Flagstone

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 67.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.34 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain and document informed consent, including an explanation of risks and benefits, for 1 of 5 residents (R43) reviewed for the use of psychotropic medications.Findings include: R43's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R43 had both long-term and short-term memory impairment and severely impaired cognitive decision-making skills. The MDS indicated R43 had Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, depression, and a psychotic disorder.R43's order summary dated 3/18/26, indicated R43 had an order for 50 milligrams (mg) of Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) twice a day for psychosis with a start date of 3/12/26. The order summary also included an order for 25 mg of Seroquel daily for psychosis with a start date of 3/12/26. R43's medical record was reviewed and lacked evidence that consent for the use of the Seroquel at the current dose and frequency was obtained prior to the medication being administered. During an interview on 3/19/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure instructions for use of multiple as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were included, to ensure appropriate administration and minimize the risk of unnecessary medication usage for 1 of 5 residents (R43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:R43's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R43 had both long-term and short-term memory impairment and severely impaired cognitive decision-making skills. The MDS indicated R43 had Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, depression, and a psychotic disorder. The MDS indicated R43 did not have hallucinations, delusions, or rejection of care during the look-back period.R43's care plan dated 2/5/26, indicated R43 had an alteration in mood or behavioral expression as well as dementia with psychotic features. The care plan indicated R43's target behaviors were paranoia, beliefs that weren't real, anger at caregivers and family, physical aggression, and wandering/yelling in the hall at others or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure complete and comprehensive Minimum Data Set(s) (MDS) were completed for 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for assessment accuracy. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2025, identified the MDS as an assessment tool that facilities are required to use. The manual directed comprehensive assessments, include the completion of both the MDS and the CAA process, as well as care planning. The CMS RAI manual also identified that the RAI process (i.e., MDS) was completed to help evaluate residents' strengths and areas for care planning. R4's annual MDS dated [DATE], included the following information:-Section B- Hearing, Speech, and Vision: indicated B0100 (Persistent vegetative state/no discernible consciousness) was answered as no, so staff were to continue to B0200, Hearing. B0200-B1000, fields regarding R4's hearing, speech, his ability to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene care (i.e., facial hair removal) was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R39) reviewed who was dependent of staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Findings included:R39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R39 had severe cognitive impairment, did not refuse personal cares, and needed setup/cleaning assistance with oral hygiene and personal hygiene. MDS also indicated R39 needed moderate assistance with bathing, dressing, and toileting hygiene.R39's Medical Diagnoses report dated 3/20/26, indicated diagnoses of chronic diastolic heart failure, amnesia, essential hypertension, muscle weakness, and bilateral shoulder pain.R39's care plan dated 3/20/26 indicated R39 was cognitively impaired and was had difficulty in communicating. This care plan indicated the staff will anticipate and meet her needs. R39's care plan also indicated she had self-care performance deficits and needed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and, if needed, determine or develop proactive interventions to help address pressure injury risk and prevent skin alteration worsening, after a pressure-induced skin alteration was identified for 1 of 3 residents (R19) reviewed for pressure injuries. Findings include: R19's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R19 had intact cognition, no rejection of care behaviors, and was diagnosed with heart failure, kidney failure, and diabetes. The MDS indicated R19 had a functional limitation in range of motion to both upper extremities, needed moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, was dependent for bathing, and needed moderate assistance for bed mobility. The MDS indicated R19 was at risk for pressure ulcers and had no current pressure ulcers.R19's order summary dated 6/9/25, included an order dated 6/9/25 to place R19's CPAP or BiPAP on at bedtime, check overnight, remove in the morning, clean the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure safety measure were put in place to prevent accidents for one of two resident (R25) reviewed for accidents who had known fainting episodes, often while on the toilet. Findings include:R25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R25 was admitted to the care facility on 7/26/23 and was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated R25 required substantial to maximum assistance with dressing, bathing and toileting. During an interview on 3/17 and 10:09 a.m., R25's family member (FM)-A stated she had concerns about R25 being left alone in the bathroom due to her having multiple fainting episodes while on the toilet, stating she believes she had an episode most recently on 3/1/26 while on the toilet. FM-A stated they were not sure what was causing the fainting episodes, but the facility was aware she was having them. R25's care plan, lacked any mention of R25's fainting spells to include interventions for her safety or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents using a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine had appropriate orders for use to include equipment settings for 1 of 2 residents (R19) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:R19's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R19 had intact cognition, no rejection of care behaviors, and was diagnosed with heart failure, kidney failure, and diabetes. The MDS indicated R19 had a functional limitation in range of motion to both upper extremities, needed moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, was dependent for bathing, and needed moderate assistance for bed mobility. R19's care plan dated 12/22/25, indicated that staff were to assist R19 in applying his CPAP machine per MD/NP orders. R19's order summary dated 3/17/26, included multiple orders for weekly and daily cleaning and maintenance of R19's CPAP/BiPAP machine. The order summary included an order dated 6/9/25, to place R19's CPAP or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the consulting pharmacist (CP) identified and acted upon 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed who had psychotropic medications without an adequate medical diagnosis for ongoing use. Findings include:R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had severely impaired cognition and was diagnosed with dementia and depression. The MDS indicated R5 did not have hallucinations, delusions, or rejection of care during the look-back period. R5's Medical Diagnosis summary dated 4/14/25, included a diagnosis of dementia with other behavioral disturbance dated 4/14/25, depression, a cognitive communication deficit, and an additional diagnosis dated 6/25/21 for dementia without behavioral/psychotic/mood disturbance or anxiety. R5's care plan dated 10/31/25, indicated R5 received antipsychotic medication for dementia with behavioral disturbance. The care plan indicated R5's 6.25 mg of Seroquel two times a day had been decreased to once a day at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered at the ordered time resulting in worsened pain for 1 of 1 resident (R25) resulting in a significant medication error. Findings include:R25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R25 was admitted to the care facility on 7/26/23, was cognitively intact, and required substantial to maximum assistance with dressing, bathing and toileting. The MDS further indicated R25 received scheduled and as needed pain medication with a pain rating of 7/10 in the past five days. The national library of medicine reports that withdrawal symptoms from baclofen can start within hours of a missed dose to include rebound muscle spasticity and painful spasms. R25' s orders, printed 3/20/26, indicated R25 was receiving the following medications:Baclofen (muscle relaxant used to treat spasticity, specifically spasms, cramping, and tightness) 7.5 milligrams (mg) three times a day at 7:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for 3 of 6 residents (R26, R51, R4) and failed to perform hand hygiene to reduce the risk of the spread of infection to others for 1 of 6 residents (R51) reviewed for infection control practices.Findings include: R26 R26's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R26 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for all personal cares including transfers. R26's diagnoses include obstructive uropathy (blockage preventing normal urine flow) and used an indwelling catheter (tube from bladder to a bag outside the body to drain urine). R26's physician orders (PO) dated 1/6/2026 stated Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to catheter. Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing Bathing/Showering Transferring Changing Linens Providing Hygiene Changing briefs or assisting with toileting. R26's care plan dated 4/12/24 included, I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN