Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 282 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 149 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 104.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.09 to 1.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed was free from a significant medication error. R1 was given another residents insulin causing her to be sent to the hospital for treatment. Findings include: R1's clinical physician orders dated 7/15/25 - 7/29/25 did not indicate R1 was ordered insulin. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1's Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) was a 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. R1 did not receive any injections including insulin. R1's diagnosis's were urinary tract infection, overactive bladder, hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone), gastro-esophageal reflux disease, muscle weakness, encephalopathy (a condition where the brains function is impaired) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (damage of a heart muscle making it difficult for the heart to pump blood). R1's diagnoses did not include diabetes. R1's nursing progress note dated 7/23/25 at 7:57 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene (i.e., showers) was completed for 4 of 5 residents (R89, R103, R159, R162) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who were dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R89 R89's admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R89 with admission to facility's transitional care unit (TCU) on 10/26/24, had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial to maximal assistance with showers, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. In addition, R89 was documented with an indwelling catheter (drain urine from the bladder) and had diagnoses of left arm fracture, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and urinary retention. Furthermore, the MDS stated R89 and family participated in the assessment and goal setting process. During initial screening on 11/18/24 at 12:15 a.m., surveyor provided with undated TCU nursing assistant care sheet. During interview with nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate bathing/shower preferences for 1 of 1 residents (R159) reviewed for choices. Findings include: R159's admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified admission to facility on 11/4/24, had impaired cognition, required substantial to maximal assistance for showering, toileting, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of transitional care unit (TCU) care sheet identified all residents by room number, name, primary diagnoses, and day of the week with AM or PM next to it. R159 identified Fri PM associated with it. R159's care plan dated 11/4/24 identified, Care Plan: I will have my preferences followed. During interview with R159 and family member (FM)-B on 11/18/24 at 3:14 p.m., R159 stated facility never offered or asked preferences on day and time of showers. R159 and FM-B stated he was informed that the showers and bath schedules were assigned per room number. R159 stated, I prefer to shower in the morning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect upper body impairment for 1 of 2 residents (R162) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2018, identified the purpose of the RAI process was to help ensure holistic care was provided. According to the RAI/MDS, the definition of functional limitation in range of motion is, limited ability to move a joint that interferes with daily functioning (particularly with activities of daily living or places the resident at risk of injury. Coding instructions for GG0115A Functional Limitation in Range of Motion question, the Upper Extremity (Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Hand) include: Code 0, no impairment: if resident has full functional range of motion on the right and left side of upper/lower extremities. Code 1, impairment on one side: if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were conducted upon admission for 1 of 2 residents (R103) reviewed for care conferences. Findings include: R103's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/24, indicated R103 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions with an admission date of 10/29/24. Diagnoses included: displaced bicondylar fracture of left tibia (fracture in left lower leg), muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, left foot drop (dragging of front of foot when walking and/or inability to raise toes or the foot from the ankle), and infection and inflammatory reaction due to other internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts (an infection caused related to implanted devices from surgery). R103's care plan, printed 11/18/24, indicated R103 discharge planning: [R103] was living at home where she is planning to return home at discharge with an intervention of arrange for in home services as ordered,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications were limited to 14 days of use or re-evaluated by the medical provider to ensure necessity and reduce the risk of complication for 1 of 5 residents (R6) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R6's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had moderately impaired cognition and was receiving hospice services. R6 was dependent on staff for toileting, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. The MDS indicated R6 was diagnosed with dementia, anxiety, and depression. R6's Verbal Orders report dated 10/23/24, indicated a hospice provider (MD)-A had ordered two milligrams (mg) haloperidol (an antipsychotic medication) three times a day as needed (PRN) starting on 10/23/24. The report had a column titled Date Discontinued that was left blank and the order did not include an end date. R6's order summary report dated 10/23/24, indicated R6 had an order for two milligrams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented or followed for 2 of 2 residents (R46 and R21) reviewed for EBP. Findings include: The CDC article titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) dated 4/2/24, indicated MDRO transmission in skilled nursing facilities was common and contributed to substantial resident morbidity. EBP is an infection control intervention to reduce transmission of MDROs by using gowns and gloves during high contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing that lead to indirect transfer of MDROs from resident to resident. The article indicated high-contact activities include changing linens, bathing, dressing, transferring, changing briefs, feeding tube care, etc. The article indicated EBP should be implemented (when contact precautions did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promote dignity and respect to 1 of 4 (R1) residents reviewed. R1 was not properly dressed when leaving her room for therapy services. R1 did not have an incontinent brief on and upon standing urinated on herself, her wheelchair, and the floor in the presence of other residents and staff. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental status (BIMs) score of 15 indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1 required maximum assistance with toileting hygiene, showering and dressing. She required moderate assistance with rolling in bed, positioning from sitting to lying and she was dependent from sitting to standing with transfers. R1 was dependent in her manual wheelchair. R1 was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. R1's pertinent diagnoses were cirrhosis of the liver, acute respirator failure with hypoxia, portal hypertension (increased pressure in the venous system), morbid obesity and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a systematic approach to assess and evaluate residents' fluid status to monitor the effectiveness of interventions for 2 of 2 residents (R1 and R3) assessed. R1 and R3 were on a daily fluid restriction, the facility was documenting the intake. The facility did not have a system in place to evaluate the total daily fluid intake to determine adequacy or if the provider required notification. Findings include: R1's nursing progress notes dated 4/24/24 - 5/7/24 did not include any documentation regarding R1's fluid restriction, except on 4/25/24 at 1:29 a.m. a note indicated drank 300 cc. R1's physician orders dated 4/25/24 indicated P1 was on a fluid restriction of 1200 milliliters (ml) per day. 500 cubic centimeters (cc) day shift, 500 cc evening shift and 200 cc night shift. R1's care plan dated 4/26/24 indicated to monitor intake and record every meal. Staff was to provide and serve diet as ordered: Heart Healthy/regular textures and regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow recommended precaution process for disinfecting medical equipment between resident use for 1 of 1 resident (R4) when observed. Licensed staff failed to disinfect the vital signs machine following the use on R4 who was on contact precautions and then used on another resident. In addition, the facility had placed R4 on incorrect isolation precautions. R4 was found to be on precautions due to suspicion of Covid requiring droplet precautions and he was on contact precautions. Findings include: Upon observation on 5/13/24 at 8:19 a.m. licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A was taking vital signs in R4's room. R4 had a cart with gowns, gloves, hand sanitizer and masks out of side of his room. The sign on the wall indicated R4 was on contact precautions that required staff to cleanse hands before entering and exiting room, don gloves and a gown when in room and discard before exiting the room. In addition, the staff were to use dedicated or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R35) reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings include: R2 R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had intact cognition, dependence on staff for all efforts of self-care including all forms of hygiene, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, positioning and mobility. Also, indicated R2 had an indwelling catheter. R2's Diagnoses Report dated on 1/31/24, indicated R2 had diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord), diabetes, depression, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and quadriplegia (paralysis of both upper and lower body). R2's physician orders (PO) dated 8/22/23, indicated R2, admitted to AccentCare Fairview Hospice on 8/22/23, with terminal Dx [diagnosis] of MS [multiple sclerosis] with life expectancy of 6 months or less. R2's care plan with a review date of 5/4/23 indicated, Foley catheter bags must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $303K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN