Cura Of Sandstone

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 36.2 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.32 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.06 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.45 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.57 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfer with a EZ Way smart lift, according to manufacturer's recommendations for 1 of 3 (R1) residents. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 fell out of the sling and sustained a contusion to the scalp, closed wedge compression fracture (front part of the vertebrae collapses) of T4 vertebra, and was sent to the Emergency Department (ED). The IJ began on 11/29/25 at 6:00 p.m., when staff, under the age of eighteen, used a full body mechanical lift to transfer R1 from her wheelchair to her bed, did not follow facility policy or manufacturer's instructions, and R1 fell out of the sling. The administrator, director of nursing, corporate nurse, and regional director of operations were notified of the IJ at 11:45 a.m. on 12/4/25. The facility implemented immediate corrective action on 11/30/25, prior to the survey, to prevent recurrence. Therefore, the IJ was issued at past noncompliance.Findings included:R1's care plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control while providing laundry services, as well as failing to maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program specific to infection surveillance. The facility's system did not track culture results, organisms identified, or transmission-based precautions (TBP) initiated to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and infection control measures were maintained. This had the ability to affect all 36 residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper glove use and hand hygiene during care for 1 of 1 resident (R8) during completion of ADL cares.Findings include: Laundry Tour: During a laundry room tour on 4/8/26 at 7:16 a.m., other staff (O)-B was observed sorting dirty laundry without wearing gloves and a gown. O-B lifted dirty laundry from a bin, holding the laundry against themselves, and putting the laundry in a washing machine. During a laundry room tour on 4/8/26 at 7:25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow care planned interventions necessary to prevent an avoidable accident from occurring for 2 of 5 (R30, R14) residents reviewed for falls and accidents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident with suicidal ideations and not following provider orders for safety precautions for 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for accident hazards. Finally, the facility failed to evaluate a resident with an increased risk of aspiration for 1 of 1 residents (R8) reviewed for accident hazards.Findings include: R30: R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R30 had moderate cognition, and diagnoses included cerebral infarct (stroke). R30 required assist of 1 staff, gait belt (a belt used as a safety device to support patients when walking) and a 4-wheeled walker for ambulation to/from the bathroom. R30 did not ambulate outside of the bedroom or bathroom. R30's undated Care Plan, identified R30 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to notify family/guardian when a resident had a change of condition. This affected 1 of 1 (R8) resident reviewed for change of condition.Findings Include: R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R8 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included dementia and epilepsy. The MDS indicated R8 was on a mechanically altered diet.R8's care plan undated, identified a potential for altered nutritional status due to hospice. Interventions included a mechanically altered textured diet and to observe, document, and report and signs or symptoms of dysphagia like pocketing, choking, coughing and holding food in mouth.R8's provider orders dated 3/19/25, identified a mechanical soft textured solid food diet with thin liquids.Review of R8's progress notes from 3/19/25 to 3/27/26 were reviewed and indicated the following:From 3/19/25 to 1/11/16, there was no documentation of concerns related to aspiration.on 1/12/26 at 12:14 p.m., R8 was eating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents with constipation received assessment, effective intervention and notification of the provider for 2 of 5 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential for resident discomfort and medical complications related to constipation. Findings include:R2:R2's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, a diagnosis of slow-transit constipation and occasional bowel incontinence. R2 was dependent for transfers to the toilet and for toilet hygiene.R2's provider orders included 3/3/26, sennosides-docusate sodium (a stool softener) 8.6/50 milligrams (mg) one tab daily for constipation. Orders activated from facility Standing Orders included prunes, prune juice or bananas apples and pears (BAP) as-needed (PRN) for bowel protocol for three days, milk of magnesia (MOM) 30 milliliters (mL) by mouth one time only for constipation, and Dulcolax suppository (a stimulant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to perform a passive range of motion (PROM) program for 1 of 2 (R13) residents reviewed for restorative care.Findings include: R13's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R13 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS) and paraplegia. Section GG indicated R13 had impairment to one upper extremity and both lower extremities. R13's Care Plan undated, indicated a potential for injury related to impaired mobility from paraplegia and MS. Interventions included complete PROM/stretching program once a shift (1 time in morning and 1 time in evening). Copies of PROM program were available at the nurse station 3. R13's PROM documentation from 3/10/26 to 4/8/26 were reviewed and indicated the following:10 shifts were documented as no not performed.14 shifts were documented as not applicable.6 shifts had nothing documented.During an observation on 4/6/26 at 4:23 p.m., R13 was observed to have contractures to her right upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to attempt to elevate the head of bed (HOB) to prevent aspiration for a resident laying flat with tube feeding (TF) running. This effected 1 of 1 (R28) residents reviewed for TFFindings Include: R28's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R28 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included abdominal distention and hemiplegia (complete to total muscle loss to one side of the body). R28 received TF with 51% or greater intake received through TF. R28's care plan undated, indicated a nutritional problem related to a diagnosis of hemiplegia. Interventions included to provide TF and water flushes as ordered. R28's care plan also indicated a risk for aspiration related to TF and inconsistent maintenance of HOB greater than 30 degrees secondary to resident preference/refusal. Interventions included ensure resident is positioned with head elevated greater than 30 degrees with feedings, if refusal for HOB elevation is found then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 1Number of residents cited: 1Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility antibiotic stewardship program was followed for antibiotic use for 1 of 1 resident (R13) reviewed for antibiotic use.Findings include:R13's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R13 was cognitively intact. R13's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, dysuria, obesity, diabetes mellitus type 2, paraplegia, and dementia. R13's care plan dated 3/18/26, identified R13 had urinary incontinence and an indwelling catheter.A nursing note dated 2/23/26 at 3:01 p.m., indicated a message was sent on portal to the provider with an update on R13's urinary color, vaginal discharge, and increasing confusion and agitation.R13's provider orders dated 2/23/26 at 7:00 p.m., included Macrobid 100 mg capsule Give 100 mg by mouth two times a day for Dysuria for 7 Days: Macrobid 100 mg by mouth two times a day for 7 days. The medication was discontinued on 3/2/26.R13's progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to develop care plans to include enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) for 2 of 3 residents when nursing assistant (NA)-A was observed lacking required personal protective equipment (PPE) while performing high contact care for R2 who required EBPs.Findings include: During observations on 3/4/26 at 1:05 p.m., an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign was observed on the door for R2's room, with a personal protective equipment (PPE) cart outside the door. NA-A was observed at the side of R2's bed, wearing only gloves and a mask as PPE. Registered Nurse (RN)-A, an agency nurse, entered the room with a mask, gloves, and a gown. RN-A failed to inform NA-A a gown was also required as a part of the necessary PPE during high-contact cares for R2. NA-A proceeded to assist RN-A with positioning R2. NA-A reached over R2 to turn her to her right side, as R2 did not participate in her own bed mobility. NA-A held R2 on her side while RN-A performed wound care to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow established infection control practices for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) while performing high-contact care.Findings include: During an observation on 3/4/26 at 7:05 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A and the director of nursing (DON) performed wound care for R1.- The DON removed two dressings on R1's left foot, discarded them and removed her gloves. The DON failed to perform hand hygiene prior to applying new gloves. She used wound cleanser and gauze to clean the stage II (partial thickness skin loss) left heel wound. She applied calcium alginate (a highly absorbent dressing that creates a moist healing environment) and covered with a bordered foam dressing. Following the application of the dressings to the left heel, the DON changed her gloves but failed to perform hand hygiene.- The DON cleansed the stage III (full thickness skin injury that involves full-thickness skin loss,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0576 — widespread
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the right to weekend mail delivery occurred for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R3, R19, R28, R36) who were reviewed for weekend mail delivery. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all 41 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact. R3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R3 was moderately cognitively impaired. R19's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R3 was moderately cognitively impaired. R28's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R28 was moderately cognitively impaired. R36's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact. During a group interview on 2/11/25 at 10:11 a.m., the following was said: --- R2 confirmed mail was delivered to the facility on the weekend and indicated packages from delivery places like UPS were also delivered to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-12-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CURA — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN