Jones Harrison Residence

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 169 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.48 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.86 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.63 to 1.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to reduce the risk of falls were implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. R1 fell from her bed when the nursing assistant (NA)-A repositioned her alone, R1's care planned interventions required two staff for repositioning. R1's fall resulted in a femur fracture with surgical intervention.Findings include: R1's care plan dated 12/15/26 indicated R1 required substantial assistance from two staff to assist and reposition every 2 hours. Substantial/maximum assistance of two staff for dressing assistance, bathing, and toilet use. R1 was able to determine when she has voided or had a bowel movement and would call for staff assistance when her incontinent brief required changing. R1's fall assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 was a high fall risk. R1 was alert and oriented. R1 was chair bound and non-ambulatory. R1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents taking psychotropic medications had an appropriate clinical rationale for not attempting a gradual dose reduction of psychotropic medications, an appropriate diagnosis for use of antipsychotic medications, and non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and documented with as needed psychotropic use. The facility further failed to ensure behaviors were observed and documented to adequately justify psychotropic medication use. This had the ability to effect 3 of 5 residents (R63, R87 and R180) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R63R63's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R63 was admitted to the care facility on 6/14/25 and had mild cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated R63 received antipsychotic medication and antidepressant medication during the look-back period without a gradual dose reduction (GDR) attempted.R63's Order Summary Reported, dated 12/2/25, indicated R63 was on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to implement their written policy and procedure and ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the state agency for 1 of 2 residents (R81) reviewed for allegations of abuse.Findings include:R81's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R81 was admitted to the care facility on 7/22/23 and had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated R81 required partial to moderate assistance with most activities of daily living and required substantial assistance with toileting.R81's care plan, dated 7/16/25, indicated should resident report that she was sexually assaulted, staff should ensure resident is safe and report allegation to their supervisor immediately.R81's progress note, dated 12/14/25 at 11:25 a.m., indicated resident [R81] reported that she was sexually abused at night. Writer reported to daughter. Daughter ran the camera and reported two NAR [nursing assistants] changed resident and she went to sleep. Nothing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 residents (R81) reviewed for allegations of abuse. Findings include:R81's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R81 was admitted to the care facility on 7/22/23 and had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated R81 required partial to moderate assistance with most activities of daily living and required substantial assistance with toileting.R81's care plan, dated 7/16/25, indicated should resident report that she was sexually assaulted, staff should ensure resident is safe and report allegation to their supervisor immediately.R81's progress note, dated 12/14/25, indicated resident [R81] reported that she was sexually abused at night. Writer reported to daughter. Daughter ran the camera and reported two NAR [nursing assistants] changed resident and she went to sleep. Nothing wrong happened to resident as per the resident daughter. Daughter said,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 residents (R18) reviewed for hospice.Findings include: During an observation on 1/5/26 at 1:41 p.m., R18 was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed. During a follow up interview and observation on 01/7/26 at 8:50 a.m., R18 was observed in the dining room. R18 smiled but did not answer questions. R18's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/1/25, identified R18 had severely impaired cognition. Diagnoses included dementia (significant loss of memory, thinking and reasoning skills), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic pain and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body). The MDS contained section O which contained a section hospice care which was marked no indicating R18 did not receive hospice services. R18's orders, printed 1/9/26, included the following order:-ok for hospice to evaluate, treat and accept with a start date of 8/1/24-call hospice in case of an emergency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nails were kept clean and trim for 1 of 3 residents (R90) reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: R90's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R90 was cognitively intact, had upper and lower extremity impairments on one side and required substantial to maximum assistance with activities of daily living. R90's care plan, dated 7/10/24, indicated R90 had limited physical mobility and self-care performance deficit related to hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or reduced strength on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting his right side, required assist of two staff with bathing/showering, and directed staff to provide nail care as needed. During observation and interview on 1/5/26 at 4:25 p.m., R90 had fingernails approximately 1/4 inch long with dark matter underneath them. R90 looked down at his nails and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a medication order, written in error and without documented justification was appropriately questions and doubled checked before implementing and administering the medication multiple times for 1 of 1 resident (R108) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:R108's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R108 was admitted to the care facility on [DATE] and has severe cognitive impairment.R108's EMR contained an order, dated [DATE], for lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg every 2 hours for anxiety, ordered by hospice. The EMR also contained an order for lorazepam 0.5mg every 2 hours as needed for 14 days, dated [DATE] - [DATE] and a second as needed order dated [DATE] and discontinued on [DATE].R108's medication administration records indicated R108 had received 6 doses of as needed lorazepam in [DATE] and 1 dose in [DATE] between [DATE] and [DATE]. Between [DATE] and [DATE], R108 received a total of 11 doses of scheduled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and develop non-pharmacological interventions to promote comfort for 1 of 2 residents (R4) reviewed for pain management.Findings include: R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/1/25, indicated R4 had intact cognition. Diagnoses included the following: rheumatoid arthritis (chronic autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks joint linings, causing pain, swelling, stiffness, fatigues and damage to joints), Sjogren's syndrome (chronic autoimmune disease which can cause symptoms including fatigue and joint pain), arthrodesisis status (indicated that patient has undergone surgical joint fusion), muscle weakness, and chronic pain. Further the assessment identified R4 received PRN (as needed) pain medications and received non-medication interventions for pain. Furthermore, R4 identified she frequently had pain which occasionally effects sleep, interferes with day-to day activities and rated pain at a 10 out of 10 on a pain scale with 10 as the worst pain. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan with goals and interventions utilizing a trauma-informed approach including monitoring of PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) for 1 of 1 (R2) residents reviewed for trauma-informed care.Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/25, indicated R4 had severely impaired cognition. Diagnoses included: PTSD, bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), anxiety disorder, depression, dementia (significant loss of memory, thinking and reasoning skills), and seizure disorder (condition where the brain has abnormal electrical activity suddenly that temporarily disrupts normal function). R2's Psychosocial History Assessment, dated 11/19/25, identified through a question with a radio-button answered yes that R2 experienced any significant life events that continued to affect R2's life. The assessment form disclosed R2 stated long ago and did not specify further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure laundry was laundered according to standard infection control practices, with the potential to affect all 116 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities: Laundry and Bedding resource dated 1/8/24, indicated that damp laundry should not be left in machines overnight. During an observation and interview on 1/8/25 at 12:45 p.m., multiple (greater than ten) cloth mop heads were observed in the laundry machine. Laundry aide (LA)-A stated that the mop heads, cleaning rags, microfiber cloths, and clothing protectors would be brought down to the laundry room throughout the day. The non-laundry staff would then start the laundry machine in the evening. The non-laundry staff would not assist in moving the clothing to the drying machine. The laundry aide confirmed that the usual practice was for the laundry listed above to be cleaned, left wet in the washing machine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assess a resident timely after a change of condition for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for change in condition.Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition with diagnoses including paraplegia, urinary tract infection, and protein-calorie malnutrition. R1's care plan dated 7/4/25, indicated R1 was usually able to identify the need to have incontinent product changed and was able to utilize the call light to request assistance. R1's preference was to have incontinent product checked at 4 am only. A nurse's note written by registered nurse (RN)-A on 7/14/25 at 6:46 a.m., indicated R1 was alert and oriented to baseline with no shortness of breath or respiratory distress noted or reported. R1 slept through the night. A nurse's note written by licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A on 7/14/25 at 6:59 a.m., indicated during report the outgoing nurse (RN-A) denied R1 had a change of condition and insisted R1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN