Consolata Rehab And Wellness Center On The Teche
2319 East Main Street, New Iberia, LA 70560 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (337) 365-8226 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 17.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.5% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.7% | 17.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 94.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 5.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.6% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.0% | 22.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.1% | 3.1% | 1.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.3% | 76.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 8.7% | 28.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.6% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 2.56 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.03 | 2.74 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 36% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.6%CMS range 22.3–45.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.8%CMS range 9.0–18.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 70.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 34.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.0–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 64.6 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by failing to:1. Implement a system of surveillance that included pathogen data to properly identify possible communicable diseases or infections before they spread. 2. Ensure staff used personal protective equipment according to accepted standards of practice as evidenced by staff not wearing the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing high contact care for 2 (#27, #54) residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy titled, Surveillance for Infections, with a last reviewed date of 02/26/2026, read in part. Policy Statement: The infection preventionist conducts ongoing surveillance for healthcare-associated infections and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcomes and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions. Data Collection and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's food was palatable, prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, and served potentially hazardous food (dairy) in a safe manner as evidenced by: 1. S4Cook failing to prepare food(s) according to the recipe, 2. Resident #38 served spoiled milk on 06/08/2026, and 3. Resident #58 served spoiled milk on 06/08/2026 and 06/09/2026.This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 70 residents who consumed food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's recipe titled, Mashed Potatoes DHY/Gravy included the following ingredients: potato granules, water, and soft margarine bulk. Further review of the recipe included the following instructions.1. Prepare mashed potatoes according to package instructions, omitting the salt. On 06/08/2026 at 10:40 a.m., S5Cook was observed preparing mashed potatoes without a recipe. S5Cook poured an undetermined amount of water, potato flakes, milk and salt in a container. She used a whisk and mixed all the ingredients. Then,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the provider failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional food service standards by failing to ensure staff:1. Wore appropriate hair covering when entering the kitchen2. Label and date all refrigerated food opened; and3. Served potentially hazardous food (dairy) in a safe manner. Findings: 1. On 06/09/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled Hair Restraints (Hair Nets and [NAME] Guards) Policy and Procedure which was last reviewed on 05/01/2026, read in part: Procedure: 1. Requirement for hair restraints.any person entering the dietary department, whether dietary staff and non-dietary personnel, must wear a hair net prior to entry and while in the dietary area. Hair restraints include hair nets, caps, or other approved coverings that fully contain all head hair. [NAME] guards are required for all staff with facial hair (beards, goatees, or long stubble) that may come into contact with food or food-contact surfaces. On 06/08/2026 at 10:30 a.m., an observation was made of two maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity by failing to ensure the room door was closed and privacy curtain was drawn while performing perineal care (peri-care) for 2 (Residents #27 and #54) of 2 residents investigated for dignity. Findings: Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly dated 04/16/2026 revealed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.Functional Ability - personal hygiene; dependent on staff. Review of Resident #54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] read in part: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated severe problems with thinking or memory.Functional Abilities- toileting hygiene dependent; personal hygiene (combing hair, shaving) partial/moderate assistance is needed from staff. On 06/08/2026 2:24 p.m., an observation of S6CNA and S7CNA providing peri-care to Resident #54 who was the roommate of Resident #27.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the soft touch call light device was within reach for 1 (Resident #27) of 38 sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #27's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, aphasia, paranoid schizophrenia, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly dated 04/16/2026 revealed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #27's care plan, dated 02/17/2026, revealed, in part, resident has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit. Intervention read in part: encourage me to use bell to call for assistance. On 06/8/2026 at 9:00 a.m., an observation was conducted of the resident lying in bed in his room. Further observation revealed the soft touch call bell was draped on the bed rails behind the resident. Resident not able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's rights to confidentiality of medical records for 1 (Resident #44) out of a sample of 38 residents. Findings:On 06/09/2026 at 8:38 a.m., an observation was made of a computer screen on a medication cart on Hall B. Resident #44's medication administration record (MAR) was observed on the computer which was facing the hall. The MAR contained the resident's prescribed medication. Two residents were observed walking by the cart with the computer visible in their line of sight. S10LPN walked out of a resident's room and confirmed that she did not apply her computer privacy screen when she left to go in the resident's room and should have. On 06/10/2026 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON and S2ADON. They both confirmed that S10LPN should not have left Resident #44's MAR information on her computer without applying the privacy screen.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician's orders for providing pudding with meals were followed for 1 (Resident #4) of 38 sampled residents.Findings: Review of Resident #4's electronic clinical record revealed an admit date of 01/02/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, abnormal weight loss, mild protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's physician orders dated 06/09/2026 revealed the following orders: Diet: Regular - mechanical soft. Pudding with all meals. On 06/10/2026 at 8:57 a.m., an observation was conducted in Resident #4's room. Further observation revealed his breakfast tray contained a mechanical soft diet of grits, sausage, eggs, milk, orange juice, and water. The resident had not been provided with pudding. On 06/10/2026 at 9:44…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) receive the necessary services to maintain grooming and oral hygiene. This is evidenced by the facility failing to ensure: Resident #27 was shaven and maintained good oral hygiene. Resident #54's adult brief and linen were clean.Findings:Review of a document titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting with a revision date of 04/2025, which read in part: Residents who ae unable to carry out activities of daily living independently receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Resident #27 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy, aphasia, [NAME] pressure Ulcer to the right hip and sacrum, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #27's care plan dated 04/23/2026 read in part, ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention read in part, oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure a resident who complained of nausea and vomiting received medication ordered by the physician to treat these symptoms for 1 (Resident #57) of 38 sampled residents.Findings:Review of Resident #57's electronic health record (EHR) revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, anxiety disorder, pain unspecified, drug induced constipation and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #57's quarterly Medicare 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed in Section C that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15, indicating her cognition was intact.On 06/08/2026 at 9:15 a.m., an observation and an interview were conducted with Resident #57. The resident was sitting in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing by failing to turn two dependent with pressure ulcers every two hours for 2 (Resident #27 and #54) of 2 residents investigated for pressure ulcers.Findings: Resident #27 A review of Resident #27's clinical record revealed an admit date of 12/11/2025 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, disorders of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and [NAME] pressure ulcers to the right hip and sacral area. A review of Resident #27's Care Plan dated 02/17/2026 read, in part: I have an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit. Interventions read, in part: assist rails times two for bed mobility and repositioning. Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly dated 04/16/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain ordered medications from the pharmacy for 1 (Resident #73) of 5 residents observed during medication administration.Findings:Review of Resident #73's electronic health record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, paranoid schizophrenia, and essential (primary) hypertension.Review of Resident #73's current physician orders revealed an order, dated 06/01/2026, for Farxiga oral tablet 10 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications.On 06/09/2026 at 8:50 a.m., an observation was made of S10LPN during morning medication administration. S10LPN administered all of Resident #73's medications except for his Farxiga oral tablet 10 mg (milligram). S10LPN stated the Farxiga was ordered last Monday (06/01/2026) but they still had not received it from the pharmacy. She was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately store over the counter (OTC) medications in the locked medication cart.Findings:On 06/08/2026 at 9:33 a.m., an observation was made of an unattended medication cart on Hall B. A bottle of Aspirin 81 mg and a bottle of Geri-Kot 8.6 mg were observed unattended on top of the cart. Two residents walked by the parked cart. S10LPN returned to the cart after 5 minutes and confirmed that she had left the medications on top of the cart and stated that she should have placed the meds in the locked cart.On 06/10/2026, a review of the facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage with a last reviewed date of 02/26/2026, read in part: Policy Statement: The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments .Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Medication Storage .5. Medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems .06/10/26 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON and S2ADON. They both confirmed the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary support personnel had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The facility failed to ensure S6HSK, S7HSK, and S8FS were competent to effectively and sanitarily perform the functions of the facility's dishwasher. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 74 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings:Review a document titled Cleaning Policies and Procedures no review date read in part: Once utensils and equipment have been cleaned and sanitized, they should be allowed to air dry; the use of towels may re-contaminate sanitized surfaces. An interview was conducted with S10HSKS on 04/13/2026 at 8:31 a.m. S10HSKS stated that since 01/2026 the kitchen staff needed assistance. She stated some staff that work in housekeeping would help in the kitchen on their days off. S10HSKS stated S6HSK, S7HSK, and S8FS helped in the kitchen by washing dishes. S10HSKS stated she had not trained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary support personnel were employed to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 74 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility's dietary schedule for 04/01/2026 - 04/15/2026 revealed on 04/2, 04/03, 04/04, 04/05, 04/08, 04/09, 04/10, 04/11, 04/14, and 04/15 one staff was scheduled for the morning shift. On 04/13/2026 at 8:40 a.m., an observation was conducted in the kitchen. S5C and S11C were observed in the kitchen. An interview was conducted with S11C. She stated many days they had to work short. She stated staff from other departments came to the kitchen to help them. She confirmed that the staff from other departments are not trained on kitchen procedures, but they are just shown how to wash the dishes. On 04/14/2026 at 6:15 a.m., an observation of the kitchen was conducted. S5C was observed preparing breakfast for the residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to distribute, store, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure:1. The food service area remained in a sanitary condition during the meal prep process.2. The ice scoops were stored away properly to prevent or minimize the spread of foodborne illnesses.3. Residents cups were stored inverted or covered.4. Staff monitored equipment to ensure that it was functioning properly.This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 74 residents who were served food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Ice Scoop Storage with no revision date read in part: Policy - ice scoops must be stored and maintained to prevent contamination. Ice is considered a food item and must be protected. Procedure: 1. Approved storage methods - store ice scoops in a clean holder outside the ice machine or in a clean container. 3. Cleaning and Sanitizing - clean and sanitize scoops daily or when contaminated. Storage containers must be cleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure the well-being of residents by failing to provide oversight of the kitchen's practices for safe food service. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the 74 residents who consumed meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings:Review of a document titled Ice Scoop Storage with no revision date read in part: Policy - ice scoops must be stored and maintained to prevent contamination. Ice is considered a food item and must be protected. Procedure: 1. Approved storage methods - store ice scoops in a clean holder outside the ice machine or in a clean container. 3. Cleaning and Sanitizing - clean and sanitize scoops daily or when contaminated. Storage containers must be cleaned routinely. Review of a document titled Dishware/Utensils Storage Policy with no revision date read in part: Policy - all dishes, glassware, cups shall be properly cleaned, sanitized, dried, and stored in a manner that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition by failing to ensure:A leak beneath the ice machine was reported to maintenance in a timely manner.Staff monitored equipment to ensure that it was functioning properly. Findings:1. On 04/13/2026 at 11:33 a.m., an observation of the kitchen was conducted which revealed an ice machine that had a large puddle of water pooled beneath the machine. On 04/13/2026 at 11:36 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S3DM. S3DM was unaware of the leak beneath the ice machine. On 04/13/2026 at 12:03 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12M. S12M stated that kitchen staff had not reported a leak beneath the ice machine to him, nor did they write it in his maintenance logbook. On 04/14/2026 at 10:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5C who stated that the ice machine has had a leak for at least three months. She stated she did not report this to S12M, she thought S3DM would get that taken care of. 2. On 04/13/2026 at 11:33 a.m., further observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to participate in the facility's residents group, Resident Council, as evidenced by administrative staff failing to consider and act upon voiced grievances during monthly Resident Council meetings for 3 of 3 residents (#2, #6 and #16) actively involved in the facility's Resident Council. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 60 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's resident council meeting minutes from October 2024 through March2025 revealed: Dated 10/03/2024 per S17AD (Activity Director) revealed Resident #16 accepted the President position and Resident #6 accepted the [NAME] President position. New issues voiced by one of the 13 residents in attendance was to please make sure the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) make sure the lifter battery is on charge correct, so they can be charged for when needed the next day. There was no evidence that the voiced concern was neither addressed nor was a rationale provided by facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of 4 Residents (#13, #23, #27, and #39) medical records. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all of the 60 residents in the facility. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy with a last review date of 01/15/2025, read in part, Our facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy. The policy also indicated general guidelines, The facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records. Computer screens will be closed or in locked position when not in use or in the presence of a nurse or unauthorized personnel. On 04/01/2025 at 8:14 a.m., an observation on Hall W revealed that the laptop on top of Med Cart A was unattended. Further observation revealed Resident #13, #23, #27, and #39's first and last name, their picture, room number, and MRN (Medical Record Number) was visible on the laptop screen. On 04/01/2025 at 8:22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received respiratory care according to professional standards of practice, the physician's order, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 (#11, #14, and #19) of 3 (#11, #14, and #19) residents investigated for respiratory care, as evidenced by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident #11's humidifier bottle was changed when it was empty, and Oxygen tubing changed weekly; 2. ensure Resident #19's oxygen nebulizer mask, nasal cannula, and suction cannula were stored in a bag when not used; and 3. date and label oxygen tubing and ensuring oxygen was delivered at the ordered rate for Resident #14. Findings: On [DATE], a review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, read in part, Policy: Oxygen shall only be administered by physician order .All safety precautions and care of equipment shall be performed according to recommended State and Federal guidelines and facility procedures. Prefilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Medication carts were locked when unattended for 1 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) out of 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) medication carts reviewed; 2. Medication carts were free of loose pills for 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) out of 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) medication carts reviewed; 3. Medication carts were free of expired medications for 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) out of 2 (Med Cart A and Med Cart B) medication carts reviewed; and 4. One Ozempic Syringe (medication that helps lower blood sugar) was stored appropriately. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all of the 60 residents in the facility. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications with a last review date of 01/15/2025, read in part, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The policy also indicated general…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure food items were covered in the walk in cooler; 2. Failing to ensure expired food items were removed from the dry goods storage room; 3. Failing to ensure the dishwasher reached 120 degrees Fahrenheit during the wash cycle; and 4. Failing to ensure clean dishes were not stored in the dishwashing area. This deficient practice had the potential to effect the 62 residents that received nourishment from the kitchen: Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, with a last revised date of 02/13/2025, read in part; Policy Statement; Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated 'use by date'. Review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning Policies and Procedures, with a last reviwed date of 02/13/2025 read in part; Once utensils and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident or resident's RP (Responsible Party) were invited to, attended, or participated in quarterly care plan meetings for 1 (Resident #47) resident out of 28 sampled residents. Findings: Review of facility document titled admission Agreement, dated 01/15/2025 revealed in part, family members are encouraged to visit often and participate in the resident's plan of care. Each quarter the Responsible Party will be invited to attend the resident's care plan conference. Review of Resident # 47's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, dementia and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #47's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/13/2025 revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 2, indicating Resident #47's cognition was severely impaired. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and maintenance log review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment, by failing to address a concern regarding bed repairs for 1 (#11) of 4 (#11, #13, #27, and #260) residents investigated for environment. Findings: On 04/01/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Resident equipment with a reviewed date of 01/14/2025, read in part, Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to ensure resident equipment is properly maintained. Procedures .2. Maintenance director will assess any repairs needed and will report any equipment that is inoperable to the nursing facility administrator. On 03/31/2025 at 10:30 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #11 in her room. She stated the button on the head of her bed had not been working for over 2 months, and she had reported it to maintenance. She stated she could not lower or lift her head making it uncomfortable to sleep. During an interview on 03/31/2025 at 10:30 a.m., S9CNA Certified Nursing Assistant), stated she worked two weeks ago and the remote wasn't picking the resident's head up and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status, for 1(#7) of 28 sampled residents. Findings: A review of Resident #7's medical records revealed an admission date of 02/14/2024 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to schizoaffective disorder. A review of Resident #7's Pre admission Screening and Assessment Resident Review (PASRR) revealed a Level 11 determination that read, The individual has a serious mental illness . A review of Resident #7's annual MDS with an Assessment Reference date of 02/12/2025, revealed the following in section A1500: Is the resident currently considered by the state level 11 PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? The answer was coded 0 for no. On 04/02/2025 at 1:37 p.m., an interview and review of Resident #7's MDS was conducted with S4MDS/LPN (Minimum Data Set/Licensed Practical Nurse). She confirmed that the PASRR was incorrectly coded and did not reflect that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received services according to the person-centered plan of care for 1 (#14) of 28 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #14's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Asthma, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute ischemic heart disease, obstructive sleep apnea and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of Resident #14's care plan revealed a focus area indicating the resident was at risk for falls, r/t (related to) decrease mobility, depression, respiratory failure and history of falls. Interventions included in part, refer to therapy dept (department) as needed, and refer to restorative program as needed . Review of S19PT (Physical Therapy) notes revealed Resident #14's discharge summary for dates of services 02/28/2024- 03/08/2024 with discharge reason maximum Potential achieved. Referred for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming by failing to trim and clean a resident's fingernails for 1 (Resident #39) of 28 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 60. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails with a last review date of 02/03/2025, read in part, The purpose of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. The policy also indicated general guidelines, Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. A review of Resident #39's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications and Vitamin D Deficiency. A review of Resident #39's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/25/2025 revealed he had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feedings as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #51) out of 28 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #51's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dysphagia, adult failure to thrive, and cachexia. Review of Resident #51's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/20/2025 revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 0, which indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed in Section K: Swallowing/Nutritional Status Resident #51 had a feeding tube. Review of Resident #51's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 03/27/2025 that read: Enteral feed order every shift, Jevity 1.2 70 ml/hr (milliliters per hour) with water flushes of 100 ml (milliliters) every four hours free flushes with pump. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving dialysis received services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#260) of 1 (#260) resident receiving dialysis out of a total sample size of 28 residents. Findings: On 04/02/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention with a last reviewed date of 01/15/2025, read in part, Policy statement: Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain: Policy Interpretation and implementation: Weight assessment: 1. Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team or the resident's physician. Resident #260 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to end stage renal dialysis and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Resident #260's physician's orders revealed an order written on 03/20/2025 which read, Weights - Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-25 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #2 and Resident #3 were assessed for the risk of entrapment from side rails. 2. Informed consent was obtained from the resident or resident's representative prior to installation of side rails for Resident #2 and Resident #3. 3. Ongoing monitoring and supervision were provided for Resident #2's use of side rails. This deficient practice occurred for 2 (Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Physical Restraints, Side Rails, with a last review date of 01/15/2024, revealed in part: Purpose: The purposes of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms. General Guidelines: 3. An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment and reason for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of injuries of unknown source that resulted in serious bodily injury was reported immediately, or within 2 hours of the allegation to the state survey agency for 1 (#1) out of 2 (#1 and #2) residents sampled with incidents. Findings: On 11/25/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a last revision date of 01/15/2024, read in part, Reporting: 1. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies: a. The State licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; The policy also indicated that the following information 2. An alleged violation of abuse, neflect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan for 1(Resident #2) out of 3 (Resident#1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents by failing to ensure that the use of side rails was included in the Plan of Care for Resident #2. Findings: A review of the facility's policy Physical Restraints, Side Rails, with a last review date of 01/15/2024, revealed in part: Purpose: The purposes of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms. General Guidelines: 4.The use of side rails as an assistive device will be addressed in the resident care plan. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 8/16/2023 with diagnosis including, but were not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Bipolar Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #2's Plan of Care contained no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents by failing to ensure the EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) was complete and/or accurately documented for Resident #1. On 11/25/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation with a last revision date of 01/15/2024, read in part, Policy Statement: All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any change in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The policy also indicated that the following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: Medication administered, treatments or services performed, events, incidents or accidents involving the resident and progress toward or changed in the care plan goals and objectives. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through observation of pleasure feedings for 1 (#3) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, R1) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed an admit date of 08/01/2023, with diagnoses which included Malnutrition, Vitamin D Deficiency, Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease. Resident#3 received continuous PEG (Percutaneous endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube feedings with pleasure feedings. A further review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed a Speech Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] that read in part . Requires cueing to utilize strategy. The summary included interventions provided: swallow treatment facilitation of liquid delivery using small controlled sips/intake, facilitation of small bites/sips (1/2 to 1/3 tsp), facilitation of body positioning to increase safety with intake, training in use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents was safe to perform self-administration of medication. The right to self-administer medications is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team to assess and determine if this practice is clinically appropriate and safe. Findings: On 11/13/2024 a review of the facility's undated policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, read in part, Policy Statement: Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. Review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 02/27/2024 with Diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Urinary Tract Infection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility failed to accommodate Resident #2's choice to refuse care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Residents' Rights with a review date of 01/22/2024 read in part .Policy Statement: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: B. be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity H. be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights. Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed an admit date of 05/09/2024 with diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Cerebrovascular Accident, and Depression. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of residents' medical records for 1 (#R1) out of 4 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 61 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled, Resident Rights with a review date of 01/22/2024, and read in part .Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: T. privacy and confidentiality. Review of the facility's document titled Security of Medication Cart with a review date of 01/15/2024, read in part the nurse must initiate the computer privacy screen when the computer is out of the nurse's view. On 11/13/2024 at 8:00 a.m., an observation of the dining room area was conducted. Further observation revealed that Medication Cart B was parked outside the dining room area. The medication cart was observed unattended and unlocked with #R1's personal information being visible for visitors/residents in the facility. On 11/13/2024 at 8:01…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's person centered care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1(#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents as evidenced by Resident #1's care plan not reflecting the resident's wish to transfer to another facility. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Urinary Tract Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease, Schizophrenia, and Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #1's 5 day MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/28/2024 revealed in Section Q, Participation in Assessment and Goal Setting, that her goal was to remain in the facility. Review of Resident #1's current care plan revealed an entry with onset date of 02/27/2024, I wish to remain in facility/No plans to D/C (discharge) at this time. Review of a grievance dated 10/01/2024 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medication Carts were locked when unattended for 2 (Cart A, Cart B) of 3 (Cart A, Cart B, Cart C) medication carts observed. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Security of Medication Cart with a review date of 01/15/2024, read in part when the medication cart is not being used, it must be locked and parked at the nurses station or inside the medication room. On 11/12/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an observation of on Hall A was conducted. Further observation revealed Medication Cart A was unlocked and unattended. S4LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed sitting in the nurses station talking on her cell phone. On 11/12/2024 at 3:01 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. S4LPN confirmed that she should have locked her medication cart prior to leaving the cart unattended. On 11/12/2024 at 3:40 p.m., an observation of Hall B was conducted. Further observation revealed Medication Cart B was against the wall near the nurse's station, unattended and unlocked. A visitor was observed in the hallway near the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure the residents call system was functioning for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. Findings: On 07/09/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Answering the Call Light, with review date of 01/01/2024, revealed in part: Purpose: the purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. General Guidelines .4. Be sure that the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times .6. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. Review of Resident #1's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/15/2024, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician was consulted when there was a change in the plan of care for 1(#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician that his smoking privileges were revoked, and that staff were administering a nicotine replacement that had not been ordered by a physician. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 9 residents who smoked. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Anxiety disorder, Major depressive disorder, Quadriplegia and Mood disorder. A review of the Resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 04/29/2024 revealed in section C that he had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, indicating his cognition was intact. Section GG revealed the resident was impaired on both sides and was dependent on staff for eating, care, and transfer. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a qualifying mental disorder, was not admitted to the facility before a preadmission screening by the State Office of Behavioral Health (OBH) was completed or obtained for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents investigated for a complaint. Findings: On 06/06/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) with a revision date of 12/10/2020, read in part, Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to ensure facility is following state guidelines regarding PASRR. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified Mood Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. A review of the resident's clinical records revealed a level 1 PASRR dated 08/17/2023. In Section 111: Mental illness, an answer of no was selected for suspected or diagnosed mental illness. Further review revealed no level 2 PASRR.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's policy and procedure, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan within 7 days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment MDS (Minimum Data Set) for 5 (Resident #4, 12, 16, 21, and 31) out of 5 (Resident #4, 12, 16, 21, and 31). The final sample size was 31. Findings: Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Hepatitis A Without Hepatic Coma, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of Resident #4's Annual MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Data) of 03/05/2024. Further review of Resident #4's EHR (Electronic Health Record) failed to reveal a compressive person-centered care plan. Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to properly store and label respiratory equipment for 2 (#9 and #16) out of 2 (#9 and #16) residents investigated for respiratory care. Findings: On 04/02/2024, a review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Administration, with a last reviewed date of 01/05/2024, revealed in part, the following, Policy: . All safety precautions and care of equipment shall be performed accord to recommended State and Federal guidelines and facility procedures. Prefilled humidifier bottles and nasal cannulas/mask will be changed every week and prn (as needed). All tubing and bottles are to be labeled each week when changed. When the tubing is not being used, it should be stored properly in a zip lock bag . Essential Points: There are multiple state and federal codes that address the storage, handling, and administration of oxygen. Procedures must be adhered to assure compliance with these codes . Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's health record revealed that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and record review the facility failed to ensure that pharmaceutical services provided to meet the needs of each resident were consistent with state and federal requirements and reflect current standards of practice as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure medication was not left at Resident #31's bedside; 2. Failing to ensure medications were not left unattended on top of the medication cart; 3. Failing to ensure controlled medication was not taped back in the blister pack; 4. Failing to ensure medications were stored separately from food and labeled with the resident's name. Findings: On 04/02/2024, a review of the facility's policy, Medications Storage, with a last reviewed date of 01/05/2024, revealed in part, the following, Policy Statement: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage . 9. Medications must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 (#30) out of 2(#17, #30) residents investigated for environment, out of a total sample of 31 residents. Findings: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Unspecified Deep Veins of Left Lower Extremity, and Moderate Protein Calorie Malnutrition. On 04/01/2024 at 9:15 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #30's bathroom. A copper colored stain was observed from the base of the left faucet into the left side of the bathroom sink. There was also a copper colored stain around the knob on the right base of the toilet spreading outward, and a large paint blister on the wall on the left side of the toilet. Further observation revealed a moderate build-up of dust on the vent in the ceiling of the bathroom. On 04/02/2024 at 3:31 p.m., a second observation was made of the resident's bathroom. The copper colored stains remained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for 2 (#13 and #17) out of 3 (#13, #15, #17) residents investigated for care planning out of a total sample of 31 residents, by failing to: 1. Address Resident #13 family's refusal for use of a proper positioning device. 2. Address Resident #17's limited range of motion. Findings: Resident #13. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the resident's care plan revealed the resident used a wheelchair for mobility. On 04/01/24 9:45 a.m., the resident was observed slouched down in her high back wheelchair in the dining room. On 04/01/2024 at 11:57 a.m., S10CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) began feeding the resident lunch at the dining room table. The resident was observed slouched down in her high back wheelchair while the CNA was feeding the resident. On 04/02/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing as evidenced by the staff failing to assess and provide treatment for an identified pressure ulcer for 1 (#13) out of 31 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #13. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the resident's Braden Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as a high risk for pressure ulcer development. Review of the resident's weekly skin inspection on 01/15/2024 revealed the resident's skin was intact. Review of the resident's weekly skin inspection on 01/22/2024 revealed the resident's skin was not intact. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed that there was no evidence that an assessment of a pressure ulcer or wound was done on 01/22/2024. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls for 1 (#42) out of 2 (#40, #42) sampled residents investigated for falls out of a total sample of 31 residents. Findings: Resident #42. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included Unspecified Dementia with other Behavioral Disturbance. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/31/2024 revealed the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score was 3 for severely impaired for cognition. Also, the quarterly MDS revealed the resident was coded for bed and chair alarm daily. Review of the resident's care plan revealed that it addressed falls. Bed and chair alarms were both interventions to prevent falls. On 04/02/2024 at 2:00 p.m., the resident was observed sitting up in wheelchair at dining room table. The resident was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that medications and pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of 2 (#25, #31) out of a total sample of 31 residents, by failing to: 1. Ensure that Resident #25's Plavix (blood thinner) was re-ordered and administered; 2. Maintain a system to account for the usage and reconciliation of all controlled medications. Findings: On 04/03/2024 at 10:30 a.m., a review of a policy titled Pharmacy Services-Ordering Medications with a revision date of 01/05/2024, revealed in part, Purpose: To ensure all medications are ordered in a timely manner. Policy .3. Drugs and Biologicals that are required to be refilled must be reordered from the issuing pharmacy not less than five days prior to the last dosage being administered to ensure that refills are readily available. 1. Review of Resident #25's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but were not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by failing to perform hand hygiene before preparing medications and after removing gloves after patient contact. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 04/03/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene with a revision date of 01/05/2024, revealed in part, Policy Statement. This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections .7 .b. Before and after direct contact with residents; c. Before preparing or handling medications .m. after removing gloves. On 04/02/2024 at 7:52 a.m., S14LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed during D1. She donned a pair of gloves, drew up insulin and walked into Resident #25's room to administer the medication. S14LPN returned to the cart, removed her gloves and did not perform hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-04-03 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results of the facility were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. Findings: A review of the previous surveys conducted in the facility during the last 3 years revealed the following: Complaint survey had been conducted on 04/11/2023 and Recertification surveys had been conducted on 03/22/2023 and 02/23/2022. On 04/02/2024 at 10:58 a.m., an observation was made of a clear plastic file holder mounted to the wall outside of a closed office door near the facility's main entrance. A brown colored binder folder labeled LDH (Louisiana Department of Health) DHH (Department of Health and Hospitals) Licensing survey was observed inside the plastic file holder and inside the binder were survey results and plan of correction from the annual surveys conducted on 03/22/2023 and 02/23/2022. There was no evidence of the most recent survey results which was a complaint survey conducted on 04/11/2023. On 04/02/2024 at 1:05 p.m., S1ADM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PARAMOUNT HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJAR INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 07/01/2022 |
| DELTA HEALTH LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 07/01/2022 |
| MGINC LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 07/01/2022 |
| PHC SPECIAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 11% | since 07/01/2022 |
| TMGS INV, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 07/01/2022 |
| BAILEY, DOTTIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| COLLIGAN, LUCAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| DAVIS, ANGENETTE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| FUTCH, DENISE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| GUIDRY, GUY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| HALL, MATTHEW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| HOPPER, KEVIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| JACOLA, ANTHONY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| LANDRY, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| MANN, CLAUDE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| RICHARDSON, ADAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| STEWART, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2022 |
| DIOCESE OF LAFAYETTE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| WALTERS, CINDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/14/2025 |
| PARAMOUNT HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| LAPARA, NICHOLAS | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $217K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in LA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 195618. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.