St Mary's D'youville Pavilion

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 259 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 165.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.17 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 1.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility internal investigation, interviews, and video surveillance, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from an avoidable accident and environmental hazards. Specifically, Resident #1 [R1] exited their assigned unit onto an exterior courtyard/patio area without staff knowledge. The resident remained outdoors, inadequately dressed for the weather, for approximately 30 minutes before being discovered face down on the snow-covered ground. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation.Findings: The Department of Licensing and Certification [State Agency] received an anonymous complaint which stated R1 was found outside on the ground in wet/snowy conditions in the early morning hours of March 21, 2026. A review of R1's clinical records stated R1 was admitted in March 2026 following an evaluation in the emergency department after a fall at home resulting in fractured ribs. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and dementia complicated by psychosis. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident-to-resident altercation, ensure that the facility's investigation was completed, and failed to send the investigation to the State Agency within 5 business days of the incident for 2 of 3 facility reported incidents investigated on 1 of 5 units (Resident #35, Resident #39, Resident #59, and Resident #186).Findings:Review of the facility Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation policy last revised 01/2025 under Investigation Procedures states, Report of potential abuse can be received from any source and will be investigated. The investigation will be conducted by any of the following: nursing, social services, administration. Immediate medical attention for the resident/patient will be obtained as needed. The reporter, witnesses, alleged abuser and resident/patient will be interviewed. The results of investigations must be reported immediately to the administrator or designee and to other officials in accordance with State law (including to the state survey and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of the facility internal investigation, interviews, and video surveillance, the facility failed to notify the State agency of a resident's elopement within 24 hours of the incident; and failed to provide the State agency with a 5 day follow up report for 1 of 1 investigated incident of neglect. (#1) Finding: The Department of Licensing and Certification [State Agency] received an anonymous complaint which stated R1 was found outside on the ground in wet/snowy conditions in the early morning hours of March 21, 2026. A review of a Late Entry note for March 21, 2026, stated R1 had went out of [his/her] room into the stairwell . [he/she] was observed by staff and brought back to [his/her] room, and states that R1 continued to be restless. A review of a Fall/Details note stated on March 21, 2026, R1 was in bed at 5:00 a.m., and at 5:30 a.m. R1 was noted to not be in [his/her] room, at 5:40 a.m., R1 was found outside lying on the grass. A review of facility records included nursing documentation, video surveillance, written staff statements and interviews…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's incident report, record reviews, interviews, and internal investigation, the facility failed to ensure staff spoke to residents in a dignified manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (R1, R2).Findings: On 9/24/25, the facility reported an incident to the Division of Licensing and Certification, which stated on 9/10/25, staff observed CNA1 (Certified Nursing Assistant) shout at R1 and stated Keep your damn hands to yourself, if you hit me, (I) am hitting you back. Later during the shift, the staff reported CNA1 was heard yelling in R2's room. When the staff entered, CNA1 was observed stating to the resident Why don't you just die already. The staff reported having observed CNA1 yell at residents who are wandering during the night to go back to bed, go to your f*ing room, I am sick and tired of you all. Staff stated no attempt was made to determine if residents needed assistance. Due to R1 and R2's level of cognitive impairment, neither demonstrated an awareness of the incidents. A review of R1's clinical record revealed diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain maintenance and housekeeping services necessary to maintain the facility in good repair and sanitary conditions for 2 of 3 units (3rd floor unit and 4th floor unit) and the laundry rooms for 1 of 1 environmental tour (3/28/25). Findings: On 3/28/25 from 8:20 a.m. to 8:45 a.m., an Environmental Tour was conducted with the Administrator, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) Manager and the 3rd Floor Unit Manager in which the following findings were observed: Laundry rooms >Clean Linen Area: There were 4 wall mounted fans that were dusty/dirty. There were 2 wall mounted air conditioning units that were dusty/dirty. > Soiled Linen Area: There were 2 wall mounted fans that were dusty/dirty. The ceiling air system, just inside the entrance door, had dusty/dirty filters. 3rd Floor Units (East and West) > The hallway walls were marred with black marks. >Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The privacy curtains were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care on 3 of 4 days of survey (3/25/25, 3/26/25 and 3/27/25) for 9 of 13 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (#40, #52, #153, #370, #366, #42, #24, #468 and #472) Findings: 1. On 3/25/25 from 9:24 a.m. to 10:23 a.m., and again on 3/26/25 at 7:25 a.m., the following was observed: > Resident #40 had an unlabeled/dated nebulizer pipe stored on the bedside dresser. In a brief interview, the resident stated he/she hasn't had to use the nebulizer in a week. > Resident #52 room had an unlabeled/dated oxygen nasal cannula tubing with the nasal prongs lying on the floor. > Resident #153 room had an unlabeled/dated oxygen nasal cannula tubing wrapped up under the concentrator handle. > Resident #370 room had an unlabeled/dated nebulizer tubing with the open tubing end hanging over the nebulizer handle. 2. On 3/25/25 at 10:29 a.m., Resident #366 had an oxygen concentrator running, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who requires Hemodialysis receives such services, consistent with the professional standards of practice and failed to ensure the care plan contained the needed information, including emergency interventions necessary to properly care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Hemodialysis. (#105 and #32) Findings: 1. On 3/26/25 at 8:32 a.m., the surveyor observed Resident #105 with a bandage to the upper arm. At this time, during an interview, Resident #105 stated he/she has an AVF (Arteriovenous Fistula) and has been going to dialysis for a couple of years. He/she then stated, Next Friday they are going to do something with my site, the past couple times they couldn't stop me from bleeding and I had to go to the hospital. The surveyor asked if and when the nurses assess and how they monitor his/her AVF site. He/she stated, They have never touched it and no monitoring. Review of the medical record states Resident #105 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of End-Stage Renal Disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0699 — pattern
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to assess resident's current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/trauma to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #39 and #110). Findings: 1. A review of Resident #39's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, dated 2/18/25, Section I, Active Diagnoses, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder, I6100 was coded to indicate Resident #39 has an active diagnosis for PTSD. The surveyor was unable to find information in the clinical record that indicates what Resident #39's PTSD was caused by, what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization, and measures to avoid trigger(s) that might cause re-traumatization. In addition, Resident #39's care plan lacked evidence of a trauma informed care plan with identified triggers and interventions to prevent re-traumatization. On 3/26/25 at 3:12 p.m., the surveyor confirmed the finding above with the Administrator and the Director of Social Services. 2. A review of Resident #110 's clinical record, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #36). Finding: Resident #36 was admitted in early March of 2025 with a primary diagnosis of fall with right ankle fracture requiring a Lovenox (anticoagulant) injection daily. As of 3/26/25 Resident #36's medical record lacked evidence of a baseline care plan that included the instructions necessary to properly care for him/her, in the area above. On 3/26/25 at 4:39 p.m., the above was discussed with the Director of Nursing.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order and care plan was followed for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy (#42). Finding: On 3/25/25 at 10:43 a.m., observation of Resident #42 receiving oxygen (O2) via nasal cannula with the oxygen concentrator set at 3 Liters Per Minute (LPM). At this time, the resident stated he/she is on 3 LPM of oxygen. On 3/26/25 at 7:29 a.m., an additional observation of Resident #42 receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula with the oxygen concentrator set at 3 LPM. Review of the medical record contained a Provider order dated 3/7/25 for Apply O2 at 4L to keep sats at 93 at rest and 88 with activity. every shift. The resident care plan for oxygen therapy r/t CHF (congestive heart Failure), Respiratory illness initiated: 2/28/25. Has interventions of oxygen settings: O2 via nasal cannula @ 4 L continuous. Further review of the nursing documentation states on 3/10/25, 3/11/25 and 3/15/25 he/she was on 3 LPM of oxygen via nasal cannula. On 3/26/25 at 11:07 a.m., during an interview, both the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a smoking assessment of resident capabilities and deficits to determine resident safety was completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking (105). Finding: On 3/26/25 at 8:44 a.m., during an interview with Resident #105, a Registered Nurse (RN) entered the resident's room and removed a lighter from the open nightstand drawer and explained to the resident that having the lighter in his/her room is a hazard and he/she can obtain the lighter prior to going out to smoke. The resident stated he/she is going outside to smoke after breakfast. Review of Resident #105's Smoking Safety Interaction dated 3/18/25, states he/she uses tobacco products, has Poor vision or blindness and Unable to extinguish tobacco or marijuana safely. The rest of the form includes the section Clinical Suggestions which has; Apply smoking apron, Set up cigarette holder, Staff to extinguish cigarette, Refer to interdisciplinary Team, if Resident deemed unsafe to smoke and Ensure eyeglasses are on, was not completed. On 3/26/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$22,205 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $22,205 — penalty dated 2026-04-15
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-21 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COVENANT HEALTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in ME