Riverbend Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, INC
13735 Highway 23, Belle Chasse, LA 70037 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (504) 656-0068 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.5% | 17.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.8% | 17.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.7% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.3% | 15.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.9% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 3.1% | 1.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.5% | 76.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.54 | 2.56 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.04 | 2.74 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 6.8–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were competent in the facility's procedure for implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a wound; and,2. A Registered Nurse (RN) was competent in the facility's procedure for implementation of EBP for a resident with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) (A PICC is a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart to provide long-term access for treatments such as medications).This deficient practice was identified for 3 (S5RN, S7CNA, S8CNA) of 3 (S5RN, S7CNA, S8CNA) staff observed for implementation of EBP. Findings:Review of the facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy and procedure revealed, in part, an effort to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), EBP will be implemented. 1. Observation on 09/09/2025 at 1:40PM of signage on the door or Room a revealed EBP. Further review revealed everyone must clean their hands,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to:1) Designate an interdisciplinary team member to be responsible for coordinating hospice care and services; and, 2) Obtain a resident's most recent hospice plan of care and recertification of terminal illness from the contracted hospice agency for 1 (Resident #18) of 1 (Resident #18) sampled resident reviewed for hospice services. Findings:Review of Resident #18's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/18/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #18 received hospice services. Review of Resident #18's September 2025 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order to admit Resident #18 to the contracted hospice agency on 06/04/2025. 1. In an interview on 09/09/2025 at 12:02PM, S6Infection Preventionist indicated the facility did not have a staff member designated to coordinate hospice care and services. In an interview on 09/09/2025 at 2:55PM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the facility did not have an interdisciplinary team staff member designated to coordinate hospice care and services. 2.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a staff member (S5Registered Nurse [RN]) implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident (Resident #89). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #89) of 1 (Resident #89) sampled residents observed on EBP. Findings:Review of the facility's undated EBP policy revealed, in part, EBP was implemented in an effort to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resident organisms (MDRO), and requires employees to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be infected with a MDRO or those at increased risk of a MDRO infection. Further review of the EBP policy revealed EBP was to be used for residents with indwelling medical devices. Review of the facility's undated Administering Medications via Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) policy revealed, in part, staff should apply personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care for residents on EBP. Review of Resident #89's record revealed, in part, Resident #89 had a PICC line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a privacy cover for a urinary catheter drainage bag for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) residents reviewed with urinary catheters. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #1 has a urinary catheter bag related to Urinary Retention, revised on 01/26/2025, with an intervention to keep Resident #1's catheter drainage bag in a privacy cover. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/16/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5, which indicated Resident #1 had impaired cognition. Observation on 05/27/2025 at 11:23AM revealed Resident #1 was in her wheelchair in the dining area. Further observation revealed Resident #1's catheter drainage bag was attached under her wheelchair seat, and yellow urine was visible in the catheter drainage bag. Observation on 05/27/2025 at 1:41PM revealed Resident #1 was in her room, lying in bed. Further observation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Foley catheter (a medical device inserted into the bladder to collect urine) was changed according to physician's orders for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for catheter use. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed, in part, he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis, in part, of urinary retention and had an indwelling Foley catheter. Review of Resident #2's March 2025 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, to not remove Resident #2's Foley catheter. Further review revealed Resident #2's Foley catheter was to be changed every month by urology. Review of Resident #2's indwelling catheter Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #2's catheter was to be changed every month at Resident #2' urology office. Review of Resident #2's electronic medical record revealed, in part, no documented evidence and the facility was unable to present any documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed ensure a resident's right to maintain a homelike environment for 1 (Resident #94) of 1 (Resident #94) sampled residents reviewed for resident's rights. Findings: Review of Resident # 94's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, malignant neoplasm of the lung, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Nicotine dependence, weakness, anxiety, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #94's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/12/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #94's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was 12. Review of Resident #94's care plan with a goal date of 12/08/2024 revealed, in part, no care plan for safety or behavior modification with an intervention for locking Resident #94's air conditioning control panel. Observation on 10/07/2024 at 12:52 p.m. revealed the air conditioning unit in Resident # 94's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 (Resident #42) sampled residents reviewed for physician order compliance. Findings: Review of Resident #42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, post operative left knee replacement, pyogenic arthritis, and acute pancreatitis. Review of Resident #42's written physician's telephone orders dated 10/08/2024 revealed, in part, an order by S21Medical Director for 1 gram of Ceftriaxone 1 gram intramuscular (IM) twice per day for 1 day. Review of Resident #42's EMR physician's orders dated 10/08/2024 revealed, in part, an order for Ceftriaxone 1 gram IM for 2 doses. Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/20/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #42's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was 11, which indicated Resident #42 was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 (Resident #51) of 1 (Resident #51) sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled Care of Fingernails/Toenails revealed, in part, nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. Review of Resident #51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, in part, of severe vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, lack of coordination, and cerebral palsy. Review of Resident #51's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/08/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #51's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was 15, which indicated Resident #51 was cognitively intact. Further review of section GG revealed, Resident #51 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene needs. Review of Resident #51's Care Plan with a goal date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record reflected the resident's medical treatment wishes following a cardiopulmonary arrest (sudden unexpected loss of heart function, breathing, and/or consciousness) for 1 (Resident #262) of 4 (Resident #28, Resident #52, Resident #94, and Resident #262) sampled residents investigated for advanced directives. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy/procedure titled LaPOST (Louisiana Physician Orders For Scope of Treatment), revealed, in part, a LaPOST is a physician order form that translates a resident's end of life wishes and goals of care into physician orders that transfer with the resident across health care settings. Further review revealed, when completing a LaPOST Form with a resident, the LaPOST document must be signed by a physician and by the resident or resident's legally recognized personal health care representative. Review of a LaPOST Fact Sheet dated 02/2024 located on the website https://…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication regarding a resident's condition was completed with the dialysis facility for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 (Resident #31) sampled residents investigated for dialysis services. Findings: In an interview on 10/09/2024 at 2:25 p.m., S10Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated the facility's staff used the Dialysis Communication sheet to communicate with the dialysis center. Review of the facility's Dialysis Communication sheets for Resident #31 dated 06/03/2024, 06/14/2024, 06/19/2024, 06/28/2024, 07/01/2024, and 08/14/2024 revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence of communication from the dialysis center regarding the dialysis treatment provided and the resident's response to the dialysis treatment. Review of the facility's Dialysis Communication sheets for Resident #31, revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence of communication between the facility and the dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to periodically reconcile controlled drugs for 2 (Medication Cart a and Medication Cart b) of 2 (Medication Cart a and Medication Cart b) medication carts reviewed for the reconciliation documentation of controlled substances. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Controlled Substances, revealed, in part, the nursing staff must count controlled medication at the end of each shift. Further review revealed the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. Review of the facility's August 2024 Medication Cart a Controlled Drugs-Count Record revealed, in part, the following shifts had an incomplete reconciliation of controlled drugs by the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty: -08/05/2024 on the 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift; -08/07/2024 on the 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift; -08/09/2024 on the 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift; -08/10/2024 on the 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. shift; -08/10/2024 on the 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift; -08/12/2024 on the 6:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Opened insulin (a medication that lowers blood glucose) pens were dated when opened and discarded as required for 2 (Medication Cart a and Medication Cart b) of 2 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b) medication carts observed; and, 2. Heparin (a medication used to prevent blood clots) was stored in a locked compartment and only accessible to authorized personnel. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Storage/Handling of Medications, revealed, in part, the facility's nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage in a safe manner. Further review revealed, the facility shall not use outdated drugs. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy/procedure titled, Beyond Use Dates of Selected Insulin Products, revealed, in part, Humalog ([Insulin lispro] a type of insulin) pen's beyond use date was after 28 days of the insulin pen being in use. Further review revealed Novolog ([Insulin aspart] a type of insulin) pen's should be discarded after 28 days of use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident with the correct diet to meet the residents needs for 1 (Resident #25) of 1 (Resident #25) sampled residents reviewed for dining services. Findings: Review of facility's Resident Nutrition Services Policy revealed, in part, nursing personnel will inspect food trays delivered to ensure that the correct meal has been delivered. Further review revealed if an incorrect meal is delivered, nursing staff will report it to dietary services so a new tray can be issued. Review of Resident #25's record revealed, Resident#25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, nutritional deficiency, and abnormal weight loss. Review of Resident #25's October 2024 Physician Orders revealed, in part, a diet order for No Added Salt (NAS), mechanical soft with chopped meat. Review of Resident #25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to: 1. Ensure opened food products stored in the walk-in cooler were sealed and labeled with the date the product was opened; 2. Ensure prepared food was stored, cooked, and maintained at the correct temperatures; and, 3. Ensure dishes were cleaned at the correct temperatures with the correct sanitizer levels to prevent foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Food Label/Dating/Storage Policy dated 08/15/2018 revealed, in part, luncheon meat can be kept for 3-5 days after opening. Further review revealed salad dressing may be kept up to 30 days in the refrigerator or use best by date. Observation on 10/07/2024 at 12:16 p.m. revealed an opened package of [NAME]-O sliced turkey breast in an unsealed bag with no opening date written on the package or bag. Further observation revealed an opened jar of Culinary Secrets Creamy [NAME] Slaw Dressing without an open date written on it. In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation was completed in a resident's record for 1 (Resident #42) of 23 (Resident #25, Resident #28, Resident #31, Resident #35, Resident #39, Resident #42, Resident #26, Resident #48, Resident #51, Resident #52, Resident #57, Resident #60, Resident #92, Resident #93, Resident #94, Resident #95, Resident #100, Resident #107, Resident #109, Resident #110, Resident #111, Resident #262, and Resident #262) sampled residents reviewed for accurate records. Findings: Review of Resident #42's admission orders dated 09/13/2024 and signed by S21Medical Director revealed, in part, flush port of midline every shift with 10 milliliters (mL) of normal saline followed by 3 cubic centimeters (cc) of Heparin. Review of the facility's standing orders dated 07/2024 revealed, in part, central lines and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) lines will be flushed every shift with 10 mL of normal saline followed by 3 cc of Heparin. Review of Resident # 42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were administered to residents as ordered for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for pressure injuries. Findings: Review of the facility's wound care/dressing change policy revised 12/2022 revealed, in part, in preparation to performing wound care, a review of the resident's medical record and/or care plan, current orders, and diagnoses to determine any special resident needs should be completed. Further review revealed, in part, the date and time the dressing was changed, and the name and title of the individual changing the dressing should be recorded in the resident's medical record. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed, in part, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Fusion of Spine, Cervical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assess and/or measure a resident's wound weekly for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for wound management. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's hospital discharge record dated 12/29/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a wound dehiscence (total or partial separation of a wound the was previously closed). Review of Resident #1's nurse's note dated 12/30/2023, revealed, in part, Resident #1 returned back to the facility with sutures to the left side of his head. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, Resident #1's left scalp incision was assessed and/or measured upon Resident #1's return from the hospital and/or weekly. In an interview on 04/09/2024 at 1:30 p.m., S2Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed there was no evidence of a wound assessment for Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to respect a resident or a resident's responsible party's right to choose a health care services for (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for resident rights. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Physician's Communication dated 03/04/2024 revealed, in part, documentation that Resident #1's representative had concerns regarding Resident #1's continued itching and requested that Resident #1 see a dermatologist. In a telephone interview on 04/11/2024 at 4:17 p.m., Resident #1's responsible party indicated Resident #1's skin rash had kept getting worse despite treatment, and Resident #1's responsible party had requested that Resident #1 be sent to a dermatologist. Resident #1's responsible party further stated no appointment with a dermatologist was made, and no staff from the facility had gotten back to her regarding the above mentioned request. Resident #1's representative indicated Resident #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have quarterly care plan meetings with the interdisciplinary team for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for care plans. Findings: Resident #1 In an interview on 04/11/2024 at 4:17 p.m., Resident #1's responsible party indicated she had only been invited to two of Resident #1's plan of care meetings since Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's responsible party further indicated she had not been to a plan of care meeting at the facility during his last 3 months as a resident. Review of a letter presented by S4Social Services Director, revealed, in part, Resident #1 was scheduled to have a plan of care meeting on 01/11/2024. Review of Resident #1's record revealed, in part, no evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence, a plan of care meeting was held for Resident #1 between 01/01/2024 and his discharge on [DATE]. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for dietary services in a total sample of three. Findings: Review of the facility's regular diet menu for 04/11/2024 revealed, in part, residents were to be served roasted pork, au gratin potatoes, sliced zucchini, a dinner roll, a brownie, margarine, salt packet, pepper packet, a choice of a beverage, and water. Observation of the facility's posted lunch menu on 04/11/2024 at 11:22 a.m. revealed, in part, residents were to be served roasted pork loin, mashed potatoes, California blend vegetables, dinner rolls, brownies, salt packet, pepper packet, juice, and water. Observation on 04/11/2024 at 2:30 p.m., revealed Resident #3's lunch tray did contain a piece of battered and/or fried meat. In an interview on 04/11/2024 at 2:30 p.m., Resident #3 indicated she did not like the meat she was given today for lunch, as it was either fried chicken or fried pork. Resident #3 further stated she saw the menu for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services by failing to: 1. Ensure walls in the dirty linen room were repaired; 2. Ensure the clean linen room was kept clean and sanitary; 3. Ensure resident's bathrooms were cleaned for 3 (Resident #30, Resident #60, and Resident #88) of 3 resident's bathrooms observed; and 4. Ensure nursing units were cleaned for 2 (POD B and POD C) of 2 nursing units observed. Findings: Observation on 11/13/2023 at 10:00 a.m. of the dirty linen room, revealed exposed pipe through a hole in the wall measuring approximately 1 foot (ft.) by 1 ft. directly behind the washing machines. Further observation revealed a second exposed pipe through a hole in the wall measuring approximately 1 ft. by 3 ft. on the right side of the washing machines. Observation on 11/13/2023 at 10:05 a.m. of the clean linen room, revealed 5 pairs of shoes with dust and lint on them on top of the air conditioner unit. Further observation revealed a folded blanket on the floor on the floor lying directly under a drain pipe coming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had comprehensive care plans for 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #50) of 22 residents (Resident #12, Resident #21, Resident #22, Resident #24, Resident #30, Resident #31, Resident #37, Resident #50, Resident #58, Resident #60, Resident #62, Resident #65, Resident #67, Resident #69, Resident #71, Resident #72, Resident #75, Resident #79, Resident #81, Resident #93, Resident #97, and Resident #102) included in the final investigation sample. Findings: Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/18/2023 revealed, in part, Resident#12 had Urinary Tract Infections that lasted 30 days. Review of Resident #12's Care Plan revealed, in part, no documented evidence of problems, goals, or interventions addressing urinary tract infections. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence of a Comprehensive Care Plan addressing urinary tract infections for Resident #12. In an interview on 11/16/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed ensure portable oxygen cylinders were secured in 1 (Resident #58) of 1 resident's room and 1 (Medication Room x) of 2 medication rooms (Medication Room x and Medication Room y) observed for safe storage of portable oxygen cylinders. Findings: Review of the facility's policy regarding Oxygen Administration revealed, in part, portable oxygen cylinders should be secure in a stand. Observation on 11/13/23 at 9:25 a.m., revealed Resident #58 had 2 one-half portable oxygen cylinders unsecured on the floor to the right side of her door way. Observation on 11/14/2023 9:45 a.m., revealed Resident #58 had 2 one-half portable oxygen cylinders unsecured on the floor to the right side of her door way. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 9:46 a.m., revealed 3 one-half portable oxygen cylinders were in Medication Room x and not secured. Observation on 11/15/2023 at 8:50 a.m., Resident #58 had 2 one-half portable oxygen cylinders unsecured on the floor to the right side of her door way. Observation on 11/15/2023 at 3:45 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The nurses were signing as verifying an accurate medication count at the beginning and end of each shift for 3 (Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e, and Medication Cart f) of 3 Medication Carts observed and reviewed for accurate dispensation of controlled medications; and 2. The controlled substances count sheet was reconciled with the medication available for 1 (Medication Cart d) of 3 (Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e, Medication Cart f) medication carts observed for controlled substance reconciliation. Findings: Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy revealed, in part, the nursing staff must count controlled drugs at the end of the shift with the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty. Further review revealed the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. Further review revealed the nursing staff must document and report any discrepancies to the Direct or Nursing or designee immediately. 1. Review of Medication Cart e 's controlled substance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to provide dinnerware, cups, plates, and utensils to meet resident's preferences and failed to follow the posted lunch menu daily. Findings: Observation on 11/14/2023 at 8:58 a.m. of POD C revealed, in part, breakfast meal was served on disposable plates, eating utensils were plastic, and drinks were served in disposable cups. During Resident Council interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #32, Resident #10, and Resident #85 stated that they are being served breakfast, lunch, and dinner with disposable plates, disposable cups, and plastic eating utensils during meals and it is hard to eat and cut meat with plastic utensils. Resident #32, Resident #10, and Resident #85 further stated they would prefer to have non disposable plates and silver ware to use. In an interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:58 a.m. S26Dietary Aide and S32Dietary Aide stated meals were served on reusable plates, plastic utensils, along with disposable cups to save time due to being short staffed. SD26Dietary Aide further stated there is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Opened food items were not sealed, labeled, and dated; 2. Scoops were not stored inside the dry goods storage bins; and 3. Proper use and testing of the three compartment sink. Review of the facility's policy entitled Food Label/Dating/Storage dated 08/15/2018 revealed, in part, it is the facility policy to ensure proper food labeling, dating, and storage. Further review revealed staff will ensure all canned items and dry goods must be dated upon receipt, and all opened items that cannot be adequately sealed in a container must be stored in plastic sealable bags or containers and labeled/dated. 1. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 10:40 a.m. of the facility's dry storage area revealed, in part, one bag of dehydrated sliced potatoes, one bag of egg noodles, and one box of brown sugar open to air, not labeled or dated, and were available for resident consumption. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 10:45 a.m. of the facility's walk in cooler revealed, in part, one bag of shredded mild cheddar cheese, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene during dining for 6 (S20Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), S21Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), S22CNA, S23CNA, S24CNA, and S38CNA) of 6 staff observed during dining; and 2. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene during and after incontinence care for 2 (Resident #60 and Resident #69) of 3 (Resident #21, Resident #60, and Resident #69) residents observed for incontinence care. Findings: Review of the facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy revealed, in part, staff must perform hand hygiene before and after direct resident contact, before and after handling food, before and after assisting a resident with meals, before and after assisting a resident with toileting, and after removing gloves. Review of the facility's Perineal Care policy revealed, in part, after Perineal Care (the washing of the genital and rectal areas of the body) is completed, staff should remove gloves and perform hand hygiene before replacing incontinence items, replacing clothing, repositioning the resident, or making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state agency in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #37) of 2 (Resident #30, Resident #37) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect Policy revealed, in part, if the source of injury is unknown and cannot be determined, the incident will be reported by the Administrator to the Department of Health. Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage (an injury to the head that causes bleeding in the skull). Further review revealed Resident #37 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for functional mobility. Review of Resident #37's Incident Report dated 11/13/2023 at 10:00 a.m. revealed, in part, S41Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was called into the shower room by a certified nursing assistant (CNA). Further review revealed S41LPN identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility failed to post nurse staffing data as required. Findings: Observation on 11/13/2023 at 10:20 a.m. revealed the facility's resident census and the total number of actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care was not posted in the facility. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 9:50 a.m. revealed the facility's resident census and the total number of actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care was not posted in the facility. Observation on 11/15/2023 at 2:50 p.m. revealed the facility's resident census and the total number of actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care was not posted in the facility. In an interview on 11/15/2023 at 2:50 p.m., S16Licensed Practical Nurse stated she was in charge of ensuring the schedule was posted but did not realize the format of the posting did not meet regulations. In an interview on 11/15/2023 at 2:55 p.m., S4CNA Supervisor stated she was in charge of ensuring the CNA schedule was posted but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart had medication properly secured for 1 (Medication Cart d) out of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart d, Medication Cart e, and Medication Cart f) had medication properly secured. Findings: Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy revealed, in part, controlled substances must be under double lock when the nursing cart is left unattended, therefore, the cart must be locked. Observation on 11/15/2023 at 12:55 p.m. revealed S17Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) left Medication Cart d unlocked and unattended while she went to transport a resident off of the unit. Further observation revealed S17LPN left the keys to Medication Cart d on top of the cart. Further observation revealed Medication Cart d was left unlocked and unattended until 1:00 p.m. on 11/15/2023. In an interview on 11/15/2023 at 1:01 p.m., S17LPN stated she should have not left Medication Cart d unlocked nor left her keys to Medication Cart d on top of the medication cart. In an interview on 11/15/2023 at 4:30 p.m., S2Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that medication orders were verified and accurately documented for 2 residents (Resident #1 and Random Resident #4) of 9 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Physician's Consultation report dated 06/28/2023 revealed, in part: Apply Bactroban to prevent infection. Review of Resident #1's June 2023 Physician's order revealed, in part, no order was transcribed for Bactroban. Review of Resident #1's June 2023 electronic Medical Administration Record (eMAR) revealed, in part, no documentation of administration of Bactroban. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 03:53 p.m., S1DirectorofNursing (DON) stated the order dated 06/28/2023 to apply Bactroban (Mupirocin) to prevent infection was not clear. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 03:54 p.m., S1DON acknowledged that an order is not clear if dosage, frequency, and administration of the medication or if the medication is a new order or there is a change in an order is not written. Review of Resident #1's June 2023 eMAR revealed documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 1.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIVERBEND NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/1997 |
| DELESERNIER, MARK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 10/01/1997 |
| GOUX, JEREMY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2020 |
| GOUX, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2020 |
| INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2017 |
| BOWERS, ALAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| LEACH, MARY LYNN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/08/2020 |
| MARONGE, KELLIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195481. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.