Presbyterian Homes Of Bloomington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 374 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 196 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.89 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 92.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.40 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.58 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medication orders received following a hospital visit were obtained, transcribed, and implemented timely for 1 of 3 residents (R110) reviewed for hospital return. The facility's failure resulted in a five-day delay in implementing an emergency department order increasing R110's torsemide dosage following treatment for worsening heart failure symptoms and placed the resident at risk for worsening fluid overload and respiratory compromise.Findings include: R110's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified R110 had moderate cognition and diagnoses included acute respiratory failure and hypoxia, heart failure, orthostatic hypotension, nonrheumatic tricuspid (valve) insufficiency, and atrial septal defect. R110 had shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion and received oxygen therapy and diuretics daily.R110's care plan dated 2/23/26 identified R110 required assistance of one staff for activities of daily living including bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurately documented medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for change of condition and oxygen use.Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had intact cognition and diagnoses of coronary artery disease, hypertension, kidney disease, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory failure. R1's MDS indicated R1 used continuous oxygen therapy.R1's Comprehensive Data Collection Review dated 1/29/26, indicated R1 had right sided pneumonia, ordered antibiotics, crackles to left lower lobe, and supplemental oxygen at two liters per minute.R1's physician order dated 1/31/26, indicated R1 used continuous supplemental oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation over 89% (percent).R1's physician order dated 2/4/26, directed staff to wean R1's supplemental oxygen as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and timely removal of facility food stored in refrigerators and freezers was completed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect approximately 20 residents who consumed meals from the third-floor kitchen, and all residents in the facility who received meals from the main facility kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour with the assistant dietary director (DA)-A on 3/31/25 at 12:30 p.m., the following foods were found in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer of the main facility kitchen. -One opened container sealed with plastic wrap; ranch dressing labeled use by 3/27/25. -One opened container of Chow Mein noodles with an expiration date of 3/4/25. -One opened container of Pace salsa with a use by date 3/8/25. -One single container of chocolate ice cream dated 8/12/24. During the walk through DA-A removed the expired food. DA-A stated the cooks were supposed to go through the refrigerator and freezers daily. After the initial walk-through, evening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the county (designated State Mental Health Authority - SMHA) for 1 of 1 resident (R11) with new onset of mental illness. Findings include: R11's 6/23/23, Initial Pre-admission Screening (PAS), did not identify a diagnosis of mental illness and did not indicate the need for a Level II (PASARR) to be completed. R11's 8/31/23, Provider Order identified R11 was to receive olanzapine (treats schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) 1.25 milligrams (mg) at night and 1.25 mg as needed for anxiety/paranoia and lack of redirection. R11's 2/3/25, Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R11 was dependent on staff for cares and activities of daily living (ADLs). R11 had a diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, depression, and a psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia, and took antipsychotics on a routine and as needed (PRN) basis. R11 was severely cognitively impaired and had disorganized thinking that would come and go with change in severity, and had little interest or pleasure in doing things and felt down,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications (group of medications used to treat psychosis) were limited to 14 days of use or re-evaluated by the medical provider to ensure necessity and reduce the risk of complication for 1 of 5 residents (R26) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R26's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/9/25, indicated R26 had moderately impaired cognition with no hallucinations or delusions, no behaviors and no rejection of care. R26 required supervision from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS indicated R26 diagnoses included: anxiety, depression, generalized weakness, and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, R26's Order Summary Report, printed 4/2/25, indicated R26 had an order for 50 milligrams (mg) quetiapine fumarate (antipsychotic medication) by mouth as needed for agitation started on 3/3/25. The report included a section titled End Date that did not include a date for this order. R26's Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment for 1 of 1 residents (R34) who had dried feeding tube-like substance on their feeding tube pole, dresser, bed, and floor. Findings include: R34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R34 had intact cognition and was diagnosed with cancer, heart failure, anxiety, and depression. The MDS indicated that R34 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene and maximal assistance with toileting, bathing, and lower body dressing. R34's order summary report dated 10/10/23, indicated that R34 received daily tube feedings over eight hours at night. During an observation on 1/8/24 at 1:24 p.m., R34 was observed lying in her bed on the right side of the room with a feeding pump on a pole between her and the drawered nightstand to the right of the bed. The nightstand was observed to have splatters of a light brown/yellow substance scattered over the left side, top, and front of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure post-hospitalization narcotic medication orders were clarified and/or obtained to reduce the risk of potential unnecessary administration and associated complication (i.e., sedation, constipation); and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and documented prior to administration of as-needed (PRN) narcotic medication for 1 of 5 residents (R33) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R33 had dementia with severe cognitive impairment and required no physical assistance to complete transfers or ambulation. Further, the MDS outlined R33 was not on a scheduled or PRN pain medication regimen, and R33 had no pain symptoms. R33's care plan, dated 1/4/24, identified R33 sustained a hip fracture on 12/30/23, and had surgical repair. The care plan listed several interventions including dispensing pain medication as prescribed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for adaptive equipment and observed with difficulty eating during dining observations. Findings include: R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R3 was cognitively intact, and required verbal cues or touching/steadying assistance to eat and received rehabilitation therapies including speech therapy. R3 diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) affecting right dominant side, hypertension(high blood pressure), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the body), anxiety disorder, manic depression (or bipolar disorder is a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels and concentration), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(lung disease that blocks airflow and make it difficult to breath).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN