Penacook Place, Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 101.8 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when on 03/18/25 he/she was administered the incorrect dose of long acting insulin. Resident #1 experienced an adverse reaction, including lethargy and malaise, for which he/she required treatment and increased monitoring by nursing until his/her blood sugar level stabilized. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Insulin Administration, dated revised 09/2014, indicated nursing would verify the type of insulin, dosage requirements, strength, and method of administration before administration, to confirm it corresponds with the physician's orders. The Facility Policy, titled Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, dated revised 02/2023, indicated that a medication error was defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biologicals which was not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted professional standards and principals of the professional providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed their abuse policy related to protection and reporting abuse allegations, when on 12/13/25 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 witnessed, but did not immediately report, that Resident #1 was allegedly verbally abused by a staff member, and waited until 12/16/25 (three days later) to report the incident, therefore placing Resident #1 and other residents on the unit at risk for potential abuse.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, dated 03/01/25, indicated it is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment immediately to the Administrator of the facility. The Policy indicated the facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for the protection of residents and for the reporting of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed policies and procedures to immediately report an altercation of abuse to Administrative staff as required, so the Facility could report the incident to the State Survey Agency, within the required time frames. On 12/13/25 although a staff member witnessed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 engage in a suspected verbally abusive altercation with Resident #1, it was not reported to Administration until 12/16/25, and therefore not reported to their State Survey Agency, until three days later.Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, dated September 2022, indicated all reports of resident abuse are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations). The Policy indicated that if abuse is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the plan of care for one Resident (#100) by not following a doctor's order to offload heels, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #100 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and pain in both feet. Review of Resident #100's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/2/24, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 3 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #100 is dependent on staff for all bed mobility tasks. On 5/06/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident #100 was observed lying in bed with both heels directly on the bed. There was no pillow present in the bed or in the room to offload pressure from Resident #100's heels. On 05/07/24 at 7:36 A.M., 8:37 A.M., and 1:47 P.M., Resident #100 was observed lying in bed with both heels directly on the bed. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide supervision with meals for one Resident (#37) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/25/24, indicated that Resident #37 could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam and was assessed by staff to have severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated that Resident #37 requires supervision with eating. Review of Resident #37's current activities of daily living care plan indicated that Resident #37 requires supervision after setup with eating. Review of the most recent Functional Abilities and Goals Assessment, dated 4/26/24, indicated that Resident #37 requires supervision or touching assistance with meals. Review of the task performance documentation for the last 30 days indicated that Resident #37 required varying assistance levels between independence and dependence with meals. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#57), out of 24 total sampled residents, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain weekly wound measurements and failed to obtain recommendations for wound treatments from a follow-up physician appointment for Resident #57. Findings include: The facility policy titled Skin Tears - Abrasions and Minor Breaks, Care of, revised September 2013, indicated, but was not limited to: -Obtain a physician's order as needed. Document physician notification in medical record. -Review the resident's care plan, current orders, and diagnoses to determine resident's needs. -Generate a Non-Pressure form and complete. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/07/24, indicated that Resident #57 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure oxygen administration was in accordance with the medical plan of care for one Resident (#5) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, undated, indicated the following but not limited to: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, neoplasm of bronchus or lung, chronic respiratory failure and dependent on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #5's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/18/24, indicated Resident #5 scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, policy reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for two Residents (#103 and #57) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that clamps and pressure dressings were kept with the Resident's #103 and #57 in case of an emergency related to a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (a plastic tube used for exchanging blood between a patient and a hemodialysis machine). Findings include: The facility policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with (sic), dated as revised September 2023, indicated the following but not limited to: -Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. -Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews and review of surveillance camera video footage, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and was cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a respectful and dignified manner which included being free from the use of restraints, when on 11/20/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 used a plastic bag to secure one of the wheels of Resident #1's wheelchair to restrict his/her movement and limit his/her ability to self propel the wheelchair on his/her own. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Use of Restraints, no date, indicated that examples of devices that are/might be considered physical restraints include leg restraints, arm restraints, hand mitts, soft ties or vests, wheelchair safety bars, Geri-chairs, lap cushions and lap trays that the resident cannot remove. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in April 2022, diagnosis included chronic kidney disease, Meniere's disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, policy reviews and interviews the facility failed to 1) provide a dignified dining experience for the residents on the Dementia Care Specialty Unity (DSCU) and 2a) failed to provide a dignified experience for 1 Resident (#188) by not providing a privacy bag for a foley catheter and 2b) For Resident #188 leaving him/her without a top sheet or blanket, leaving genitals exposed, out of a total sample of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy, Quality of Life - Dignity undated, indicated the following: *Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. *Staff shall speak respectfully to residents at all times, including addressing the resident by his or her name of choice and not labeling or referring to the resident by his or her room number, diagnosis or care needs. During observation of the breakfast meal on 3/16/23 at 8:17 A.M., the following was observed: *A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) passed out a breakfast tray to a Resident in his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #239 was admitted in 03/2023 with diagnoses including localized edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #239 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders indicated that an order was initiated on 3/10/23 for ace wrap to left lower extremity daily prior to getting out of bed. Review of the behavior tracking documentation does not indicate that Resident #239 has any behaviors. During an observation on 3/15/23 at 7:54 A.M., Resident #239 was not wearing ACE wraps on his/her left lower extremity. During an observation on 3/17/23 at 11:26 A.M., Resident #239 was out of bed and not wearing ACE wraps on his/her left lower extremity. During an interview on 3/17/23 at 11:26 A.M., Resident #239 said that he/she has not had any ACE wraps on since admission. During an interview on 3/17/23 at 2:49 P.M., the Director of Nursing said that if there was an order for ACE wraps then it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,868 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-04-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COVENANT HEALTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $363K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA