Vantage Health & Rehab Of New Bedford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 67.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.68 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at risk for falls and required the use of a chair alarm in an effort to prevent falls, the Facility failed to ensure his/her assistive devices were functioning properly to prevent incidents and/or accidents resulting in an injury. On 4/07/24 after Resident #1 was found on the floor in the hallway after a fall, it was determined that his/her chair alarm was found to be in the off position and therefore had not sounded to alert staff that he/she was in motion. Resident #1 sustained a laceration to the left side of his/her head, was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for evaluation, required staples to close the laceration, was diagnosed with multiple fractures as a result of the fall and was admitted for treatment. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Fall Policy, dated 10/2022 indicated the following: -it is the policy of the facility to ensure that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to implement their grievance process and attempt to resolve grievances in a timely manner for one Resident (#25), out of a total sample of 17 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, dated 1/5/26, indicated but was not limited to the following: - [Corporate Name] shall ensure that residents, family members, responsible parties are provided with a mechanism to communicate concerns, conflicts, complaints, grievances or opportunities for improvement in care and services- grievance forms are available for the resident, family, responsible party to complete on first floor bulletin board, through resident council activity staff, and with social services- it is the responsibility of all staff who hear a grievance to report it to their supervisor- investigation and resolution of grievances shall be completed in a timely manner (within 5 working days of receipt of the grievance form)- the individual initiating the grievance will be notified of the findings and method of resolution by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for injuries of unknown origin for one Resident (#25), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - It is the responsibility of our employees, agency staff, facility consultants, attending physicians, family members, visitors, etc. to promptly report any incidents or suspected incidents of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown source to facility management- The abuse coordinator in the facility is the Director of Nurses (DON)- To help with recognition of incidents of abuse the following definitions of abuse are provided: injury of unknown source is defined as an injury that meets both of the following conditions: 1. the source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident AND 2. the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury; location of the injury;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin for one Resident #25, out of a total sample of 17 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - It is the responsibility of our employees, agency staff, facility consultants, attending physicians, family members, visitors, etc. to promptly report any incidents or suspected incidents of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown source to facility management- The abuse coordinator in the facility is the Director of Nurses (DON)- To help with recognition of incidents of abuse the following definitions of abuse are provided: injury of unknown source is defined as an injury that meets both of the following conditions: 1. the source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident AND 2. the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury; location of the injury; number of injuries observed at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown origin for one Resident (#25), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - It is the responsibility of our employees, agency staff, facility consultants, attending physicians, family members, visitors, etc. to promptly report any incidents or suspected incidents of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown source to facility management- The abuse coordinator in the facility is the Director of Nurses (DON)- To help with recognition of incidents of abuse the following definitions of abuse are provided: injury of unknown source is defined as an injury that meets both of the following conditions: 1. the source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident AND 2. the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury; location of the injury; number of injuries…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program which included a complete and accurate system of surveillance to identify any trends or potential infections. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated December 2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.-The elements of the infection prevention and control program consist of coordination/oversight, policies/procedures, surveillance, data analysis, antibiotic stewardship, outbreak management,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included antibiotic use protocols and monitoring of antibiotic use in accordance with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, last revised December 2016, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program.-The purpose of our antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents.-When a culture and sensitivity is ordered lab results and the current clinical situation will be communicated to the prescriber as soon as available to determine if antibiotic therapy should be started, continued, modified, or discontinued. Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Review and surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, last revised December 2016, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Antibiotic usage and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to develop baseline care plans for two Residents (#78 and #79), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan:1. For Resident #78, that included the necessary care of a colostomy (a surgical procedure where a portion of the large intestine is brought through the abdominal wall to carry stool out of the body) and Foley catheter (a tube inserted through the urinary tract into the bladder, connected to a drainage bag); and2. For Resident #79, that included strategies to mitigate future falls and offer a copy of those care plans to the Resident/healthcare proxy (HCP).Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, dated 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - a person-centered baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission-baseline care plans include a minimum of: physician orders, initial goals based on admission orders, therapy and social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards by failing to implement physician's orders to discontinue Oxycodone (a pain medication), for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 17 residents, resulting in Resident #5 receiving the medication for 22 extra days. Findings include:Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following:-The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated:-Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were communicated to the provider and addressed in a timely manner for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure recommendations by the pharmacy consultant to clarify two as needed (PRN) albuterol orders (respiratory inhaler), review risk versus benefit of Paxil (Paroxetine, an antidepressant) medication dosing of extended release (ER) 50 milligrams (mg) daily which is over the daily recommended dose of 37.5mg and recommend Narcan order (reverses opioid overdose) as needed (PRN) due to history of recent opioid overdose, was reviewed and responded to by the provider timely. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Reviews, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The Consultant Pharmacist shall review the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly.-The Consultant Pharmacist will provide the Director of Nursing Services and Medical Director with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate modified texture diet was prepared and served for one test tray. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure broccoli was prepared and served in a form designed to meet the individual needs of Residents on a dysphagia advanced diet. Findings include:Review of facility's Diet Guide Sheet indicated the facility was to serve chopped broccoli florets to residents on a dysphagia advanced diet with their lunch on 2/18/26. On 2/18/26 at 12:11 P.M., a test tray was performed; the meal requested included dysphagia advanced texture. The test tray included broccoli florets and stalks. The surveyor observed the florets ranged approximately between dime-sized to quarter-sized and the stalks ranged approximately between dime-sized to nickel-sized on the test tray. On 2/18/26 at 12:11 P.M., the surveyor sampled two broccoli stalks noting the flesh was very tender and easily crushed between the tongue and roof of the mouth while the outer skin remained intact. On 2/18/26 at 12:25 P.M., the surveyor observed one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,318 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-04-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VANTAGE CARE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA