Cura Of Le Sueur

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 22.6 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.45 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.46 to 1.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 12 of 25 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, and R12) reviewed for drug diversion were free from misappropriation of their property when their medications were taken by a staff member. This resulted in diversion of 121 oxycodone tablets, one tramadol tablet and two doses of liquid lorazepam. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 9/27/24, when registered nurse (RN)-A notified the director of nursing (DON) with her concerns that trained medication aide (TMA-A) had been signing controlled medications out of the narcotic logbook. However, TMA-A was not documenting medication in the medication administration record (MAR) as given. R1 and R2 notified RN-A and their provider they had not received as needed (PRN) medications. The facility initiated an internal investigation, which included additional narcotic record review and audits against electronic medical records. Discrepancies were found in the following records: R1, R2, R3,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-06-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders which resulted in a significant medication error for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration. This resulted in actual harm for R1 when an increased dose of a diuretic (water pill) had been ordered but was later discontinued without a physician order. R1 did not receive an increased dose, nor any doses of prescribed diuretic for two days and subsequently developed shortness of breath, had to be sent to the emergency department (ED) where he received intravenous diuretic and needed to be hospitalized . The facility implemented immediate corrective action and corrected the deficient practice by 6/18/26, so the citation was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 6/24/26, identified diagnoses of chronic systolic congestive heart failure (heart failure that occurs at the bottom of the heart), chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was comprehensively assessed and appropriately monitored for fluid volume status after a reported significant increase in daily weight for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change in condition.Findings include: R2's face sheet dated 6/24/26, identified diagnoses of edema (swelling cause by excessive fluid trapped in the body's tissues), diabetes mellitus (condition that you body uses sugar as fuel), paraplegia (a condition where half of the body does not function), sick sinus syndrome (a group of heart rhythm disorders caused by a malfunctioning sinoatrial node (the hearts natural pacemaker). R2's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2's cognition was intact, had no behaviors, no rejection of care, was dependent for bed mobility/transfers, and was administered a diuretic medication. R2's care plan dated 6/23/25, identified R2 had the potential for pacemaker malfunction/failure or altered cardiac…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain 1 of 1 ice machine to prevent potential contamination and to ensure food and drinks were served in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents who resided in the facility.Findings Include:On 2/23/26 at 10:45 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen with the dietary director (DD-D), a Manitowoc brand ice machine located in a hallway adjacent to the kitchen was observed with white/grey chalky, powdery, hard, crusty, rock-like, lumpy deposits present on: the inside lid of the ice machine, the outside lid, the front exterior surface, and both side exterior surfaces. The buildup appeared consistent with lime scale and mineral deposits. The DD-D stated the ice machine had lime scale buildup and that maintenance staff were responsible for cleaning the ice machine. DD-D further stated that, as of approximately two weeks prior, the facility no longer had maintenance staff, and she was unsure who was responsible for ensuring the ice machine was cleaned. DD-D confirmed the ice machine was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a system to ensure concerns voiced during resident council meetings were addressed and follow up with residents. This had potential to effect 6 of 6 residents (R1, R4, R5, R9, R18, R20) identified to have attended the meetings.Findings include:R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment.R4's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment.R5's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment.R9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment.R18's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment.R20's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment.On 2/23/26 at 2:08 p.m., the activities director (AD)-F stated the resident council did not have a current president and further gave permission for the survey team to review previous minutes of resident council meetings. These minutes were provided and identified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0851 — isolated
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit accurate and/or complete data for staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter 4, 2025), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include:The CMS payroll-based journal (PBJ) staffing data report for quarter four of 2025, which included dates from 7/1/25-7/30/25, triggered for four or more days within the quarter with <24 hours/day licensed nursing coverage. The following infraction dates were identified: 8/3/25, 8/23/25, 8/24/25, and 9/6/25.Review of nursing staff schedules for each infraction date indicated a licensed nurse had been scheduled each of the three shifts (days, evenings, and nights).On 2/24/26 at 10:25 a.m., the assistant director of nursing (ADON) stated they were responsible for scheduling nursing staff, stated there was always a licensed nurse working every day, on each shift - days, evenings, and nights. On 2/24/26 at 2:05 p.m., registered nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive skin assessment and monitoring of impaired skin integrity for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for skin care. Findings include: R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified invasive ductal carcinoma (cancer that starts in the cells lining the milk duct in the breast and breaks through the duct wall invading nearby breast tissue) had been discovered during a previous hospital stay 2/2025 and treatment had not begun yet. Current hospital stay was complicated by right breast pain with oncology follow-up 5/1/25 scheduled. Skin check identified tender, indurated (thickened/hard) right breast including the areola (pigmented area surrounding the nipple), without warmth and consistent with known breast cancer, likely lymphatic obstruction (blockage of lymph vessels which can lead to swelling). R1's face sheet dated 5/1/25, identified diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of lower outer quadrant of right breast (cancer). R1's care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure residents received care and assistance as needed. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Refer to F676: Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with meals for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R10) reviewed for dining who required staff assistance and/or supervision with meals. Refer to F684: Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor weights per physician order for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for edema and 2 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (R20 and R23). Refer to F688: Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain and prevent loss of range of motion (ROM) for 2 of 2 residents (R20, R22) reviewed for restorative services. Refer to F686: Based on observation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines by appropriately implementing preventive measures to prevent the spread of influenza A, failed to post appropriate signage for 11 of 11 residents (R2, R9, R10, R79, R12, R4, R16, R1, R18, R22, R3) who exhibited symptoms of influenza A or had tested positive for influenza A, and further failed to ensure correct personal protective equipment (PPE) use. In addition; the facility failed to ensure correct use of gloves during wound care for 1 of 1 resident, (R16). This had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: R2's facesheet printed 1/15/25, indicated diagnoses of heart failure, pain syndrome, and kidney disease. R2's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, no behaviors, and dependent on staff for personal hygiene and transfers. Facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed for 4 of 4 nursing assistants (NA-A, NA-F, NA-B, NA-E) whose files were reviewed. This had potential to affect all residents who currently resided in the nursing home and who could receive care from these staff. Findings include: The following nursing assistants (NA)'s personnel records were reviewed for annual performance reviews and identified the following: NA-A was hired on 6/14/23. NA-A's personnel record lacked evidence an annual performance review was ever completed. NA-F was hired on 11/7/23. NA-F's personnel record lacked evidence an annual performance review was ever completed. NA-B was hired on 7/16/18. NA-B's personnel record lacked evidence of a current annual performance review. NA-E was hired on 6/7/21. NA-E's personnel record lacked evidence an annual performance review was ever completed. During interview on 1/15/25 at 8:10 a.m., administrative support stated she did not have any performance reviews for staff in personnel files. She further stated there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 tub/shower rooms were maintained in good repair and sanitary conditions for 15 residents who utilized two tub/shower rooms on the Prairie unit. Finding include: Prairie Unit - East During an observation on 1/14/25 at 2:15 p.m., the tub/shower room on the east Prairie unit was observed to have a large tub and separate walk-in shower, toilet, and vanity with sink and cupboards. A furnace filter measuring approximately two feet by eight inches was observed laying on the floor half-way under the wall-mounted heater. The filter was heavily laden with gray fuzzy material. On top of the heater where air came out where small square grates that had an accumulation of dust and webs on them. Next to the heater was a corner wall where sheetrock was missing on the lower one - two feet. The material exposed resembled cement - white and porous, and was crumbling. These open areas were discolored rust and brown. A ceiling vent, approximately 12 inches x 12 inches was heavily laden with gray fuzzy debris with some of it hanging…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an annual performance review was conducted for 4 of 4 nursing assistants (NA-A, NA-F, NA-B, NA-E) and therefore failed to ensure annual training reflected the NA's areas of weaknesses identified on performance reviews. Findings Include: The following NA's personnel and training records were reviewed for annual performance reviews and training and identified the following: NA-A was hired on 6/14/23. NA-A's personnel record lacked evidence an annual performance review was ever completed. NA-F was hired on 11/7/23. NA-F's personnel record lacked evidence an annual performance review was ever completed. NA-B was hired on 7/16/18. NA-B's personnel record lacked evidence of a current annual performance review. NA-E was hired on 6/7/21. NA-E's personnel record lacked evidence an annual performance review was ever completed. Review of online training transcripts for NA-A, NA-F, NA-B, and NA-E included online trainings on abuse prevention, behavioral health, workplace injury, cultural competency, dementia, dining and food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-10-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CURA — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $147K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN