No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brandon Woods of New Bedford

397 County Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 · For profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (508) 997-9396 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0603, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations at the harm level (F0740, F0741)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$528,970 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $528,970 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
854 Purchase St · (508) 992-3209 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
212 Union St
Park
22 7th St · (508) 979-8828 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
412 County St · (508) 993-6242

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased43.6%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.8%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.3%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.3%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.9%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.0%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%21.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table43.4%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.8%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.731.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.171.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.2%CMS range 39.7–63.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.9–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.3–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
49.6%
Total nursing turnover
65.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 102.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.55 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-27)
44
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect for one Resident (#77), from a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #77, with severe cognitive impairment and a history of aggression, violence, and sexually inappropriate behaviors toward staff and other residents, did not physically and sexually abuse other residents; and that Resident #77 was protected from being physically abused by other residents. Using the reasonable person concept, a person would experience emotional distress after being hit, unprovoked, and after being sexually abused. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Abuse, Mistreatment, and Neglect Policy and Procedure, last revised 4/2017, indicated but was not limited to: -Purpose: To promote prevention, protection, prompt reporting and interventions in response to alleged, suspected, or witnessed abuse/neglect/exploitation of any resident. -There are many types of abuse, including but not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-12-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective and appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychological well-being for one Resident (#77), with a known history of conduct disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depression, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop, implement, and update the plan of care to meet the Resident's behavioral needs, resulting in wandering intrusively into other residents' rooms; standing at female residents' bedsides and fondling his/her genitals; exposing him/herself to another resident; physically assaulting and being physically assaulted by other residents. Using the reasonable person concept, a person would experience emotional distress after being hit, unprovoked, and after being sexually abused. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Behavior Management and Response Guidelines, last revised 12/2023, indicated but was not limited to: -Physical aggression is the act of one person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-12-16 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, for one Resident (#77), out of a total sample of 23 residents, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient staff to provide behavioral health care services as indicated in the facility assessment. Specifically, for Resident #77 with a known history of agitation, aggression, ongoing intrusive wandering into other residents' rooms, physically abusing other residents, being physically abused by other residents, and sexually inappropriate behaviors (including indecent exposure) toward female staff and residents, the facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to effectively manage his/her behavioral health needs, including developing non-pharmacological interventions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Abuse, Mistreatment, and Neglect Policy and Procedure, last revised 4/2017, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility provided training on orientation and ongoing to all staff on the Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedures including training on issues relating to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-27 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed for one Resident (#106), in a sample of three closed records, to:-Establish and follow a written policy on permitting the Resident to return to the facility after being transferred to the hospital for evaluation; and -Through communication with the hospital, determine the treatments, medications, and services the facility would need to provide to meet the resident's needs upon returning to the facility and document why they could no longer meet those needs.Specifically, when Resident #106 was transferred to the hospital he/she was provided with a notice indicating he/she would have a bed hold. The following day, the facility informed the hospital that Resident #106 would not be allowed to return to the facility. Resident #106 has remained in the hospital (after 25 days) because he/she had nowhere to be discharged and had not been permitted to return to the facility. This has caused Resident #106 emotional distress. Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated as revised in February 2026, indicated common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for one Resident (#77), out of a sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff notified the Director of Nurses (DON) and Administrator about allegations of physical and sexual abuse; keep residents safe by implementing protective measures to prevent further abuse by Resident #77; keep Resident #77 safe by implementing protective measures to prevent further physical abuse by other residents; report and investigate abuse allegations as required; report allegations to the state agency (SA) and law enforcement; and ensure all staff received required abuse training. Using the reasonable person concept, a person would experience emotional distress after being hit, unprovoked, and after being sexually abused. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Abuse, Mistreatment, and Neglect Policy and Procedure, last revised 4/2017, indicated but was not limited to: -Purpose: To promote prevention, protection, prompt reporting and interventions in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-12-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and neglect for one Resident (#77), out of a sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report five of five allegations of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect to the state agency (SA) and two of five allegations to law enforcement as required. Using the reasonable person concept, a person would experience emotional distress after being hit, unprovoked, and after being sexually harassed and exposed to another person's genitals. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Abuse, Mistreatment, and Neglect Policy and Procedure, last revised 4/2017, indicated but was not limited to: -There are many types of abuse, including but not limited to: Neglect: The failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Verbal abuse: The use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-12-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff thoroughly investigated five allegations of abuse and neglect, put measures in place to prevent further abuse and neglect, and report the results of the investigations for one Resident (#77), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Using the reasonable person concept, a person would experience emotional distress after being hit, unprovoked, and after being sexually abused. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Abuse, Mistreatment, and Neglect Policy and Procedure, last revised 4/2017, indicated but was not limited to: -The Facility has procedures to investigate different types of incidents and to identify the staff member responsible for the initial reporting, investigation of the alleged violations and reporting of results to the proper authorities. -During the course of any investigation, the safety and protection of all residents is of utmost priority, and the Facility makes provisions to protect residents from harm during investigations. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs to address the behavior care needs of five Residents (#77, #60, #64, #25, and #105) to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented: 1. For Resident #77, to address the Resident's physically and sexually abusive behavior and address him/her being physically abused by other residents; 2. For Resident #60, to address a history of hypersexual behaviors; 3. For Resident #64, to address using pillows to prevent falls; 4. For Resident #25, to address transferring in and out of his/her scoot chair (mobility chair that reduces falls and improves comfort for users who propel themselves with their feet) for meals; and 5. For Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#72), who was identified as being a high risk for skin breakdown, out of a total sample of 23 residents, received the care and services per professional standards of practice to help prevent the development of a facility acquired Stage III (full thickness tissue loss) right heel pressure ulcer and promote optimal wound healing. Specifically, the facility failed to implement recommendations made by the Wound Care Specialist timely and develop and implement a care plan that identified risk factors as well as interventions designed to reduce or prevent the development of pressure related ulcers/injuries. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Injury Policy, revised July 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -On admission or re-admission, the licensed nurse will assess the resident's skin to identify and document existing skin areas. -The licensed nurse will assess each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Monitor the dishwasher sanitation chemical agent after switching from high temperature dishwasher to chemical sanitation for 43 days to ensure all dishes were properly sanitized to prevent food borne illnesses; and2. Handle ready-to-eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another) and ensure glove use was limited to a single task. Findings include: 1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following:-4-302.14 Sanitizing Solutions, Testing Devices. Testing devices to measure the concentration of sanitizing solutions are required for 2 reasons: 1. The use of chemical sanitizers requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained complete and accurate medical records for five Residents (#7, #42, #9, #14, and #4), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. For Resident #7, ensure physician and nurse practitioner progress notes were accessible in the Resident's medical record; and2. For Resident #42, ensure physician and nurse practitioner progress notes were accessible in the Resident's medical record; and3.For Resident #9, ensure primary physician progress notes were accessible in the Resident's medical record; and4. For Resident #14, ensure primary physician and wound nurse practitioner progress notes were accessible in the Resident's medical record; and5. For Resident #4, ensure his/her monthly behavior sheets were complete and accurate. Review of the facility's policy titled Medical Records Procedure, dated as revised in December 2025 indicated the following should be retained in the medical record:-1 year of physician progress notes-last 6 months of consults 1. Resident #7 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Representative (guardian) was not extended authority of decision making beyond the extent required by the court to consent to the administration of an antipsychotic medication for one Resident (#81), from a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the court approved Treatment Plan allowed Resident #81 to be treated with Seroquel and Rexulti (antipsychotics) and the Resident Representative consented for Resident #81 to be administered Zyprexa, which was not an approved antipsychotic medication on the Treatment Plan. Findings include:An Incapacitated Person (I.P.) is someone who is determined by the Court to have a clinically diagnosed condition that leaves them unable to make or communicate decisions affecting their physical health, safety, or self-care. The Guardian appointed by the court for an I.P. will make some or all decisions for the I.P. If the I.P. requires medical treatments or care that the court considers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's Health Care Proxy (HCP, individual chosen by the resident to act on behalf of the resident in order to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social or other personal information of the resident; manage financial matters; or receive notifications) about changes in their condition and potential need to alter the treatment plan for one Resident (#6), from a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the HCP of a change in the Resident's condition requiring transfer to the hospital and a significant weight loss.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Change in Condition, reviewed February 2024, indicated but was not limited to:-To facilitate nursing response for residents exhibiting change in condition.-The resident's Physician, legal representative and/or responsible party is to be notified.Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Nutritional Policy and Procedure, reviewed June 2025, indicated but was not limited to:-Weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for one Resident (#106), out of three closed records reviewed, to provide in writing, the reason for discharge to the Resident, and failed to send a copy of the notice to the Ombudsman office. Specifically, after transferring Resident #106 to the hospital, the facility determined they would not allow the Resident to return from the hospital and did not send any written notices to the Resident or the Ombudsman. Resident #106 remained in the hospital as of 3/26/26. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Notification of Transfer/Discharge and Bed Hold, revised in December 2025, indicated the following:-When the transfer/discharge of a resident occurs to the hospital, the Social Worker is to complete a Notice of Intent to Transfer Resident with Less than 30 Days' Notice or 30-Day Notice of Intent to Transfer Resident, these are facility specific, and send it along with the Facility Bed Hold Policy and Resident Notification Regarding Facility Bed Hold cover letter, with the resident to the hospital- When the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement the person-centered plan of care for two Residents (#40, #7), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Implement interventions identified on Resident #40's care plan for falls; and2. Develop and implement interventions to address Resident #7's history of suicidal ideations.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy, revised 5/2025, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:Care Planning - Comprehensive:-Care plan interventions are designed after careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), rather than addressing only symptoms or triggers.-Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change.Behavior Care Plans:-Any resident exhibiting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for two Residents (#7 and #40), of 21 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure care was provided to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #7, to document the Resident's 8 P.M. blood sugar levels, amount of sliding scale insulin administered, and the sites of insulin administration;2. For Resident #40, to ensure physician's orders were implemented:a. in response to accepted pharmacy recommendations; andb. for prosthetic eye care.Findings include:Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following:-The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address high blood glucose levels over a period of 34 days for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Diabetes-Clinical Protocol, revision date March 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The provider and staff will summarize factors contributing to, or conditions affected by, the resident's diabetes or glucose intolerance and will assess the impact of diabetes on the individual's function and quality of life.-Based on the preceding assessment, including causes and complications, the provider will order individualized interventions, which may include:a. Treatment of underlying condition causing impaired glucose intolerance;b. Physical activity, diet, lifestyle modifications, where feasible and accepted by resident;c. Oral hypoglycemic agents; and/ord. Insulin-The provider will order desired glucose targets and monitoring regimes, as well as parameters for reporting information related to blood sugar management.-The provider will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident with a pressure ulcer (Resident #14), out of a total sample of 21 residents, was provided accurate interventions and treatments to promote healing. Specifically, for Resident #14, the facility failed to:a. Set the air mattress per the physician's orders; andb. Ensure treatments for a left heel pressure ulcer were documented and consistent with current physician's orders. Findings include:Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with a diagnosis of advanced dementia and was receiving hospice services. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/28/26, indicated Resident #14 had long-term and short-term memory problems, was dependent on staff for care, had one stage 3 (full thickness loss of skin) pressure ulcer, had a pressure reducing device on the bed, and received pressure ulcer/injury care. Review of the Care Plans indicated Resident #14 was at risk for skin breakdown and had active pressure ulcers with interventions including: an air…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#32) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PC- PTSD-5) Screen Assessment Procedure, dated 1/2024, included but was not limited to:-The PC- PTSD-5 screen is a five item screen designed to identify individuals with probable PTSD. Those screening positive require further assessment, preferably with a structured interview, and care planning.-Procedure:a. To be completed by Social Services or clinical designee on admission and annually thereafterb. If the respondent indicates a trauma history - experiencing a traumatic event over the course of their life the respondent is instructed to answer five additional yes/no questions about how that trauma has affected them over the past monthc. If there are any yes responses, care plan goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to properly secure Xanax (a controlled substance prescribed for anxiety and panic disorders) for one Resident (#44), out of a total sample of 21 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storing, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Controlled substances (listed as Schedule II-V of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976) and other drugs subject to abuse are separately locked in permanently affixed compartments, except when using single unit package drug distribution systems in which the quantity stored is minimal and a missing dose can be readily detected.Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had intact cognition and was dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy when on 08/13/25, Family Member #1 (Resident #1's Health Care Agent) informed the Unit Manager that Resident #1 had alleged that CNA #1 was rough during the provision of care on 08/10/25, and the Executive Director was not notified until the next day (08/14/25). Findings include:Review of the Facility's Abuse Policy, titled Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedure, dated as revised November 2024, indicated that the Facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after an allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Policy related to Reporting Resident Abuse Policy, when on 5/22/25, the Hospice Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) reported an allegation of verbal abuse of a resident by a staff member (CNA #1 or CNA #2) to Nurse #1, and Nurse #1 did not immediately report the allegation to their direct Supervisor as required, and facility Administration was not made aware until the next day. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Reporting Resident Abuse, last reviewed 2/2025, indicated that any staff member who believed that a resident of the Facility has been abused, mistreated or neglected, the individual is required to notify their direct supervisor who will notify the Executive Director or Director of Nursing. Resident #1's medical record indicated he/she was admitted to the Facility during February of 2024. Resident #2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/07/25, indicated his/her short…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Administration effectively utilized their resources to provide for the behavioral needs for one Resident (#77), who had a known history of aggressive and sexually inappropriate behaviors and provide a safe environment to protect other residents from physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect. Findings include: During the recertification survey conducted on 11/13/24 through 11/15/24 and 11/18/24 through 11/21/24, the survey team determined the facility provided substandard care and identified numerous care concerns. The survey team determined the facility failed to provide residents a safe environment free from physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 and had diagnoses including conduct disorder, major depression, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #77 has a history of agitation, aggression, ongoing intrusive wandering into other residents' rooms, hitting other residents, being hit by other residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and implement a comprehensive facility wide assessment that was inclusive of resources necessary to provide both emergency and day to day care of the population the facility currently serves, including their short-term, long-term, and dementia specialty care residents. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Safety Oversight (QSO) Memorandum: QSO-24-13-NH, Titled: Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements, dated: June 18, 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - new provisions become effective 90 days after publication and must be implemented by August 8, 2024 - new requirements specify that the facility assessment must include an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population, acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and any other pertinent information about the resident population as a whole that may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0941 — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review and interview, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff received mandatory effective communications training. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee on 6/20/24, failed to indicate Effective Communications Training was required. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of the classes to provide to the surveyor. In addition, a list of all staff was provided to the survey team that totaled 163 staff members. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:26 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) provided the survey team with the electronic training system learning annual curriculum for skilled nursing facilities. She said she believes the curriculum is specific to the company, not the facility. She said no one had been able to locate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0942 — widespread
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff received training on Resident's Rights. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled: Abuse Prevention policies and procedures, dated as revised: 4/2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility provides training on orientation and ongoing to all staff on Abuse prevention, including trainings on issues related to abuse risk and prohibition practices such as: Resident's Rights. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of the classes to provide to the surveyor. In addition, a list of all staff was provided to the survey team that totaled 163 staff members. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:26 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) provided the survey team with the electronic training system learning annual curriculum for skilled nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff were trained in standards, policies, and procedures for the facility's abuse prevention and reporting protocols. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedures, dated as revised 4/2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility provides training on orientation and ongoing to all staff on Abuse prevention, including trainings on issues related to abuse risk and prohibition practices. - The facility conducts trainings on how to recognize and manage burnout, frustration and stress that may lead to abuse. - The facility may provide trainings in varied ways including online learning with competency testing, group in-service trainings, one on one and skills labs. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review and interview, the facility failed to provide training and education to their staff to outline elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings include: During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of the classes to provide to the surveyor. In addition, a list of all staff was provided to the survey team that totaled 163 staff members. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:26 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) provided the survey team with the electronic training system learning annual curriculum for skilled nursing facilities. Review of the electronic training system curriculum indicated the following: All staff to complete: - Implementation of QAPI Programs in Nursing Facilities Review of the facility's in-service and education records from 11/1/23 through 11/21/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff were trained on standards, policies, and procedures for the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of the classes to provide to the surveyor. In addition, a list of all staff was provided to the survey team that totaled 163 staff members. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:26 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) provided the survey team with the electronic training system learning annual curriculum for skilled nursing facilities. Review of the electronic training system curriculum indicated the following: All staff to complete: - About Infection Control and Prevention - Basics of Personal Protective Equipment - Understanding Bloodborne Pathogens - Basics of Hand Hygiene Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0946 — widespread
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to provide their staff training on the facility ethics standards, policies, and procedures. Findings include: During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of the classes to provide to the surveyor. In addition, a list of all staff was provided to the survey team that totaled 163 staff members. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:26 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) provided the survey team with the electronic training system learning annual curriculum for skilled nursing facilities. Review of the electronic training system curriculum indicated the following: All staff to complete: - Basics of Corporate Compliance Review of the facility's in-service and education records from 11/1/23 through 11/21/24 for Corporate Compliance training failed to indicate that any current active staff had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain records of certified nurse aide (CNA) trainings for continuing competency that included no less than 12 hours of mandatory trainings per year for each CNA employed by the facility for five out of five CNAs reviewed. Findings include: During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of the classes to provide to the surveyor. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:26 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) provided the survey team with the electronic training system learning annual curriculum for skilled nursing facilities. Review of the electronic training system curriculum indicated the following: All staff to complete annually for a total of 22.75 hours: - HIPPA Basics, About infection control and prevention, Providing customer service, Preventing and managing accidents, Dementia Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-16 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral health training and education to their staff. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee on 6/20/2024, failed to indicate behavioral health trainings were required in accordance with the regulations. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator reviewed the Facility Assessment with the surveyor which failed to indicate what education/trainings and competencies were necessary for the facility staff to complete. He said he was unsure if the facility had a training plan but would provide one to the survey team if one could be found. He provided the survey team with printouts of all the staff training that had been completed on their electronic training system in the last 12 months at this time. He said he did not believe it was possible to obtain the content of the classes to provide them to the surveyor. In addition, a list of all staff was provided to the survey team that totaled 163 staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for three Residents (#64, #25, and #2), out of 23 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #64, to ensure the MDS was accurately coded for: a. weight loss of greater than 10% over six months, and b. a Stage 3 wound (full thickness skin loss); 2. For Resident #25, to ensure the MDS was accurately coded for weight loss of greater than 10% over six months; and 3. For Resident #2, to ensure the MDS was accurately coded for a wound. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled MDS Policy and Procedure, last revised March 2024, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: It is the policy of this facility that all MDS assessments and tracking forms will be completed and submitted according to state and federal regulations. The facility is required to refer to the current CMS Long-Term Care RAI User's Manual for guidance in completing the MDS. 1. Resident #64 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#102 and #65), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #102, injection sites for intramuscular (IM-injection deep into muscle tissue) antibiotic medication were rotated to prevent potential adverse effects; and 2. For Resident #65, a physician's order was obtained to transfer the Resident to the hospital for an evaluation following identification of a change in condition to the Resident's surgical wound. Findings include: 1. According to the National Institute of Health, July 2019, it is crucial to rotate injection sites when administering medications to prevent the development of lumps or hardened tissue under the skin, known as lipohypertrophy, which can interfere with proper medication absorption; this means moving the injection site to a different area of the body with each injection, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Physician signed and dated all orders for one Resident (#102), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (April 2024), a handwritten signature is defined as a mark or sign the ordering or prescribing physician or non-physician practitioner (NPP) makes on a document signifying knowledge, approval, acceptance, or obligation. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 and had diagnoses including dementia, depression, and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings, along with changes in energy, sleep, thinking, and behavior). Review of the entire medical record (electronic and paper) indicated the physician last signed the Resident's orders in January 2024. There were no additional orders signed by the physician/physician extender. Review of a three-ringed binder, labeled with Physician #1's name on it at the third-floor nursing station indicated unsigned physician's orders from February 2024 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to utilize the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, with no nurse staffing waivers in place as required placing all residents at risk for not having their clinical needs met either directly by the RN or indirectly by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) of Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) that the RN was responsible for overseeing with the provision of resident care. Findings include: During the Entrance Conference interview on 11/13/24 at 9:02 A.M., the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have any nurse waivers in place. Review of the 11/1/24 through 11/18/24 as worked nursing schedules provided by the Staff Scheduler failed to indicate that an RN worked at least eight consecutive hours each day, seven days a week, in the facility without a waiver of nurse staffing requirements on the following days: -Saturday, 11/2/24 -Sunday, 11/3/24 -Saturday, 11/9/24 -Sunday, 11/10/24 -Saturday, 11/16/24 -Sunday, 11/17/24 During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act promptly upon recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) for two Resident (#2 and #77), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #2, to ensure the Pharmacist reviewed and reported irregularities related to the administration of Clonazepam (a benzodiazepine medication used to treat anxiety); and 2. For Resident #102, to ensure the physician reviewed and addressed gradual dose reduction (GDR) recommendations for the antipsychotic medication Seroquel. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review, last revised 6/1/24, indicated but was not limited to: -The consultant pharmacist will conduct MRRs if required under a Pharmacy Consultant Agreement and will make recommendations based on the information made available in the resident's health record. -The facility and consultant pharmacist will follow guidance outlined in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure thickened beverage items were properly dated and stored in three of three kitchenettes; and 2. Ensure staff were not eating in one of three kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (B) Except as specified in (E) - (G) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and PACKAGED by a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT and if the FOOD is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the FDA Food Code 2022 Chapter 3. Food Chapter 3 - 29 PREMISES,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for four Residents (#25, #64, #83, and #102), out of 23 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #25, to ensure that: a. his/her medical records contained a copy of his/her Health Care Proxy Form (HCP, health care agent designated by the resident when competent who has the authority to consent for health care decisions when a resident has been declared, by a physician, not to be competent to make his/her own health care decisions) and HCP Activation Form, and b. documentation of physician visits was part of the medical record in a timely manner; 2. For Resident #64, to ensure that documentation of physician visits was part of the medical record in a timely manner; 3. For Resident #83, to ensure that documentation of physician visits was part of the medical record in a timely manner; and 4. For Resident #102, to ensure documentation of physician visits was available in the medical record.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the binding Arbitration Agreement presented to residents as part of the admission packet was explained to the resident and/or his/her representative in a form and manner that he/she understands for two Residents (#63 and #84), out of three sampled residents, that had signed arbitration agreements in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Arbitration Procedure, revised May 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: Purpose: To meet regulatory compliance. Scope: To be followed by all Social Workers and/or any staff involved in the admissions process with oversight by the Executive Director. Procedure: Upon admission, the admission packet to be used contains an arbitration agreement. This agreement is to be explained to the resident and or responsible party. If the resident/responsible party is in agreement and chooses binding arbitration, then they must sign, and date where indicated. During the Entrance Conference interview on 11/13/24 at 9:02 A.M. with the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure their arbitration agreement provides for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Arbitration Procedure, revised May 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: Purpose: To meet the regulatory requirements. During the Entrance Conference interview on 11/13/24 at 9:02 A.M. with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor requested a list of residents, who were currently residing in the facility, that had entered into a binding arbitration agreement on or after 9/16/19. Review of a list of residents, provided by the Administrator on 11/15/24 at 11:55 A.M., who were currently residing in the facility indicated a total of 109 residents/representatives had entered into a binding arbitration agreement on or after September 16, 2019. Review of the Arbitration Agreement in use by the facility, last revised February 2022, failed to indicate the residents or their representatives had the right to the selection of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which addressed the full range of care and services, was comprehensive and data-driven, and focused on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, quality of care, and services to residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing QAPI program was implemented and maintained and addressed identified priorities including ongoing identified concerns of physical and sexual abuse involving Resident #77. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assessment and Assurance Procedure, revised April 2013, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee meeting is held quarterly and is chaired by the Executive Director. The committee will identify quality deficiencies, develop, and implement plans of action to correct the quality deficiencies, including monitoring the effect of implemented changes and making needed revisions to the action plans.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain a complete and accurate system of surveillance and analyze their collected surveillance data to identify any trends of actual or potential infections within the facility to validate the effectiveness of their program; 2. Maintain a written water management plan and documentation to ensure a facility risk assessment was conducted to identify where Legionella (bacteria that can cause Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility's water system; and 3. Failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene with glove use during a Resident's (#72) dressing change. Findings include: Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included antibiotic use protocols and monitoring of antibiotic use in accordance with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, last revised 12/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Purpose: to monitor antibiotic use to decrease unnecessary antibiotic utilization. - Appropriate indications for use of antibiotics include: (a.) Criteria met for clinical definition of active infection; and (b.) Pathogen susceptibility, based on culture and sensitivity, to antimicrobial (or therapy begun while culture is pending). - The Infection Preventionist (IP) or designee, will review all antibiotic starts within 48 hours to determine if continued therapy is justified, justified with needed intervention, or not justified. - At the conclusion of the review, the provider will be notified of the review findings and recommendations. His or her response will be documented as follows: (a.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one Resident (#63) with dignity and respect, out of a total sample of 19 residents, by not allowing the Resident to exercise his/her right to smoke. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking Policy, revised July 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Prior to, and upon admission, residents shall be informed of the facility smoking policy, including designated smoking areas, and the extent to which the facility can accommodate their smoking or non-smoking preferences. -A resident's ability to smoke safely will be re-evaluated quarterly, upon a significant change (physical or cognitive), and as determined by staff. -Any smoking related privileges, restrictions, and concerns shall be noted on the care plan, and all personnel caring for the resident shall be alerted to these issues. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in July 2024. Review of Resident #63's quarterly Smoking Assessment, dated 10/29/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Resident desires to smoke -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#363) representative, as designated by the Resident, was able to make medical decisions for the Resident, in a sample of 23 records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #363's representative was able to change the Resident's Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form to meet their wishes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Advanced Directives, last revised December 2016, indicated but was not limited to: -Policy Statement- Advanced directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. -If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive information about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the information may be provided to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician of recommendations or changes in condition for one Resident (#102), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician of the lack of availability and delay in administering intramuscular (IM- injection deep into muscle tissue) antibiotic medication as ordered for Resident #102. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Change in Condition Policy, last reviewed February 2024, indicated but was not limited to: -Purpose: To facilitate nursing response for residents exhibiting change in condition, and to define requirements for notification of change in condition. - Procedure: -The resident's Physician, legal representative and/or responsible party is to be notified. -A change in condition will be documented in the nurse's notes, shift report book, and other area of the medical record as required. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 and had diagnoses including a history of urinary tract infections (UTI). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#67), out of a total sample of 19 residents, was free from involuntary seclusion, when during the day shift on 1/14/25, staff applied a stop sign banner secured with Velcro strips (fabric and vinyl banner used to deter wandering residents from entering restricted areas) across the entry door to the Resident's room preventing him/her from coming out of their room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedures, revised 11/2024, indicated that facility residents had the right to be free from involuntary seclusion. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 and had diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behaviors, anxiety, and major depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/6/25, indicated Resident #67 had both short- and long-term memory problems, severely impaired skills for daily decision making, and behaviors which included wandering. Review of Resident #67's Behavior Plan of Care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the recapitulation of the Resident's stay that included his/her course of illness/treatment for one Resident (#112), of two closed records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medical Records Procedures, dated as reviewed 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Following a resident's discharge, medical records shall give all forms needing a physician signature or date to the Director of Nurses (DON); if the physician or Medical director is in the facility and the DON is not available then medical records is responsible to follow through with obtaining signatures and dates as needed - In the event the forms are incomplete, it is the Medical directors responsibility to get attending physicians to visit the facility and close out the charts within 14 days of discharge as required by state law. Resident #112 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 and discharged in October 2024 following a brief stay for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic treatment was administered as ordered by the physician for one Resident (#102), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to access the facility's electronic medication dispensing system to obtain intramuscular (IM-injection deep into muscle tissue) antibiotic medication prescribed to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) which resulted in a delay in treatment. Findings include: Resident #102 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 and had diagnoses including a history of UTIs. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/7/24, indicated Resident #102 had both short- and long-term memory problems and severely impaired skills for daily decision making according to a staff assessment. Review of a Physician's note, dated 5/20/24, indicated Resident #102 presented with nausea and vomiting which the physician indicated was unusual for the Resident. The note indicated he would order a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity and screening chemistry and blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services to assess urinary incontinence were implemented for one Resident (#63), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to perform a bladder scan (procedure that uses ultrasound to measure the amount of urine in the bladder and determine how well the bladder is emptying) for Resident #63's new complaints of urinary incontinence, retention, and dribbling per physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Urinary Continence and Incontinence-Assessment and Management, revised September 2010, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The staff and practitioner will appropriately screen for, and manage, individuals with urinary incontinence. -Management of incontinence will follow relevant clinical guidelines. -The physician and staff will provide appropriate services and treatment to help residents restore or improve bladder function and prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in May 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, for one Resident (#83) out of 23 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was seen by the Physician at least every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter, with alternate visits by a Nurse Practitioner (NP) as indicated. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Services, last revised April 2013, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: The medical care of each resident is under the supervision of a Licensed Physician. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: - The Physician will perform pertinent, timely medical assessments; prescribe an appropriate medical regimen; provide adequate, timely information about the resident's condition and medical needs; visit the resident at appropriate intervals; and ensure adequate alternative coverage. - Physician visits, frequency of visits, emergency care of residents, etc., are provided in accordance with current regulations and facility policy. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address the dementia care needs of one Resident (#79) to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care of Residents with Dementia, last revised February 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: General: -Residents will receive ongoing comprehensive assessment for evaluation of cognitive function, physical changes associated with the disease process, and all other areas affected by the disease process. -A comprehensive care plan will be developed for all residents, and care planning will focus on needs identified through the assessment process. Care planning will be individualized to a resident's unique needs. -Care plans will be implemented, monitored, evaluated, and revised as a resident's needs evolve. Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Resident's (#2 and #102) drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #2, to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days, or extended beyond 14 days with a documented clinical rationale and duration; and 2. For Resident #102, to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of the antipsychotic medication Seroquel was attempted, unless clinically contraindicated and documented in the medical record, in an effort to discontinue the drug. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, last revised 9/15/24, indicated but was not limited to: - PRN orders for psychotropic medications should be limited to no more than 14 days. Each resident who is taking a PRN psychotropic drug will have his or her prescription reviewed by the physician/prescriber every 14 days and reviewed by the pharmacist at least monthly. - If the physician/prescriber believes that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To ensure medications were not stored in a medication cup in the top drawer of the medication cart in one medication cart out of three observed carts; and 2. To ensure treatment carts were locked when not in direct supervision of a licensed nurse on one of three units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, dated as revised 8/1/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: - facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals are stored for each resident in the containers in which they were originally received - facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors Review of the facility's policy titled General Dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to practice acceptable standards of infection control and prevention for two Residents (#93 and #49), out of a total sample of 27 residents, and during staff COVID-19 testing. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #93, to ensure staff utilized personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to the Resident who was on droplet precautions for COVID-19; 2. For Resident #49, to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and utilized PPE upon entering a room of a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions; and 3a. To ensure staff adhered to infection control protocols during COVID-19 testing, and b. To ensure staff followed the facility's policy and manufacturer's guidelines for specimen collection and handling for staff rapid COVID-19 antigen testing (Binaxnow COVID-19 AG Card) during a COVID-19 outbreak. Findings include: Review of the Department of Public Heath (DPH) memo titled When Caring for Long-Term Care Residents, including Visitation Conditions, Communal Dining, and Congregate Activities, Appendix A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-30 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespread
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify residents, families, and/or resident representatives of COVID-19 positive staff cases that occurred in the facility by 5:00 P.M., the next calendar day during the recent COVID-19 outbreak in August 2023, as required. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Interim Final Rule Updating Requirements for Notification of Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 Cases of Residents and Staff in Nursing Homes, Reference: QSO-20-29-NH dated May 6, 2022, indicated: - 3) Inform residents, their representatives, and families of those residing in facilities by 5 P.M., the next calendar day following the occurrence of either a single confirmed infection of COVID-19, or three or more residents or staff with new-onset of respiratory symptoms occurring within 72 hours of each other. On 8/27/23 at 12:47 P.M., the Administrator informed the survey team via email that five residents and one employee tested positive for COVID-19. During an interview on 8/28/23 at 3:00 P.M., the Administrator informed the survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled in accordance with current accepted professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Residents #13 and #91, that medications were not unlabeled, not in their original packaging and stored at the bedside; and 2. Medications were not stored unsecured and easily accessible in the Director of Nursing's office. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. -Drugs for external use, as well as poisons, shall be clearly marked as such, and shall be stored separately from other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, meal test trays on 2 of 3 units, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with meals that were prepared and served in a manner that conserved flavor, were palatable, and served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: On 8/24/23 at 11:03 A.M., the surveyor conducted a Resident Group Meeting with eight residents in attendance who voiced concerns regarding the quality and palatability of the meals provided to them. They indicated the eggs were cold in the morning, lunch was not always warm, and the meal trays were cold. On 8/25/23 at 12:05 P.M., the surveyor conducted a lunch test tray on Unit 3 with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS). Food temperatures were obtained using the FSS's digital thermometer. The meal truck left the kitchen at 11:40 A.M., and arrived on Unit 3 at 11:42 A.M. The first tray was removed from the truck at 11:46 A.M. Nurse #4 checked the trays for accuracy, and the first tray was removed at 11:46 A.M. The last tray (test tray)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to consistently follow professional standards for two Residents (#4 and #11), out of total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #4, to ensure a physician's order for an air mattress was implemented and accurately documented; and 2. For Resident #11, to ensure an undated, signed Application for an Authorization of Temporary Involuntary Hospitalization was not available in the Resident's medical record. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in August 2019 with diagnoses which included abdominal aortic aneurysm, schizophrenia, and palliative care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/14/23, indicated Resident #4's weight was 181 pounds. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 6/6/23, indicated Resident #4 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, required extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility, had a stage two pressure ulcer and was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the recapitulation of the Resident's stay, medication reconciliation, and obtain physician orders for discharge from the facility for one Resident (#103 ), out of three closed records reviewed. Findings include: Resident #103 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses which included dementia with other behavioral disturbances, post traumatic-stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. Review of the medical record indicated the Resident was discharged to another facility on 7/19/23. Review of the Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/19/23, indicated the Resident left the facility via transport chair car with the help of a certified nursing assistant and was being transported to his/her new facility. The driver was given the rest of the Resident's medication, and the little clothes and belongings that were left behind. Review of the form titled Physician Discharge Summary, Revised 8/86, indicated the sections Brief History, Prognosis and Final diagnosis were left blank. The form was signed by Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for three Residents (#64, #34, and #4). Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #64, to ensure Oxygen was administered according to Physician's orders and ensure oxygen tubing was changed weekly; 2. For Resident #34, to ensure oxygen tubing was changed weekly; and 3. For Resident #4, to ensure Oxygen was administered according to Physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, indicated but was not limited to: - Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. - Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. - Turn on the oxygen. Unless otherwise ordered, start the flow of oxygen at the rate of 2 to 3 liters per minute. - Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. Review of the facility's policy titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure for three Residents (#11, #93, and #57), out of a total sample of 27 residents, each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication ordered as needed (PRN) was limited to 14 days and was reviewed by the Physician with a documented rationale for its continued use and failed to monitor the Residents for adverse consequences of its use. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, Antipsychotic Medication Use, last revised December 2016, included but was not limited to: -Residents will not receive PRN dose of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. -The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days unless the healthcare practitioner has evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-12-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Nurse staffing information posted included the current date and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff including Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), as required. Findings include: On 11/18/24 at 6:38 A.M., the surveyor observed a Nurse staffing document posted in the main lobby on top of the receptionist's desk. The information on the document was as follows: Date: 11/14/24 Total Census: 112 Day Shift Staffing Totals: RN: 1, LPN: 6, CNA: 11 Evening Shift Totals: RN: blank, LPN: 6, CNA: 13 ½ Night Shift Totals: RN: 1, LPN: 2, CNA: 6 The daily staffing report had not been updated from 11/14/24 until 11/18/24, after surveyor intervention, and failed to include staffing data including the total hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and CNAs as required. The staffing report indicated the number of licensed and unlicensed staff only. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 6:38 A.M., the Housekeeping Manager was at the receptionist's desk and said the staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-16 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC-notice issued to a resident who is receiving benefits under Medicare Part A when all covered services end) and a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN -notice issued to a resident when a facility determines the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all his/her Medicare benefit days) were issued for two Residents (#60 and #163) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #60, to issue the SNF ABN notice and NOMNC so the Resident/Resident Representatives could decide if they wished to continue receiving skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare, and were aware of the financial responsibility they may have to assume; and 2. For Resident #163, to issue the NOMNC so the Resident/Resident Representatives could decide if they wished to continue receiving skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare, and were aware of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Transfer/Discharge was issued to one current Resident (#109), out of a total sample of 23 residents and one discharged Resident (#65), out of a sample of two discharge residents and failed to ensure the Ombudsman's office received copies of all resident notice of transfers as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Notification of Transfer/Discharge and Bed Hold, dated as reviewed 12/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -When a transfer/discharge of a resident occurs to the hospital the social worker is to complete the Notice of intent to transfer resident with less than 30 days' notice and a copy is sent with the resident to the hospital and the social worker is responsible to document the transfer/discharge in the medical record under social services progress notes. The note must include the transfer/discharge date , location, bed hold status and communications with the hospital. During entrance conference on 11/13/24 at 9:02 A.M., the Administrator said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-30 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observations, the facility failed to post a notice of availability of survey results and prominently post the Department of Public Health Survey Inspection results binder. Findings include: During the Resident Group Interview on 8/24/23 at 11:03 A.M., eight of eight residents in attendance said they were not aware of the location of the Department of Public Health Survey inspection results and said they were not aware the survey results were available for review. Multiple observations of the three resident care units and front lobby of the facility on 8/24/23 and 8/25/23 failed to include any postings which indicated the survey results were readily available and accessible for examination without having to ask to view them. Two of the three resident care units were secured and residents cannot exit the units without staff assistance, and do not have the ability to go to the lobby and view the survey results without asking staff. During an interview on 8/25/23 at 1:50 P.M., the Administrator said the survey results were kept in a binder which was located in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-08-30 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#26), out of a total sample of 30 residents, the Resident, and/or representative was provided with a Discharge/Transfer Notice upon transfer. Findings include: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses which included unspecified lack of coordination, weakness, and unspecified fall. Review of the Order Summary Details indicated on 7/13/23, Resident #26 was transferred to the hospital emergency room for evaluation. Further record review indicated there was no evidence that a Discharge/Transfer Notice was provided to the Resident and/or the family. During an interview on 8/25/23 at 1:57 P.M., Unit Manager #3 said the Discharge/Transfer Notice was not completed on 7/13/23. Unit Manager #3 said the missing discharge/transfer notice should have been completed by the nurse who transferred the Resident out on that date. She said there was no evidence the Discharge/Transfer Notice was completed and provided. During an interview on 08/29/23 at 4:55 P.M., the Social Worker said she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Resident and/or the Resident's representative and the Ombudsman were provided with a written notice of transfer as required for three Residents (#64, #70, and #26), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy tilted Notification of Transfer/Discharge and Bed Hold, revised 4/11/2023, indicated but was not limited to: - When the transfer/discharge of a resident occurs to the hospital, the Social Worker is to complete a Notice of Intent to Transfer Resident with Less than 30 Days' Notice (Expedited Appeal) or 30-Day Notice of Intent to Transfer Resident and send it along with the Facility Bed Hold Policy and Resident Notification Regarding Facility Bed Hold cover letter, with the resident to the hospital. - A copy is sent to the family or responsible party as notification of the transfer. - A copy is also maintained in the Social Services section of the chart and in the business office file. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-08-30 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notification of the bed hold policy to the Resident or Resident representative prior to discharge to the hospital, for three Residents (#64, #70, and #26), in a sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy tilted Notification of Transfer/Discharge and Bed Hold, revised 4/11/2023, indicated but was not limited to: - When the transfer/discharge of a resident occurs to the hospital, the Social Worker is to complete a: Notice of Intent to Transfer Resident with Less than 30 Days' Notice (Expedited Appeal) or 30-Day Notice of Intent to Transfer Resident and send it along with the Facility Bed Hold Policy and Resident Notification Regarding Facility Bed Hold cover letter, with the resident to the hospital. - A copy is sent to the family or responsible party as notification of the transfer. - A copy is also maintained in the Social Services section of the chart and in the business office file.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-08-30 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff transmitted a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two Residents (#22 and #82), out of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #22, a quarterly MDS assessment was transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days of completion as required; and 2. For Resident #82, a discharge MDS assessment was transmitted to CMS within 14 days of completion as required. Findings include: Review of the CMS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) version 3.0 Manual, dated October 2019, indicated MDS assessments must be submitted within 14 days of the MDS Completion Date. 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record indicated a quarterly MDS assessment was completed and dated 6/13/23. The assessment was unlocked and had not been submitted to CMS as required as of 8/30/23. 2. Review of Resident #82's medical record indicated he/she was discharged from the facility on 5/21/23. Further review of the medical record indicated a discharge MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the Resident's status for five Residents (#45, #19, #12, #93, and #102), out of a sample of 27 residents and one closed record. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Residents #45, #19, #12, and #93, to accurately reflect the use of a restraint device; and 2. For Resident #102, to accurately reflect the discharge location of the Resident. Findings include: 1A. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses which included repeated falls and adult failure to thrive. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #45's Device/Physical Restraint Assessment, dated 7/18/23, indicated no device/restraint was recommended. Review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS assessment Section P, dated 7/18/23, indicated a bed rail restraint device was in use for Resident #45. During an interview on 8/29/23 at 10:26 A.M., MDS Nurse #2 said no restraints were used in the building. MDS Nurse #2 reviewed the Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #45. MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$528,970 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $64,480 — penalty dated 2026-03-27
  • $464,490 — penalty dated 2024-12-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELDER SERVICES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ROMANO, FRANKIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/04/1978
ROMANO, JAMESIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/25/2013
ROMANO, KATELYNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/08/2017
ROMANO, KYLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/17/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 38%Medicare 4%Other / private 58%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$338per resident / day
operating cost
$10,283per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$318per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next