No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Blaire House Of Milford

20 Claflin Street, Milford, MA 01757 · For profit - Corporation · 73 certified beds · (508) 473-1272 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 473-1272 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2022Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$38,610 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $38,610 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-14)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
308 Main St · (508) 478-0555 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
137 S Main St · (508) 478-1223 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
186 Central St · (508) 381-3901 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.1%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.4%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%15.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.6%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.1%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.8%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.1%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.081.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.351.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
20.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 20.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.4%CMS range 34.6–53.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.9–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge20.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge13.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 4.9–14.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
39.0%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 68.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-28)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was physician's orders included the administration of an antipsychotic medication (clozapine) and an antianxiety medication (clonazepam), the Facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was free from the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications, when although the dosages of his/her psychotropic medications were successfully titrated down while he/she was in the hospital, upon readmission to the Facility he/she was restarted on his/her previous higher dosages, Resident #1 became lethargic, was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for evaluation for mental status changes and required readmission related to drug-induced fever related to the rapid dose increase of clozapine. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Medication Reconciliation/Drug Regimen Review Policy and Procedure, with a revision date of 02/2024, indicated the following: -To provide a systematic format for collecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely medical care resulting in the development of an infection requiring oral and intravenous antibiotics, a seven-day hospitalization, and recommendation for a third toe amputation for one Resident (#20), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Notify the physician and/or physician assistant immediately once the Resident reported the right third toe injury to staff, which delayed physician evaluation and treatment for over 48 hours, and b. Provide ongoing assessment for latent injuries and/or signs of infections of the right third toe wound over the course of 48 hours (Saturday and Sunday). Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses which included stroke, end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, peripheral vascular disease, and a recent left above knee amputation (September 2022). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-12-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff identified, addressed, and monitored gradual unplanned significant weight loss for one Resident (#20), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Assess nutritional interventions put in place on 10/7/22 for their effectiveness to prevent continued weight loss through 12/7/22, and b. Identify in a timely manner the Resident's food and flavor preferences to optimize the Resident's caloric intake to prevent continued weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Nutritional Policy and Procedure, dated May 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Purpose: To promote optimal nutrition and provide a mechanism to identify significant weight changes and implement corrective action as well as providing nutritional interventions for residents with pressure ulcers. Weight monitoring: Each resident is to be weighed upon admission and thereafter, a minimum of once a month, and more frequently as medically necessary or as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a Legal Guardianship (person designated by the court to make health care decisions on behalf of a person determined to not be able to make those decisions) in place, the Facility failed to ensure nursing honored his/her Guardian's request and Physician's Order regarding the administration of his/her as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications used to help treat his/her mood and behavior. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Rights, dated as last reviewed 07/2025, indicated the Resident (or Legal Representative) has the right to participate in the planning and treatment of care.Review of the Facility Policy titled Administering Medications, dated as last revised, April 2019, indicated medications are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders, including any time frame.Review of the Facility Policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, dated as last revised, February 2025, indicated psychotropic medication management is an interdisciplinary process that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had lost his/her upper and lower dentures and had been seen by the Dentist to have new dentures made, the Facility failed to ensure they obtained a signed consent in a timely manner from his/her Legal Guardian, resulting in a delay of several months before his/her new dentures could be fabricated.Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, Dental Services, dated as last revised 2/2014, indicated that all orders for the treatment of the resident's dental problems must be in writing and signed and dated by the dentist providing the service. The Policy further indicated that all orders must be charted and made part of the resident's medical record and care plan.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in August 2023, diagnoses include a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) related to a motor vehicle accident, depression, anxiety and behavioral disturbances.Review of Resident #1's Decree and Order of Appointment of Guardian for an Incapacitated Person, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #111 was newly admitted to the facility from home in 5/2025 with diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, combined systolic and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance. The Resident had been living at home with his/her family and received services from a home Hospice agency. Review of the nursing policy for new admissions, revised in 10/2024, indicated that an admission Checklist (CN-011) was to be completed for each admission. Upon completion of the First Day tasks from the checklist, the nurse was to return the checklist to the Director of Nursing/Executive Director. First Day tasks included, but were not limited to the following: -Physician notification -Physician orders complete, including order to admit for skilled nursing and observation During an observation and interview on 5/22/25 at 11:18 A.M., Resident #111's family member said that they were concerned with the topical, antifungal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when one Resident (#162), was involved in a resident to resident altercation, in a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff, who were aware of the incident and notified the Administrator, implemented their abuse protocol by notifying the local authorities of the potential abuse or implemented a system of follow up with interventions to prevent potential future incidents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure, dated as reviewed 4/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the purpose of the policy is to promote prevention, protection, prompt reporting and interventions in response to an alleged, suspected or witnessed abuse of any resident - reporting requirements: in general each covered individual shall report to the secretary and 1 or more law enforcement entities in which the facility is located any reasonable suspicion of a crime (as defined by the law) against any individual who is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident to resident altercation as potential abuse in which one Resident (#162) was struck with a pillow by their roommate, in a total sample of 16 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure, dated as reviewed 4/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the purpose of the policy is to promote prevention, protection, prompt reporting and interventions in response to an alleged, suspected or witnessed abuse of any resident - reporting requirements: in general each covered individual shall report to the secretary and 1 or more law enforcement entities in which the facility is located any reasonable suspicion of a crime (as defined by the law) against any individual who is a resident; timing: if the event that caused the suspicion did not result in serious bodily injury, then the suspicion shall be reported not later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion - the procedural and investigational requirement for serious reportable events…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory results were reported and acted on timely for one Resident (#262), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report Resident #262's 4/1/25 critically low hemoglobin (Hgb, a protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen from the lungs to the body's tissues and returns carbon dioxide from the tissues back to the lungs) level result to the Resident's provider until 4/3/25. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Consults, Labs and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol, dated 4/2024, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -Nursing staff will review all consults, labs, diagnostic test results, and gather any other pertinent documentation that would be necessary for the provider to recommend the course of treatment. The nurse will notify the physician by calling into the provider's answering service, in which they will then document in the Electronic Health Record (EHR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated in three of three kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except when packaging food using a reduced oxygen packaging method as specified under § 3-502.12, and except as specified in paragraphs (E) and (F) of this section, refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41°Fahrenheit (F) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain an accurate surveillance system that reflected potential illnesses and infections in the facility in accordance with the most up to date pre-defined McGeer criteria; and 2. Ensure hand hygiene was performed by staff and residents during meals and tray pass. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policy, dated last revised 10/2024, included but was not limited to: - Purpose: to maintain an infection control and prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. - A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors and other individuals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#14 and #28), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations, were screened for eligibility to receive the recommended PCV20 or PCV21 pneumococcal vaccination, the residents/residents' representatives were educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine, and were offered and administered (if applicable) the vaccine in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed: to identify that the Residents were eligible for the PCV20 or PCV21 pneumococcal vaccinations and were offered the opportunity through shared decision making to receive the vaccination if warranted and desired in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Facility Vaccine Procedure, last reviewed 12/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Purpose: to offer residents the recommended immunizations against influenza and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0847 — widespread
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to fully inform all residents of their right to not sign a binding arbitration agreement upon admission. Findings include: Review of the facility's Resident and Facility Arbitration Agreement, last revised 2/2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: It is understood and agreed by (the Facility) and (Resident, or Resident's Authorized Representative, hereinafter collectively the Resident) that any legal dispute, controversy, demand or claim (herein collectively referred to as claim or claims) that arises out of or relates to the Resident admission Agreement or any services or health care provided by the Facility to the Resident, shall be resolved exclusively by binding arbitration to be conducted at a pace agreed upon by the parties, or in the absence of such agreement, the Facility, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association (AAA) Alternative Dispute Resolution Services Rules of Procedure for Arbitration which are hereby incorporated into the agreement, and not by lawsuit or resort to court process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, policy review, and review of Resident Council Minutes, the facility failed to ensure that grievances brought forward through Resident Council from 9/21/23 through 3/29/24 were addressed and promptly resolved as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Resident Council Policy and Procedure, last revised 4/2018, and the Grievance and Missing Items Policy and Procedure, last revised 4/2017, included but was not limited to: -The Grievance Officer is the Executive Director or the Director of Nursing, in their absence. -The Grievance Officer is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; issue written grievances decision to the resident. -The facility must consider the views of a resident council and act promptly upon grievances and recommendations of the resident council concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. -The facility must be able to demonstrate their response and rationale for their response. Review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow professional standards for five Residents (#46, #27, #62, #17, and #51), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #46, to transcribe a physician's order for a gradual dose reduction (GDR, the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) for Haloperidol (antipsychotic medication); 2. For Resident #27, a. to transcribe a physician's order for a GDR for Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication), and b. to follow a physician's order to re-evaluate a GDR for Olanzapine; 3. For Resident #62, to follow manufacturer's instructions for administering Metamucil (used to treat constipation); 4. For Resident #17, to follow a physician's order to obtain pathology results following surgical intervention to treat osteomyelitis in the Resident's right great toe; and 5. For Resident #51, to obtain a physician's order for the Resident to self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in a safe and secure manner as required. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure all medication and treatment carts were locked when unattended and unsupervised on three of three units in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, last revised 8/7/23, indicated but was not limited to: -Applicability: This Policy 5.3 sets forth for the procedures relating to the storage and expiration dates of medications, biologicals . -Procedures: 3. General Storage Procedures: -3.3 Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. The surveyor observed the following medication/treatment carts: - 4/29/24 at 8:14 A.M., East unit medication cart unlocked and unattended parked in front of the nurses' station. -4/29/24 at 9:36 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, for one Resident (#28) of 16 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure his/her call light was accessible so he/she was able to call for assistance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Answering the Call Light, dated as revised September 2022, indicated but was not limited to: -Ensure the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility and from the floor. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with the following diagnoses: cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the right side and aphasia (defect or loss of the power of expression by speech, writing, or signs, or of comprehending spoken or written language, due to injury or disease of the brain). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/29/24, indicated Resident #28 had short and long-term memory problems as evidenced by staff interview. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #28 had unclear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and records reviewed, for three Residents (#14, #22, and #51), out of 16 sampled residents, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans to reflect the individual needs of the residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #14, to develop and implement a care plan for an indwelling Foley catheter (tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder); 2. For Resident #22, to develop and implement a care plan for an indwelling Foley catheter; and 3. For Resident #51, failed to a. develop a comprehensive care plan for self-administration of finger stick blood sugar testing (FSBS), and b. develop a comprehensive care plan for an implantable cardiac device. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning- Comprehensive, last revised May 2017, indicated but not limited to: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs is developed for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, for one Resident (#66), of three closed records reviewed, the facility failed to document the recapitulation of the Resident's stay that included his/her course of illness/treatment. Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with the following diagnoses: partial amputation of left great toe. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #66 was discharged home on 1/31/24. Review of the discharge paperwork, titled Discharge Plan, indicated the following information in the Summary of Stay and Discharge Observations sections were left blank: -admission diagnosis -Summary of Course of Stay -Final Diagnosis -Lab, X-ray, Skin Condition, Pain, etc. -Comments During an interview on 5/2/24 at 3:28 P.M., Social Worker #1 said the facility utilized a paper packet for discharge. Social Worker #1 said each department was responsible for completing a section of the discharge paperwork. During an interview on 5/2/24 at 3:32 P.M., Nurse #3 said when a resident was discharged home the nurse completing the discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to promote and manage the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted Standards of Nursing Practice for one Resident (#26), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a dietary aide did not move a resident off the floor and into a wheelchair after the Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall with a head strike, prior to having a nurse assess the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's Falls Policy & Procedure, last reviewed 12/2023, included but was not limited to: -The resident is to be left as found, and not moved, until the nurse has completed an assessment. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in July 2017 and had diagnoses including malignant brain tumor and epilepsy. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/14/24, indicated Resident #26 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, had short and long-term memory problems, and severely impaired cognitive skills. Review of Nursing Progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one Resident (#14), of 16 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide indwelling catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside of the body) care consistent with professional standards related to infection control prevention. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain/secure the Resident's Foley catheter drainage bag away from contaminated surfaces. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, page last reviewed November 2015, indicated but was not limited to: - Do not rest the catheter bag on the floor. Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, last revised September 2014, indicated but was not limited to: - Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infections. - General Guidelines: Infection Control 2. Maintain clean technique when handling or manipulating the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag. b. Be sure the catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#27), out of a total sample of 16 residents, that each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment (a clinical outcome checklist completed by a healthcare provider to assess the presence and severity of adverse outcomes, such as abnormal movements of the face, limbs, and body) was completed timely in accordance with standards of practice. Findings include: Review of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), dated 5/15/23, indicated but was not limited to: - The AIMS is administered every three to six months to monitor the patient for the development of TD (tardive dyskinesia, is a syndrome characterized by abnormal involuntary movements of the patient's face, mouth, trunk, or limbs. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10292174/) Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, last revised 2016, failed to indicate intervals at which an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review for one Resident (#16), of 16 sampled residents, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for Resident #16, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were implemented per physician's order for contact precautions. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated 8/1/23, indicated but was not limited to: -Contact Precautions are one type of Transmission-Based Precaution that are used when pathogen transmission is not completely interrupted by Standard Precautions alone. Contact Precautions are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents, like MDROs, that are spread by direct or indirect contact with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, for one Resident (#46), of five residents reviewed, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy. Specifically, for Resident #46, the facility failed to ensure that pneumococcal vaccinations were administered after consent was obtained. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated as revised October 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has completed the current recommended vaccine series -Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines are made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview for one Resident (#63), of five sampled residents, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer COVID-19 vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Stay Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines, revised January 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -People aged 12 years and older who got COVID-19 vaccines before September 12, 2023, should get one updated Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Novavax COVID-19 vaccine. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 and was [AGE] years old at that time. Review of Resident #63's medical record indicated: -Consent to receive the COVID-19 vaccination was obtained on 1/28/24. Review of Resident #63's vaccination administration record from the Massachusetts Immunization Information System (MIIS), indicated he/she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a physician's order, dated 2/13/24, for a stat (immediate) x-ray of his/her left lower leg, the Facility failed to ensure nursing promptly notified the Physician when although they received Resident #1's x-ray results on 2/14/24 which indicated he/she had left distal tibia and fibula (lower leg bones, near the ankle) fractures, the physician was not made aware of the results until 2/16/24, resulting in a delay in treatment. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Resident Change in Condition, with a review date of 02/2024, indicated that prior to contacting the physician, the nurse will conduct a clinical assessment and collect pertinent information to report to the physician; for example, history of present illness and test results. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in March 2022, diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus and diabetic neuropathy (weakness or numbness in the hands/feet due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality of care that met professional standards of practice, when Resident #1 developed swelling, with redness and tenderness to his/her left ankle area which was later identified as a left fibula (lower leg) fracture, and he/she was not monitored for worsening or a change in condition and was not assessed for pain by nursing on the days following the injury. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Pain-Clinical Protocol, with a revision date of March 2018, indicated the following: -Nursing will assess each individual for pain whenever there is a significant change in condition and when there is onset of new pain. -The staff will reassess the individual's pain and related consequences at regular intervals, at least each shift for acute pain. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in March 2022, diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus and diabetic neuropathy (weakness or numbness in the hands/feet due nerve damage). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure staff completed all sections of the annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) no later than 14 calendar days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11, for Annual Comprehensive Assessments, dated October 2023, included the following: -Assessment Reference Date (ARD) refers to the specific endpoint for the observation (or look-back) periods in the MDS assessment process; -The facility is required to set the ARD on the MDS Item Set or in the facility software within the required time frame of the assessment type being completed; -The MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the ARD (ARD + 14 calendar days); -The MDS Transmission Date is required no later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the completion of the Care Plan Decisions. Review of the Facility's Policy titled, MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Health Care Proxy had been activated, the Facility failed to ensure that nursing staff notified Resident #1's Physician and Health Care Agent (HCA) in a timely manner, when on 8/27/23 nursing was made aware that the pinky finger on Resident #1's right hand was red and swollen, but the Physician and the HCA were not notified until more than 24 hours later. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Resident Change in Condition Policy, date revised 05/17/2021, indicated the following: -To facilitate nursing response for resident exhibiting change in condition, and to define requirements for notification of change in condition; to be followed by all licensed nurses -Whenever there is a change in a resident's condition, the nurse will follow protocols in accordance to the Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status -Prior to contacting the physician, the nurse will conduct clinical assessment and collect pertinent information to report to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had developed redness and swelling of his/her right pinky finger, the Facility failed to ensure Resident#1 was provided nursing care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, after he/she experienced a change in condition on 8/27/23, and nursing was made aware that Resident #1's pinky finger on his/her right hand was red and swollen, however he/she was not assessed by nursing until approximately 24 hours later, at which point the Physician was notified and new orders were obtained for an X-ray of his/her right hand. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated revised July 2017, indicated the following: -all services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to maintain and consistently implement an infection prevention and control program during a current COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a system for resident surveillance of COVID-19 within the facility to: a. ensure staff consistently documented an assessment of symptoms of COVID-19 during each shift for three Residents (#1, #2, and #3), out of a total sample of three residents reviewed; and b. maintain resident COVID-19 infection surveillance line listings to include symptomatic residents. Findings include: During an interview on 10/11/23 at 8:05 A.M., during the entrance conference, the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility was experiencing a current COVID-19 outbreak that started on 9/25/23 with three of three units affected. She said there were two residents who were currently COVID-19 positive residing on the Subacute Unit with the last resident case being on 10/7/23. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 1:23 P.M., the Administrator said the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer pneumococcal vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Flu/Pneumovax Procedure, revised September 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following: Purpose: -To offer each resident immunization against pneumonia. -The licensed nurse under the direction of the Director of Nursing will administer immunization of pneumovax vaccine to residents. -Obtain informed consent on admission from each resident/responsible party to receive the pneumovax vaccine. Resident/responsible party will sign form ADM-G020 indicating their acceptance or declination of the vaccine. -The licensed nurse will administer the vaccine per physician's order. -Document administration of the vaccine in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer COVID-19 vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy for two Residents (#1 and #2), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Policy, revised September 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Each resident will be offered the COVID-19 vaccine when available to the facility unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. -The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, that the resident or representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, each dose of the COVID-19 vaccine administered, and if the resident did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical records related to documentation of his/her Foley catheter care, including changing and flushing the Foley catheter in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy tilted, Guidelines for Charting and Documentation, dated as revised April 2012, indicated that the Facility will provide a complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to care and the progress of the resident's care. The Policy indicated that all entries in the medical record shall be concise, accurate, reflect the date, the time and the signature of the person recording the data. The Policy further indicated that treatment orders must specify what is to be done, location and frequency, and duration of the treatment. Review of the Facility Policy, titled, Charting and Documentation, dated as revised July 2017, indicated that all services provided to the resident shall be documented in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-14 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to allow residents to make individualized meal choices prior to meal service, and ensure residents were offered a choice and variety. Findings include: During an interview on 12/07/22 at 12:45 P.M., Resident #53, #56 and #62 all said they have no choices for meals. -Resident #53 said he/she calls it the Blaire surprise, you never know what you are going to get. -Resident #62 said he/she was not aware you could get something else to eat. He/she said the alternate is called Door Dash. -Resident #56 said there are no choices, if you don't like what is delivered you don't eat it and wait for the next meal. -Resident #56 said you can get snacks, but no sandwiches if you are hungry. During a meeting with the surveyor on 12/09/22 at 02:00 P.M., nine of nine residents in attendance said they never get menus to choose their meals in advance of the meal service. They all said they would like to have a choice in what they get for their meals. During an interview on 12/12/22 at 12:00 P.M., Resident #54 said he/she did not like the meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that addressed the full range of care and services, was comprehensive and data-driven, and focused on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, care, and services to residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Procedure, dated April 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility will develop, and implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven quality assurance and performance improvement QAPI program that focuses on indicators of outcomes of the quality outcomes of care and quality of life. -The quality assurance and performance improvement QAPI committee is held quarterly and is chaired by the executive director. -The committee will identify systematic identification, reporting, investigation analysis, and prevention of adverse events and documentation of demonstrating the development,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-14 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespread
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents, resident representatives, and families of positive COVID-19 cases (staff or resident) by 5:00 P.M. the following day as required. Findings include: During an interview on 12/12/22 at 10:26 A.M., the Infection Control Nurse said she does not have a line-listing of positive COVID-19 cases and that she records the dates of positive cases on a computerized vaccination list. The Infection Control nurse said that prior to 12/9/22 she was not sure of when previous COVID-19 cases occurred. Review of the facility's computerized vaccination list indicated positive COVID-19 cases on: a. 8/31/22- Dietary b. 9/22/22 - Human Resources c. 9/24/22 - Nursing d. 9/24/22 - Administration e .9/24/22- Activities f. 9/24/22 - Nursing g. 9/25/22 - Dietary h. 9/26/22- Housekeeping i. 9/27/22 - Rehab j. 9/28/22 - Rehab k. 10/11/22 - Housekeeping On 12/12/22 at 1:05 P.M., the Infection Control Nurse failed to provide documented evidence of family/resident representative notification. During an interview on 12/12/22 at 6:04 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-14 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to manage COVID-19 in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Perform contact tracing for 12 positive staff members to include all resident and staff exposures and subsequently failed to perform outbreak testing, and 2. Perform surveillance testing for COVID-19 as indicated in the facility's policy. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Event Policy, revised 11/8/22, included but was not limited to: -The facility will comply with the requirements of the most recent DPH LTC Testing Guidance, which may be updated from time to time in response to further recommendations -The facility must conduct weekly testing of all staff -If the staff testing results indicate a positive COVID-19 staff member(s), then the provider must conduct outbreak testing of all residents and staff, including those who are up to date with COVID-19 vaccine and those who are not, to ensure that there are no resident cases and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 2 medication rooms. Findings include: 1. On 12/8/22 at 10:28 A.M., the surveyor inspected the [NAME] Unit medication room with Nurse #2 present and observed the following: -A multidose vial of influenza vaccine was in the refrigerator opened and not labeled with the date that it was opened. -An emergency drug kit was opened on 12/3/22. The medication glucagon was removed from the drug kit and administered to a resident. A form was observed in the kit that indicated the same. There was no evidence to indicate that the facility had faxed the form to the pharmacy to request a replacement emergency drug kit. During an interview on 12/8/22 at 10:30 A.M., Nurse #2 said that the influenza vaccine should have been dated with the date it was opened. He said he would discard the vial of influenza vaccine as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Roger's Treatment Plan (court approved treatment plan for the administration of antipsychotic medications) was active and current for administration of an antipsychotic medication for one Resident (#13), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (depressive type) and generalized anxiety. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #13 was found to be incapable of taking care of himself/herself by reason of mental illness and Guardianship was appointed on [DATE] by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Probate and Family Court. Subsequent review of the medical record indicated the court issued an expansion of the Guardianship on [DATE] and authorized administration of antipsychotic medication via a Roger's Treatment Plan, which expired on [DATE] at 4:00 P.M. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated [DATE], indicated:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of an investigation, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation for one Resident (#53), in a total sample of 10 residents. Specifically, following a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #53 and Resident #2A, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent an additional resident-to-resident altercation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident-to-Resident Altercations, revised in December 2016, indicated the following: -All altercations, including those that may represent resident-to-resident abuse, shall be investigated and reported to the Nursing Supervisor, the Director of Nursing Services, and to the Administrator. -If two residents are involved in an altercation, staff will: -identify what happened, including what might have led to aggressive conduct on the part of the one or more of the individuals involved in the altercation -review the events with the Director of Nursing and possible measures to try to prevent additional incidents;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#53), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated, an alleged staff member was removed pending an investigation, and the incident/allegation was reported to the Department of Public health within two hours. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedures, dated April 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Immediate action will be taken against anyone who abuses a resident, or anyone who fails to report witnessed or suspected abuse in accordance with specific timeframes once it becomes known that he/ she had prior knowledge of such information. -Section E: investigation: The facility has a procedure to investigate different types of incidences to identify the staff member responsible for the initial reporting, investigation of the alleged violations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#53), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report the alleged allegation of abuse to the state agency within two hours. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedures, dated April 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Section G: Reporting/Response: -It is the policy of the facility to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegations do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury period to the Executive Director and the officials (including to the state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#53), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to fully investigate the allegations of abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedures, dated April 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Section E: investigation: The facility has a procedure to investigate different types of incidences to identify the staff member responsible for the initial reporting, investigation of the alleged violations and reporting of results to the proper authorities. During the course of any investigation, the safety and protection of all residents is the utmost priority, and the facility makes provisions to protect residents from harm during investigations. Upon observation of potential/alleged resident abuse, the observing staff is required to intervene, stop the potential/alleged abuse and report to a supervisor. Upon the observation/allegation/formed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#52), out of a total sample of 20 residents, that the Resident, and/or family were provided with a Discharge Notice upon discharge to an acute care hospital. Findings include: Resident #52 was admitted in January 2021 with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder with psychosis. Record review indicated that on 11/9/22, the Resident was observed to exhibit a change in mental status, hypotension, and loss of appetite and was sent to a local hospital for evaluation and treatment. Further record review indicated that there was no evidence that a Discharge Notice was provided to the Resident and/or the family. During an interview on 12/13/22 at 1:30 P.M., the Senior Executive Director said, I can't find it (the Discharge Notice) for the Resident's hospitalization on 11/9/22. She said that there was no evidence that one was provided.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 20 residents, that the plan of care was revised following a change in the Resident's dental status. Specifically, Resident #10's plan of care was not revised following the loss of her/his dentures and reported difficulty chewing and swallowing. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted in August 2019 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular accident. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/6/22, indicated the Resident was assessed to be alert and oriented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (no cognitive deficits), had no memory issues. On 12/13/22, further review of the MDS assessment, dated 9/6/22, indicated: Section L0200-Dental-of the MDS was inaccurate and did not code for the Resident's missing dentures that were lost at the facility sometime in April 2022, according to the Resident, (confirmed with the DON), had not been replaced, and made it difficult for the Resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff followed professional standards of practice during medication administration and observed the resident's consumption of the medication for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, revised 1/1/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -During medication administration, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law including, but not limited to the following: observe the resident's consumption of the medication(s). Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in August 2019 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis), cerebral infarct (stroke) and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/6/22, indicated Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating he/she was cognitively intact. Review of the current Physician's Orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and investigate a fall and implement interventions to decrease the risk for future falls for one Resident (#35), out of a total sample size of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Accident Reporting Procedure, dated March 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - To identify and review factors associated with the resident's accident in order to implement interventions to address those factors. - To identify areas which require educational reinforcement for resident or the staff. Resident accident- An accident is defined as any episode which results in visible signs of injury, any resident observed on the floor, witnessed falls, or one in which follow up treatment or evaluation is necessary. Procedure: - License nurses are to complete the multi-purpose Quality Assessment and Assurance Incident Report. - Record date and time of accident. - Assess the resident's condition before the accident through factual data seen or communicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have an effective communication system in place between the facility and the dialysis center for one Resident (#20), out of a sample size of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility did not document in the dialysis communication book changes in medication including new or held medications, vital signs, laboratory values, or nutritional concerns. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses of stroke, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, peripheral vascular disease, and legally blind left eye. In addition, Resident #20 had a recently (September 2022) acquired absence of left above knee amputation (AKA). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/22, indicated Resident #20 scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the facility's policy titled End Stage Renal Disease Care of a Resident with, dated September 2010, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and employee record review, the facility failed to ensure that agency nursing staff was provided an orientation to the facility's day-to-day operations including emergency services to ensure resident safety. Findings include: Review of the facility's procedure titled Staffing Agency Utilization and Orientation Procedure, revised 4/19, included but was not limited to: -If the scheduled agency staff has not previously worked at the facility and does not have completed documents in the Agency Staff Binder, the Scheduler will facilitate completion of the Agency CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] and Licensed Nurse Orientation Checklist. - In the event of off-hours arrival of an agency staff new to the Facility, a Facility licensed nurse will verify the agency staff's identity and credentials, and complete, the Agency CNA and Licenses Nurse Orientation Checklist with the agency staff. During an interview on 12/09/22 at 12:20 P.M., (5 hours and 20 minutes into his shift) Nurse #5 (an agency nurse) told the surveyor that it was his first time in the building, and he could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each Resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure targeted behaviors and signs and symptoms of side effects were adequately monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of psychotropic medication to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for two Residents (#13 and #52), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring, revised December 2016, included but was not limited to the following: -When medications are prescribed for behavioral symptoms, documentation will include: a. Rationale for use; b. Potential underlying causes of the behavior; c. Other approaches and interventions tried prior to the use of antipsychotic medications; d. Potential risks and benefits of medications as discussed with the resident and/or family; e. Specific target behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an MDS assessment was completed timely as required for four Residents (#5, #12, #11, and #59), out of four records reviewed and 16 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure MDS discharge assessments were completed within the required timeframe. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 Manual Chapter 2: Assessments for the RAI, dated October 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -A Discharge Assessment when return is anticipated must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the discharge date . Review of the facility's policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, dated as revised July 2017, indicated but was not limited to: -Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes -Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for four Residents (#47, #58, #22, and #46), out of 16 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #47, to ensure falls were accurately coded on the MDS; 2. For Resident #58, to ensure falls were accurately coded on the MDS; 3. For Resident #22, to accurately code his/her hospice status on the MDS; and 4. For Resident #46, to accurately code a fall with fracture. Findings include: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility in November 2022 with the following diagnoses: dementia and weakness. Review of Resident #47's medical record, including fall incident reports, indicated he/she had a fall on 1/25/24, 1/26/24, 3/3/24, 3/24/24, and 4/9/24. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 4/11/24, Section J, indicated Resident #47 had only one fall since the previous assessment on 1/18/24. During a telephonic interview on 5/2/24 at 2:29 P.M., MDS Nurse #2 said she reviewed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment review and staff interview, the facility failed to encode and electronically transmit MDS data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) processing system, for one Resident (#12), out of one resident assessment reviewed. Findings include: A discharge MDS is required any time a resident is discharged from the facility. Facilities are required to encode and transmit (submitted and accepted into the QIES ASAP system) the MDS electronically no later than 14 calendar days after the MDS completion date. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses that included surgical aftercare and weakness and was discharged from the facility on 8/25/22. Review of the MDS assessment indicated that a discharge MDS had not been transmitted to CMS. During an interview on 12/13/22 at 12:35 P.M., the MDS Nurse said the discharge MDS assessment had not been completed by social services and was therefore not submitted to the CMS processing system.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 20 residents, that the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the Resident's Oral/Dental Status. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted in August 2019 with diagnoses which included, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, and hemiplegia. On 12/13/22, record review indicated that a Quarterly MDS was completed on 9/6/22. Section L0200 of the MDS was inaccurate; the facility staff did not code for the Resident's missing dentures that were lost at the facility sometime in April 2022, and had not been replaced, which made it difficult for the Resident to chew and eat properly. During an interview on 12/14/22 at 4:25 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said that the Resident had been without upper dentures since around April 2022, and that the MDS was not accurate regarding the Resident's dental status.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$38,610 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $38,610 — penalty dated 2024-03-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELDER SERVICES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ROMANO, FRANKIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/1978
ROMANO, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/16/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$982K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 6%Other / private 32%

This home reported $982K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$408per resident / day
operating cost
$12,390per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225260. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next