Maranatha Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 90.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.15 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure assessment, monitoring, and documentation surrounding PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication administration included resident-specific target behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for psychotropic medications.Findings include:R1R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe cognitive impairment, unclear speech, and impaired vision. R1 had disorganized thinking and no behaviors or rejection of care. R1's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. R1 received hospice services with a prognosis of less than six months of life.R1's care plan dated 5/27/26, indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment related to neurocognitive disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia and combative with cares. R1 received psychotropic medications. An intervention dated 6/21/24, directed staff to monitor occurrence for target…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within the two-hours for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had an injury of unknown origin of the left humerus (the long bone located in the upper arm, from the shoulder to the elbow).Findings include R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe cognitive impairment, unclear speech, and impaired vision. R1 had disorganized thinking and no behaviors or rejection of care. The MDS identified R1's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, Alzheimer's, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. R1 had hospice services with prognosis of less than six months of life. R1 was independent with wheelchair use, required partial and/or moderate assistance with eating and substantial/maximum to dependent on staff for other activities of daily living, such as transfers, dressing, toileting, and bed mobility.R1's abuse and/or neglect care plan focus dated 6/3/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food safety practices including proper food storage such as labeling and dating foods stored in the kitchen as well as monitoring the temperature of the dishwashers and refrigeration/freezer units and maintaining a sanitary work environment in the main kitchen and kitchenettes on the resident floors. This had the potential to affect 85/87 residents. Findings include: Food storage During the initial kitchen tour on 03/31/2025, at 7:17 a.m., the following items were discovered in the walk-in refrigerator without proper label/date; 12 Quart clear plastic square storage container with a blue lid 1/3 full of unknown cream colored liquid, a small, metal pan of pork cutlets- covered with plastic wrap, breaded meat in an uncovered, flat, metal pan, diced onions in clear plastic, square, covered container with plastic wrap, four separate small, metal pans - contained rice, mashed potatoes, chicken breast, and sliced zucchini as well as a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) was reviewed and/or revised following a change in condition comprehensive assessment for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, dementia, and malignant neoplasm of sigmoid colon. Further, R1's cognition was noted to be moderately impaired. R1's POLST dated 9/13/24, which was signed by R1's health care agent and family member (FM)-A, indicated R1's wishes were to be do not attempt resuscitation (DNR), allow natural death, in the event R1 had no pulse and was not breathing, as well as comfort-focused treatment (allow natural death) to relieve pain and suffering through the use of any medications by any route, positioning, wound care, and other measures. Use oxygen, suction and manual treatment of airway obstruction as needed for comfort. Patient prefers no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor and evaluate response to interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R1) identified to have been taking antibiotics for a urinary tract infection (UTI). Findings include: R1's significant change Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, dementia, and malignant neoplasm of sigmoid colon. Further, R1's cognition was noted to be moderately impaired. R1's medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR) for the month of November 2024, indicated Keflex 500 milligram (mg) twice daily for UTI until 11/15/24, ordered on 11/13/24 and Macrobid 100 mg twice daily for retention of urine for 5 days begin on 11/8/24 discontinued on 11/12/24. Further on 11/8/24, refer to infection progress note template for assessment and documentation requirements. Document at least with the start and the end of an antibiotic regimen and during the course of treatment with clinical change or vital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper glove use and hand hygiene was performed during assistance with toileting and incontinence care for 2 of 4 residents (R5, R4) reviewed for toileting needs. Findings include: R5's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R5 needed extensive assistance with personal hygiene. On 7/11/24 at 9:30 a.m., nursing assistant-A (NA-A) entered R5's room to assist him to the bathroom. NA-A assisted R5 to the bathroom and placed gloves on without performing hand hygiene. NA-A assisted R5 to stand after he was done urinating and wiped his peri area and buttocks with toilet paper. Urine was in the toilet. NA-A took off the soiled gloves, and without performing hand hygiene, assisted R5 to pull up his pants and sit in his wheelchair. NA-A assisted R5 back to his bedside in his wheelchair, and placed the TV on for him to watch. NA-A washed her hands prior to exiting the room. R4's annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated R4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown origin were reported to the State Agency (SA) immediately (within two hours) for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for injuries of unknown source. Findings include: On 3/25/24 at 3:10 p.m., a facility reported incident (FRI) submitted to the SA indicated R1 had bruises of unknown origin. These included bruising on her left upper inner arm measuring 30 centimeters (cm) x 5cm, the left palm of her hand measuring 4 cm x 1 cm, her left shoulder measuring 5 cm x 4 cm, and a skin tear to her left knee measuring 5 cm x 4 cm. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment, and had a diagnosis of dementia. The MDS indicated R1 required substantial to maximum assistance of staff for all personal care and transfers. The MDS also indicated R1 was non-ambulatory, required a manual wheelchair for all locomotion, and she had a history of falls. On 3/23/24 at 2:15 a.m. a progress note indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 (R71) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R71 had severe impairment of cognition, did not speak and was nonresponsive. In addition, R71 had diagnoses of traumatic brain dysfunction, seizure disorder, dysphagia (with gastrostomy tube), and cognitive communication deficit. In addition, R71 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's) for all cares including bathing, dressing, and hygiene. R71's care plan (CP) with revision date of 8/29/23 indicated, Dressing, Grooming, Hygiene: I require assist of 2. During interview with family member (FM)-A and emergency contact on 2/12/24 at 5:00 p.m., FM-A stated, she'd [R71] be very uncomfortable with her pants left down while in bed. FM-A stated she had observed R71 with pants down below the knees while R71 was in bed. FM-A stated she had, talked with [designated social services (SS-D)] about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were accessible for 3 of 3 residents (R8, R67, R195) reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R8 R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R8 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance for all hygiene, dressing, and mobility. In addition, R8 had diagnoses including dementia, coronary artery disease (impaired blood flow to the heart), and renal disease. R8's care plan (CP) dated 8/7/22 indicated, Place call light within reach and answer promptly. During observation on 2/12/24 at 3:12 p.m., R8 was sleeping in bed with the call light looped through a plastic tube attached to bed frame aligned with R8's left shoulder. However, the controller for the call light was laying on the floor out of reach of R8. During observation on 2/14/24 at 7:36 a.m., R8 was sleeping in bed with the call light looped through a plastic tube attached to bed frame aligned with R8's left shoulder. However,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the emergency contact (FM-A) in a timely manner for 1 of 1 residents (R71) reviewed for notification of change when R71 required an emergency hospital procedure. Findings include: R71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R71 had severe impairment of cognition, did not speak and was nonresponsive. In addition, R71 had diagnoses of traumatic brain dysfunction, seizure disorder, oxygen dependency, dysphagia (with gastrostomy tube), and cognitive communication deficit. Also, R71 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's) for all cares including bathing, dressing, and hygiene. R71's facesheet printed 2/15/24 at 4:50 p.m., indicated R71's Emergency Contact #1, Responsible Party, and Guardian was FM-A. R71's progress note (PN) documented with Effective date of 1/29/24 at 8:49 p.m., indicated R71, pulled the G-tube. The resident [sic] called the NP, instructed to put on a folly [sic] and send the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN