No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Twin Oaks Nursing Home

506 West 5th Street, Laplace, LA 70068 · For profit - Corporation · 148 certified beds · (985) 652-9538 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (985) 652-9538 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
113 Belle Terre Blvd · (985) 359-2273 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
932 Carrollwood Dr · (985) 652-1245 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Cashsaver0.2 mi
1709 W Airline Hwy · (985) 652-9523 · Call to confirm hours
Park
398 Greenwood Dr · (985) 652-9569 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.9%17.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%2.3%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.9%17.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%94.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.6%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.0%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.9%76.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.2%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.102.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.662.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.6–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
45.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 80.5 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-13)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source with serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency within two (2) hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents sampled for quality of care and treatment.Findings:Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Funds Program policy and procedure, revealed, if the determination is that abuse occurred or was unable to be determined with reasonable certainty, or the source of the injury was unknown and cannot be determined, the incident will be reported by the Administrator to the Department of Health and Hospitals through the States Incident Management System.Review of the facility's State Incident Management System report #316731 revealed, in part, an incident was reported to the State Survey Agency on 12/16/2025 at 4:15PM revealing Resident #1 experienced an injury of unknown origin and had bruising to his left shoulder, which was reported by Resident #1 the week prior to 12/16/2025.Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was maintained free of odors, soiled linens, a spill, and debris for 1 (Resident #56) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #12, Resident #45, Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #83, Resident #89) sampled residents investigated for environment. Findings: Observation on 08/11/2025 at 9:26AM, revealed Resident #56's room had a strong unpleasant odor. Observation further revealed linens with an odor were piled on Resident #56's roommate's bed. Further observation of Resident #56's room revealed a small puddle of an unknown liquid by the door, small pieces of paper, a straw, and other small white colored debris scattered on the floor. In an interview on 08/11/2025 at 9:31AM, S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed the presence of a strong urine odor, soiled linen on Resident #56's roommate's bed, trash and debris on the floor, and a spill by the door. In an interview on 08/13/2025 at 1:42PM, S2Director of Nursing stated S7CNA confirmed the above findings in Resident #56's room. S2DON acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory nebulizer tubing was changed and dated 1 (Resident #22) of 8(Resident #1, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #15, Resident #22, Resident #49, Resident #56 and Resident #89) sampled residents investigated for respiratory care. Findings:Review of Resident #22's July 2025 and August 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, the nurse was to change and date all respiratory tubing/supplies/storage bag every Sunday on the 11:00PM to 7:00AM shift. Observation on 08/11/2025 at 9:58AM revealed Resident #22's nebulizer tubing was dated 07/07/2025. Observation on 08/12/2025 at 2:45PM revealed Resident #22's nebulizer tubing was dated 07/07/2025.In an interview on 08/13/2025 at 1:09PM, S18Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated nebulizer tubing should be changed every week on Sunday. In an interview on 08/13/2025 at 1:11PM, S17LPN indicated nebulizer tubing should be changed every week on Sunday night. Observation on 08/13/2025 at 1:17PM Resident #22's nebulizer tubing was dated 07/07/2025. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to ensure menu substitutions were approved by the facility's dietician. Findings:Review of the facility's approved lunch menu for 08/11/2025 revealed, in part, the facility was to serve white beans, ham, steamed rice, and brussel sprouts.Observation on 08/11/2025 at 12:05PM revealed the lunch menu served was white beans, rice, and beets.In an interview on 08/12/2025 at 10:45AM, S12Dietary Manager (DM) indicated she did not document the substitution of beets for the 08/11/2025, nor had she notified S19RD for approval of the substitution. In an interview on 08/12/2025 at 2:47PM, S1Administrator indicated the before menu revision should have been documented, and S19Registered Dietician (RD) should have been notified of the above mentioned menu change.In an interview on 08/12/2025 at 3:47PM, S19RD indicated the facility had not notified him of the above mentioned substitution. There was no documented evidence, and the facility could not produce any documented evidence, S19RD was notified of the revision to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to:1. Ensure food items stored in the facility's three door refrigerator and the facility's freezer were dated once opened; 2. Ensure food items stored in the facility's three door refrigerator were covered; 3. Ensure food items from an outside source which were stored in the facility's freezer were labeled; and, 4. Ensure the sanitization test strips used to test the amount of sanitization in the dishwasher were not expired. Findings: 1. Observation on 08/12/2025 at 8:20AM revealed three undated disposable bowls with round multi colored dry cereal, and one undated disposable bowl of dry corn cereal in the facility's three door refrigerator. In an interview on 08/12/2025 at 8:30AM, S12Dietary Manager (DM) indicated the above mentioned items in the facility's three door refrigerator should have been labeled with an opened date. Observation on 08/12/2025 at 9:10AM revealed an undated partially used container of frozen chicken liver in the facility's freezer. In an interview on 08/11/2025 at 9:10AM, S12DM indicated the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. Staff wore the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while moving a mattress in the room of a resident on contact isolation precautions (an infection control strategy that uses gloves and gowns to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms) (Resident #90); and,2. Staff wore the appropriate PPE while providing care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control strategy that uses gloves and gowns during high-contact resident care to reduce the spread of infection) (Resident #4).This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #4, Resident #90) of 5 (Resident #4, Resident #62, Resident #76, Resident #82, Resident #90) sampled residents observed for infection control practices during direct resident care.Findings:1. Review of the facility's Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based policy and procedure, revised on 09/2022, revealed in part, staff members should wear gloves when entering the room of a resident on contact isolation precautions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman of discharges in writing for 2 (Resident #3, Resident R1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident R1) sampled residents reviewed for discharge requirements. Findings: Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR), in part, revealed he was discharged from the facility on 03/05/2025. Resident R1 Review of Resident R1's EMR, in part, revealed she was discharged from the facility on 01/11/2025. The facility did not present any documented evidence the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of Resident #3 or Resident R1's discharge in writing as required.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure its facility-wide assessment addressed the behavioral health needs of its resident population as required . This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) of 2 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health needs. Findings : Review of the facility's matrix revealed 42 residents were identified as having behavioral health needs Review of the facility's September 2024 facility-wide assessment last revised September 2024 revealed no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence its facility wide assessment addressed the behavioral health needs of its resident population, staff competencies related to the behavioral health needs of its resident population, or facility resources necessary to care for the behavioral health needs of its resident population. In an interview on 04/30/2025 at 4:15PM, S1Administrator confirmed the above mentioned findings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Funds Program policy revealed, in part, abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury which resulted in physical harm or pain. Further review revealed physical abuse way defined as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking and any other means used to cause physical injury to a resident. Review of Resident #4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, a note by S4Registered Nurse (RN) dated 11/07/2024 at 10:42AM indicating Resident #4 was complaining of pain to his right upper lip after he was hit by another resident. Further review revealed when S4RN assessed Resident #4 and noted that Resident #4's right upper lip was swollen. Review of the facility's investigative documents for the above mentioned revealed a written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview record and reviews, the facility failed to report an incident of resident to resident abuse to the statewide incident management system (SIMS) as required for 2 (Resident #2, Resident #4) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Funds Program policy revealed, in part, abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury with resulting physical harm or pain. Further review revealed physical abuse is defined as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking and any other means used to cause physical injury to a resident. Further review revealed if the determination was that abuse occurred or was unable to determine with reasonable certainty, or the injury was unknown and cannot be determine, the incident will be reported by the administrator to the state surveying agency. Review of Resident #4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part, a nurse's note by S4Registered Nurse (RN) dated 11/07/2024 at 10:42AM indicating Resident #4 was complaining of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mood disorder that can cause intense mood swings) was referred to the appropriate state agency for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, in part, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Level I PASARR which was approved for a temporary period from 01/22/2024 through 04/20/2024 for skilled therapies. Further review revealed Resident #3 received another Level I PASARR screening dated 04/21/2024 indicating Level II services were not required. Review of Resident #3's psychiatric assessment completed on 02/07/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #3 received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #3's EMR revealed no documented evidence, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for neglect. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy for Prohibition of Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property revised on 08/05/2024 revealed, in part, the facility will have evidence of a thorough investigation of all alleged violations. Review of the facility's records revealed a report dated 08/21/2024 revealed, in part, in which the allegation of neglect was reported and investigated for Resident #1. Further review revealed Resident #1 was sent to the hospital due to a drop in blood pressure on 08/21/2024. In the emergency room Resident #1 was found to have gauze and an empty ketchup packet lodged in the back of his throat. Further review of the report revealed the lunch meal on 08/21/2024 included French fries served with ketchup. Further review revealed the camera footage was reviewed by the facility and the footage showed multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for 2 (Resident #28 and Resident #40) of 6 (Resident #24, Resident #28, Resident #40, Resident #47, Resident #61, and Resident #78) sampled residents investigated for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings: Resident #28 Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia affecting the right side. Review of Resident #28's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/16/2024 revealed she had impairment on one side of her upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident #28's Care Plan revealed Resident #28 required assistance with ADLs with a goal to be kept clean, dry and well-groomed. Observation on 08/06/2024 at 2:20 p.m. revealed Resident #28's toe nails extended past the tips of her toes. Observation on 08/07/2024 at 9:40 a.m. with S13Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and S6MedRecords/CNA Supervisor revealed Resident #28's bilateral toe nails and bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for 1 (Resident #3) of 1 resident (Resident #3) receiving respiratory care by nasal cannula. Findings: Observation on 08/05/2024 at 9:40 a.m. revealed Resident #3 received oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) by nasal cannula. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 04/29/2024 revealed, in part, a brief interview mental status of 13 which indicated cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's Physician Orders dated August 2024 revealed, in part, no orders for oxygen per nasal cannula. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revealed, in part, most current target date listed for problems identified was dated 10/01/2024. Further review of the care plan revealed no plan of care was developed for oxygen care by nasal cannula. Observation on 08/06/2024 at 11:40 a.m. revealed Resident #3's received oxygen at 4 LPM per NC. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 11:58 a.m., S10Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated Resident #3 received oxygen at 2 LPM by NC.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff signed a verification of an accurate medication count at the beginning and end of each shift for 2 [Medication Cart (a) and Medication Cart (b)] of 2 [Medication Cart (a) and Medication Cart (b)] Medication Carts (Med Cart) observed and reviewed for accurate dispensation of controlled medications. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Controlled Substances Policy revealed, in part, the nursing staff must count controlled drugs at the end of the shift with the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty. Further review revealed the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. Further review revealed the nursing staff must document and report any discrepancies to the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee immediately. Review of Med Cart (a)'s controlled substance binder dated 05/31/2024 to 08/07/2024 revealed, in part, no documentation of signatures of the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty on the following dates and shifts: 06/03/2024 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect client confidentiality for 1 resident (Resident #8) of 32 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #8, Resident #11, Resident #15, Resident #25, Resident #21, Resident #24, Resident #28, Resident #29, Resident #40, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #53, Resident #54, Resident #56, Resident #57, Resident #60, Resident #6, Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #70, Resident #73, Resident #78, Resident #80, Resident #88, Resident #86, Resident #87, Resident #89, Resident #340, Resident #34, and Resident #342). Findings: Observation on 08/06/2024 at 11:02 a.m. revealed Resident #8's closed exterior side of the door facing the hallway revealed written sign titled, Appointment Sheet. Further observation revealed, in part, Resident #8's written name with Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday goes to dialysis with a pick up time of 5:30 a.m. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 12:15 p.m., S10Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), after reading Resident #8's sign on exterior side of the door that was facing the hallway,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed correctly for 1 (Resident #56) of 1 (Resident #56) residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part, of Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, and Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #56's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/23/2024, revealed, in part, diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, and Schizophrenia. Further review revealed Resident #56 received antipsychotics on a daily basis. Review of Resident #56's record revealed a Level- 1 PASARR completed on 10/21/2021. Further review revealed Section 3: Mental Illness was marked yes. Further review revealed a referral was not made to appropriate state designated authority for Level II PASARR evaluation and determination. In an interview on 08/07/2024 at 2:05 p.m., S3Social Services indicated Resident #56's Level-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred for dental services for 1 (Resident #25) of 3 (Resident #25, Resident #68, and Resident #21) sampled residents reviewed for dental services. Findings: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #25's care plan with a goal date of 08/21/2024 revealed, in part, the potential for dental issues. Further review revealed care plan approaches to include arranging for dental appointments and periodic dental visits. Review of Resident #25's records revealed, in part, no documented evidence, and the provider could not provide any documented evidence, Resident #25 was evaluated for dental services. Review of Facility's resident dental treatment schedule dated 08/19/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #25 was not listed on the schedule for dental services. Observation on 08/05/2024 at 9:57 a.m. revealed Resident #25 did not have any upper teeth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure: 1. Ensure clean items in the facility's laundry room were not kept in the contaminated laundry area, and 2. Ensure staff wore proper protective equipment and performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for 1 (Resident #24) of 6 (Resident #24, Resident #28, Resident #40, Resident #47, Resident #61, and Resident #78) residents investigated for activities of daily living. Findings: 1. Observation on 08/05/2024 at 9:15 a.m. revealed the facility's clean mop heads were hung on wall hooks directly over soiled linen barrels in the facility's contaminated laundry area. Observation on 08/06/2024 at 10:52 a.m. revealed 15 of the facility's clean mop heads were hung on wall hooks in the facility's contaminated laundry area. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 10:52 a.m., S2Laundry Supervisor confirmed the facility's clean mop heads were stored on the wall of the contaminated area of the facility's laundry room. In an interview on 08/06/2024 at 10:53 a.m., S1Administrator confirmed the facility's clean mop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal and physical abuse was reported to the required state survey agency for 1 (Resident #1) of the 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Policy for Prohibition of Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property with a revision date of 09/26/2017 revealed, in part, all alleged violations and all substantiated incidents should be reported to the required state agency, and any employee who becomes aware of an allegation of abuse should report the incident to a supervisor, Director of Nursing, or Administrator immediately. Further review of the policy revealed the facility will report all allegations of abuse to the state agency. Review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed, in part, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of physical abuse for 1(Resident #1) of the 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Policy for Prohibition of Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property with a revision date of 09/26/2017 revealed, in part, the facility will thoroughly investigate all alleged violations of abuse and take appropriate actions. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Emergency Certificate (PEC) dated 06/03/2024 revealed Resident #1 alleged claimed S1Administrator pushed her. Review of the police report document case with a disposition/completion date and time of 06/04/2024 at 1:41 p.m. revealed, in part, Resident #1 stated S1Administrator pushed her. There was no documented evidence, and the facility did not present any documented evidence Resident #1's allegation of abuse by S2Administrator was investigated. In an interview on 06/25/2024 at 1:42 p.m., S1Administrator stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a training program for 1 (S1Administrator) of 6 (S1Administrator, S6Sunshine Aide, S7Social Services, S8Cerified Nursing Assistant [CNA], S9CNA, and S10CNA) sampled personnel files reviewed for training. Findings: Review of S1Administrator's Personnel File revealed a date of hire of 07/22/2015. Further review revealed, no documented evidence and the facility presented no documented evidence, S1Administrator received training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, behavioral health training, ethics training, and resident rights. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 3:05 p.m., S2Regional Administrator indicated the facility did not have documented evidence S1Administrator had received trainings for QAPI, behavioral health, ethics, abuse, and resident rights.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by other residents. This deficient practice was identified for 6 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) reviewed for abuse. Findings: Resident #4 Review of facility documents related to an incident dated 03/17/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #3 struck Resident #4 in the face in the facility dining room. In an interview on 05/01/2024 at 10:30 a.m., S4Food and Nutrition Manager stated she witnessed Resident #3 approach Resident #4, who had his eyeglasses on and was sitting in his wheelchair. Resident #3 then stated that was her glasses. Resident #3 removed Resident #4's eyeglasses and pulled her hand back and struck Resident #4 in the face. In an interview on 05/02/2024 at 11:26 a.m., S1Administrator stated she reviewed the facility video tape of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was: 1. Reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #10) of 10 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) sampled residents reviewed for abuse; and, 2. Reported timely to the State Survey Agency for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #9) of 9 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #9) sampled residents reviewed for timeliness of reporting of abuse allegations. Findings: #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record reveal, in part, a nurse's note dated 04/01/2024 documenting Resident #1 verbally threatened Resident #10 by shouting I'm gonna kill you if you don't shut up! Review of Morning Leadership Meeting minutes dated 04/01/2024 revealed an incident of Resident #1 yelling at Resident #10 and had been discussed by the leadership team. In an interview on 05/01/2024 2:51 p.m., S1Administrator indicated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of verbal abuse between 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #10) of 10 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fractured left femur, pressure ulcer of right heel, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, cerebral infarction, depression, left BKA, lack of coordination/muscle weakness, repeated falls. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 04/17/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1's cognition was moderately impaired. Further review revealed Resident #1 did not have physical or verbal symptoms directed toward others. Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included closed skull fracture,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of a significant change of condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the policy: Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revealed in part, the following Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Review of Resident #1's record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux with Esophagitis with Bleed and Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage unspecified. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/30/2023 revealed, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #1 needed extensive assistance by two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications per a physician's order for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) resident's records reviewed. Findings: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's December 2023's physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 12/11/2023 to administer Levofloxacin (a medication used to treat infections) 750 milligrams (mgs) daily for 14 days, was discontinued on 12/20/2023. Further reviewed revealed an order dated 12/21/2023 to administer Levofloxacin 750 mgs daily for 14 days, was discontinued on 12/22/2023. Further review revealed, an order dated 12/27/2023 to administer Clonidine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 0.1 mg as needed for blood pressure reading greater than 170/90. Review of Resident #2's December 2023 electronic medication administration record (eMAR) revealed, in part, Resident #2 was administered Levofloxacin 750 mg daily from 12/12/2023 to 12/22/2023 for a total of 11 days. Further review revealed Resident #2 had a blood pressure (B/P) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have accurate orders and nursing notes for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) resident's records reviewed for accuracy. Findings: Review of Resident #3's January 2024 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 01/03/2024 for Glucerna 1.5 calorie 10 milliliters (ml) per hour with goal of 55ml per hour. Further review revealed an order dated 01/03/2024 for Glucerna 1.5 calorie 20 milliliters ml per hour. Further review revealed an order dated 01/03/2024 for Glucerna 1.5 calorie 30 milliliters ml per hour. Further review revealed an order dated 01/03/2024 for Glucerna 1.5 calories 40 ml per hour. Review of Resident #3's progress notes dated 01/04/2024 at 5:31 a.m. for a late entry on 01/03/2023 at 7:00 a.m. revealed, in part, S3RN (Registered Nurse) received a clarification order from S6Nurse Practitioner (NP) to increase Resident #3's enteral feedings every 1-2 hours by 10 ml increments, or as tolerated, up to a goal of 55 ml per hour. Further review revealed S3RN increased the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to allow residents access to their personal funds for 1 (Resident #29) of 4 (Resident #4, Resident #29, Resident #44, and Resident #69) sampled residents investigated for personal funds. Findings: In an interview on 10/30/2023 at 10:34 a.m., Resident #29 stated she had money held in an account by the facility; however, she can only get her money at a certain time on Mondays through Fridays. Observation on 11/01/2023 at 10:45 a.m. of S3Business Office Manager's (BOM) office door revealed signage which revealed, Banking hours Monday - Friday 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. In an interview on 11/01/2023 at 10:50 a.m., S3BOM confirmed Resident #29 participated in the facility's resident trust fund. S3BOM stated approximately a month ago, S1Administrator implemented banking hours from 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. S1BOM further stated when she was not in the facility and on the weekends there was no system to ensure the residents could access money from their trust fund. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status matched and was maintained throughout the clinical record for 1 (Resident #44) of 16 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #13, Resident #18, Resident #19, Resident #25, Resident #29, Resident #38, Resident #44, Resident #53, Resident #57, Resident #58, Resident #59, Resident #69, and Resident #81) residents reviewed for code status. Findings: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #44's [DATE] physician orders revealed, in part an order dated [DATE] the read Resident #44's code status was full code. Review of Resident #44's Louisiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (LaPOST) dated [DATE] revealed, in part, Resident #44 desired to have a code status of do not resuscitate (DNR). Review of Resident #44's comprehensive care plan revealed, in part, Resident #44's code status was full code. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan and administer a resident's insulin per physician's order for 1 (Resident #11) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #13, Resident #53, Resident #57, and Resident #58) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #11's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed, in part, Resident #11 was care planned for the potential of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) related to Diabetes with an intervention to have insulin administered as ordered. Review of Resident #11's October 2023 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order dated 06/29/2023 for Novolog (a medication used to lower blood sugar levels) 100 units per milliliters (units/mL) subcutaneously (injection under the skin) sliding scale for a blood glucose of 0-60 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) administer 0 units and give orange juice or milk; for a blood glucose of 61-200 mg/dL administer 0 units; for a blood glucose of 201-250 mg/dL administer 2 units; for a blood glucose of 251-300…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident with a history of falls received increased supervision to prevent further falls for 1 (Resident #59) of 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #59) sampled residents reviewed for falls; and 2. Ensure a resident with a known history of unsafe smoking in his room did not have smoking materials in his possession for 1 (Resident #25) of 6 (Resident #6 and Resident #25) sampled residents reviewed for safe smoking. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/28/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #59 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0, which indicated Resident #59 had a severe cognitive impairment. Review also revealed Resident #59 required maximal assist for transfers. Review of Resident #59's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in part, Resident #59 was assessed as being at high risk for falls. Further review revealed Resident #59 had intermittent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident's physician's order for dialysis was accurate for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 (Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for dialysis services; and, 2. Maintain ongoing communication regarding a resident's condition with the dialysis facility for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 (Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for dialysis services. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #13's Dialysis Care Plan revealed, in part, an intervention for Resident #13 to attend dialysis per the physician's order. Review of Resident #13's October 2023 Physician's Order's revealed, in part, an order with a start date of 03/27/2023 for Resident #13 to attend dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays at Dialysis Center A. In an interview on 11/02/2023 at 11:30 a.m., S8Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated Resident #13 attended Dialysis Center B. S8LPN confirmed Resident #13's dialysis location in the October 2023 Physician's Order with a start date of 03/27/2023 was incorrect. In an interview on 11/02/2023 at 12:35 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring for the use of anticoagulant medication was completed for 1 (Resident #53) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #13, Resident #53, Resident #57, and Resident #58) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of Resident #53's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/29/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #53 received anticoagulant medication (a medication to prevent blood clots) 7 days of the 7 day look back period. Review of Resident #53's physician's orders dated August 2023, September 2023, and October 2023 revealed, in part, an order with a start date of 06/28/2023 for Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) 5 milligrams by mouth twice daily. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence of a side effect monitoring for Resident #53's anticoagulant use. Review of Resident #53's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated August 2023, September 2023, and October 2023 revealed, in part, no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the nurse performed hand hygiene during insulin (a medication used to lower blood sugar) administration for 3 (Resident #9, Resident #53, and Resident #286) of 3 (Resident #9, Resident #53, and Resident #286) residents observed for glucose monitoring and insulin administration; and 2. Ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performed hand hygiene while passing ice to 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #8, Resident #26, Resident #50, Resident #66, Resident #67, and Resident #286) of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #8, Resident #26, Resident #50, Resident #66, Resident #67, and Resident #286) observed for hand hygiene while passing ice. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy revealed, in part, hand hygiene should be performed before and after preparing or handling medications. Further review revealed staff were to perform hand hygiene before applying non-sterile gloves. Observation on 10/31/2023 at 11:55 a.m. revealed S5Treatment Nurse entered Resident #286's room, applied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had access to the air conditioner thermostat controls in order to set the temperature in her room per her preference for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 (Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for environment. Findings: Review of Resident #13's face sheet revealed, in part, Resident #13 had diagnoses including end stage renal disease and anemia. Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/29/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, which indicated Resident #13 was moderately, cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #13 weighed 85 pounds. Review of Resident #13's Resident [NAME] of Rights revealed, in part, each resident has the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of an individual's needs and preferences, except when the health or safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. Observation on 10/30/2023 at 10:10 a.m. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed ensure necessary supervision was provided to ensure a resident did not verbally and physically abuse another resident for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 (Resident #19) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property revealed, in part, residents had the right to be free from abuse. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 09/05/2023 at 11:00 a.m. revealed, in part, Resident #19 hit another resident. Review of Resident #19's care plan for Resident #19 exhibiting behaviors and hit another resident with a target date of 12/14/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #19 was told to keep hands to self. In an interview on 11/01/2023 at 2:32 p.m., S11Dietary Manager stated on 09/05/2023 Resident #15 ambulated in her wheelchair next to Resident #19, who was sitting in her gerichair in the dining room. Resident #19 attempted to hit Resident #15 in the back, missed, then swung again and hit Resident #15 in the back.S11Dietary Manager further stated Resident #19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse and verbal abuse was reported to the state survey agency within 2 hours of the allegation for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 (Resident #19) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property revealed, in part, all alleged violations involving abuse should be reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with state law. Review of the facility Incident Report dated 09/05/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #19 hit another resident in the back. Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/01/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, which indicated Resident #19 had moderate cognitive impairment. In an interview on 11/01/2023 at 2:32 p.m., S11Dietary Manager stated on 09/05/2023 Resident #15 ambulated in her wheelchair next to Resident #19, who was sitting in her gerichair in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, failed to ensure an allegation of resident to resident physical abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 (Resident #19) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy for Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property revealed, in part, the facility should have had evidence of thoroughly investigating an incident of alleged physical abuse. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 09/05/2023 at 11:00 a.m. revealed, in part, Resident #19 hit another resident. Review of Resident #19's care plan for Resident #19 exhibiting behaviors and hit another resident with a target date of 12/14/2023 revealed, in part, Resident #19 was told to keep hands to self. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence that an investigation was conducted after the above mentioned incident. In an interview on 11/01/2023 at 2:32 p.m., S11Dietary Manager stated on 09/05/2023 Resident #15 ambulating in her wheelchair next to Resident #19, who was sitting in her gerichair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure only licensed personnel administered medications for 1 (Resident #43) of 1 (Resident #43) sampled residents observed for medicated cream administration in a total sample of 18. Findings: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a pressure ulcer of the buttock. In an interview on 10/31/2023 at 9:27 a.m., S9Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she used cream on Resident #43's buttocks as needed. S9CNA presented the surveyor with two tubes of creams she used on Resident #43 buttocks. Observation revealed a tube of Miconazole Nitrate 2% cream (an antifungal ointment) and a tube of silicone cream (a moisture barrier). S9CNA further stated she used both creams and asked the wound care nurse which cream should be used. In an interview on 11/02/2023 at 9:37 a.m., S5Treatment Nurse stated the CNAs were allowed to apply silicone cream as a moisture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure: 1. Maintain accurate reconciliation records of controlled medication for 2 (Medication Cart b and Medication Cart c) of 3 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, and Medication Cart c) medication carts observed; 2. Maintain accurate reconciliation records of controlled medication for 5 (Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #R6, Resident #R7, and Resident #R8) residents who received controlled medication; and 3. Medication records were accurately documented for 3 (Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: 1. Observation on 08/22/2023 at 1:05 p.m. revealed Medication Cart c did not have two signatures for the Schedule Drug Count on 08/01/2023 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. shift, 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift, and 11:00 to 7:00 p.m. shift; on 08/02/2023 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. shift; 08/03/2023 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. shift and 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift; on 08/05/2023 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. shift; on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident's medications were not left unattended on top of the medication cart for 1 (Medication Cart a) of 3 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, and Medication Cart c) medication carts observed, and 2. Medication Carts were locked when unattended for 1 (Medication Cart b) of 3 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, and Medication Cart c) medication carts observed. Findings: 1. Observation on 08/22/2023 at 8:50 a.m. revealed Fluoxetine (medication to treat depression) 20 milligram (mg) capsule card, Divaloproex Sodium (medication used to treat seizures) 250 mg tablet card, Potassium Chloride Extended Release (medication used to replace potassium) 10 milliequivalent (meq) tablet card, Furosemide (medication used to treat edema) 40 mg tablet card, and Cyproheptadine (medication used to treat allergy symptoms) 4 mg tablet card was left on the top Medication Cart a unattended. In an interview on 08/22/2023 at 8:55 a.m., S8Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) acknowledged she left Fluoxetine 20 mg capsule card, Divaloproex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TWIN OAKS NURSING HOME INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/13/1973
BURCH, FELIXIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 06/22/2020
BURCH, GUY S.Individual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 01/21/2021
BURCH, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 06/22/2020
BURCH, PAULAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 06/22/2020
BURCH, RENEEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 06/22/2020
KERL, ELISEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 06/22/2020
GOUX, JEREMYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2021
GOUX, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2012
INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
BAILEY, COLINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/1983
CONNOR, KARENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2015
LEACH, MARY LYNNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/08/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$293K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 1%Other / private 16%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $293K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$278per resident / day
operating cost
$8,465per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$272per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195303. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next