No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Martin Luther Care Center

1401 East 100th Street, Bloomington, MN 55425 · For profit - Corporation · 137 certified beds · (952) 888-7751 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jun 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$20,625 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,625 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-12)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
600 W 98th St · (952) 881-2651 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
509 W 98th St · (952) 884-7528 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1716 E Old Shakopee Rd · (952) 948-1184 · Call to confirm hours
Park
10201 10th Ave Cir S · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
927 E Old Shakopee Rd · (952) 881-0035

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.7%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%4.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%2.6%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%4.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened35.1%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.6%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.0%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.5%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.6%17.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%82.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%23.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.6%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.851.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.671.901.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 194 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.8%CMS range 36.2–49.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.2–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.1–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.63
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.31
RN hoursweekends
24.0%
Total nursing turnover
15.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 124.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.76 to 1.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-12)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure written Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (i.e., POLST) were accurately entered, transcribed and reflected in the medical record in a timely manner to help guarantee correct resuscitation measures (i.e., DNR or CPR) would be performed in accordance with resident wishes for 2 of 2 residents (R50, R321) reviewed for advanced directives. These findings constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R50 who would have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures (CPR) against her declared wishes. The IJ began on [DATE], when R50's POLST, indicating R50's wishes for Do not Resusitate (DNR) was signed by the medical provider and it wasn't changed within the facility' electronic Medical Record (EMR) system (i.e., banner) to reflect R50's wishes. This error was not identified despite multiple opportunities; and a series of interviews with direct care nurses outlined they would implement the incorrect directions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow 1 of 3 residents (R1's) Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) do not resuscitate, do not intubate, allow for natural death when R1 was found unconscious in his bed and registered nurse (RN)-A initiated CPR. This deficient practice had the potential to prolong R1's right for a natural death encumbered by potential complications of unnecessary life saving measures. The IJ began on [DATE] at 2:45 a.m. when RN-1 was found unresponsive in his room and RN-A initiated chest compressions. The IJ was identified on [DATE]. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing were notified on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE] and deficient practice was corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey and therefore was issued at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was severely cognitively impaired. His pertinent diagnoses were metabolic encephalitis (chemical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop a bowel management program to meet voiced needs and wishes for 1 of 1 residents (R8) who needed digital stimulation; failed to ensure physician orders for diabetic monitoring devices were acted upon and implemented timely to prevent unnecessary distress (i.e., finger sticks, pain) for 1 of 1 residents (R8); failed to ensure a developed skin condition was assessed and appropriately treated for 1 of 2 residents (R1); failed to ensure a request for diet modification was appropriately and timely referred for evaluation for 1 of 1 resident (R57); and failed to ensure medical devices were consistently applied to reduce edema for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for edema management; and failed to recognize and comprehensively assess a resident's hearing concerns resulting in a delay in identification and treatment of cerumen (earwax) impaction for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed who had difficulty with hearing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored safely and under direct observation of authorized staff in areas where residents, staff and guests could access medications in two medication carts affecting 2 of 4 units of the facility. Findings include: During a continual observation on 6/10/25 at 3:00 p.m., an unattended and unlocked medication cart was observed in the hallway of the Bridgeway unit against the wall right outside a resident room with two other resident room doors facing the cart. During observation, a resident was observed sitting on her walker approximately 3 feet away from the unattended unlocked medication cart. Numerous unidentified staff members walked past the cart, along with another resident and family member. At 3:18 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-H returned to the medication cart and was observed interacting with the resident on the walker, reviewing the electronic medical record, and opening the cart without unlocking it. RN-H did not remove keys from their pocket to unlock the medication cart. RN-H verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a timely manner to preserve desired temperatures of food for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R3, R40, R113) reviewed who expressed concerns for food temperatures and palatability. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchenettes. Findings include: During survey entrance on 6/9/25 at 11:00 a.m., the facility provided a document titled Mealtimes for [NAME], TCU, Eagle Crest, Prairie Spirit: Breakfast-7:45 am Lunch-11:45 am Dinner-4:45 pm. During observation of the facility's three kitchenettes, a sign was posted on the walls adjacent to the serving line facing the dining rooms. It stated: Menu Cheat Sheet with instructions to obtain meal tickets in advance to meal service and staff should be taking the resident's meal orders WITH the resident, not for them. Review of resident council (RC) meeting minutes for: 6/10/24: indicated 19 residents were in attendance for the meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure voiced complaints about nursing services were acted upon and, if needed, investigated or resolved for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed who complained staff were placing two incontinent products on them at night, and they did not want a particular staff person to help with certain cares. Findings include: R57's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R57 had intact cognition and did not have hallucinations or delusions. R57 rejected care daily. R57 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, dressing, rolling left and right and transfers. R57's diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hip fracture, Parkinson's Disease, malnutrition, anxiety, and depression. During interview on 6/9/25 at 2:35 p.m., R57 stated staff often turned off her call light but did not help her with what she needed. R57 stated staff double briefed her multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document reivew, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for weight gain. Findings include: R57's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R57 had intact cognition and did not have hallucinations or delusions. R57 rejected care daily. R57 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, dressing, rolling left and right and transfers. R57's diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hip fracture, Parkinson's Disease, malnutrition, anxiety, and depression. R57's care plan revised 6/9/25, indicated R57 had daily weights and directed staff to notify the provider for weight gain of more than three pounds per day or five pounds per week. R57's Weight Summary indicated: -5/31/25, 170 pounds with mechanical lift. -6/1/25, 170.4 pounds with Hoyer lift. -6/2/25, 171 pounds with Hoyer lift. -6/3/25, 172.2 pounds with mechanical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene and grooming (i.e., nail care, hair care, beard trimming) was provided for 2 of 3 residents (R20, R25) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and whom were dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R20 R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R20 had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking or rejection of care behaviors. Further, the MDS outlined R20 required substantial assistance with personal hygiene cares. On 6/9/25 at 2:35 p.m., R20 was observed lying in bed while in his room. R20 had a meal tray placed on a bedside table over him while lying down, and he had rice and beans spilled onto his chest. R20's fingernails were observed and multiple nails had a visible, dark-colored substance or debris present under the edge of the nail to the nail bed. R20 was asked about his bathing and grooming at the care center and responded aloud,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a referral for potential cataract surgery was facilitated and/or completed in a timely manner to help improve vision and quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed who was diagnosed with cataracts and expressed difficulty with his vision. Findings include: R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R20 had moderate cognitive impairment. The section to record R20's vision status, located under Section B - Hearing, Speech, and Vision (B1000, B1200) - was left blank. On 6/9/25 at 2:32 p.m., R20 was observed lying in bed while in his room and his television was turned on and positioned on the opposite wall of the head of the bed. R20 had no eye glasses on at this time. R20 was interviewed and spoke with a soft, at times mumbling, voice but articulated clearly, My eyes aren't good. R20 was unsure if he'd seen an eye doctor recently when asked and then voiced aloud, Been awhile. On the bedside dresser, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a range of motion (ROM) program was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R74) reviewed for mobility. Finding includes: R74's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R74 was cognitively intact, had no delusions, hallucinations, had no behaviors and refused cares one to three days during a 7-day period. MDS indicated R74 had limited lower extremity ROM and did not received ROM in the last 7 days prior the MDS assessment date. R74's MDS indicated she received set up assistance for oral hygiene and eating, maximal assistance with showers/bathing, toileting hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, and was dependent with transfers, and wheelchair mobility. R74's clinical diagnosis report printed on 6/12/25, indicated chronic respiratory failure, chronic pain, anxiety, restless leg syndrome, weakness, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, chronic congestive diastolic heart failure( a condition where the heart muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure acute symptoms of distress or pain were recorded; and non-pharmacological interventions attempted or documented prior to the use of as-needed (i.e., PRN) narcotic medications to help promote continuity of care and care-planning for 1 of 5 residents (R50) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R50's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R50 had intact cognition and demonstrated no delusional thinking. Further, the MDS outlined R50 received scheduled pain medication but no PRN pain medications; and reported occasional pain which she rated at 4/10 on the numeric rating scale. On 6/9/25 at 12:40 p.m., R50 was observed seated in a recliner chair while in her room. R50 had visible white-colored bandages on both legs and reported she sustained a fall the week prior which she felt injured her hip adding, I think I cracked it. R50 denied significant, unresolved pain issues at this time when asked.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dental needs were coordinated with a dental provider for further care to reduce the risk of complication [i.e., cavities, oral pain] for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for dental care and services. Findings include: R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 was cognitively intact, had no hallucinations, delusions, and didn't refuse personal cares. MDS indicated R25 received maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, sit to stand and was dependent with transfers. MDS indicated R25 received moderate assistance with personal hygiene, dressing and received set up for eating and oral hygiene. MDS section L-oral/dental status indicated R25 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. R25's Medical Diagnosis record printed 6/12/25, indicated diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical emergency that occurs when the body's tissues don't have enough oxygen), atrial fibrillation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure assessed and care-planned adaptive equipment for eating was provided to promote independence and personal hygiene during meals for 1 of 1 residents (R20) reviewed who needed special utensil handles. Findings include: R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R20 had moderate cognitive impairment and required set-up assistance with eating. On 6/9/25 at 2:35 p.m., R20 was observed lying in bed while in his room. R20 had a meal tray placed on a bedside table over him while lying down, and he had rice and beans spilled onto his chest. R20 took more bites of food from the provided tray which had a ceramic plate with regular, metallic utensils (i.e., fork, spoon) on it. The meal tray had a white-colored menu slip on it which recorded R20 as having a diabetic diet and no adaptive equipment was listed on it; however, on the wall immediately next to R20's bed was a white-colored sign which had black writing, Keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 of 4 shower rooms reviewed for cleanliness. Also, facility failed to ensure resident walls were in good condition for 3 of 3 resident rooms (R4, R28, and R77 ) reviewed for concerns of peeling and chipped paint. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a hallway handrail was secured firmly to wall outside resident room. Findings include: Shower Rooms: During observation and interview on 6/10/25 at 11:34 a.m., on the long-term care unit, the counter including the sink had two opened boxes of gloves and dry washcloths, a stack of opened 4x4 gauze, opened cotton tipped applicator, a used finger lancet, two unfolded towels with an opened one-gallon bottle of shampoo and body wash, and opened 8-ounce bottle of body lotion with screwcap not applied. The upper cabinet door next to sink had a door that was halfway opened hanging by one hinge rather than secured with two hinges. On the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to wear proper personal protective equipment for residents who were on droplet precautions for one of ten residents (R8) reviewed for personal protective equipment and precautions. Findings include: Observation on 1/2/25 at 4:11 p.m. showed R8 had a contact, droplet, and eye protection sign on the door. The sign indicated when entering R8's room, you should have clean hands, follow the droplet precautions by wearing a mask, eye protection if splashed/sprayed, gown, gloves, mask, and eye protection. Nursing assistant (NA)-A was observed walking into R8's room with a surgical mask, and reusable gown, no eye protection, or gloves. At 4:13 p.m., NA-A came out of R8's room and removed his gown but did not change his mask or wash his hands. R8's Face sheet printed on 1/2/25 indicated R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. R8's additional diagnoses included cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor and obtain orders for surgical wound dressing changes for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: R1's admission assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 had a surgical incision on her back measuring 9.4 centimeters (cm) by 0.8 cm. R1's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had intact cognition. The MDS also indicated R1 had a surgical wound, but lacked indication of surgical wound care. R1's diagnoses included surgical aftercare following back surgery. R1's August Wound Treatment Record (WTR) indicated an order for daily dry dressing change to her back starting on 8/22/24. This was not completed because R1 was admitted to the hospital for an unrelated problem. The order was discontinued on 8/25/24, when R1 returned to the facility from the hospital. R1's readmission assessment dated [DATE] indicated a surgical incision to the mid-back measuring 9.4 cm by 1 cm. R1's Weekly Skin assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for grab bars and implement interventions to ensure safety and mitigate the risk of entrapment or other injuries when using any mattress/bed types for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) who had grab bars installed on their beds. Findings include: The facility reported incident (FRI) dated [DATE], identified R1 had been found with his head caught between the mattress and the grab bar. R1's face sheet dated [DATE], identified R1 admitted in [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's, arthritis left knee, congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, morbid obesity, weakness, fracture of upper and lower end of left fibula, bacteremia, and repeated falls. R1's comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment, no delirium, no behaviors, no upper extremity impairment. Impairment of left lower extremity. R1 had frequent urinary incontinence and occasional bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation neglect to the State Agency (SA) within 24 hours for 1 of 1 resident (R1). R1 was given the incorrect medications at the facility, which required R1 to be sent to the hospital for bradycardia (low heart rate), pain and anxiety. Findings include: R1's care plan dated 6/12/24 indicated R1's diagnoses included pneumonia, shortness of breath, saddle emolus of the pulmonary artery with acute cor pulmonale (a large blood clot that lodges in the pulmonary artery obstructing blood flow to both lungs), chronic pain, stage 3 kidney disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left side (weakness), osteoarthritis, and depression. R1's medication/treatment error report dated 6/15/24 at 9:15 a.m. indicated R1 was given Keppra (an anticonvulsant), metoprolol (a beta blocker to treat high blood pressure), and clopidogrel (a blood thinner). The description of the error indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for medication administration. R4 had an over-the-counter medication on his tray table that he had been taking for approximately two weeks, the facility failed to monitor his intake of the medication. This medication had an interaction with a prescription medication R4 was taking. Finding include: R4's self-administration of medication assessment dated [DATE] indicated: -Required assistance for storing medications in a secure location. -Required assistance for opening and closing medication containers. -Could count not accurately tell time to know when medications need to be taken. -R4 did understand that skipping a medication dose is a refusal and staff will be notified when refusal has occurred. -Required assistance administering eye drops/ointments, topical lotions, ear drops, suppositories, subcutaneous injections, nasal sprays, and oral medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure expired and visibly molding produce was disposed to prevent serving expired food. This had potential to affect all residents, visitors and staff who consumed food from the main kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour with the dietary director (DD) on 4/15/24 at 12:10 p.m., the walk-in cooler was observed, which stored food served to all units of the facility and contained the following expired foods; an unopened bag of broccoli with a use-by date of 3/18/24, which was noticeably watery with brown spots, four unopened five-pound bags of brussels sprouts with a use-by date of 2/28/24, a cardboard box with approximately 25 cucumbers with noticeable denting open areas and white colored mold, a cardboard box 1/4 full of wrinkled, drooping asparagus with a use-by date of 3/22/24, three unopened bags of pre-chopped zucchini with a use-by date of 4/2/24 which was noticeably watery and browning, and two undated bags of precut potatoes which appeared watery with white mold spots. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures were implemented for direct resident care for 1 of 1 residents (R230) who was placed on enhanced barrier precautions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure clean personal and facility laundry was protected during transport and storage outside resident rooms. This had the potential to affect all 132 residents who utilized facility provided laundry services. Findings include: PPE Use The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety and Oversight Group Ref: QSO-24-08-NH dated March 20, 2024, state Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. In addition, EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: -Infection or colonization with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure two medication carts were kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in areas where residents, staff and guests could access medications. The deficient practice had the potential to affect twenty residents that resided on those units. Findings include: Facility map provided to surveyors immediately after entrance on 4/15/24 identified the Bridgeway unit of facility as the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) of the facility. This includes rooms 110-129. During observation on 4/16/24 at 8:19 a.m., an unattended medication cart in the west section of the TCU was observed to be unlocked with no staff visible. During interview with registered nurse (RN)-A on 4/16/21 at 8:21 a.m., RN-A stated he was responsible for the unlocked unattended medication cart. RN-A stated, when I leave med cart I should hide the resident info on the laptop and lock med cart. During interview with charge nurse, RN-C on 4/17/24 at 8:08 a.m., RN-C stated, When you leave [it], med cart is to be locked and screen locked for patient privacy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure timely assistance with elimination care was provided, when requested, to promote dignity and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., incontinence) for 1 of 2 residents (R182) reviewed for dignity with personal care. Findings include: R182's N Adv Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) Evaluation (a screening tool used to determine cognition), dated 4/10/24, identified R182 had intact cognition. On 4/15/24 at 5:45 p.m., R182 was observed lying in bed while in her room. R182 was interviewed, and explained she had admitted to the care center about a week prior and was mostly bed-ridden due to a sustained injury adding she could only use a bed pan for various elimination needs due to the immobility. R182 stated the biggest complaint about the care center was staff who respond to her calls for assistance, and then express they will be right back but not then return timely, if at all. R182 stated this had happened many times since she admitted . On 4/17/24 at 8:46 a.m., medication administration was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records which contained private, medical, and personal information were kept private and not accessible to unauthorized personnel for 2 of 2 residents (R230 and R6) reviewed for privacy. Findings include: During observation on 4/16/24 at 8:19 a.m., an unattended medication cart in the hallway in the west side of the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) with laptop open to R230's medication list was observed. During interview with registered nurse (RN)-A on 4/16/21 at 8:21 a.m., RN-A stated he was responsible for the unattended TCU medication cart with R230's medication list visible on the laptop screen. RN-A stated, when I leave med cart I should hide the resident info on the laptop and lock med cart. During observation and interview on 4/18/24 at 1:27 p.m., an unattended medication cart with a laptop open to R6's electronic medical record was observed in the 2nd floor east hallway of the long term care unit of facility. RN-G approached medication cart with a rolling vital sign equipment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene care (i.e., nail care) was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R64) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) who was dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R64's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R64 had moderate cognitive impairment, needed substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, eating, oral hygiene and was dependent on toileting and showering. R64's MDS did not indicate behaviors or refusal of cares. R64's Clinical Diagnosis Report printed 4/18/24, indicated diagnoses of vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgement, memory, and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain), type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure wound prevention treatment was implemented for 1of 1 resident (R36) who had a history of bilateral heel pressure areas and risk for skin breakdown. Findings include: R36's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R36 had moderate cognitive impairment, no delirium, or behaviors, and did not refuse cares. MDS indicated, R36 needed moderate assistance with upper body dressing, toileting, oral hygiene, and bathing. R36 needed maximal assistance with lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, and transfers. MDS also indicated, R36 was at risk to develop pressure areas. R36's Clinical Diagnosis Report printed 4/17/24, indicated diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the pancreas doesn't make enough insulin causing the body to have trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), diabetes chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function), vascular dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively reassess after repeated refusals of an ambulation program and, if needed, develop interventions to reduce the risk of mobility loss for 1 of 1 resident (R36) reviewed for mobility. Finding include: R36's annual Minimum Data Set, dated (MDS) 4/8/24, indicated R36 had moderate cognitive impairment, no delirium, or behaviors, and did not refuse cares. MDS indicated, R36 needed moderate assistance with upper body dressing, toileting, oral hygiene, and bathing. R36 needed maximal assistance with lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, and transfers. MDS also indicated, R36 was at risk to develop pressure areas. R36's Clinical Diagnosis Report printed 4/17/24 indicated diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the pancreas doesn't make enough insulin causing the body to have trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), diabetes chronic kidney disease (means a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the use of bilateral, bed-mounted grab bars was comprehensively reassessed and, if needed, develop interventions to ensure safety while in bed for 1 of 1 resident (R62) reviewed who developed seizures after admission to the care center. Findings include: R62's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R62 had intact cognition, demonstrated no delusional thinking during the review period, and required supervision or touch-level assistance with mobility-related activities of daily living (ADLs; i.e., rolling left to right, lying to sitting). Further, the MDS outlined a section labeled, Section I - Active Diagnoses, with R62 being recorded as not having a seizure disorder or epilepsy. R62's most recent Device Assessment and Consent - V2, dated 3/26/24, identified an admission evaluation was being completed for two devices which included, 9. Grab Bars - Bilateral. The evaluation outlined R62 was not prevented from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure staff provided cares according to standard of practice for gastrostomy tube care for 1 of 1 residents (R230) reviewed for tube feedings. Findings include: R230's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R230 dependent on helper (staff) for all effort of activity or requires assistance of 2 or more helpers for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, personal hygiene and mobility. In addition, R230 diagnoses included stroke (cell death to portions of the brain causing loss of functioning), aphasia (inability to speak well), hemiplegia/hemiparesis (partial paralysis) of right dominant side, respiratory failure, dysphagia (inability to swallow), and had a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube to stomach) for all nutrition and medication administration. R230's care plan (CP) dated 2/23/24, documented R230 Dependent with tube feeding and water flushes. And Enteral feed: Water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 unit refrigerators for resident use were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a safe temperature of between 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 41 degrees F was maintained in 2 of 3 resident's refrigerators. In addition, the facility also failed to date food in 2 of 3 resident's refrigerators. Findings include: On 8/2/23 at 11:00 a.m. the BW resident refrigerator was observed with dietary supervisor (DS)-A. A tan, purple spillage was observed inside of the door on two shelves, two undated opened ice-cream containers were observed, yellow liquid in 12 ounce opened cup undated, and build up of an unidentified brown colored substance was noted throughout the entire BW resident refrigerator. The temperature of the refrigerator was 44 degrees Fahrenheit (F). DS-A verified the observations. On 8/2/23 at 11:30 a.m. the FC resident refrigerator was observed with dietary director (DD)-A. An unidentified brown colored substance was observed on the second shelf…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 commercial food cooling devices (i.e., refrigerators, freezers) had ongoing monitoring of temperature and function to reduce the risk of potential foodborne illness; failed to ensure 1 of 2 commercial can openers was kept in a clean and sanitary manner; and failed to ensure dry goods removed from original packaging were stored in a manner to reduce the risk of cross-contamination. These findings had potential to affect all 123 residents, staff, and visitors, who consumed food prepared from the main production kitchen. Findings include: On 3/20/23 at 12:14 p.m., an initial kitchen tour was completed, and the following items were identified: 1) A commercial [NAME] can opener was attached to the counter by the oven range(s). The blade of the opener had copious amounts of a dried black debris present along the bottom of the blade, along with red and tan-colored debris present along the top of the blade. 2) A single Continental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring call light were accessible for 5 of 5 residents (R11, R20, R53, R61, R426). Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 had moderate cognitive deficits, was independent with eating and required extensive assistance with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). R11's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/16/22, indicated R11 triggered for visual function, urinary incontinence, falls, and psychotropic medication use. R11's care plan undated, indicated R11 had a self-care deficit and limited mobility weakness, a history of falls with a rib fracture, and blindness. Interventions included encouraging R11 to use the call light for assistance. R11 also had a fall related to poor balance and an unsteady gait. Interventions included keeping frequently used items within his reach and encouraging R11 to call for assistance when in pain. R11 was also on oxygen therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to safely secure medications that were left at the bedside in reach for 3 of 3 residents (R29, R20, R53) reviewed for self-administration of medication (SAM). Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R29 was cognitively intact. R29's Self Administration of Medications assessment dated [DATE], indicated R29 was not safely able to self-administer medications. R29's orders dated 6/22/22, indicated diclofenac sodium gel 1% (medication used to relieve joint pain from arthritis), apply to bilateral knees topically four times a day for knee pain. During observation on 3/20/23 at 2:00 p.m., R29 was lying in bed, sitting up with her tray table over her bed. A tube of diclofenac sodium gel 1% was within reach on R29's tray table. When interviewed on 3/20/23 at 2:00 p.m., R29 stated the diclofenac sodium gel was often left in the room, and this time since approximately 11:30 a.m. R29 stated she would have found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment and person-centered care plan was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R11) who was legally blind. Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 had moderate cognitive deficits, was independent with eating and required extensive assistance with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). R11's diagnoses included heart failure, legal blindness, insomnia, and depression. R11's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/16/22, indicated R11 triggered for visual function, urinary incontinence, falls, and psychotropic medication use. R11's care plan undated, indicated R11 preferred to be notified and invited to larger group activities. Interventions included providing R11 with a monthly activity calendar although R11 was legally blind and unable to read. R11 was at risk for pain related to a fall with a rib fracture. Non-pharmacological interventions included walking/ambulation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to provide shaving assistance for 2 of 2 residents (R72, R78), and failed to provide scheduled baths for 1 of 1 resident (R87) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R72's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R72 had moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs), and had medical diagnosis of diabetes type II and urinary tract infection. R72's care plan indicated R72 had an ADL self-care deficit and required assistance from one staff member to complete personal hygiene. During observation on 3/20/23, at 3:37 p.m. R72 was noted to have long chin hairs approximately one inch long. During observation on 3/21/23, at 2:55 p.m. R72 was noted to have long chin hairs approximately one inch long. During observation and interview on 3/22/23, at 7:29 a.m. R72 still had long chin hairs after receiving a shower by facilty staff that morning. R72…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to ensure staff could communicate effectively to 1 of 1 resident (R51), a non-English speaking resident, reviewed for communication. Findings include: R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderate cognitive impairment, the preferred language was Vietnamese and needed/wanted an interpreter for communication. The MDS further indicated no behaviors, R51 required assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, and assistance of one staff for eating, toileting and personal hygiene. R51's care plan updated 2/13/23, indicated to utilize Vietnamese interpreter as needed and at times, use interpreter to help with communication barriers but lacked indication when interpreter services were required. The care plan indicated R51 had a communication resource book to use with pictures and words in Vietnamese. When interviewed on 3/20/23, at 6:33 p.m. FM-E with FM-F on the phone, stated staff cannot communicate with R51 in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility and on a walking program received appropriate assistance to maintain or improve mobility for 1 of 1 residents (R78) reviewed for mobility. Findings include: R78's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R78 had mild cognitive impairment, needed limited physical assistance from one staff member for most activities of daily living (ADLs) including walking, and medical diagnoses which included aspiration pneumonia due to inhalation of food or fluids, adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, and inactivity, often accompanied by dehydration, depressive symptoms, impaired immune function, and low cholesterol), schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and unspecified dementia. R78's care plan indicated R78 had limited physical mobility related to weakness and was on a nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess, create and implement intervention to promote the safety for 1 of 1 residents (R26) who resided in the memory care unit, had an unwitnessed fall, and continued to ambulate without assistance. Findings include: R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R26 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff assessment indicated R26 had severe cognitive deficits. R26 was independent for eating and required extensive assistance of one staff for all other activities of daily living (ADLs). R26 also required limited assistance of one person physical assist for walking. R26's facesheet indicated R26's had diagnoses including aphasia (a brain disorder affecting language and comprehension), Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, diabetes, corns and callosities (a thick, hard and painful raised bump), pain in right and left feet and toes, right and left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and document review the facility failed to assess and monitor for complications per standard of practice before and after dialysis for 1 of 1 resident (R35) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include: R35's face sheet printed 3/23/23, included diagnoses of end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart), heart failure, and oxygen therapy due to respiratory failure. R35's provider orders printed 3/23/23, failed to indicate any assessment of the dialysis port and care prior to and following the three times per week hemodialysis appointments. R35's care plan dated 3/23/23, stated R35 had intact cognition and required assistance of two staff for toileting and transferring into his electric wheelchair. In addition, R35 was scheduled for dialysis three times per week. During interview with R35 on 3/20/23 at 4:44p.m., R35 stated facility staff have not looked at his dialysis port prior to or after his three day per week hemodialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide food choices to 1 of 1 residents (R11) during meal service. This had the potential to affect all 15 residents residing in the memory care unit. Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 had moderate cognitive deficits, was independent with eating and required extensive assistance with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). R11's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/16/22, indicated R11 triggered for visual function, urinary incontinence, falls, and psychotropic medication use. R11's care plan undated, indicated R11 had personal preferences with a goal of having his preferences followed. R11 had a potential for cognitive impairment and ranged from intact to moderate cognition. Interventions included providing R11 opportunity to make choices. R11 had potential for nutritional problems related to heart disease, edema, and legal blindness. Interventions included assisting R11 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment was provided as care planned to promote independent, easier eating abilities for 1 of 1 resident (R112) observed to have difficulty drinking from regular (i.e., non-handled) glassware. Findings include: R112's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R112 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with set-up assistance for eating. R112's Nutritional Assessment 4.0 - V2, dated 12/29/22, identified R112 consumed a regular diet with thin liquids. A section labeled, Physical Functioning, identified R112 required set-up assistance for feeding and a checkmark was placed next to a subsection labeled, Adaptive equipment required, which outlined, OT [occupational therapy] recommending 2-handle cup. Further, the section of the assessment labeled, Analysis, outlined R112 demonstrated no difficulties with chewing or swallowing and was able to feed himself . with meal set up and uses a 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's immunization status was verified or documented for 1 of 5 residents (R118) reviewed for immunizations. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the influenza vaccine was offered or received for 1 of 5 residents (R118) in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: R118's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had moderate cognitive impairment. R118's immunization record showed no evidence of receiving, or being offered, the influenza vaccine. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 1:29 p.m., R118 stated she was not offered any vaccines when she admitted to the facility, including the influenza vaccine. During interview on 3/23/23 at 10:00 a.m., the infection preventionist (IP) stated she was responsible for verifying residents' immunization status through the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC) when they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's COVID immunization status was verified or documented for 1 of 5 residents (R118) reviewed for immunizations. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the COVID vaccine was offered or received for 1 of 5 residents (R118) in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: R118s admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had moderate cognitive impairment. R118's immunization record showed no evidence of receiving, or being offered, the COVID vaccine. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 1:29 p.m., R118 stated she was not offered any vaccines when she was admitted to the facility, including the COVID vaccine. During interview on 3/23/23 at 10:00 a.m., the infection preventionist (IP) stated she was responsible for verifying residents' immunization status through the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC) when they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-06-12 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post survey results and/or a notice of the availability of such in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public. This had the potential to affect all 118 residents, families and visitors who may have wished to review the information without having to ask. Findings include: During survey entrance on 6/9/25 at 11:00 a.m., a three-ring binder labeled Survey Results was located on small table in an alcove around the corner inside the main entrance to facility. The receptionist desk had a stone front with a [NAME] and a sign posting Happy Pride Month. Adjacent to the receptionist desk was a partial wall with postings of facility events, calendars, and information. There was no signage or notice posted anywhere in the main entrance including the receptionist desk where individuals wishing to examine survey results did not have to ask to see them. During interview with lead receptionist (F-D) on 6/9/25 at 1:32 p.m., F-D stated, no,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure resident's personal care information was kept secured and out of public view when stored on 2 of 4 facility units with mobile medication carts. This had the potential to affect 9 of 9 residents (R8, R106, R110, R173, R174, R177, R325, R326, and R330) on the transitional care unit, and 3 residents (R70, R88, and R99) on the long-term care unit whose private and personal information was left unattended on medication carts left out in the hallway corridor. Findings include: During continuous observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 12:29 p.m. to 12:37 p.m., on the transitional care unit of facility, an unattended medication cart with visible care sheet exposing TEAM 4 NURSES CENSUS SHEET including columns with resident name, room number, diagnoses, bath days, diet orders, nursing care notes, skin impairment and labs. This included 9 residents. Housekeeper (HK)-A walked past the unattended care sheet and stated, I know the patient information should not be showing. In addition, there were thirteen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-04-18 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure complaint investigations regarding the facility during the three preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility and posting of notice of availability of such reports were posted in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public. This had the potential to affect all 132 residents, families and visitors who may have wished to review the information. Findings include: According to the Federal database Automated Survey Processing Environment (ASPEN) in 2023, facility had in-person complaint investigations on 4/3/23, 6/22/23,5/18/23, 6/8/23, 6/21/237/20/23, 8/2/23, 9/28/23. Per ASPEN deficiencies were issued for 5/18/23 and 8/2/23. During observation on 4/17/24 at 11:08 a.m., review of [NAME] Care Center Annual State Survey Results located in main lobby of facility on small table inside front door failed to include any complaint investigation results including the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-04-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen floors and mats were routinely and properly cleaned to ensure a sanitary kitchen environment. This had the ability to affect all 132 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 4/15/24 at 12:10 p.m., the kitchen floors including the food preparation area, the walk-in cooler, the dry storage room, and the clean dishware storage room were noticeably soiled. The floors were covered sporadically with a white/brown coating, various old dried food particles filling the crevices of floor mats and sporadically covering the floor in all rooms including underneath food and clean dish storage racks, various used food wrappers such as used Café Delight and brown sugar topping packets, broken and scattered dishware pieces in the clean dishware room, as well as noticeably darkened and soiled mop heads found underneath food storage racks and in the food preparation area. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 1:09 p.m., the dietary director (DD) confirmed the dirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,625 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $11,798 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
  • $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-10-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MARTIN LM LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2007
DENVER KAUFMAN REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED 06/07/2004, RESTATED 07/25/20Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/17/2014
ROGER W SCHNOBRICH REVOCABLE TRUST U/A NOVEMBER 7, 2013Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/25/2015
MCNELLIS, GREGORYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2007
SCHNOBRICH, ANGELINEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2020
EBENEZER MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2007
CHRISTOPHER, MACKENZIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/21/2025
STEIN, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
WILLETT, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/24/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 10%Other / private 41%

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$485per resident / day
operating cost
$14,750per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$472per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245272. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next