No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pontchartrain Health Care Center

1401 Highway 190, Mandeville, LA 70448 · For profit - Corporation · 182 certified beds · (985) 626-8581 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$105,898 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $105,898 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
AVALA0.6 mi
 
Urgent care / clinic
784 Asbury Dr · (985) 635-5537 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
521 Asbury Dr · (985) 951-2688 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3377 U.S. Hwy 190
Park
Fountain Blue · (985) 845-4113 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased33.3%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection9.5%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%2.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened31.7%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.5%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%5.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.0%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.1%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%3.1%1.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.1%76.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.7%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.5%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.402.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.942.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.9%CMS range 25.6–56.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 6.9–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified43.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.3–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.11
RN hoursweekends
54.7%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 102.3 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 80 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-13)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the provider failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the needs of 2 (#61 and #84) of 25 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff consistently implemented an intervention of sitters at bedside for supervision for Resident #61; and 2. Staff scheduled an order neurology consultation for Resident #84. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/12/2025 when Resident #61, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls, recent brain bleed, poor safety awareness, and impulsiveness, had an unwitnessed fall when staff left him unsupervised. Resident #61 was assessed to need staff supervision at bedside on 05/03/2025. On 05/18/2025, the resident had another unwitnessed fall when S22CNA left his bedside leaving the resident unsupervised. Resident #61 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and head CT revealed a new subacute subdural hematoma. Resident #61 was then admitted to the neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent avoidable falls for 1 (#61) of 4 (#6, #61, #85, and #103) residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/12/2025 when Resident #61, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls, recent brain bleed, poor safety awareness, and impulsiveness, had an unwitnessed fall when staff left him unsupervised. Resident #61 was assessed to need staff supervision at bedside on 05/03/2025. On 05/18/2025, the resident had another unwitnessed fall when S22CNA left his bedside leaving the resident unsupervised. Resident #61 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and head CT revealed a new subacute subdural hematoma. Resident #61 was then admitted to the neurological Intensive Care Unit through 05/27/2025. When Resident #61 returned to the facility, he only received staff supervision at bedside as the staffing schedule would allow which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-06-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that effectively used its resources for 1 (#61) of 4 (#6, #61, #85, and #103) residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure a care plan intervention of sitter at bedside was continuously implemented for Resident #61 to prevent falls. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/12/2025 when Resident #61, a cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls, recent brain bleed, poor safety awareness, and impulsiveness, had an unwitnessed fall when staff left him unsupervised. Resident #61 was assessed to need staff supervision at bedside on 05/03/2025. On 05/18/2025, the resident had another unwitnessed fall when S22CNA left his bedside leaving the resident unsupervised. Resident #61 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and head CT revealed a new subacute subdural hematoma. Resident #61 was then admitted to the neurological Intensive Care Unit through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances were entered into the grievance log and followed through to resolution for 1 (#2) of 3 residents sampled for grievances, resulting in the potential for unresolved care concerns.Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy and Procedure - Voicing and Resolution, revised date 11/2025, revealed the following, in part:Policy:Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents and other concerns regarding their stay. Procedure:3. Grievance will be written on the home's grievance/complaint report form.6. The home will keep a grievance/complaint log outlining each grievance/complain and the disposition of the complaint. 8. Home will upon resolution of grievance, follow-up in a timely manner to assure that resolution has been successful. Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#2) resident of 3 sampled residents.Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/12/2026 revealed Section C, question C0100 should brief interview for mental status be conducted, coded as 0 - no (resident is rarely/never understood). On 02/18/2026 at 11:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #2. Resident interview revealed Resident #2 was able to hear and understand my questions with no issue. Resident interview further revealed Resident #2 was able to voice answers to my questions with no issue. On 02/19/2026 at 9:51 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7SW. S7SW reviewed Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/12/2026. S7SW stated she was responsible for answering all questions of Section C. S7SW stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to provide sufficient evidence ongoing monitoring and evaluations were implemented to ensure corrective actions were put in place after identifying residents were not receiving showers. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who required assistance with showering/bathing. Findings: Review of the facility's Quality Improvement Corrective Action Plan dated 01/12/2026, revealed the following, in part:Identified area for improvement: facility identified resident's not receiving showers consistent with their schedule. Actions to implement: 1. if resident is refusing shower, shower aid is to notify floor nurse and floor nurse will sign if resident refuses after checking. Resident may be offered a shower at a later time of day. 2. Shower sheets are turned in to S6CNA for review and a copy is given to S2DON. Objection Measures to evaluate plan effectiveness: S6CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding the residents' code status reflected the residents' wishes for 2 (#18 and #14) of 34 residents reviewed in the initial screening for advanced directives. Findings: Resident #18 Review of Resident #18's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #18's Louisiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (LaPOST) in physical hard chart, dated [DATE], revealed the following, in part: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR): Box checked-CPR/Attempt Resuscitation Signed by Resident #18. Review of Resident #18's current Physician Orders revealed: [DATE] DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) Review of Resident #18's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: Resident #18 advanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure staff: 1. Properly utilized Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during direct care with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line for 1 of 1 (#206) residents whom required PICC line care; and 2. Performed appropriate Standard PPE glove precautions during incontinence care for 1 of 1 (#18) residents observed for incontinence care. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy with a review date of 04/2025, titled, Enhanced Barrier Precaution Policy revealed the following, in part: 1. Gown and gloves will be used during high-contact care activities for residents at increased risk (residents with indwelling medical devices). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's assessments accurately reflected the resident's status by failing to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 (#90) of 2 (#29 and #90) sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings: Review of Resident #90's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a 142 Form Notification of Medical Certification with an approval for admission by the state Level II Authority dated 06/30/2024. Review of Resident #90's annual MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/31/2025 revealed Section A1500 PASRR: Has the resident been evaluated by Level II PASRR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition, was coded as 0. No. Section A1510 Level II PASRR conditions were blank. An interview was conducted with S14MDS on 06/11/2025 at 1:55 p.m. S14MDS verified Resident #90's Form 142…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (#29) of 2 (#29 and #90) sampled residents records reviewed for PASRR. Findings: Review of Resident #29's Clinical Record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, which included Bipolar Disorder. Further review revealed additional medical diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (02/20/2025) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (05/07/2025). Further review of the Clinical Record revealed no documentation of a Level II PASRR evaluation. On 06/11/2025 at 11:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S13BOM. She stated when a resident acquired a new mental health diagnosis either S13BOM or S1ADM submitted a request to the state agency for a PASRR Level II referral. She reviewed the PASRR Level I on file for Resident #29 dated 06/09/2023. She confirmed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standards by failing to follow physician orders for 1 (#84) of 25 residents reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #84's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Cerebral Palsy, Extrapyramidal and Movement Disorder, and other Seizures. Review of Resident #84's current Physician's Orders revealed the following: Start date: 04/02/2025 - Seizure precautions. Review of Nurse Practitioner Progress notes revealed, in part: Created By: S25NP Created Date: 04/02/2025 11:04:20 Chief Complaint / Nature of Presenting Problem: Evaluation status post ER visit for seizure-like activity 1. Seizure-like activity: Workup per ER unremarkable. Seizure precautions please. On 06/10/2025 at 2:30 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #84 resting in bed. Resident noted to have two pillows behind his head and one wedge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was accurately documented and complete for 1 (#17) of 25 residents reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Resident #17 Review of Resident #17's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including: Bipolar disorder, PTSD, Fibromyalgia, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Legal Blindness, Insomnia, Type 2 Diabetes, and Long Term Use of Insulin Review of Resident #17's Current Physician Orders revealed the following in part: Oxycodone-acetaminophen tablet 10-325 mg - Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for severe pain Trazodone hcl tablet 100 mg - Take 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime Monitor targeted behavior of anxiety - every shift Monitor targeted behavior related to depression - every shift Monitor target behaviors related to insomnia - every shift Duloxetine hcl capsule delayed release particles 30 mg - Give 1 capsule by mouth one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to meet the following Hospice requirements by failing to maintain a system to ensure a Hospice resident's Hospice Binder contained the most recent Hospice Plan of Care and a current Recertification of Terminal Illness for 1 of 1 (#56) residents reviewed for Hospice care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 10 residents receiving Hospice services in the facility. Findings: A review of the facility's signed Hospice Services Agreement with Resident #56's Hospice agency, undated, revealed, in part, the following: 4. Responsibilities of Facility 4.14.4 Obtain the following information from Hospice: 4.14.4 (a) The most recent Hospice Plan of Care specific to each Hospice Patient. 4.14.4 (c) Physician Certification and Recertification of the Terminal Illness specific to each Hospice Patient. A review of Resident #56's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #56 was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility was a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1.) The floor tiles were cleaned and without debris, the wall adjacent to the bed was without chipped/missing paint, the shower was functional and sanitary, and the bed's mechanical parts were cleaned in Room a; and 2.) The air conditioner units in Room b and Room c were cleaned. This deficient practice had the potential to effect the 113 residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. On 03/31/2025 at 12:10 p.m., an observation was made of Room a. There was a scattered brown/black substance on the floor tiles near the window and air conditioner unit. There was missing/chipped paint behind the bed. There was a dried brown substance on the bottom left foot control of the bed which was missing a cover. The shower was missing a shower head, and not functional. There was a dried orange substance along the bottom left shower tiles with chipped/missing shower tiles and no shower curtain. On 04/01/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment. The facility failed to ensure: 1.) Ceiling tiles were in good repair for Room b, Room c, Room d, Room f, and Hall b; 2.) The vent above the ice machine on Hall c was clean; 3.) The gutters of the building remained intact; and 4.) Hall a's bathroom toilet was maintained in a sanitary and functional condition. This deficient practice had the potential to effect the 114 residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. On 03/03/2025 at 9:45 a.m., a tour of the facility was conducted. In Room b there were 2 ceiling tiles which had a brown substance on them. In Room c there were 18 sagging ceiling tiles, a tan substance on the ceiling tile above a resident's bed, and a tear in 1 ceiling tile. In room d there was a baseball sized brown substance on 1 ceiling tile. In room f there were 3 ceiling tiles with a brown substance on them. On Hall b there were 4 ceiling tiles with tears, and 2 ceiling tiles had a brown substance on them. 2. On 03/03/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the state agency in the required time frame for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property with a revision date of 09/26/2017, revealed, in part, the following: Policy: Reporting/Response: 1.Report all alleged violations of abuse to the state agency 2.Any employee who becomes aware of an alleged abuse .shall report the incident to a supervisor, DON or Administrator immediately. 3.The facility will report all allegations of abuse to the state agency within 24 hours of discovery . Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/23/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00 which indicated Resident #1 was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive plan of care was implemented for 1(#1) of 3(#1, #2 and #3) residents reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had daily meal intake percentage documented. Findings: Review of the Clinical Record for Resident #1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Malnutrition and Dysphagia. Review of Care Plan for Resident #1 revealed the following, in part: 09/24/2024- Potential for altered nutrition. I am fed by staff. Goal: I will have adequate nutrition. Intervention: Observed meal intake and document percentage. Review of Nutrition Intake for Resident #1 dated February 2025, revealed no percentage of meal intake documented on the following dates: 02/02/2025, 02/09/2025, 02/10/2025, 02/12/2025, 02/13/2025, 02/14/2025, 02/15/2025, 02/16/2025, 02/21/2025, 02/22/2025, 02/24/2025 and 02/25/2025. On 03/05/2025 at 1:19 p.m., an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were provided and maintained a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for the residents for 3 of 3 (Hall A, Hall B, Hall C) areas observed for environmental concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 110 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings: Hall A An observation was conducted on 11/12/2024 at 9:00 a.m. of Hall A. Observations were conducted on Hall A near the double doors of two busted and cracked floor tiles with exposed concrete subflooring. Further observations were conducted across from the shower room and revealed a busted and cracked floor tile with exposed concrete subflooring. Hall B An observation was conducted on 11/12/2024 at 9:00 a.m. of Hall B. Observations were conducted at the beginning of Hall B of a cracked and uneven tile. Further observations were conducted on Hall B and revealed two more cracked tiles with missing parts. Hall C An observation was conducted on 11/12/2024 at 9:00 a.m. of Hall C.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure residents had a pest free environment. The deficient practice affected 2 (#1 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents and had the potential to affect all 110 residents that resided in the facility. Findings: Observations on all days of the survey (11/12/2024 - 11/13/2024) revealed flies flying around throughout the facility, including hallways and resident rooms. On 11/12/2024 at 3:30 p.m., an observation revealed Resident #1 was in his room in bed and there were two flies flying around his room. A blue and green fly trap device was observed hanging from the left side of the curtain track near Resident #1's window, as well as a fly swatter on his bedside table. On 11/12/2024 at 3:45 p.m., an observation revealed Resident #3 was in his room in bed and there was a fly flying around his room. On 11/13/2024 at 5:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4CNA. He stated there were flies in and out of resident rooms and in the hallways daily. He confirmed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards for 2 (#2 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for baths. Findings: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident#2's Bath/Shower Logs revealed Resident #2 should receive a bath three days a week. Review of Resident #2's September 2024 and October 2024 Bath/Shower Logs revealed no documentation for a bath or shower given on 09/21/2024, 09/24/2024, and 10/10/2024. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #3's Bath/Shower Logs revealed Resident #3 should receive a bath three days a week. Review of Resident #3's September 2024 Bath/Shower Logs revealed no documentation for a bath or shower given on 09/07/2024, 09/10/2024, 09/12/2024, 09/14/2024, 09/19/2024, 09/19/2024, 09/21/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 ( #2 and #3) of 2(#2 and #3) residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing peri-care and catheter care to residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 04/01/2024, revealed the following, in part: Guideline: 1. Gown and gloves will be used during high-contact resident care activities for residents .who are at increased risk of multidrug-resistant organisms acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 2#'s admission MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for resident assessment. The facility failed to code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) correctly for antipsychotic and antidepressant use. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Depression and Hallucinations. Review of Resident #3's Physician's Orders revealed: Start date: 07/01/2024, Quetiapine Fumarate Tablet 25 mg Give one tablet by mouth at bedtime. Start date: 08/03/2024, Venlafaxine Extended Release Tablet 150 mg Give one tablet by mouth one time a day. Review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 08/01/2024 to 10/11/2024 revealed Resident #3 received Quetiapine Fumarate and Venlafaxine in accordance with Physician's Orders for the dates reviewed. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standards by failing to ensure physician's orders were accurately transcribed for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) residents reviewed for physician's orders. Findings: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Gastrostomy Status and Colostomy Status. Review of Resident #2's Physician's Orders dated October 2024 revealed there were no orders for Gastrostomy Care. Further review revealed an order for Colostomy Care, dated 09/19/2024, had no start date. Review of Resident #2's MAR dated October 2024 revealed no Gastrostomy Care and no Colostomy Care. On 10/11/2024 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7QAN. S7QAN reviewed Resident #2's current October 2024 Physician's Orders and October 2024 MAR, and confirmed there were no orders for Gastrostomy care or Colostomy care written after Resident #2 was readmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were properly labeled for 1 of 1 (#3) resident; and 2. Oxygen was administered at the ordered rate for 1 of 1 (#3) resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Dyspnea. Review of Resident #3's Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date: 07/01/2024: Oxygen at 2 Liters per nasal cannula. On 10/11/2024 at 9:45 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #3's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle which were not properly labeled with date of last changed. On 10/11/2024 at 10:03 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #3's oxygen tubing with S4LPN. S4LPN confirmed the oxygen tubing was not labeled with the date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 3 of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to ensure staff documented completed baths or showers in the Residents' record. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's current Clinical Record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's July 2024 Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday Shower Lists revealed no documentation of a completed bath or shower for the resident on 07/18/2024 and 07/20/2024. An interview was conducted on 07/31/2024 at 4:00 p.m. with S3CNA. S3CNA stated on 07/18/2024 and 07/20/2024 she was the shower aide for Resident #1. S3CNA stated on the aforementioned dates she completed a bath or shower for Resident #1 but did not document and should have. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's current Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions by failing to do the following: 1. Ensure food was properly labelled and stored in unit refrigerators; and 2. Ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 101 residents who were capable of storing and consuming food in the facility's unit refrigerators. Findings: 1. On 05/06/2024 at 3:25 p.m., a tour was conducted of Medication Storage Room A. An observation wad made of a sign posted to the front of the refrigerator stating, STOP- all items must be labeled and dated. Further observations revealed the following: Unit Refrigerator - 3- to-go boxes with no label and date; Unit Freezer - 1- frozen coffee drink with no label and date; and 1- frozen fast food ice cream with no label and date. On 05/07/2024 at 9:29 a.m., a tour was conducted of Medication Storage Room B. An observation was made of a sign posted to the front of the refrigerator stating, Before putting anything in this refrigerator make sure it's labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 101 residents who were capable of storing and consuming food in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policies revealed no policy on ensuring safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors. On 05/07/2024 at 11:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with R. [NAME], S2ADON. She stated the facility did not have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. On 05/07/2024 at 11:40 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She confirmed the facility did not have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and ensure waste was properly contained in the outdoor dumpster Findings: On 05/06/2024 at 8:40 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S5DM. An observation was made of the outside area immediately to the left of the entrance/exit door of the kitchen which revealed a pool of grey stagnant water containing loose trash and one deteriorating mop head. Further observation revealed one metal cooking pan filled with black water and spoiled food. S5DM verified the entryway was used for food deliveries and was unsanitary. On 05/06/2024 at 8:45 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S5DM. An observation of the area surrounding the facility's two dumpsters revealed multiple bedframes and mattresses. S5DM stated the bedframes and mattresses were trash and were waiting to be disposed of. he stated the trash company came once this week and did not pick up the bedframes and mattresses. On 05/06/2024 at 9:45 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM confirmed all of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 (#50, #54, and #78) of 22 sampled residents reviewed for MDS. Findings: Resident #50 Review of Resident #50's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #50 was diagnosed with Alzheimer's. Review of Resident #50's admission MDS with an ARD of 03/11/2024 revealed Alzheimer's was not coded as an active diagnosis in Section I. Resident #54 Review of Resident #54's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #54 was diagnosed with Depression. Review of Resident #54's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/29/2024 revealed Depression was not coded as an active diagnosis in Section I. Resident #78 Review of Resident #78's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed Resident #78 was diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the right to rescind the arbitration agreement within 30 calendar days for 3 (#50, #109, and #114) of 3 (#50, #109, and #114) residents reviewed for arbitration. Findings: Review of the facility's form titled Resident [NAME] of Rights on page 5 of 5 revealed an arbitration agreement was included in the admission packet. Further review revealed no documentation of the resident's right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days. Resident #50 Review of Resident #50's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #50's Clinical Record revealed a signed form titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights. Resident #109 Review of Resident #109's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #109's Clinical Record revealed a signed form titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights. Resident #114 Review of Resident #114's Clinical Record revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was referred for a PASARR Level II evaluation as required for 1 (#72) of 4 (#34, #49, #72, and #114) sampled residents records reviewed for PASARR Level II. Findings: Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #72 was diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type on 10/23/2023. An interview was conducted on 05/08/2024 at 2:50 p.m. with S6BOM. She stated she was responsible for submitting Resident Reviews for all residents in the facility. She confirmed Resident #72 acquired a new diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type on 10/23/2023. She stated a Resident Review for PASARR Level II was not submitted after Resident #72 received the new diagnosis. An interview was conducted on 05/08/2024 at 3:00 p.m. with S2DON. She confirmed a Resident Review for PASARR Level II should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 (#19 and #51) of 6 (#9, #12, #19, #34, #51 and #58) residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days. Findings: Resident #19 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Anxiety Disorders, Hallucinations and Senile Degeneration of the Brain. Review of Resident #19's active Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start Date: 04/29/2024 -Lorazepam 2mg/ml oral concentration, 0.25ml by mouth/sublingual every 4 hours PRN for anxiety/agitation until death for standard of hospice care. Further review revealed the order did not have a documented stop date. Resident #51 Review of Resident #51's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene after incontinent care for 1 (#101) of 1 (#101) residents observed for incontinent care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy revised on 08/2015 titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revealed, in part: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub . or alternatively, soap and water for the following situations: b. Before and after direct contact with residents. j. After contact with .bodily fluids. m. After removing gloves. 8. Hand hygiene is the final step after removing and disposing of personal protective equipment. 9. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene. Integration of glove use along with routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were unable to carry out ADLs, received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 (#1 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings: Resident #1 Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Unspecified Fracture of Second Lumbar Vertebra, Subsequent encounter for Fracture with Routine Healing, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, Unspecified Lack of Coordination, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Ankylosing Spondylitis Lumbar Region, Dementia in Other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities, Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee, and Legal Blindness. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with an ARD of 12/29/2023 revealed she had a BIMS of 1 indicating she was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed she required maximal assistance to complete the activity of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. The facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene and cleaning techniques during incontinence care for 2 (Resident #2, Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3 and R2) residents reviewed for incontinent care. Finding: A review of the policy labeled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revealed the following: Policy Statement: The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/ hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 7. Use an alcohol based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored in 2 (a and b) of 3 (a, b, and c) Medication Carts observed for medication storage. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications revealed in part, the following: 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage. 9. Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses' station or other secured location. Medication Cart a An observation was made on 04/24/2023 at 9:55 a.m. of Medication Cart a. One bottle of Lorazepam 2mg/mL for Resident #66 was observed in the narcotic lock box drawer of the medication cart. The Lorazepam bottle revealed a label which read Refrigerate. An interview was conducted on 04/24/2023 at 9:56 a.m. with S4LPN. S4LPN confirmed the bottle of Lorazepam's label read Refrigerate and should have been placed back into the refrigerator after each dose. She stated the bottle of Lorazepam for Resident #66 was in the medication cart for an unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions by failing to ensure food was properly stored in the refrigerator of the facility's kitchen. This had the potential to effect all residents served out of the kitchen. This had the potential to effect 95 residents served out of the kitchen. Review of the facility's policy entitled Preventing Foodborne Illness-Food Handling revealed in part, the following: Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. 1. This facility recognizes that the critical factors implicated in foodborne illness are: d. Unsafe food sources. Observations were made on 04/24/2023 at 9:20 a.m. of the facility's walk-in cooler with S8DM. The following observations were made: 1. 1 opened ten pound box of unsealed smoked ham located on the 4th shelf, directly above a box of sliced cheese and a crate of skim milk. 2. 1 opened twelve pound box of unsealed roast beef located on the 4th shelf, directly above a box of dinner rolls and a crate of skim milk. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding the resident's code status consistently reflected the resident's wishes for 1 (#66) of 32 residents reviewed in the initial screening for advanced directives. Findings: Review of Resident #66's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of the Significant Change MDS with an ARD of [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was unable to complete the BIMS due to an inability to be interviewed. Review of Resident #66's [DATE] Physician Orders revealed: [DATE] Code Status: CPR [DATE] Admit to hospice Diagnosis: CVA; DNR Code Status Review of Resident #66's Advance Directive dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: 4. Does the resident have a DNR (no code)? Box checked: No 5. Do you have a LaPost? Box checked: No Document signed by Resident #66's Health Care Representative on [DATE]. Review of Resident #66's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. The facility failed to ensure 1 (#66) of 4 (#14, #48, #66 and #82) residents reviewed for resident assessment had an accurate MDS (Minimum Data Set) that reflected the resident's active treatment of hospice. Findings: A review of Resident #66's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of the Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 04/10/2023 revealed Resident #66 was unable to complete the BIMS due to an inability to be interviewed. Further review of Resident #66's MDS revealed the following: Section O-Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs K. Hospice care: Unchecked A review of Resident #66's Physician Orders dated April 2023 revealed the following, in part: 04/06/2023-Admit to hospice Diagnosis: CVA (Cerebral Vascular Accident); DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (#51) of 4 (#15, #46, #50 and #51) residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #51 was weighed on a monthly basis as ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of the facility's Weight Management Policy revealed, in part: 2. New admits and readmits will be weighed for the first four weeks to establish baseline weights, after which they will be placed on the monthly weight schedule, if there is not a significant weight loss or gain. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis, in part: Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of the Care plan for Resident #51 revealed the following, in part: Problem onset 10/02/2022: I am at risk for altered nutrition. I will be free from significant weight loss/gain. Interventions: Monitor my weights per MD (Medical Doctor) orders. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days and indicate the duration for PRN orders for 2 (#66 and #82) of 6 (#11, #12, #15, #60, #66 and #82) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use revealed the following: Policy Statement: Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. 12. Psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given on a PRN basis unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosis specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. a. PRN orders psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. (1) For psychotropic medications that are not antipsychotics: If the prescriber or attending physician believes it is appropriate to extend the PRN order beyond 14 days, he or she will document the rationale for extending the use and include the duration for the PRN order.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices by failing to ensure staff appropriately changed gloves and performed hand hygiene for 1 (#108) of 2 (#30 and #108) residents reviewed in the final sample for incontinence care. Findings: Review of the Clinical Record for Resident #108 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Pressure Ulcer of Left Buttocks-Stage 4, Difficulty Walking, Diarrhea, Ulcerative Colitis, and Chronic Cystitis Without Hematuria. Review of the Admit MDS with an ARD of 03/28/2023 revealed Resident #108 had a BIMS of 6, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed Resident #108 was always incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling catheter. On 04/27/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an observation/interview was conducted with S1LPN performing incontinence care for Resident # 108. S1LPN washed her hands with soap and water, then applied gloves. S1LPN then set up a basin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-13 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Post the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of pertinent state agencies and advocacy groups, such as the State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit; and 2. Post a statement for how a resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation for all required postings reviewed. This deficient practice had to the potential to affect all 109 residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 06/09/2025 at 8:10 a.m., an initial tour of the facility was conducted. A list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, such as the State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit was not observed to be posted in the facility. Further observation revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-08 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all complaint surveys since the last annual survey were available for resident review. Findings: An observation was made on 05/06/2024 at 8:35 a.m. of the facility's binder Survey results located near the entrance of the facility. Review of the survey results binder revealed the last survey posted in the binder was dated 04/27/2023. Further review revealed no documented evidence of the survey results from complaint surveys dated 08/24/2023, 08/30/2023, 11/15/2023, and 02/15/2024 having been available for review. Review of the documents included in this binder revealed the annual recertification survey results dated 04/27/2023. No other survey results were available for resident viewing. An interview was conducted on 05/06/2024 at 8:40 a.m. with S1ADM. She reviewed the facility's binder Survey results. She confirmed the only survey results located in the binder was the annual recertification survey dated 04/27/2023. She confirmed the complaint surveys since the annual recertification survey should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-05-08 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data, including resident census, and total number and actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff, was posted in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 110 residents residing in the facility. Findings: An observation was made on 05/06/2024 at 8:30 a.m. of the staffing data sheet dated 05/06/2024. Further review revealed no documentation of the resident census, no total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, and certified nurse aides. An observation was made on 05/07/2024 at 8:30 a.m. of the staffing data sheet dated 05/07/2024. Further review revealed no documentation of the resident census, no total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, and certified nurse aides. An interview was conducted on 05/07/2024 at 11:00 a.m. with S1ADM. She reviewed the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$105,898 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $105,898 — penalty dated 2025-06-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PONTCHARTRAIN GUEST HOUSE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/16/1990
GOUX, LYNETTEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF48%since 07/13/1990
GOUX, JEREMYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2012
GOUX, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2012
INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
LAURENT, MERRILLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1999
LAVARINE, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2020
LEACH, MARY LYNNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/08/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 6%Other / private 17%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$261per resident / day
operating cost
$7,947per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$280per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195297. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next