Aurora On France

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 560 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 246 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 58.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.08 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.53 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.77 to 1.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (R29) when staff directed a continent resident to roll over and have a bowel movement in his brief rather than assessing and implementing toileting interventions consistent with his needs, preferences, and dignity. The facility failed to ensure assessments, care plans, and staff practices provided clear direction regarding R29's toileting status and preferences, despite documentation identifying him as continent of bowel and bladder and his expressed distress regarding having bowel movements in bed. This had the potential to cause psychosocial harm, loss of dignity, and diminished quality of life by failing to respect the resident's autonomy, preferences, and right to receive care in a dignified manner. Findings include: R29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow resident to safely administer own medications for 1 of 1 (R1) resident observed with medications at bedside. Findings include:R1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact, needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, upper/lower body dressings, bed mobility, transfers, and needed moderate assistance with oral and personal hygiene. R1 was dependent on staff for bathing. R1's diagnosis report dated 5/28/26, indicated diagnosis of pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertensive heart failure, diabetes, anxiety disorder, and chronic low back pain. R1's physician orders dated 5/28/26 included orders for clobetasol propionate external ointment 0.05% (a topical steroid) with directions to apply to labia, distal left wall topically in the evening every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer a written notice of transfer which included a statement of the resident's appeal rights and the contact information of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. In addition, the facility failed to provide written information on the duration of the bed-hold, and reserve bed payment for 2 of 3 residents (R51, R69) reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include: R51 R51's admissions Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified R51 with intact cognition, had no functional impairment, required assistance with toileting, dressing, and showering. In addition, R51 had diagnoses of congestive heart failure, heart disease, arthritis, depression, and chronic lung disease. During record review of R51's electronic medical record (EMR) R51 was hospitalized on [DATE] following a fall in his room. He was sent to the hospital and remained until 5/18/26 when he was transferred back to the facility. During interview with registered nurse (RN)-A on 5/28/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge return anticipated (DRA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) was transmitted for 1 of 3 residents (R42) and a discharge return not anticipated (DRNA) MDS was transmitted for 1 of 1 residents (R8), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) reviewed for no MDS record in 120 days.Findings include: R42's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R42 had a discharge- return anticipated and it was unplanned. The MDS indicated the assessment was completed but did not indicate the assessment was submitted to CMS. The MDS included under the submit section, do not submit to CMS. R42's Census listing dated 12/11/25, indicated R42 admitted to the nursing home on [DATE], and their status changed to STOP BILLING on 12/11/25. R42's progress note dated 12/11/25 at 2:56 a.m., indicated R42 was discharged to the emergency department due to a fall. R8's DRNA MDS dated [DATE], indicated R8 had a discharge- return not anticipated and it was planned. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a level I Pre-admission Screening (PAS) and, if needed, a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed to screen for mental health needs for 1 of 1 residents (R45) reviewed for PAS.Findings include: R45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had intact cognition. The MDS indicated R45 was diagnosed with anxiety and bipolar disorder. R45's PAS notice dated 4/22/26, indicated a copy of the PAS was included with this notice, but the PAS was not final until the lead agency sent a final determination to the nursing facility. R45's medical record was reviewed and lacked evidence that a final determination from the lead agency had been received. During an interview on 5/27/26 at 2:13 p.m., the admissions coordinator (AC) stated that when a resident was admitted from the hospital, the hospital would complete a PAS, and the screening would then be sent to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine/as-needed nail trimming and cleaning was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R13) reviewed for nail care who required staff assistance with their activities of daily living (ADLs).Findings include: R13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 4/10/26, indicated R13 had intact cognition and was diagnosed with paraplegia (the partial or complete paralysis of the lower half of the body) and not diabetes. The MDS indicated R13 required setup/clean-up assistance with eating, supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene and personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on and taking off footwear. R13's care plan dated 4/6/26, indicated a weekly body audit was to be performed. The care plan indicated R13 required setup/clean-up assistance with eating, supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene and personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on and taking off…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement hospital discharge recommendations and facility standing orders for daily weight monitoring for a resident with a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF). The facility also failed to assess and implement a low-sodium diet recommendation, failed to monitor for weight changes indicative of fluid retention, and failed to develop a care plan addressing CHF management after the resident's diuretic therapy was placed on hold pending further clinical evaluation for 1 of 1 residents (R84) reviewed for quality of care.Findings include: Findings include:R84's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/5/26, identified R84 had mild cognitive impairment and a primary diagnosis of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition where the heart cannot pump blood well often resulting in excess fluid buildup in the body).R84's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a documented weight of 270 pounds on 5/4/26.R84's hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured medications were available to meet residents' needs for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (R29 and R57). This deficient practice resulted in multiple prescribed medications being unavailable for administration and created the potential for residents to miss ordered medications or receive doses that differed from the physician's prescribed regimen. Findings include: R29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. R57's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. During observation and interview on 05/27/2026 at 8:01 a.m., RN-E conducted a medication pass for R29 and identified four…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in refrigeration units. In addition the facility failed to ensure dishes were properly air dried prior to stacking for storage. These deficient practices had the potential to impact all residents who consumed facility prepared food. Findings include: During a kitchen tour on 5/19/25 at 2:27 p.m., led by the culinary manager (CM) the following were noted: ---The bottom 3 racks on the right of the walk-in freezer were less than 6 inches from the floor of the freezer and held food. The middle rack bottom shelf touched the floor. There was a prep pan of raw whole turkeys on it. The prep pan had a brownish red substance on the bottom of the pan. ---The first-floor fridge had a stack of boxes sitting directly on the fridge floor. The CM stated they had just got a shipment, and the boxes were still being put away. ---On the clean side of dish room there were 18 stacks of plastic glasses that had visible moisture between and in the glasses. The CM stated the glasses had been stacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to infection control standards including the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) and contact precaution rooms, as well as failing to properly perform hand washing and gloving for 3 of 3 residents (R208, R23, R259) reviewed for infection prevention and control. Findings include: R208: R208's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of the right foot with necrosis of muscle, gangrene, cellulitis of right lower limb, osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic kidney disease. The MDS indicated R208 needed moderate assistance of one person for transfers, was taking antibiotics, and had been participating in occupational and physical therapy. R208's provider order dated 5/9/25 included an order for wound care to her right foot. And on 5/6/25, an order for physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $805K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN