 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.1% | 13.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 28.4% | 17.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.2% | 29.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 96.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.0% | 19.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.8% | 16.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.7% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.5% | 83.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 24.2% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.0% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.23 | 1.94 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.01 | 2.14 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.2%CMS range 25.4–57.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.8–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.3%CMS range 6.4–15.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 105.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 1.00 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
21 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented for two of five sampled residents assessed for elopement risk, Resident (R)82 and R259. 1. The facility assessed R259 to be at risk for elopement and R259 was care planned as at risk for elopement due to exhibited exit-seeking behavior. However, the resident exited the facility undetected by staff on 09/08/2022 at approximately 4:10 PM and was outside unsupervised for approximately five minutes. 2. The facility assessed R82 to be at risk for elopement for exhibited exit-seeking behaviors. Tthe facility, however, failed to develop and implement an elopement care plan for the elopement risk until 11/03/2022, seven (7) days after R82 first eloped on 10/27/2022. The resident exited the facility again, without staff's knowledge, on 01/02/2023. Staff failed to follow the resident's interventions and the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide effective monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement and to prevent residents from becoming missing for two of five sampled residents assessed for elopement risk, (Resident (R)82 and R259) out of the total resident sample of twenty-three (23). R259 on 09/08/2022, and R82 on 10/27/2022, eloped from the facility unescorted, unsupervised, and without staff knowledge. The facility's failure to have an effective system in place to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent elopement has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 07/20/2024 and was determined to exist on 09/08/2022 in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan, F656; and 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, F 689 at a Scope and Severity (S/S) of a J. Substandard Quality of Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to identify a change in condition for one (1) of thirteen (13) sampled residents. Review of Resident #8's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident with the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Essential Hypertension, and Heart Failure. Review of Resident #8's Nursing Documentation, dated 11/03/19 at 10:55 PM, revealed a shift note for Exacerbation of Respiratory Condition, which stated the resident's lungs were not clear and rhonchi were heard upon auscultation and the resident had a non-productive cough. However, this change in respiratory status was not communicated to the physician. On 11/04/19 at 12:06 AM, Resident #8 was out of bed, found to be unsteady on his/her feet, and experienced shortness of breathe. Nursing applied oxygen, assisted the resident to bed, raised head of bed up, administered steroids and pain medication. However, nursing did not notify the physician of a change in condition. Review of Resident #8's weights revealed, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to protect residents from sexual abuse for one (1) three (3) of a total sample of fifty-six (56) residents (Resident #26). Interview and record review revealed the facility failed to assess Residents #5 and #26 for the capacity to consent to sexual relations. Nor did the facility conduct behavior monitoring of Resident #5, to ensure Resident #26 and other residents were protected from potential sexual abuse. Review of Resident #5's nursing progress notes, first noted on 09/13/18, revealed the resident exhibited inappropriate sexual behavior to self in public areas and also directed this behavior towards Resident #26. Review of the Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation, dated 10/05/18, revealed Resident #5 was aware that a person could not be able to give consent and therefore could not be a willing participant in sexual behavior, and the resident's judgment in the matter seems to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to ensure staff reported allegations of sexual abuse when they occurred and to ensure these allegations were reported to State agencies for one (1) of two (2) of a total sample of fifty-six (56) residents, Resident #26. Record review revealed Resident #5 requested and engaged in sexual acts with Resident #26, including exposure of his/her genitals and masturbation in common areas. Interview with staff revealed these sexual acts were not always reported because the facility was aware and it occurred often. In addition, the facility failed to report the incidents to the required State agencies. The facility's failure to report potential resident abuse has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/13/19 and was determined to exist on 09/13/18. The facility was notified of the IJ on 08/16/19. The facility provided an Acceptable Allegation of Compliance (AOC) on 08/20/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system to investigate allegations of sexual abuse and to protect residents from further potential abuse for one (1) of two (2) of a total sample of fifty-six (56), Resident #26. Resident #5 performed a sexual act with Resident #26, made requests for oral sex, exposed his/her genitals, and masturbated in the presence of Resident #26 and other residents; however, the facility failed to investigate the allegations to prevent potential abuse and ensure resident safety. The facility's failure to investigate an allegation of potential abuse has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/13/19 and was determined to exist on 09/13/18. The facility was notified of the IJ on 08/16/19. The facility provided an Acceptable Allegation of Compliance (AOC) on 08/20/19, which alleged removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2019-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to implement the care plan for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents out of a total sample of fifty-six (56) residents (Resident #25, #46). Resident #46 was care planned for alteration in comfort related to his/her fracture of the radius and muscle spasms. However, nursing staff did not know about the resident's fracture and certified nursing assistant (CNA) #3 repositioned the resident in his/her bed by pulling on the resident's fractured wrist. In addition, staff did not assist Resident #25 with a change of clothing. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy Pain Management revised 03/01/18, revealed residents were evaluated as part of the nursing assessment process for the presence of pain upon admission/readmission, quarterly, with change in condition or change in pain status, and as required by the state thereafter. Pain management consistent with professional standards of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to meet care needs for one (1) of one (1) sampled residents out of a total of fifty-six (56) total residents (Residents #106). Resident #106's Care Plan was not updated with interventions related to the resident's new diagnosis of Pneumonia with Antibiotic therapy or any interventions related to this diagnosis. In addition, licensed nursing staff failed to monitor the resident for edema related to his/her diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure; the resident died at the facility. Review of Resident #106's clinical record revealed no updates for the intervention given by the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (ARPN), to elevate the resident's left lower extremity (LLE) and left upper extremity (LUE) was elevated at least four (4) times a day above the resident's heart and that his/her care plan was updated with the ordered interventions. The findings include: 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the facility's policy titled, Emergency Cart, review dated [DATE] and revision dated [DATE] revealed the facility would maintain at least one (1) emergency cart per nursing care floor. Emergency carts would contain all supplies required to establish and sustain basic life support. Equipment from the emergency cart would be used only when emergency care was provided. Equipment taken from the emergency cart would be identified and replaced promptly. The emergency cart would be checked every twenty-four (24) hours, and after every use. The Emergency Cart Checklist purpose ensured all supplies critical to basic life support were readily available on the emergency cart. Review of Resident # 8's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Essential Hypertension, Heart Failure, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, and Wedge Compression Fractures of the First, Second, and Third Vertebra. Continued review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff performed Respiratory Assessments for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents of a total sample of fifty-six (56) residents (Resident #106). Interview and record review revealed nursing failed to monitor and assess for respiratory decline that included auscultation of lung sounds, evidence of sleep apnea, edema in extremities, and/or weight fluctuations related to Resident #106's diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure and new onset of pneumonia. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 on, [DATE] at 12:25 PM, revealed on [DATE] she was assigned to care for Resident #106 and was unaware of the resident's recent diagnosis and treatment for pneumonia. She stated she administered the resident's medication around 10:30 AM on [DATE]; and if the resident had a pneumonia diagnosis then she should have assessed the resident's lungs at that time but she did not. In addition, she could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the job description for the Center Executive Director, it was determined the facility failed to be effectively administered in a manner that enabled effective use of resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psycho-social wellbeing for two (2) of thirteen (13) sampled residents, Resident's #6 and #8. Review of a closed clinical record revealed the facility readmitted Resident #6 on [DATE], after a hospitalization for Pneumonia with sepsis and fluid overload. Review of the resident's nursing assessments revealed they were incomplete or non-existent. Record review and interview revealed nursing staff found the resident unresponsive in the bed on [DATE], and failed to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to honor Resident #6's advance directive for a Full Code. Furthermore, record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #8 on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Heart Failure, Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2019-08-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and the Center's Executive Director (CED) job description it was determined the facility failed have an effective system to address system failures related to providing Respiratory and Emergency Services through regularly scheduled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. The QAPI Committee, failed to identify discrepancies related to staff delivery of Respiratory Care Services; nor with the provision of Emergency Services in order to meet residents advance directive wishes, and did not implement a formal plan of action to address. Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to provide resident's with consistent respiratory/cardiovascular services for two (2) of thirteen (13) sampled residents. Record reviews for Resident's #6 and #8 revealed incomplete or non-existent respiratory and cardiovascular nursing assessments during several days of their facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to supervise and monitor residents to ensure an accident free environment for six (6) of twelve (12) residents of a total sample of fifty-six (56) residents, Resident #6, #62, #77, #78, #100, and #102. Staff failed to supervise Resident #77 to ensure his/her safety. On 07/21/19, the resident exited the building to an outdoor courtyard without staff knowledge and fell from his/her wheelchair. The facility transferred the resident to the emergency room (ER) where he/she was diagnosed with a closed head injury. Observations revealed residents with lighters in their possession without staff knowledge, Resident #6, #62, #77, #78, #100, and #102. The findings include: Review of facility policy Smoking, revised 07/24/18, revealed the admissions designee would explain the Center's smoking policy to the patients and their families, and inform them that patients would be assessed to determine if supervision was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-08-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to manage pain for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #46) out of a total resident sample of fifty-six (56) residents. Interview and observation of Resident #46, on 08/07/19 at 10:17 AM, revealed the resident on his/her cellular phone and wiped tears away. The resident stated, I have a pain level of ten out of ten (10/10) and got the Tylenol about ten (10) minutes ago. Resident #46 stated, Before the CNA {certified nursing assistant} pulled me over using my broken wrist, the pain was not as bad. The resident stated the CNA pulled him/her over during incontinent care causing him/her to scream out in pain. Interview with CNA #3, on 08/07/19 at 2:43 PM, revealed she was not told in report Resident #46's had a fractured wrist or had pain in his/her hand. The CNA stated she was not instructed to avoid the use of the resident's wrist and she expected to receive this information during shift report and she felt bad she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow infection control precautions related to standard and transmission-based precautions for four of 30 residents on Standard and Transmission based precautions (Resident (R)3, 15, 104 and 42). Multiple observations during survey revealed staff failing to don (put on) personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering resident rooms identified with infection precautions. Additionally, observation revealed no signage indicating enhanced barrier precautions for a resident with a midline catheter with the tubing end left exposed.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy, Infection Control effective 08/08/2024 stated, the facility infection control policies and practices were intended to maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment while helping prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. Additionally, all personnel were trained on infection control policies and practices upon hire and periodically thereafter including how to find and use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and/or serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Observations revealed food items were opened with no dates and/or uncovered. This had the potential to affect 95 of 99 residents with five residents receiving tube feedings The findings include: Review of facility policy, dated 03/2023, revealed all opened food items should be dated with the date opened and covered. Additionally, all food items will be checked to ensure consumption before their use-by date, or frozen, or discarded. During the initial kitchen tour on 07/16/2024 at 5:30 AM, observation revealed in the reach-in refrigerator a package of strawberry yogurt. In the walk-in refrigerator a bag of carrots, cabbage in a shredded cheese box, one package of bacon not covered, a bag of potato tots, all of which was opened and not dated. Additionally, observation revealed a pork roast lying on a top shelf in the freezer, not in correct box, or dated when it was placed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure it provided a private space for resident council members to meet. This had the potential to affect 16 of 99 residents who attended resident council meeting on 07/17/2024. The findings include: Record review of the facility's policy, Residents Rights. revised March 2017 revealed the facility informed the resident both orally and in writing of his or her rights as a resident, and the rules and regulations governing the resident's conduct and responsibilities during his or her stay at the facility. During an interview with the Administrator on 07/19/2024 at 3:10 PM, he stated the facility did not have a policy to address a residents' privacy during resident council. He stated his expectations would be that federal and state laws would be followed. Observation of resident council meeting, on 07/17/2024 at 11:00 AM, staff were observed entering and exiting the resident concil meeting area that was held in the dining room of the kitchen. Interviews with members of the resident council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of the CDC's (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines revealed hand hygiene was necessary after glove removal because hands could become contaminated through small defects in gloves from the outer surface of gloves used during removal. CDC guidelines stated hand hygiene should be performed immediately after gloves were removed. The CDC recommends changing gloves when going from dirty to clean area. Review of the facility's policy Hand Hygiene, revised 11/28/16, revealed hand hygiene was to be performed before providing patient care, before conducting an aseptic procedure, and after contact with a patient's environment. Hands were to be washed with warm water, applying soap and rubbing hands vigorously outside the stream of water, covering all surfaces, rinsing hands, and drying them thoroughly with a disposable towel. Also, use a towel to turn off the faucet. Review of the facility's policy Wound Dressings: Aseptic, revised 11/30/15, revealed prior to the wound care, the care giver was to clean the over-bed table, place a clean barrier on the over-bed table, place wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-23 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) information was transmitted timely for one (1) of fifty-six (56) sampled residents (Residents #1) where data submission exceeded one hundred-twenty (120) days. The findings include: Request of the facility's policy related to the Automated Data Processing Requirements revealed the facility did not have a specific policy. Interview with MDS Nurse #1, on 08/15/19 at 10:15 AM, revealed the facility followed the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) requirements for transmission, as the facility did not have a policy. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 03/06/19 with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, and Hypertension. He/she had a planned discharge on [DATE]. Review of the Batch report revealed the assessment for Resident #1, dated 03/22/19, was transmitted with an accepted date of 08/08/19, or one hundred thirty-nine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to develop the baseline care plan for one (1) of fifty-six (56) sampled residents (Resident #456). Resident #456 did not have a base line care plan initiated within forty-eight (48) hours, per facility policy. The findings include Review of the facility's policy, Person-Centered Care Plan, revised 07/01/19, revealed the center developed and implemented a baseline person-centered care plan within forty-eight (48) hours for each patient (resident), which included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that met professional standards of quality care. Further policy review revealed the practice standards for the baseline care plan must be developed within forty-eight (48) hours, and include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a patient including, but not limited to initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, social services, and Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-23 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure its staff and agency staff were trained at a minimum on what activities constituted abuse, neglect and exploitation, dementia management and management of persons with intellectual disabilities and resident abuse prevention. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse Prohibition revised 07/01/19, revealed the facility prohibited abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation for all residents. The policy stated the center complied with the Elder Justice Act (EJA) and employees were designated mandatory reporters and obligated to report any suspicion of a crime against a resident without fearing any retaliation. The policy defined abuse, in specific sexual abuse, as a non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident, which included, but was not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion or sexual assault. Mental abuse included, but was not limited to humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment or deprivation. Mental abuse occurred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-08-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENCORE PARENT HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/20/2023 |
| ENCORE INVESTORS 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/20/2023 |
| GRINSPAN, ELI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/20/2023 |
| GRINSPAN, ISAAC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/20/2023 |
| RUBENSTEIN, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/20/2023 |
| 1550 RAYDALE DRIVE REALTY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| DWIGHT MORTGAGE TRUST LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/05/2025 |
| FISCHEL, MAYER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS 2 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/12/2025 |
| MONO, ANNABEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/28/2024 |
| BALT M4 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| ENCORE REALTY 2 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| GEFNER FAMILY HOLDING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| J & R FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| J&R KC DERBY KY FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| KC DERBY KY JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| KC DERBY KY PARENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| KC DERBY KY PARTNERS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| LANDAU FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| PERIGROVE 1034 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| BLOOM, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| GEFNER, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| MEREDITH, KARA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/14/2024 |
| SHEMWELL, JOAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| ZOBERMAN, SARAH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kentucky Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 185290. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.