Cura Of Willmar

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 63.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.11 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.02 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.36 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident (R1) from neglect when R1 experienced a fall from the toilet on 3/7/26 and unidentified staff assisted R1 back to bed without notification to nurse and assessment. This resulted in actual harm when R1 was later identified to be in pain, required emergency medical attention, and was diagnosed with closed fracture of left hip. R1 required surgical repair of the fracture. The facility implemented corrective action, and the deficient practice was corrected on 3/08/26, prior to the survey, and was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: Neglect, as defined at S483.5, means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1's diagnoses included stroke, hypertension, end stage renal disease (ESRD) , diabetes mellitus and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure timely assistance with repositioning occurred for 1 of 2 residents (R29) reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings Include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R29 was cognitively intact and had diagnosis which included; diabetes mellitus, coranary artery disease, and hypertension. R29's MDS identified R29 was dependent for dressing lower half, transfer, toileting and required substantial/maximal assistance with rolling in bed side to side. R29 had one stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or with directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer). R29's Care Area Assessment (CAAS) dated 12/19/25, identified R29 had alteration in skin integrity due to being admitted with chronic pressure ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. R29's CAAS identified R29 was often noncompliant with repositioning and often refused to get out of bed. R29's Braden…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to prevent further falls for 1 of 2 resident (R22) reviewed for falls.Findings include: R22 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R22 had moderate impaired cognition, had diagnosis which included cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia. R22 required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) which included toileting, transfers, and locomotion. R22 had one fall with no injury since the last required assessment. R22 quarterly Care Area Assessments (CAA) dated 05/22/2026, identified R22 had a terminal condition due to cancer, had hearing or vision impairment, and was on hospice care. The CAA indicated R22 was an increased risk for falls. Review of R22's current care plan revised 12/24/26, showed R22 was a fall risk. Care plan indicated R22 was at high risk for falls related to de-conditioning, cognitive deficits and history of falls prior to admission. R22's care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-15 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations, and document review, the facility failed to provide nursing rehab services as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for rehab services.R44's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R44 had intact cognition, did not reject care that is necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and well-being. R44's diagnoses included hemiplegia (left side weakness), hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes. R44's care plan revised on 6/10/26, directing staff to the nursing rehab program as noted in tasks; the program is overseen by a nurse and periodically reviewed. R44's discharge recommendations, signed 11/26/25, identified range of motion program; skilled physical therapy was necessary to develop a passive range of motion (PROM) program with staff to maintain range of motion (ROM) in left upper extremity and lower left extremity due to patients dependent status with transfers and mobility. Prognosis: good with consistent staff flow through. R44's Rehab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices including hand hygiene were followed during wound cares for 1 of 1 residents (R29) observed for wound cares.Findings Include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R29 was cognitively intact and had diagnosis which included; diabetes mellitus, coranary artery disease, and hypertension. R29's MDS identified R29 was dependent for dressing lower half, transfer, toileting and required substantial/maximal assistance with rolling in bed side to side. R29 had one stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or with directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer). R29's Care Area Assessment (CAAS) dated 12/19/25, identified R29 had alteration in skin integrity due to being admitted with chronic pressure ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. R29's CAAS identified R29 was often noncompliant with repositioning and often refused…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to develop and implement a process to ensure the wander alert system was in working order. This had the potential to affect 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) who utilized a wander alert device. Findings include:R1's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility 2/23/24. Diagnosis included vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease and bilateral below the knee amputations.R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified a memory problem and delusions. The MDS indicated R1 did not wander during the assessment period and wore a wander alert device daily. R1's care plan dated 9/3/25, identified a high risk for elopement and directed staff to provided one to one supervision while awake and 15-minute checks while in bed. The care plan indicated R1 had wander device bracelets placed on his left wrist and on the back of his wheelchair.Facility incident report dated 8/24/25, indicated R1 was able to exit the facility via the front entrance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were maintained for 1 of 3 residents (R37) reviewed for dignity.Findings Include: R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R37 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R37's diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia, weakness and localized edema. MDS also indicated R37 had an indwelling external catheter. During observation on 8/4/25 at 2:21 p.m., R37's urinary catheter drainage bag, which was approximately half full of dark amber colored liquid, was hanging on the left side of bed. Drainage bag was visible to all residents and staff who walked past. During observation on 8/5/25 at 2:19 p.m., R37's urinary catheter drainage bag, which was approximately one-quarter full of dark amber colored liquid, was hanging on the left side of bed. Drainage bag was visible to all residents and staff who walked past. During observation on 8/6/25 at 8:50 a.m., R37's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to inform residents in the facility that all bird feeders, including personally owned bird feeders, were being removed, prior to doing so, for 1 of 1 residents (R34) in the sample. Findings include: In review of R34's electronic medical record diagnosis page, the following diagnoses were listed: Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, major depression with moderate recurrence, and anxiety disorder. R34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated resident required minimum - moderate assistance from staff for all activities of daily living. The MDS also indicated R34 was cognitively intact. A review of R34's assessments, the following was documented:6/20/25 Mood Interview (PHQ-9) R35 scored of 8 of 27 which indicated R35 was mildly depressed.6/20/25 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) R35 scored 15 out of 15 which indicated R35 was cognitively intact. R34's care plan printed 8/6/25, documented resident had been care planned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 2 residents (R22) reviewed for care plans.Findings include: R22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R22 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R22's diagnoses included: Type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs), hypertension (high blood pressure), hemiplegia (a condition characterized by weakness or paralysis on one side of the body), malnutrition (a serious condition resulting from an imbalance in nutrient intake, leading to deficiencies or excesses that negatively impact health), depression, dependence on renal dialysis and hypothyroidism (when your thyroid gland doesn't make and release enough hormone into your bloodstream). MDS indicated R22 received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a wheeled walker was not used as a wheelchair for 1 of 1 residents (R10) which placed resident at increased risk for a fall. Findings include: R10's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 was cognitively intact and was independent with cares. R10s care plan dated 12/3/24, indicated R10 was up ad lib (allowed to get out of bed and move around as they please, without restrictions), ambulated and transferred slow and steady with four wheeled walker, and R10 was at risk for falls related to decreased functional strength, decreased activity tolerance and impaired standing balance. On 8/04/2025, at 10:57 a.m. was observed sitting on four wheeled walker using feet to propel walker backwards, two wheeled legs were observed to be bowed outwards from the walker. There was no wheelchair observed in R10s room. On 8/04/2025 at 11:30 a.m., R10 was observed entering the building sitting on four wheeled walker, propelled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure coordination of dialysis care for 2 of 2 resident (R3 and R22) who required dialysis (treatment to filter blood when kidneys are no longer able). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessment and monitoring was completed for 2 of 2 resident (R3 and R22) reviewed for dialysis.Findings include: R3 R3's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R3's diagnoses included heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal failure (occurs when the kidneys are unable to adequately filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disease where blood glucose levels are too high due to the body's inability to produce enough or properly use insulin), malnutrition (a serious condition resulting from an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-11 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CURA — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MN