Craneville Rehabilitation And Skilled Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 63.9 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physician's orders included the need to notify family member of changes, the facility failed to ensure nursing notified the family/resident representative when he/she developed an injury to his/her foot and when he/she was referred to Hospice.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Change in Resident Condition, dated 6/2024, indicated that unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the Nurse will notify the resident's representative when the resident is involve in any accident or incident that results in an injury including injuries of an unknown source and that a nurse or healthcare provider will inform the resident of any changes in his/her medical care or nursing treatments.Review of the facility policy titled, Incidents and Accidents, dated 10/2017, indicated that the date and time the injured person's family was notified, and by whom, will be documented on the Report of Incident/Accident form.During a telephone interview on 04/03/26 at 8:22 A.M., Family Member (FM)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services related to: -a rubber baseboard that was pulled away from the wall exposing glue, and debris build-up in the Resident's room. -peeling paint behind the toilet in the Resident's bathroom. -gouges on the Resident's bathroom door and the other shared resident's door. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 2/5/25, indicted Resident #10: -was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15. -was able to make him/herself understand. -was able to understand others clearly. During an interview on 3/31/25 at 12:40 P.M., Resident #10 said that his/her bathroom was a mess because of the mechanical lift that the staff must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene care and services for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, for Resident #9, the facility failed to ensure grooming assistance was offered and/or provided relative to nail care when the Resident was dependent on staff for grooming tasks. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), Supporting, revised March 2018, indicated the following: -Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Resident #9 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely. Specifically, the facility failed to provide documentation and could not verify that three Licensed Nurses (#3, #4, and #5) out of a sample of three Licensed Nurses, had completed orientation training/competencies (Nurse #3), or annual competencies (Nurse #4, Nurse #5) as outlined in the Facility Assessment Tool Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, most recent revision undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: >Section 1.4: If we have a referral that we have screened and we are not certain we are able to care for the person, we would complete research to see what the needs are and to see if we are able to care for that person. -We will determine if we have the clinical competence and resources to care for that person. -We may be able to do some inservicing (education) to be sure our staff are competent and at times staff may need…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food in three unit kitchenettes (Unit 1, Unit 2, and Unit 3) out of three units observed, were labeled and dated as required, and the cleanliness of the refrigerators and freezers were maintained to prevent contamination and the spread of food borne diseases. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Labeling and Storage of Food, dated 9/1/16 indicated the following: -All food must be discarded 3 days after it is opened. -All food belonging to a specific resident must be labeled with their name and the date that it was put in the refrigerator. Review of the facility policy titled Nourishment Kitchen Sanitation, reviewed 9/23, indicated the following: -The following tasks and the frequency are the responsibility of the Housekeeping Department .Weekly or more frequently as needed wash all refrigerator shelves and clean toaster . -The following tasks and the frequency are the responsibility of the Nutrition and Food Service Department .remove/discard unlabeled items, remove/discard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely Physician and/or Nurse Practitioner (NP) notification of a significant change in condition for one Resident (#61) out of three sampled residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Physician and/or NP when the Resident was assessed to have low blood pressure readings, resulting in delayed interventions and transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Change in Resident Condition, dated April 2020 indicated but was not limited to: -The facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician and resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. -The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been significant change in the resident's physical/emotion/mental condition. -Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the nurse will notify the resident's representative when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the required Discharge/Transfer notices to the Resident and/or his/her Representative and the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Discharge Policies: Transfer out of the facility or by death, revised 9/23, indicated the following: -Notification of a potential transfer or discharge of the resident must be made in writing 30-days prior or as soon as practicable .The transfer/discharge notice is issued and contains all required elements by regulation. -A copy of the transfer/discharge notice must be sent to the Ombudsman . Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems). Review of the Resident's Medical Record indicated the Resident was transferred to the hospital on the following dates: -9/5/23 -11/22/23 Further review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the required Notice of Bed-Hold Policy to the Resident and/or Resident Representative for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Discharge Policies: Transfer out of the facility or by death, revised 9/23, indicated the following: -Before the facility transfers the resident to a hospital or therapeutic leave, the nursing facility must provide a copy of the facility Bed-Hold policy to the resident and if known, a family member or representative. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in September 2019 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems). Review of the Resident's Medical Record indicated the Resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the Medical Record indicated no evidence the Resident and/or Resident Representative received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen care and services were provided per the Physician's prescribing orders for one Resident (#20) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, for Resident #20, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's Oxygen flow rate was set at the ordered three (3) liters per minute (LPM - the rate at which Oxygen flows over a period of one minute) prescribed by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Use of Oxygen, reviewed 9/23, indicated the following: -Oxygen is administered only on the order of the Physician. -Physician's order shall include liters of flow and vehicle of administration. -Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (CHF - when the heart cannot pump blood as it should resulting in fluid buildup in the lungs and extremities [hands and legs]) and cardiomyopathy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#40) out of a total sample of 15 residents, received dialysis care consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility staff failed to monitor and track the Resident's fluid intake as ordered. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - condition in which a person's kidneys stop functioning on a permanent basis) and dependent on renal dialysis (treatment that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood). Review of the facility's policy titled Intake and Output, dated September 2023 indicated but was not limited to: -Purpose: to determine residents at risk and provide early intervention for dehydration/fluid overload. -All residents placed on fluid restriction will be on intake and output for the duration of their therapy. Review of the January 2024 Physician's orders included the following: Fluid restriction to 1200 milliliters (ml) per 24 hours. Nursing allowance 480 ml per 24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BANECARE MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $372K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA