Savoy Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 80.1 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.11 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.11 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities based on comprehensive assessments, care plans and preferences for 3 (Resident #15, Resident #43, and Resident #70) of 33 sampled residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 83 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Activities , read in part . The facility will provide an ongoing program of actives that support the interest and enhances the quality of life of each resident. Activities will be individualized based in resident assessments, preferences, and functional abilities. Procedure: 3. Implementations:Activities will be scheduled daily, including afternoon and weekendsPrograms will include group and individual activitiesResidents will be encouraged but not forced to participate Review of the facility's March 2026 activities calendar revealed the following scheduled activities in part . 03/23/2026 - 9:00 a.m. Coffee &…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete and accurate by failing to ensure administration of narcotics were properly documented on the narcotic record for 2 (Cart A & Cart B) of 2 medication carts reviewed during the medication storage facility task. Findings:Review of the Controlled Substances facility policy dated 01/15/2026 revealed the following in part: Policy Statement: The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Scheduled II and other controlled substances. 7. The charge nurse who administers the prescribed narcotic will immediately document it on the medication administration record and the controlled drug administration record.Medication Carts A and B were observed and narcotics were counted and compared to narcotic records for both carts with S5 LPN present on 03/25/2026 at 2:15 p.m. The following discrepancies were found:Record Review revealed Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 (Resident #59 & Resident #60) of 33 sampled residents, by failing to:1. Promote resident dignity by providing a bedpan per the resident request for Resident #60.2. Promote resident dignity by providing disposable dishware for Resident #59 in the dining room. Findings: Resident #60 Record review of facility policy Resident Rights reads in part . 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. a dignified existence. On 03/25/2026 at 8:59 a.m. observation revealed Resident #60 lying in bed requesting bed pan. Surveyor assisted resident with pressing call light, per resident request. S6 CNA entered room shortly and stated resident has on a diaper and is not able to get up at this time due to left side weakness due to stroke; S6 CNA said she can go in her diaper. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a reasonable accommodation of their needs by failing to ensure the call light was accessible to a resident for 1 (Resident #3) of 33 sampled residents.Review of a facility policy dated 01/16/2026, titled Answering the Call Light revealed in part. The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the residents needs and request. 5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy each of the resident.Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/07/2023, with diagnoses that included, in part, Moneural Disorder, Paraplegia, Epilepsy, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS with an ARD 03/03/2026 revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident required set up assistance with eating, dependent for toileting hygiene and personal hygiene, and required substantial/maximal assistance to roll left to right.An observation on 03/24/2026 at 10:12 a.m. revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the person-centered care plan was implemented for 1 (Resident #84) of 33 sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #84's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 10/06/2023 with diagnoses which included: Dementia, Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, Polyneuropathy, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Repeated Falls, and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Review of Resident #84's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/25/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 6, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #84 required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers. Review of a task in Resident #84's electronic medical record, initiated on 02/15/2026, revealed Resident #84 required transfer using a Hoyer lift with two-person assist. Review of Resident #84's comprehensive care plan dated 02/04/2026 revealed Resident #84 required transfer using a Hoyer lift with two-person assist. On 03/23/2026 at 1:35 p.m., observation of S12CNA and S13CNA revealed staff exited Resident #84's room without a Hoyer lift. Interview with S12CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care was reviewed and revised to include nursing interventions implemented for a client with behaviors that required increased supervision and monitoring of behaviors for 1 resident (Resident #61) of 33 sampled residents. Findings:Review of the facility's revised policy dated March 2022 titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered read in part. Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/15/2025 with diagnoses that include Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity with other Behavioral Disturbances, Insomnia, Depression, Alcohol Abuse, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered by a physician to meet the needs of its residents for 1 (#2) of 5 (#1, #2, #7,#10, and #11 ) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings: Review of the Facility's undated policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results- Clinical Protocol read in part.1. Thy physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the residents diagnostic and monitoring needs. 2. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for the test. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the following Diagnoses: Cerebral infarction, Dysarthria, Type 2 Diabetes, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypothyroidism, Hypertensive Heart Disease, and Cirrhosis of Liver. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed a TSH lab completed 01/22/2026 with a hand written order at the bottom of the page that read in part . repeat TSH in 4 weeks. Review of Resident #'2 03/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record, the facility failed to ensure that the mattress was compatible with the bedframe for 1 (Resident #3) of 33 sampled residents.Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/07/2023, with diagnoses that included, in part, Myoneural Disorder, Paraplegia, Epilepsy, and Peripheral Vascular Disease.Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS with ARD 03/03/2026 revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment.On 03/23/2026 at 11:39 a.m., observation revealed Resident #3 lying in bed with his feet hanging off of his mattress. Resident #3's mattress appeared to be too small for the bed frame.On 03/24/2026 at 10:12 a.m., an observation revealed Resident #3 lying in bed, positioned on his back with his head elevated. The resident's air mattress was observed not to fit the bed frame properly. There was approximately a 1-foot gap between the top of the bedframe and the head of Resident #3's mattress. Resident #3's head was partially above the mattress.On 03/24/2026 at 12:48 p.m., S4CNA was present at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure:1. A fall mat was in place as ordered and care planned for Resident #1, and2. Physician's orders for increasing water flush for Resident #3, who received feeding and hydration via PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy), was followed. Findings:Resident #1Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed an admit date of 06/06/2025 with diagnoses that included in part: Encephalopathy, Chronic Combined Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Alcohol Abuse Uncomplicated, and Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent with Psychotic Symptoms. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/18/2025 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice by failing to ensure a resident's Medical Director was notified of Registered Dietician recommendation in a timely manner for 1 (#2) of 6 (#1, #2,#3, #4,#5, and #6) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Weights read in part The Registered Dietician will complete the dietician recommendations and or/dietician noted at her discretion. The notes will be given to the DON for nursing staff to send to the physician for review and follow-up. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/06/2025 with diagnoses that included in part .Supraventricular Tachycardia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cardiac Pacemaker, Aphasia following Cerebrovascular Disease and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Review of Resident #2's 03/2025 Physician Orders read in part . 02/06/2025 -Isosource hn at 50cc/hr per pump with water flushes at 30 cc/hr per feeding pump. Review of Registered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAMOUNT HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $325K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA