Rock Point Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 71.The facility did not provide a policy regarding dietary. 1. Observation on 03/17/26 at 9:50 A.M., 03/18/26 at 10:23 A.M., and 03/19/26 at 6:16 P.M., of the kitchen showed: - One compartment and three compartment sinks with the hot side water temperature at 106 degrees Fahrenheit after one minute;- One large metal cookie sheet with dark brown carbon build-up in the corners and one small cookie sheet with carbon build-up in the corners; - The commercial gas range oven with excessive black grime build-up on all interior surfaces and on the floor beneath; - One dented 3-quart can of spinach, dated received on 03/03/26;- One dented 50-ounce can of cream of mushroom condensed soup, dated received on 03/03/26;- The commercial dishwasher interior and exterior with flaky white grime (dirt ingrained on the surface of something) build-up and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refund resident funds within 30 days of when a resident expired for three residents (Residents #80, #81 and #82) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 71.Review of the facility's policy titled, Accounting and Records of Resident Funds, revised [DATE], showed:- The facility maintains accounting records of resident funds on deposit with the facility;- Individual accounting ledgers are maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;- Inquiries concerning a resident's personal funds account record are referred to the Administrator or to the business office. 1. Review of Resident #80's closed medical record showed:- The resident expired on [DATE]. Review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Fund Ledger, dated [DATE], showed:- Resident #80 had $93.13 held in the resident trust fund account as of [DATE] (121 days late). 2. Review of Resident #81's closed medical record showed:- The resident expired on [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for the residents residing on the Men's Locked Behavior Unit which affected 12 residents with the potential to affect all 15 residents on the unit. The facility also failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment which could have the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, showed:- Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible;- Staff provides person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences;- The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting including a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. 1. Observation on 03/17/26 at 12:05 P.M., of the Men's Locked Behavior Unit showed:-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic (medication to treat psychosis, a mental health condition characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking) medication for two residents (Residents #9 and #16) and failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for an antipsychotic medication for one resident (Resident #16) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy Psychotropic Medication Use, revised 02/2025, showed:- An adequate indication for use refers to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering medication that is based on: a. an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals;b. a determination that non-pharmacological interventions are clinically contraindicated;- Psychotropic (any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior) medication may be considered appropriate when: a. a resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the amount a bed would be held for on the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital and failed to include the statement of appeal rights or the name, address, or the telephone number of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsmen (advocate for the resident in nursing facilities), the mailing and email address for the agency for protection and advocacy for residents with intellectual disabilities, and the mailing, email address, and telephone number for the agency for protection and advocacy for residents with mental illness, within the transfer and discharge notices for four residents (Residents #1,#3, #24, and #41) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 71.Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, revised October 2022, showed:- All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one resident (Resident #43) out of one sampled resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care to meet professional standards of quality care. The facility census was 73.Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline, revised March 2022, showed:- A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission;- The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including, but not limited to initial goals based on admission orders, discussion with the resident/representative, and physician orders;- The baseline care plan is updated as needed to meet the resident's needs until the comprehensive care plan is developed;- Provision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure placement of the urinary indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag and tubing was maintained for two residents (Residents #1and #5) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care, dated August 2022, showed:- The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections;- Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor;- Position the drainage bag lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary bladder. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (the bladder does not empty properly due to a neurological condition) and urinary tract infection. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated March 2026, showed:- An order to flush the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure training was provided, competence was assessed, and a physician's order was received for laryngectomy tube ([NAME] tube - a flexible silicone tube inserted into the stoma (neck opening) to maintain the airway opening) care to be completed independently, and the type and size of the [NAME] tube supplies, and to have all of the needed [NAME] tube supplies easily accessible for one resident (Resident #5) out of one sampled resident with a [NAME] tube. The facility also failed to follow the physician's order for supplemental oxygen therapy and to change, date, and store the oxygen tubing (flexible tubing that delivers supplemental oxygen through the nostrils) and the nebulizer (a medical device that converts liquid medication into a mist to be inhaled directly into the lungs) tubing for one resident (Resident #43) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 71.The facility did not provide a policy regarding oxygen tubing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents diagnosed with dementia (a decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities) had a personalized plan of care to ensure appropriate services to promote the resident's highest level of functioning and psychosocial needs were provided for three residents (Residents #9, #13, and #16) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 71.Review of the facility's policy titled Dementia - Clinical Protocol, dated November 2018, showed:- The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will evaluate individuals with new or progressive cognitive impairment and help identify symptoms and findings that differentiate dementia from other causes;- For the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life;- Direct care staff will support the resident in initiating and completing activities and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices with hand hygiene and glove changes during wound care, and suprapubic catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the abdominal wall to drain urine) care for one resident (Resident #1) and incontinent care for three residents (Residents #5, #38, and #75) out of three sampled residents. The facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices when inserting a nasal cannula (a device used to deliver oxygen with two small tubes that fit into the nostrils) into the nares of one resident (Resident #38) after it lay on the floor. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility's policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated October 2023, showed:- This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections;- All personnel are expected to adhere to hand hygiene policies and practices to help prevent the spread of infection;- Hand hygiene is indicated immediately before touching a resident,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARADIGM SENIOR MANAGEMENT — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO