St Mary Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 118.8 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality of care that met professional standards of practice, when he/she did not receive routine laboratory testing to ensure his/her Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus was controlled, when on 09/12/25 he/she experienced a significant change in condition, was found to be hyperglycemic (elevated blood sugar level) with critically high blood sugar reading, he/she required transfer to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and was admitted for treatment. Findings include:Review of the Facility's policy, titled Diabetes, undated, indicated the following:-For residents who meet the criteria for diabetes testing, the Physician will order pertinent screening; for example [Hg] A1c (Hemoglobin A1c is a test that measures the average glucose level over the previous two to three months).Review of the American Diabetes Association website indicated the following:- A1C testing should be performed routinely in all people with diabetes at initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 23 residents, to maintain left-hand range of motion (ROM) when the Resident had a left-hand contracture.Specifically, the facility failed to adequately identify and treat Resident #3's left-hand contracture in a timely manner, when the severity of the Resident's left-hand contracture changed, increasing the Resident's risk for further decrease in ROM and skin breakdown. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Resident Mobility and ROM, last revised July 2017, indicated:-Residents with limited ROM will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in ROM.-The care plan will be developed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) based on the comprehensive assessment and will be revised as needed. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses including symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that competency and skills necessary to provide the level and type of care needed for one Resident (#12) were demonstrated by one Licensed Nurse (Nurse #3). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Nurse #3 completed the necessary training and competencies relative to gastrointestinal feeding tube management prior to providing tube feeding care and services for Resident #12. Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment Tool (self-completed assessment that indicated what types of care a facility provided as well as what their staffing and educational plans to meet the Resident's needs), dated 10/1/25, included but was not limited to:*Nursing facilities will conduct, document, and review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their residents. The assessment will be reviewed annually and updated as needed. >The purpose of the assessment is to evaluate the resident population and determine what resources are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that three Residents (#96, #1 and #5) out of a total sample of 23 residents were provided the right to participate in the care plan process.Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #96, ensure that the Resident was provided with the required information for participation in the care planning process when he/she was not informed of where the care meetings were held and the facility did not provide rationale why the Resident's participation in the care planning process was not practicable when the Resident's Healthcare Proxy declined to attend.2. For Resident #1, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was invited to participate in and attended his/her care plan meetings and provide facility rationale as to why the participation of the Resident was determined to be not practicable for the development of his/her care plan.3. For Resident #5, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident was invited to participate in and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services relative to enteral feeding (delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube into the stomach/intestines), for one Resident (#12) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #12, the facility failed to ensure that the accurate amount of water flushes as ordered by the Physician, and the appropriate tube feed flush procedure was being administered via the Resident's enteral feeding tube, when more than the ordered amount of water flushes was administered, placing the Resident at risk for gastrointestinal complications. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, flushing a Feeding Tube, undated, included but limited to:*It is the policy of this facility to ensure that staff providing care and services to the residents via a feeding tube are aware of, competent in, and utilize facility protocols regarding feeding nutrition and care. Feeding tube care and services will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional requirements on one unit's (Dementia Unit -Third Floor Side A) medication cart, out of a total of three units reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a medication cart on the Third floor Side A was locked, and prepared medications were secured when the medication cart were left unattended, to prevent unauthorized personnel and residents' access to medications on and in the medication cart. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, Storage of Medications, dated 1/2025, included but was not limited to:*Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturers or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications.-The provider pharmacy dispenses medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Specifically, the facility's dietary staff failed to: -ensure food items were properly labeled and dated in the main kitchen refrigerators placing residents at risk for food borne illness. -discard left over food within 72 hours that had been clearly labeled and dated, placing residents at risk for foodborne illness. -maintain a clean and sanitary food storage freezer, stove, and blender used for the storage or preparation of resident food placing residents at risk for food borne illness. -store chemicals away from the drink station, placing residents at risk for receiving contaminated beverages. Findings include: Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2017 included the following: Nonfood Contact Surfaces: The presence of food debris or dirt on nonfood contact surfaces may provide a suitable environment for the growth of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Pneumococcal Vaccination was offered as required to one Resident (#1), of five applicable residents reviewed for Pneumococcal immunization, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #1, the facility failed to offer Pneumococcal Vaccination to the Resident when he/she was eligible for Pneumococcal Vaccination PCV20 or PCV21 (Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine: vaccine used to protect against 20 and 21 types of pneumococcal bacteria that commonly cause serious infections) at the time of admission to the facility. Findings include: Review of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines reviewed at www.cdc.gov indicated: >Based on shared clinical decision-making, adults 65 years or older have the option to get PCV20 or PCV21, or to not get additional pneumococcal vaccines. They can get PCV20 or PCV21 if they have received both: PCV13 (but not PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21) at any age PPSV23 at or after the age…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who had an invoked Health Care Proxy, the facility failed to ensure his/her representative was notified when he/she developed an alteration of his/her skin integrity to his/her buttocks and a fluid filled blister on his/her left foot, requiring physician ordered treatments.Findings include:Review of the Facility's policy, titled Notification of Changes, dated 08/2024, indicated the following:-The purpose of the policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his/her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification.-Circumstances requiring notification include: A new treatment.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in February 2023, diagnoses included Type II Diabetes Mellitus and vascular dementia.Review of Resident #1's medical record indicated his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) was invoked permanently due to severe dementia on 08/12/2020 (prior to admission to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0557 — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5), who were alert and able to made their needs known, the Facility failed to ensure they were treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when they all reported that Nurse #1 responded to their request for assistance with yelling, rudeness and disrespect. Findings include: Review of the Facility Resident Rights Policy, undated, indicated residents had the right to be treated with dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality and to receive services with reasonable accommodations to individual needs and preferences. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 6/13/25, indicated that 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) reported that Nurse #1 withheld medications, used a curt or aggressive tone of voice, threw medications on the resident's table and/or yelled at them. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in June of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and complete in the required time frame, a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a Significant Change in Status Assessments (SCSA) for two Residents (#9 and #34) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #9, complete a SCSA within 14 days after the Resident had a decline in bowel functioning, bladder functioning, and a new pressure injury. 2. For Resident #34, complete a SCSA within 14 days after the Resident was admitted to a Hospice program. Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.19.1 dated October 2024 indicates: -A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: >Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, the decline is not considered self-limiting. >Impacts more than one area of the resident's health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-10-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COVENANT HEALTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $519K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA