Hancock Park Rehabiliation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 355 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 189 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 127.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement treatment interventions for a deep tissue injury (DTI- a pressure-related injury to subcutaneous tissues under intact skin), for one Resident (#58), out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Subsequently, the wound deteriorated. Findings include: Review of the facility's Skin Integrity Guidelines, dated 2019, indicated: *The interdisciplinary team will address problems, goals and interventions directed toward prevention of pressure ulcers and/or skin integrity concerns identified. Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including cancer and epilepsy. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/28/23, indicated he/she scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating intact cognition. The MDS also indicated he/she requires physical assistance with bed mobility and transfers. On 7/11/23 at 10:42 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #58 resting in bed on an air mattress (a mattress utilized to redistribute air to promote circulation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #48, who was diagnosed with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a bacterium that is resistant to several antibiotics, to ensure staff implemented precautions after entering and exiting a room identified as being on contact precautions, and2. To implement an infection control surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, monitoring and/or reporting of infections, communicable diseases and outbreaks among residents and staff.Findings include:1. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control- Personal Protective Equipment, dated as reviewed September 2025, indicated the following:This facility requires that all employees determined to have occupational exposure use appropriate personal protective equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels on the third floor of the East Dining Room.Comfortable and safe temperature levels means that the ambient temperature should be in a relatively narrow range that minimizes residents' susceptibility to loss of body heat and risk of hypothermia, or hyperthermia, or and is comfortable for the residents. Findings include:The following observations were made on the third-floor dining room:12/2/25 at 9:18 A.M., two out of four residents reported feeling cold and one resident had his/her jacket on. 12/3/25 8:41 A.M., three out of five residents reported feeling cold and one resident had his/her jacket on.12/3/25 at 8:49 A.M., one resident left the dining room and said, I need to go get my coat, it's freezing and wheeled him/herself out of the dining room and returned with a winter coat on.During an observation and interview on 12/3/25 at 9:07 A.M., the surveyor and the Assistant Maintenance Director observed the third-floor dining room, and the following thermal temperatures were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for one Resident (#121) out of a total of 28 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #121's call light was within reach and accessible per his/her fall care plan. Findings include:Resident #121 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/3/25, indicated Resident #121 is severely cognitively impaired as evidenced by a score of 00 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS). On 12/3/25 at 7:34 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #121 resting in bed. Resident #121 did not respond to the surveyor's questions. The surveyor observed Resident #121's call light out of reach and inaccessible on his/her bedside table. Review of Resident #121's Fall Care Plan, dated 3/6/22, indicated: Problem: Resident #121 is at risk for fallsIntervention: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for one Resident (#15), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #15, the facility failed to provide assistance and/or supervision with meals as per the plan of care.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated 9/22, indicated the following:-Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs).-Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.Policy Interpretation and Implementation-Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#43) with limited range of motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in ROM, out of a total of 28 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the discharge plan of care made by rehab services for daily ROM with care and the use of a carrot (a device utilized to position the fingers away from the palm to protect the skin from excessive moisture, pressure, and the risk of nail puncture injuries while helping to prevent bacteria build up and protect against increased spasticity).Findings include:Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Policy, dated September 2025, indicated: 3. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay or when discharged from rehabilitative care. 3. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for two Residents (#45, #43), out of a total of 28 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #45, to accurately document the presence of three new skin areas during weekly skin evaluations; and 2. For Resident #43, to accurately document the onset of a contracture. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity Guideline, revised 2019, indicated the following: -Purpose: To provide a systemic approach and monitoring process for skin. -Residents will be observed by the CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) daily for reddened/open areas, edema of feet or sacrum. Changes will be reported to the licensed nurse and documented. -The facility develops a routine to review residents with wounds or at risk on a weekly basis and will document as needed. -Newly identified skin areas will have a skin event report completed. -If identified risk present, the interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sample residents (Resident #1), whose Hospital Discharge Summary included treatment orders related to his/her surgical incision staple removal, the Facility failed to ensure nursing provided care and services that met professional standards of practice, when nursing removed his/her staples two weeks prematurely, Resident #1 wound dehisced (partially or completely reopened along the incision line) and he/she was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for evaluation of the wound.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled, Physician's Orders, dated as last reviewed 09/2025, indicated that Physician's Orders will be transcribed by licensed nurses only. The order is entered into the electronic medical record (Point Click Care, PCC) and Medication and Treatment Administration Records will be updated as required.The Policy further indicated that if there is any question concerning interpretation of the Physician's Order, the nurse will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for one Resident (#102), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide diabetic foot care treatments and skin checks as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity Guidelines, dated as last revised 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -All residents will be assessed/observed for risk of skin breakdown within 24 hours of admission, quarterly, and as necessitated by change in condition. -Wound will be documented on weekly measuring tools such as weekly measuring assessment. -Interventions will be documented in the Resident Care Plan. -Licensed nurse will be responsible for performing skin evaluation/observation. Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing Care of the Resident with Diabetes Mellitus, dated as last revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and review of facility menus, the facility failed to ensure a repetitive menu was not provided to the residents resulting in complaints about the lack of variety in food options. Specifically, the facility failed to offer a variety of the main meal to residents on a renal diet (a diet that limits sodium, potassium, phosphorus, and sometimes protein to help people with kidney disease or limited kidney function). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Menu Development, dated as last reviewed September 2023, indicated nutritional needs of individuals will be provided in accordance with the established standards, as needed adjusted for age, gender, disability, and through nourishing diets, unless contraindicated by medical needs. Review of the facility's policy titled Menu Review, dated as last reviewed September 2023, indicated menus would be reviewed by the Registered Dietitian, Food Service Director or designated staff on an as needed basis and updated according to the needs of the population served. Review of the Resident Dining Committee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain a safe and clean ice machine on three out of three floors. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code, a model for safeguarding public health and ensuring food is safe for consumption, indicated but was not limited to: 4-602.11 Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces and Utensils: Surfaces of utensils and equipment contacting food that is not time/temperature control for safety such as ice makers, and ice bins must be cleaned on a routine basis to prevent the development of slime, mold, or soil residues that may contribute to an accumulation of microorganisms. On 10/3/24 at 3:50 P.M., the surveyor observed the 5-East unit to have a small automatic ice machine. The inside of the ice machine had black speckles on the cover and a brown slimy substance on the inside of the door. The surveyor observed a brown, slimy substance on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BANECARE MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $679K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA