Cura Of Onamia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 37.7 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.35 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.60 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident medications were properly labeled with either an expiration date or beyond use date to ensure expired medications were not administered to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents who received medications at the facility.Findings include:During a medication pass observation on 4/21/26 at 10:30 a.m., R17's medication labels were reviewed. Labels did not include an expiration or beyond use date.During a medication pass observation on 4/21/26 at 11:58 a.m., R7's medication label was reviewed. The label did not include an expiration or beyond use date.During a medication pass observation on 4/22/26 at 10:22 a.m., R1's medication labels were reviewed. Labels did not include an expiration or beyond use date.During a medication observation on 4/23/26 at 7:19 a.m., R7's medication labels were reviewed. Labels did not include an expiration or beyond use date.Two medication carts were reviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication injectable supplies were removed from active stock once expired. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled with either an expiration date or beyond use date. These deficient practices had the potential to impact all residents who received medications at the facility.Findings include:During a medication pass observation on 4/21/26 at 10:30 a.m., R17's medication labels were reviewed. Labels did not include an expiration or beyond use date.During a medication pass observation on 4/21/26 at 11:58 a.m., R7's medication label was reviewed. The label did not include an expiration or beyond use date.During a medication pass observation on 4/22/26 at 10:22 a.m., R1's medication labels were reviewed. Labels did not include an expiration or beyond use date.During a medication observation on 4/23/26 at 7:19 a.m., R7's medication labels were reviewed. Labels did not include an expiration or beyond…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered a substantial snack when there were more than 14 hours between the dinner and breakfast meals. This had the ability to affect all 35 residents who resided in the facility.Findings include:A facility-submitted document, received 4/21/26, identified breakfast began at 8:00 a.m., lunch began at 12:00 p.m., and dinner began at 5:00 p.m.During an interview on 4/20/26 at 2:15 p.m., the manager of nutrition services confirmed the mealtimes at the facility were 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 5:00 p.m. The facility contracted food services through the kitchen of the attached hospital.During an interview on 4/23/2026 8:43 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A indicated the evening snacks were sent from the kitchen for specific residents between 6:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. These snacks were labeled with resident names, not all residents received them, but snacks were available to all residents upon request.During an interview on 4/23/26 at 8:47 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A indicated dietary brought a tray for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to track and monitor residents and staff with symptoms of possible illness to prevent a possible outbreak. This could affect all residents and visitors in the facility.Findings include:During a review of the facilities infection control program paper on 4/23/26 at 8:12 a.m., the paperwork lacked any information related to staff and resident illness symptoms reported to the facility. There was no documentation of symptoms, trends in the facility or indications the facility was monitoring to prevent a potential outbreak.During an interview on 4/23/26 at 8:38 a.m., the assistant director of nursing/infection preventionist (IP) stated there had been no tracking and trending of resident or staff symptoms since she had taken over the IP program on 1/26. The IP was not aware tracking and trending of symptoms needed to be done.During an interview on 4/23/26 at 9:18 a.m., the regional clinical director (RCD) stated the facility should have a way to keep track of resident and staff symptoms. The IP should monitor that system…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0570 — pattern
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident personal fund accounts were insured with adequate surety bond coverage to cover the total account balance. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who had personal funds in the facility's trust account. Findings include: On 4/21/26 at 1:18 p.m., the residents' personal funds accounts were reviewed with the business office manager. The business office manager confirmed the total amount of the residents' accounts was in the amount of 40,688.56 dollars.On 4/22/26 at 10:02 a.m., the chief financial officer (CFO) confirmed the facility's surety bond for the residents' personal funds identified a penalty amount of 10,000 dollars. The CFO stated the bond should cover 100,000 dollars and stated they needed to reach out to their insurance [NAME] for clarification.Review of surety bond number 2653018 document dated 7/17/25, identified a surety bond for ten thousand dollars was in effect 7/23/25 and ended on 7/23/26. This document was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and monitor bruising for 1 of 1 residents (R9) reviewed for impaired skin integrity. Findings include: R9's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of dementia, benign paroxysmal vertigo (a sensation of spinning or moving), inflammatory arthritis (pain, swelling and warmth in the joints) and pruritus (itchy skin). R9's care plan dated 11/21/23, identified the potential for alteration in skin integrity and directed staff to complete skin audits with showers or baths weekly. During observation on 2/3/25 at 11:52 a.m., was seated in the memory care unit dayroom area and was noted to have what appeared to be a dark purple irregular shaped bruise on the top of her left hand between the thumb and index finger approximately five centimeters (CM) in diameter. When interviewed on 2/3/25 at 11:53 a.m., R9 stated she did not remember how she obtained the bruise, denied pain and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based of observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician prescribed medications are reviewed and monitored, for interactions between other prescribed medications, for 1 of 12 residents (R9) in the resident sample reviewed. Findings include: R9's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of 11/11/24, identified R9 had brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 9, classified as moderate cognitive impairment. R9's medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia - unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbances, mood disturbance, anxiety, major depression, Gasto-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) without esophagitis and hyperuricemia (increased uric acid levels) without signs of inflammatory arthritis or tophaceous disease (monosodium urate crystals build up in the body). In review of R9's physician orders, the following medications were noted to have been ordered: Allopurinol 50 milligrams (mg) - give 1 tablet every day for hyperuricemia Diltiazem HCL 15 mg - give 1 tab three times a day for hypertension Carafate 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported immediately and/or within 2 hours, to the State Agency (SA) and administrator for 1 of 1 residents (R1). Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included stroke, aphasia, dementia, and hemiplegia. Further, MDS indicated R1 had severely impaired cognition and exhibited physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms. Review of facility report to the SA, submitted at 11:48 a.m. on 11/24/24, by director of nursing (DON) indicated R1 had unexplained bruising to left arm. Nursing assistant (NA)-A reported R1 had bruising to left forearm, left posterior hand, and some purple coloring on the inside of left fingers, and the bruising was tender to the touch to licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A in the morning after a.m. cares on 11/23/24. LPN-A reported to registered nurse (RN)-A around 2:00 p.m. on 11/23/24, and RN-A filed a MAARC (Minnesota Adult…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an injury of unknown to ensure abuse had not occurred for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included stroke, aphasia (language disorder that makes it difficult to understand, speak, read, or write), dementia, and hemiplegia. Further, MDS indicated R1 had severely impaired cognition and exhibited physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms. Review of facility report number 358743 to the SA, submitted at 11:48 a.m. on 11/24/24, by director of nursing (DON) indicated R1 had unexplained bruising to left arm. Nursing assistant (NA)-A reported R1 had bruising to left forearm, left posterior hand, and some purple coloring on the inside of left fingers, and the bruising was tender to the touch to licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A in the morning after a.m. cares on 11/23/24. Further, report indicated DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure bruising was monitored for changes until resolved for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included stroke, aphasia (language disorder that makes it difficult to understand, speak, read, or write), dementia, and hemiplegia. Further, MDS indicated R1 had severely impaired cognition and exhibited physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms. R1's Progress Notes revealed: -On 11/23/24 at 2:35 p.m., large amount of bruising was reported by nursing assistant. R1 was unable to state what happened. -On 11/24/24 at 11:48 a.m., resident had a 7-centimeter (cm) x 7 cm bruise to proximal and posterior left forearm, bruise was purple in the center with green around the edges, bruise was slightly raised and tender to the touch. Bruise 2 cm x 1.8 cm to distal posterior forearm dark purple in color. 3 cm x 4 cm bruise to posterior (back) of left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CURA — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MN