Seacoast Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 335 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 188 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 107.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a decline in range of motion leading to the development of a contracture for one Resident (#46) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, dated September 2024, indicated the following: - Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in range of motion (ROM). - Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in (ROM). - Interventions may include therapies, the provision of necessary equipment, and/or exercises and will be based on professional standards of practice and be consistent with state laws and practice acts. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in November 2020 with diagnoses including dementia, apraxia, polymyalgia rheumatica (a condition that causes muscle pain and stiffness), and abnormal posture. Resident #46's diagnosis list did not include a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#96) was free from significant medication errors out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were not administered when the Resident #96's blood pressure was not within the parameters prescribed by the physician. Findings include: Resident #96 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #96's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 8 out 15 which indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #96 requires partial to moderate assistance with functional daily tasks. Review of Resident #96's physician orders indicated the following orders: - Lasix Oral Tablet (a diuretic medication) 20 MG (milligrams). Give 20 mg by mouth one time a day for edema Hold for SBP (systolic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and records reviewed the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, 1.) The facility failed to disinfect shared resident medical equipment and adhere to infection control guidelines during medication pass. 2.) For one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 26 residents, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Resident Care and Treatment- Diagnostic Testing Glucose Testing with Glucometer (Assure Platinum)', dated as revised September 2024, indicated: 14. Clean Assure Platinum according to manufacturer's guidelines. Meter shuts down after two minutes. Should use two wipes; the first to clean and the second to disinfect. Review of the manufacturers' guidelines for the Assure Prism Multi Use Glucometer indicated the following: - Cleaning and Disinfecting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#69) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by ensuring a reassessment of an as needed (PRN) dose of trazodone after 14 days, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Psychotropic PRN Medication Use', dated September 2024, indicated the following: - Policy: the following requirements are in place to safeguard the health of our residents, ensure PRN orders for psychotropic medications do not remain in place for an extended period of time without being reviewed by the resident's physician and ensure that benefits and side effects of these medications are evaluated between required physician visits. -Type of PRN order: PRN orders for psychotropic medications excluding antipsychotics. Time Limitations: 14 days. Exception: Order may be extending past 14 days if the physician or prescribing practitioner believes it is appropriate to extend the order. Required actions:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility to ensure that services provided met professional standards for one Resident (#43), out of 26 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain and implement a physician's order for Resident #43's skin tear for approximately three days. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following: - Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a management role must ensure an infrastructure is in place, consistent with current standards of care, to minimize error. Review of the facility policy titled 'Care and Treatments: Skin/Wound Care: 2-Documentation Guidelines', dated as reviewed September…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss for one Resident (#14) out of a total of 26 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy title 'Determining and Addressing Significant Weight Changes', dated September 2024, indicated: - Purpose: The nutritional and hydration status of residents will be maximized with appropriate and timely intervention. 1. A resident experiencing weight loss or gain per guidelines: a. 5% in one month, b. 10% in six months. should be referred to the dietitian for further monitoring. 2. The nurse will notify [Occupational therapy / Speech therapy] for screening as necessary and appropriate recommendations will be communicated by the nursing staff to the physician. Physician orders will be obtained for an evaluation if indicated and for all interventions. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and cognitive communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on one of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to secure drugs and biologicals on one of three units during a medication pass when medication was left unattended at the nurse's station. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Medication Management-Medication Storage', dated as revised September 2024, indicated: - The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas and a clean safe and sanitary manner. 8. Drugs shall be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets drawers carts or automatic dispensing systems. On 5/14/25 at 7:28 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #4 prepare medications during a morning med pass on the Atlantic [NAME] Unit. Nurse #4 mixed miralax (laxative/stool softener) with a cup of water and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff accommodated food preferences for one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to honor Resident #65's preferences and served the Resident foods he/she disliked, including eggs, white bread, toast, and broccoli. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Resident Food Preferences and Choice, dated as reviewed September 2024, indicated: - Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. - When possible, staff will interview the resident directly to determine current food preferences based on history and life patterns related to food and mealtimes. - Facility staff may document the residents' significant food and eating preferences in the care plan. During a telephone interview on 5/13/25 at 9:43 A.M., the ombudsman said there is an ongoing concern at the facility regarding food choices being made available to residents. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in November…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document urinary output as ordered for one Resident (#93) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Nursing Service Documentation, dated September 2024 indicated; 5. Nursing documentation is performed as required by each person responsible for the care of the resident. 6. Every entry is noted by complete date, time and signature. Each set of initials used shall correspond to a complete signature. Review of the facility's policy titled 'Catheter Care', dated September 2024, indicated: 1. Residents with indwelling catheters should have their urinary output assessed at regular intervals to ensure that adequate drainage is occurring. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including venous insufficiency and polyuria (urinating more than usual). Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #93 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#9) did not self-administer medications out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, Resident #9 was not assessed to be able to safely self administer medication, and was observed self administering medication. Findings include: The facility policy, titled 11 - Self Administration of Medications, dated as reviewed 9/23, indicated the following: -It is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to determine that it is safe for the resident to self-administer medications before the resident may exercise that right. Procedure: 1. Upon request, assess the resident's ability to meet the criteria outlined above and document outcomes on the form Assessment for the Self-Administration of Medication. 2. If determined that the resident is capable of self-administering medications, obtain order from the MD (Medical Doctor). 3. Document on the resident's care plan. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including arthritis, heart failure and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident centered care plans were implemented for two Residents (#36 and #59) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #36, the facility failed to implement thigh high TED hose (compression stockings) as ordered by the Physician. 2. For Resident #59, the facility failed to implement pressure relieving boots, as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: 1. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included nephrotic syndrome, orthostatic hypotension, and small cell b-cell lymphoma. Review of Resident #36's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/24, indicated Resident #36 scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating intact cognition. On 5/28/24 at 1:12 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #36 out of bed in a geri-recliner chair, not reclined. Resident #36 was not wearing compression stockings on his/her legs. On 5/29/24 at 12:44 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #36 out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,808 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,808 — penalty dated 2025-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BANECARE MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $740K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA