No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vantage at Lowell LLC

500 Wentworth Avenue, Lowell, MA 01852 · For profit - Individual · 115 certified beds · (978) 458-1271 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (978) 458-1271 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 actual-harm citations$13,497 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,497 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-29)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
600 Clark Rd · (978) 323-2800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
134 Andover St · (978) 221-6674 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
101 Phoenix Ave · (978) 970-3832 · Call to confirm hours
Park
433 Rogers St · (978) 970-4173 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.1%16.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%15.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.8%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.1%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.1%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.1%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.1%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%21.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.2%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.2%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.681.881.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.021.501.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.9%CMS range 41.1–62.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.9–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 5.7–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
29.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 79.8 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-14)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews and observations, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) whose bed was equipped with an air mattress, had limited mobility in his/her lower extremities and was dependent on staff for bed mobility, the facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance during care to maintain his/her safety. On 04/08/26, Certified Nurse Aide #1, while providing care to Resident #1 by herself, turned and repositioned Resident #1 onto his/her side, away from herself (CNA #1), Resident #1 rolled off the bed and fell to the floor. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and treatment and was diagnosed with bilateral distal femur fractures (both legs above the knee joint area).Findings include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, undated, indicated that staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had limited mobility, and decreased sensation from diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage in the hands and feet) in his/her extremities, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with adequate preventative measures to maintain his/her safety in an effort to prevent incidents/accidents, resulting in serious injury, when on 7/28/23 maintenance staff members moved Resident #1, who was in bed, to a new room and during the move they placed Resident #1's portable oxygen (O2) container (containing liquid oxygen) on the bed with him/her, the container tipped over and resulted in liquid O2 leaking out of the container onto Resident #1's bedding and he/she sustained a full thickness (full thickness injury, involves all layers of the dermis and which can often injure the underlying subcutaneous tissue) non-thermal burn to his/her left heel, which required treatment. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a decline in range of motion causing the development of a contracture for 1 Resident (#59) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, failure to thrive, anxiety and depression. Review of Resident #59's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated , 2/2/21, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 indicating he/she is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #59 requires extensive assistance from staff for bathing, grooming and toileting tasks. On 3/22/23 at 8:10 A.M., Resident #59 was observed lying in bed. His/her left hand was observed to be half closed into a fist. The third, fourth and fifth fingers were bent at the first and second knuckles and the Resident was unable to open his/her fingers when asked. Resident #59 said his/her hand started to bend like this about a month ago and he/she has been waiting to see a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one Resident, (#31) received adequate supervision to prevent a fall with injury out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Fall Reduction' revised 6/22/22 indicated the following: Goal: To identify residents at risk for falls and to decrease the incidence of resident falls. Procedure: *1. g. Instruct the resident to use the call light to call for assistance for transfer and mobility needs as indicated. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, frequent falls and abnormalities of gait. Review of Resident #31's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/1/23, indicated Resident #31 had intact cognition as evidenced by the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of possible 15. Review of Resident #31's fall care plan date initiated 9/22/21 indicated an intervention dated 10/10/21- Remind resident to ask for assistance when ambulating with walker. Review of quarterly rehabilitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) the facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record related to his/her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), when daily documentation by Certified Nurse Aides was incomplete, with some ADL's left blank. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation, undated, indicated the following:-All services provided to the resident shall be documented in the resident's medical record.-Documentation in the medical record will be complete and accurate.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in July 2025, diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF- a long-term condition that affects the heart's ability to beat well), and Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA/stroke).Review of Resident #1's Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) flow sheet for the month of April 2026 indicated the following:*Bathing, dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had limited mobility, required the use of an air mattress, and was dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, the facility failed to ensure his/her Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan was individualized, with interventions that clearly identified the appropriate number of staff assistance required to safely meet his/her needs.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, revision date of 03/2022, included the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. Review of the facility's policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a dignified manner during the dining experience for one Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 22 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff were not operating a cell phone while assisting Resident #24 with eating breakfast. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality of Life - Dignity, undated, indicated the following: - Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacral region, and unspecified protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #24's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 6 out of 15 indicating severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new ulcers from developing for two Resident (#24 and #53) out of a total of 22 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's air mattress were set at the correct setting according to the physician's order. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries, dated and revised April 2020, indicated the following: - Support Surfaces and Pressure Redistribution: Select appropriate support surfaces based on the resident's risk factors, in accordance with current clinical practice. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacral region, and unspecified protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #24's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide continued therapy services and recommended by the Occupational Therapist for one Resident #24 out of a total sample of 22 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #24 continued to receive Occupational Therapy services as recommended for the use of a hand orthotic while under hospice services. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Scheduling Therapy Services, dated and revised July 2013, indicated the following: - Therapy services shall be scheduled in accordance with the resident's treatment plan. - The therapist shall interview the resident and consult with the attending physician as to the type of treatment to be administered. - Therapy is scheduled in coordination with nursing service and is documented in the resident's medical record. - Nursing service shall be responsible for preparing and escorting the resident to the therapy area unless such treatment is scheduled in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to support nutritional needs for one Resident (#48), out of a total sample of 22 residents were implemented in accordance with professional standards of care. Specifically, Resident #48, who was assessed for nutritional risk, experienced a severe weight loss, which was not evaluated by the registered dietitian. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, revision date March 2022 indicated the following: Residents weights are monitored for undesirable and unintended weight loss or gain. Weight Assessment 1. Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team., 2. Weights are recorded in each unit's weight record or chart and in the individual's medical record. 3. Any wight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. a. if the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure standards of practice to prevent the spread infection were implemented. Specifically, a Laboratory Technician providing laboratory services to residents, failed to adhere to infection control practices when she placed her bag, which she uses to store supplies and specimens and uses in other facilities, on top of a resident's bed. Findings include: During an observation on 5/13/25 at 11:36 A.M., a Laboratory Technician was observed in a resident room occupied by two residents. The room was marked by a sign at the door indicating enhanced barrier precautions. The Laboratory Technician's bag with her supplies was on top of the resident's bed and in contact with the linen. The lab technician did the blood draw to the resident in bed 2 and then moved to the bedside table of the resident in bed one to fill out a form and then removed her gloves and placed the specimen in a plastic bag and into the bag that was on the bed. During an interview on 5/13/25, when the Laboratory Technician exited the room, the Laboratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment carts on two of two units were locked and secured while not in use. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, not dated, indicated the following: -Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing staff is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. On 5/14/24 from 7:35 A.M. to 8:06 A.M., the surveyor observed the the Left Unit treatment cart unlocked and unsupervised in the hallway. On 5/15/24 at 7:52 A.M., the surveyor observed the the Left Unit treatment cart unlocked and unsupervised in the hallway. On 5/15/24 at 8:08 A.M., the surveyor observed the the Right Unit treatment cart unlocked and unsupervised in the hallway. During an interview on 5/16/24 at 9:11 A.M., Nurse #4 said the expectation is that the treatment carts are always locked unless a nurse is present at the cart. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, resident group meeting, and test tray results, the facility failed to ensure foods provided to residents were prepared by methods that conserve nutritional value, flavor, were palatable and at appetizing temperatures on 2 out of 2 units. Findings include: During the screening portion of the survey, numerous residents expressed concerns about poor food quality, palatability, and temperature. During the resident group meeting on 5/15/24 at 11:00 A.M., 8 out of 8 participating residents said that they did not like the food being served at the facility. Residents described the food as gross or disgusting. Review of the grievances book included two resident grievances regarding the quality of the food, food delivery and accurate meal orders. On 5/15/24 at 1:01 P.M., the left-wing unit food truck arrived. At 1:11 P.M., all resident trays were served, and the surveyors received test trays. The following results were recorded: 1a) -Pureed Chicken: 131 degrees Fahrenheit, no flavor, very bland. Warm to taste, not hot. - Pureed Vegetables: 132 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to properly store food items and properly follow sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, undated, indicated the following: - Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. - Food Services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times. - All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date) The surveyor made the following observations in the walk-in refrigerator during the initial walk-through of the kitchen on 5/14/24 at 7:10 A.M.: - A pan containing raw chicken was observed covered in plastic wrap with the date 5/7/24 written. The chicken was observed to be covered in slimy, pink juices. - A pan containing a cooked meat product covered with aluminum foil. There was no date or label identifying what the product was. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Residents on the Right Wing unit. Findings include: The surveyor made the following observations: - On 5/14/24 at 8:19 A.M., a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed feeding a resident in bed while standing over him/her, not at eye level. - On 5/14/24 at 11:47 A.M., a resident was observed sitting at a table in the dining room with a second resident. The first resident received his/her tray at 12:08 P.M. and was being assisted by staff. At 12:08 P.M., the staff assisting the resident told the other resident Your food is in the next truck. The second resident received his/her meal at 12:42 P.M., 55 minutes after the first resident had begun eating. - On 5/15/24 at 8:13 A.M., a resident was observed sitting in a Broda chair at a dining room table with another resident who was being assisted with breakfast. At 8:17 A.M., a CNA was observed leaning on the initial resident's Broda chair talking to another CNA at a different table. At 8:27 A.M., a CNA sat down with the resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect one Resident (#54) from abuse out of a total of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, Occupational Therapist (OT) #1 yelled at Resident #54 in the presence of other residents and staff for not following his/her directions. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy dated 2/20/23 indicated: *The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc. Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers and staff of other agencies serving the resident. *Types of abuse: Verbal: oral, written or gestured language, that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms, to the resident/patient or their families,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#13) was free from restraints by locking the remote control for the bed, preventing the Resident to reposition him/herself in bed, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Physical Restraints, dated 1/1/17, indicated the following: -The facility recognizes each resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity including the right to be free from any physical restraint imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical condition. -The policy includes an interdisciplinary process of assessment and reassessment in order to ensure that when a restraint is necessary to treat a resident's medical condition the least restrictive is utilized for the least amount of time to treat the resident's medical condition with the plan for continued assessment and reduction. -Components of constraint use:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed its abuse policies and procedures for one Resident (#54) out of a total of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, staff who were present when Occupational Therapist (OT) #1 yelled at Resident #54 did not intervene or remove OT #1 from the unit per policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy dated 2/20/23 indicated: *The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc. Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers and staff of other agencies serving the resident. *Types of abuse: Verbal: oral, written or gestured language, that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the state agency as required for one Resident (#285) out of a total of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy, dated 2/20/23 indicated: The Administrator is responsible for ensuring that there has been notification [to] local law enforcement and the State Survey Agency within two hours of allegation after identification of alleged/suspected incident. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made. Review of the grievance book included a grievance dated 6/13/23 which indicated that Resident #285's family member had found Resident #285 in his/her room not wearing oxygen (02). The grievance indicated that nurse staff then took Resident #285's 02 saturation level and he/she was at an Oxygen saturation of 81 percent. The family member documented on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident centered care plans were implemented for three Residents (#64, #182, #23) to ensure aspiration risk precautions were followed, out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated December 2022, indicated To provide support, assistance, and encouragement to remain as independent as possible with activities of daily living, including hygiene, mobility, elimination, dining, and communication; and that the care and services provided are person-centered, and honor and support each resident's preferences, choices, values, and beliefs. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. 1. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including dysphagia, type 2 diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide showers for one Resident (#62) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated 12/22/21, indicated the following: -the resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including heart failure. Review of Resident #62's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of a possible 15, which indicated Resident #62 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #63 required substantial assistance from staff for bathing tasks. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 7:44 A.M., Resident #62 said he/she had not received a shower in a long time and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide vision services as requested for one Resident (#60) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow up with the Resident's and physician's request to schedule an appointment for glasses for Resident #60. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Vision and Hearing, dated and revised 12/21/21, indicated the following: - The facility will provide from an outside source ophthalmology and audiology services to meet the needs of the residents. - The facility will, if necessary or requested, assist the resident with: making appointments, arranging transportation to and from the office of a practitioner specializing in the treatment of vision or hearing impairment or the office of a professional specializing in the provision of vision of hearing assistive devices. - Assistive devices to maintain vision include, but are not limited to, glasses During an interview on 5/14/24 at 7:49 A.M., Resident #60 told the surveyor that he/she cannot see and he/she needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident admitted with an indwelling catheter is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates continued catheter use is necessary for one Resident (#23) in a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy which is according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), indicated the following: -Indwelling catheters should not be used unless there is valid medical justification. Assessment should include consideration of the risk and benefits of an indwelling catheter, the anticipated duration of use, and consideration of complications resulting from the use of an indwelling catheter. Complications can include an increased risk of urinary tract infection, blockage of the catheter with associated bypassing of urine, expulsion of the catheter, pain, discomfort, and bleeding. Resident # 23 was admitted to the facility in 04/18/2021…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to address the nutritional status in a timely manner for one Resident (#19) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for Resident #19. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Monitoring, revised and dated 12/22/21, indicated the following: - Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken within 24 hours for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Dietitian, Physician and the resident/responsible party. - The Dietitian will review the weights monthly to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. The plan of care will be updated as needed. - The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria: a. 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice one Resident (#8) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow Resident #8's physician's orders to implement the correct oxygen flow rate and ensure the external filter was clean. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Equipment Change/Disinfection, undated, indicated the following: - Oxygen Concentrators: Rinse and dry the external filter weekly and PRN (as needed) when visibly dusty. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus and pneumonia. Review of Resident #8's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 out of a possible 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #8 requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide food in a form to meet the needs of three Resident (#64, #13, and #23) out of a sample of 22 residents. Specifically, for Residents #64 and #24, the facility to provide the correct diet texture during meals. For Resident #13, the facility failed to provide the correct diet during meals and failed to prevent the Resident from consuming food that was of a texture not ordered by the physician. Findings include: 1. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including dysphagia, type 2 diabetes, and COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #64's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 4 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident has severe cognitive impairments. On 5/14/24 from 11:53 A.M. to 12:01 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #64 in the hallway with his/her lunch tray. The Residents' tray was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document one Resident's (#2) skin assessment out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis. Review of Resident #2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15, which indicated the Resident was cognitively intact. Review of the wound documentation dated 5/7/24 and 5/14/24 indicated Resident #2 had a stage 2 pressure wound to his/her right buttock, which first appeared on 5/5/24. Review of Resident #2's skin assessment dated [DATE] failed to indicate a right buttock pressure wound. During an interview on 5/16/24 at 8:41 A.M., Nurse #4 said all residents receive a skin assessment weekly and all skin issues are documented on those assessments regardless of the wound doctor documentation. During an interview on 5/16/24 at 8:51 A.M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee identified quality deficient areas and to develop and implement an appropriate corrective action plan, to ensure satisfactory outcomes from concerns brought forth from resident council meetings. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled 'QAPI Plan' dated 2023 indicated the following: *Performance Improvement Projects The QAPI team at Belvidere Healthcare Center will review our sources of information to determine if gaps or patterns exist in our systems of care that could result in quality problems, or if there are opportunities to make improvements. During the group meeting on 3/23/23 at 11:00 A.M., 19 out of 19 participating residents said they had brought the following concerns to management and had not received resolutions or feedback. - On going issues with laundry not being done in a timely manner - Receiving cold food - Staff being on their own personal phones in resident care areas - Concerns with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain functioning equipment in the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation, during the breakfast tray line service, on 3/22/23 at 7:17 A.M., the dietary staff was not putting any of the plated breakfasts on a plate warmer to prevent food from getting cold. During an interview on 3/22/23 at 7:28 A.M., the cook said that the plate warmer has been broken for a few days and that maintenance needed to fix it. The plate warmer was broken for the duration of the survey.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to 1. provide a timely room transfer to 1 Resident (#49) and 2. provide a dignified dining experience for 1 Resident (#13), and 3. failed to provide linen services for the facility in order for residents personal clothing to be cleaned, and 4. provide a dignified existence for 1 Resident (#9) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #49 was admitted in 09/2022 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #49 scored a 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the facility policy titled Room to Room Transfers, dated 03/2023, indicated the following: - Where feasible, the facility will make room transfers when requested by the a resident or their representative as it becomes necessary to meet the resident's medical and nursing care needs. - The facility reserves the right to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 3/22/23 at 8:30 A.M., the following were observed on the Right Wing unit: *Both entry doors to the unit had significant scuff marks. *In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were gouges in the wall with plaster exposed behind both beds. *In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a piece of tile missing in the bathroom. The radiator in the bathroom had significant rust and both doors of the bathroom had significant scuff marks. *In room [ROOM NUMBER], two tiles at the end of the B bed were cracked and one tile was missing a piece. The walls were scuffed behind the A bed and there were two spots behind the B bed with paint missing. *In room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtain was soiled with stains. *In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom floor was missing piece of the tile, there were significant stains on wall next to sink, the radiator had significant rusting and there were 3 small holes next to toilet paper dispenser. There were scuff marks on wall next to A bed. *In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a missing piece of baseboard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the grievance log, resident group response and interviews, the facility 1) failed to ensure residents of the facility were aware of the grievance process and had access to grievance forms and 2) resolved a grievance for 1 Resident (#15) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident group meeting was held on 3/23/23 at 11:00 A.M., 19 out of 19 participating residents said they were unaware of the process to file a grievance in the facility. None of the 19 residents were aware of the grievance process, where grievance forms are available, how to fill out a grievance form or who to give the form to. Nineteen of 19 participating residents said when they verbally tell staff of a grievance, they feel the facility does nothing to resolve it. The residents said they feel like they never get any feedback from the administrator or never feel like there is follow through. Nineteen out of 19 residents said they have been complaining of the same things (cold food, long call light wait times and staff members on their phone) for several months without a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performance reviews for 5 of 5 sampled CNAs. Findings include: During review of 5 CNA employee records, the Surveyor was unable to locate annual performance reviews for all 5 CNAs. During an interview on 3/24/23 at 10:13 A.M., the Corporate Human Resource Officer said the facility and corporate has fallen behind on training and performance reviews for staff. The Corporate Human Resource Officer said annual reviews for the 5 CNAs were not completed, as well as reviews for most if not all other staff members of the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of a medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. Two of four licensed nurses made errors during a medication administration on 2 out of 2 units. Three medication errors were observed out of 27 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.11%. Findings include: Review of policy titled' Medication Administration-General Guidelines, undated indicated the following: Procedure: *4. Five rights-Right resident,right drug,right dose, right route and right time, are applied for each medication being administered. A triple check of these 5 rights is recommended at three steps in the process of preparation of a medication for administration: (1) when the medication is selected, (2) when the dose is removed from the container, and finally (3) just after the dose is prepared and the medication pt away. a. Check #1: select the medication-label, container and contents are checked for integrity, and compared against the medication administration record (MAR) by reviewing the 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide dental services to 3 Residents (#48, #26 and #59) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services & Denture Services, dated 12/2022, indicated the following: -Purpose: to ensure that residents receive routine and emergent dental services to meet their individual needs. - Our facility has a contract with a dentist that comes to the facility and provides dental services on a routine basis. - Failure of a dentist to provide follow up services will result in the facility's right to use it's consultant dentist to provide the resident's dental needs. - Nursing services or designee is responsible for scheduling dental services as needed. 1. Resident #48 was admitted in 8/2016 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #48 scored a 10 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. The surveyor made the following observations in the Activity Room: On 3/22/23 at 1:02 P.M., two activity staff members were observed eating lunch at the same table as 1 resident and while other residents were eating at another table. The staff were unable to wear masks while eating. On 3/23/23 at 12:54 P.M., two activity staff were observed eating lunch at a table with other residents who are were also eating. The staff were unable to wear masks while eating. On 3/23/23 at 2:48 P.M. an activity assistant had her mask on her chin. not covering her mouth or nose, eating ice cream with residents close by. During an interview on 3/24/23 at 10:44 A.M., the Infection Preventionist said staff would be wearing masks when around residents. She said she reminds staff of this every day but it is still a work in progress. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement infection control practices by 1. failing to complete inspections for Legionella and other waterborne pathogens, 2. failing to store dirty linen appropriately for pick up and 3. failing to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 5 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants reviewed received 12 hours of mandatory in-service training in a year. Review of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) employee records indicated that 5 out of 5 did not complete the mandatory 12 hours of education required. During an interview on 3/24/23 at 10:13 A.M., the Corporate Human Resource Officer said the facility and corporate headquarters have fallen behind on training for staff. The Corporate Human Resource Officer said required in-service training for the 5 CNAs were not completed, as well as training for most if not all other CNAs in the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident group responses and interviews, the facility failed to provide a private space for residents of the facility to meet for resident group. Findings include: Resident group meeting was held on 3/23/23 at 11:00 A.M. During the meetings, 19 out of 19 participating residents said they meet for resident group meeting every month, however, feel the space in which they meet in is not private. The residents said that other staff are often walking through the space when they are meeting, kitchen staff are bringing food trucks through the space, and other residents are being taken out by staff to smoke and need to walk through the group meeting. Nineteen out of 19 residents also said they do not feel they can meet as a group without staff present. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 1:45 P.M., the Activity Director said she attends the resident group every month. She said the group is held in the only room available in the facility large enough to meet. The Activity Director said although the room does not have a closed door the meeting could be private if other staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in the required timeframe for 1 Resident (#59) out of a total of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, last revised 12/1/18, indicated the following: *Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals. *Allegations of abuse will be reported promptly and thoroughly investigated. *The administrator and director of nursing are responsible for investigation and reporting. *Notify the shift supervisor/charge nurse/manager immediately if person is suspected abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of property occurs. *Report the incident immediately to the Director of Nursing, and Administrator the Administrator, Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to investigate an alleged incident for 1 Resident (#9) out of a sample of 30 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition last revised 12/1/18 indicated the following: *The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends. *Allegations of abuse will be reported promptly and thoroughly investigated. *The shift supervisor is identified as responsible for immediate initiation of the reporting process. *The Administrator and Director of Nursing are responsible for the investigation and reporting. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including depression. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of possible 15 indicating intact cognition. During a Resident group meeting held on 3/23/23 at 11:00 A.M., Resident #9 reported that staff do not take him/her to activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards for 2 Residents (#14 and #23) by 1). checking the pacemaker for Resident #14 and 2). not following physician's order for Resident #23, out of a total of 30 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in November 2019 with diagnoses including heart failure and presence of a cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #14's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of a possible 15 which indicates he/she has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicates Resident #14 requires extensive assistance from staff for functional tasks. Review of Resident #14's pacemaker care plan last revised 12/6/22 indicated the following intervention: *Arrange for pacemaker checks as needed. Review of Resident #14's physician orders and nursing notes failed to indicate pacemaker checks were regularly scheduled and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance during mealtime for 2 Residents (#13 and #14) out of a total of 30 residents sampled. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated December 2022, indicated the following: *The facility will provide care and services for the following activities of daily living: Dining - eating, including meals and snacks. 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including high blood pressure and spinal stenosis. Review of Resident #13's most recent Minimum Data Set, dated , 1/12/23, indicated the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8 out of a possible 15 indicating he/she has moderate cognitive impairment. On 3/23/23 at 8:05 A.M., Resident #13 was observed lying in bed with his/her meal in front of him/her. From 8:05 A.M., to 9:00 A.M., the Resident attempted to feed him/herself. The Resident was able to drink his/her coffee but was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and interview the facility failed to maintain a urinary catheter in a manner to reduce infection for 1 Resident (#225) out of a total 30 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Catheter Care' undated, indicated the following: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infection Control: *2. (b) Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident #225 was admitted to the facility in March 2023, with diagnoses including, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract infection. Review of Resident #225's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of possible 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicates Resident #225 requires total dependence from staff for toileting. Section H of MDS indicates Resident has an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and interview the facility failed to 1) provide oxygen as ordered and store oxygen supplies in a manner that would reduce infection for 1 Residents (#14) and 2) failed to store nebulizer equipment in a manner that will reduce infection for 1 Resident (#225) out of a total 30 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedure, dated 12/6/22, indicated the following: *Oxygen is administered by licensed nurses with the physician's order in order to provide a resident with sufficient oxygen to their blood and tissues. Orders should specify the oxygen equipment and flow rate or concentration required as routine or PRN (as needed). Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in November 2019 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, dependence on supplemental O2 (oxygen), and heart failure. Review of Resident #14's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a physician order for pain management for 1 Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain Management and Management Program, dated 10/2021, indicated the following: - Purpose: to provide a consistent method for the assessment, observation, planning, development and evaluation of an effective pain management plan of care. - Pain is whatever the person experiencing it says it is, whenever he/she states it does exist. Resident #48 was admitted in 8/2016 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #48 scored a 10 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the progress note, dated 11/15/22, indicated the following: - Resident complained of pain in his/her teeth and is not able to chew because of the pain. Resident said his/her dentist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication did not exceed 14 days unless the prescriber documented the rationale and duration of use of the medication for one Resident (#46) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Use of Psychotropic Drugs', revised 12/6/21 indicated the following: Policy: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition,as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). Procedure/Guidelines *8. As needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs shall be used only when the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record, and for a limited duration (example 14 days). a. If the attending physician or prescribing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and menu review, the facility failed to follow the menu for a breakfast meal. Findings include: During resident group meeting on 3/23/23 at 11:00 A.M., 19 out of 19 participating residents said the food given at meals frequently does not match what is on the facility menu and it is very frustrating to them. Review of the menu for the date of 3/22/23, during the breakfast meal, indicated that residents should have received 2 pancakes with syrup and a 2 ounce piece of sausage. During an observation on 3/22/23 at 7:17 A.M., on the breakfast tray line, there were no 2 ounce pieces of sausage prepared.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and test trays, the facility failed to maintain appropriate temperatures of the food to prevent foodborne illness. Findings include: During an observation, during the breakfast tray line service, on 3/22/23 at 7:17 A.M., the dietary staff was not putting any of the plated breakfasts on a plate warmer to prevent food from getting cold. During an interview on 3/22/23 at 7:28 A.M., the cook said that the plate warmer has been broken for a few days and that maintenance needed to fix it. During the resident group meeting on 3/23/23 at 11:00 A.M., 19 out of 19 participants said that the food is cold every day at every meal. During a test tray on 3/22/23 at 8:31 A.M., the following temperatures were taken: - Pancakes: 88 degrees Fahrenheit - Oatmeal: 93.7 degrees Fahrenheit - Coffee: 113.7 degrees Fahrenheit - Milk: 61 degrees Fahrenheit During a test tray on 3/23/23 at 12:12 P.M., the following temperatures were taken: - Milk: 46.5 degrees Fahrenheit

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the prescribed therapeutic diet for 2 Residents (#5 and #28), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #28 was admitted in 04/2010 with diagnoses including dementia and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #28 scored a 9 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During an observation on 3/22/23 at 9:37 A.M., Resident #28 was laying in bed with his/her breakfast tray in front of him/her. Resident #28 had cheerios on his/her tray. Behind Resident #28's bed was a sign that stated Resident #28 should not have hard, crunchy items and is on a dysphagia diet. Review of Resident #28's diet order and speech therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #28 was on a dysphagia diet with thin liquids. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 12:07 P.M., the Speech Therapist said that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and tray ticket review, the facility failed to provide the dietary preferences for 1 Resident (#42) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Resident #42 was admitted in 12/2022 with diagnoses including depression and type 2 diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #42 scored a 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS indicated that Resident #42 is independent with eating. During an observation on 3/22/23 at 8:45 A.M., Resident #42 was lying in bed with his/her breakfast untouched. Resident #42 said that he/she did not get what he/she ordered and was not going to eat breakfast. Review of the tray ticket for Resident #42 indicated that he/she was supposed to receive 1/2 cup of scrambled eggs and 1 slice of white toast. Resident #42's tray only contained 2 pancakes. During an interview on 3/22/23 at 8:50 A.M., Nurse #3 said that she checks the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to 1. maintain kitchen sanitation practices and 2. failed to record and log temperatures of the food and dish machine. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, undated, indicated the following: - Food services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times. - Food in designated dry storage areas will be kept off the floor (at least 18 inches) and clear of sprinkler heads. - All foods stored in the refrigerator will or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated. 1. During the kitchen walk through on 3/22/23 at 7:17 A.M., the following was observed: - a box of juice was on the floor in the dry storage room - a container of fruit medley was not labeled or dated in the walk in refrigerator - a package of sliced ham was open and undated in the refrigerator - a container of vegetable soup was labeled 3/16/22 - a container of shredded cheese and sliced cheese was opened and unlabeled or dated. During an observation on 3/23/23 at 1:20 P.M., 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Residents were delivered mail on Saturday. Findings include: During the Resident Group Meeting conducted on 5/14/25 at 10:45 A.M. and attended by twelve residents. Multiple residents said they do not get mail delivered on Saturdays. A few residents said they are expecting deliveries of mail. The residents said it is written someplace on the bulletin board. Upon completion of the meeting, one resident directed the surveyor to the Activity Calendar on a large bulletin board. Review of the calendar revealed *Personal Mail will be distributed Mon-Friday. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 12:07 P.M., the Administrator said he was not aware the Activity Calendar indicated mail was delivered Mon-Friday, and did not include Saturday delivery. The Administrator said that was not right.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,497 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,497 — penalty dated 2023-11-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VANTAGE CARE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AREM, CHERYLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/29/2025
BROWN, YOSSIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 12/29/2025
HERSKOVITZ, MIRIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/29/2025
YUROWITZ, SAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 12/15/2025
VANTAGE LOWELL REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
JOHNSON, JERIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
INNOVATIONS HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2025
BRESNICK, LOUISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
CAHILL, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
GAUGHAN, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
GREEN, MORRISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
IM FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
JCA CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
LTC CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025
VANTAGE CARE MA4 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$450K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 47%Medicare 9%Other / private 44%

This home reported $450K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$363per resident / day
operating cost
$11,048per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225489. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next