John Scott House Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 273 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 21.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 161 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 112.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to promote and manage the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted Standards of Nursing Practice by failing to implement wound care recommendations to promote wound healing for one Resident (#64), in a total sample of 22 residents, which resulted in deterioration of an arterial wound to the Resident's left ankle. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Wound and Skin Care Protocols/Definitions, last revised September 2022, included but was not limited to: -The interdisciplinary plan of care will address problems, goals, and interventions directed toward the prevention and/or treatment of impaired skin integrity/pressure injury/ulcer; -Monitor and document interventions and outcomes; -Reclining and dependent residents should have position changes, alternating or low air loss mattress addressed in their care plan; -Use pillows or foam wedges to keep bony prominences such as knees and ankles from direct contact with each other; Resident #64 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-12-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management consistent with professional standards and the resident's goals and preferences was provided to one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Resident #66, the facility failed to administer medications timely and manage pain effectively during a dressing change. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management Guidelines, last updated September 2022, included but was not limited to: -Attempts to control pain will be employed and adjusted until the resident reaches an acceptable comfort level. When several medications or varying doses of medication are used to control pain, criteria must be established to identify varying levels of pain. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with diagnoses including a history of falls and a pelvic fracture. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/22, indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an invoked Health Care Proxy (HCP), the Facility failed to ensure that staff promptly notified his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) and his/her Physician when he/she experienced a significant change in status related to a fall.Findings include:Review of Facility Policy titled Change in Resident Condition, dated as last revised 09/2025, indicated the Facility will promptly notify the resident, his or her Physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status.The Policy indicated that the nurse would notify the resident's physician when there has been an accident or incident. During a telephone interview on 01/13/26 at 3:39 P.M., Family Member #1 said on 10/28/25, she went to visit Resident #1 and when she walked into his/her room she immediately noticed a bruise near his/her right eye and asked the nurse where the bruise had come from. Family Member #1 said that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who experienced an unwitnessed fall, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided care and treatment that met professional standards for quality of care, when he/she was not adequately assessed and monitored by nursing after being found on the floor after an unwitnessed fall.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Falls Program Policy, dated as last reviewed 09/2025, indicated that the documentation of a fall should include;-Notification to Physician and family;-Complete Fall Incident Report;-Fall investigation Report and obtain witness statements;-Monitor Vital Signs; and-Neurological Checks for any unwitnessed falls. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in 10/2025 diagnoses include status post fall sustaining a subdural hematoma (brain bleed) requiring a right craniotomy (surgical procedure removing part of the skull to get to the brain), Parkinson's disease, and anticoagulation use. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean, comfortable, and homelike. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To ensure two ([NAME] 1 and East 2) out of four units were homelike, comfortable, and in overall good repair; 2. To ensure the Whirlpool tub room and room [ROOM NUMBER] East were free of water damage; and 3. To maintain and clean the window air conditioner in room [ROOM NUMBER] East. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Environment of Care, dated 9/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Responsibilities of the maintenance department will include but not to be limited to painting, mechanical repairs (electrical, plumbing), and grounds keeping. -The facility has a program of preventative maintenance and safety, which are to be implemented by the maintenance department. Review of the facility's policy titled Environment of Care- EOC manual, dated 9/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for one Resident (#55) of 23 sampled residents, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life while recognizing his/her individuality. Specifically, for Resident #55, the facility failed to identify and maintain the Resident's wishes to grow a handlebar mustache. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Right and Organizational Ethics and Resident Rights and Overview, dated 10/17, indicated but was not limited to: -individual rights will be retained by all residents/patients of the facility -this facility will protect and promote the rights of each patient/resident as described below -residents have the right to the quality of life that supports independent expression, choice, and decision-making, consistent with all applicable laws and regulations -residents have a right to perform or refuse to perform tasks in or for the facility -residents have a right to refuse care or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the person-centered plan of care for one Resident (#74), out of 23 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the care plan interventions for safe swallowing strategies for a resident with oropharyngeal dysphagia (a condition that affects the movement of food and liquid from the mouth to the esophagus during swallowing). Findings include: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses of dementia and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/4/25, indicated Resident #74 scored 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #74 had a swallowing disorder as presented by complaints of pain or difficulty while swallowing, had a mechanically altered diet and received supervision for eating (helper provides verbal cues or touching assistance as the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#62), in a sample of 23 residents, had been seen by a physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) every 60 days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Essential Guidelines for Licensed Independent Practitioners, dated as reviewed September 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -In keeping with Company, State, Federal, and JCAHO (Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) regulations for long term care facilities, the following requirements apply to physicians and/or licensed independent practitioners treating patient/residents within facilities; -Patient/Residents require reassessment and an updated medical care plan at a minimum of every 30 days for the first 90 days, every 60 days thereafter, and as needed in between as indicated by clinical condition; -Progress notes and signed and dated physician orders are required at each physician visit. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in May 2020. Review of Physician's Progress Notes indicated Resident #62…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen floor and ceiling were maintained in a sanitary and safe condition. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 1-2 Definitions 1-201 Applicability and Terms Defined 1-201.10 Statement of Application and Listing of Terms. Easily Cleanable. (1) Easily cleanable means a characteristic of a surface that: (a) Allows effective removal of soil by normal cleaning methods; (b) Is dependent on the material, design, construction, and installation of the surface; and (c) Varies with the likelihood of the surface's role in introducing pathogenic or toxigenic agents or other contaminants into food based on the surface's approved placement,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0924 — isolated
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a secure handrail was in place on one Unit (East 2) out of four total Units. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 2:30 P.M., the surveyor observed and tested the handrails on the East 2 unit. The surveyor was able to move three separate pieces of handrails with minimal effort in three different areas on the unit where the handrails had come loose from the wall. The surveyor observed residents walking in the hallway on the East 2 unit. During an interview on 3/31/25 at 3:35 P.M., the Director of Nurses said all handrails should be affixed securely to the wall. She said the handrails were used by residents and should not be loose or unsecure. During an interview on 3/31/25 at 3:50 P.M., the Administrator said the handrails not being securely fashioned to the walls were a concern and having them repaired was a priority for safety. He said there was not a specific process for identifying broken handrails but he depends on staff to inform the maintenance department when they are loose. He said the handrails in all locations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who has an activated Health Care Proxy (HCP), the Facility failed to ensure that staff promptly notified Resident #1's Health Care Agent (HCA) when he/she experienced a change in status with a decline in condition, which resulted in the need for new physician's orders related to a change in his/her treatment plan. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titles, Change on Resident Condition, dated as last revised 06/2024, indicated that the Facility shall promptly notify the resident, his/her Attending Physician, and the resident's representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The Policy further indicated that unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the nurse will notify the resident's representative when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2023, diagnoses include Alzheimer's type dementia, acquired hypothyroidism with history of thyroid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide education, assess eligibility, and offer Pneumococcal Vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy for three Residents (#9, #67, and #52), out of a total sample of five residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff offered, assessed, and provided education on the recommended 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) (an active immunizing agent used to prevent infection caused by certain types of pneumococcal bacteria). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control, Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated as reviewed 9/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - residents admitted to or residing in the facility will be offered the Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV 13, PCV 15 or PCV 20) based on availability of the vaccine and the individual's previous vaccination history. This vaccine is only administered once…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BANECARE MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $847K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA