Clinton Healthcare LLC - SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 207 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 111.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 32% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to have an Advance Directive readily available for staff usage if needed for one (1) of twenty-three (23) resident Advance Directives reviewed. Resident #83Findings include:A record review of the facility policy, Residents Rights Regarding Treatments and Advance Directive, no date, revealed, Policy: It is the resident's right to formulate an Advance Directive, and to accept to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment. Procedure. 1. On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has formulated an Advance Directive .On 11/18/25 at 12:25 PM in an interview with License Practical Nurse #2 (LPN) who works in Medical Records confirmed that the advance directive was not in the paper chart. She stated the purpose of having it in the chart is if the resident is unable to cognitively respond it should be in the chart so staff can have access. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/20/25 at 1:15 PM, stated that Advance Directives are important to have to direct the healthcare of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement its abuse-prevention policy by not completing a written investigation when staff were made aware of suspected physical abuse for one (1) of 21 sampled residents (Resident #106).Findings include:A review of the facility's Abuse Policy Employee Responsibility dated 3/21/23, revealed, .5. The facility will identify and INVESTIGATE all suspicions or allegations of abuse.a. the facility will thoroughly INVESTIGATE all alleged violations under the direct supervision of the Administrator.7. Any alleged incident REPORTED must be investigated.A review of the facility's Abuse Investigation Process, dated 3/21/23, revealed, The investigation will include the following: a. Written report from the person reporting the incident with date of report and date and time of incident (Incident/Accident Report).d. Signed statements from all witnesses, stating time, date and shift of incident. Documentation of investigation should include: A description of resident's behavior and environment at the time of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one (1) of twenty-three (23) residents reviewed for assessment accuracy (Resident #40). This is evidenced by the facility incorrectly coding the resident as receiving anticoagulant therapy on two consecutive MDS submissions. Findings include:A review of the MDS Assessment Policy, dated 5/2006, reveals, It is the policy of this facility to follow the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) process as set forth by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) protocol .A record review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/11/25 and 10/9/25 reveals a yes indicating the resident is on an anticoagulant.A record review of the physician orders does not reveal Resident #40 received anticoagulant medication.At 11/18/25 at 10:39 AM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) who is the MDS Nurse, confirmed that she did code the annual MDS with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/11/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen-use cautionary signage was posted on or near the resident's door for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for respiratory care, Resident #78.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Safety, revealed, .No Smoking' signs must be clearly visible in areas where oxygen is stored or in use.On 11/17/25 at 11:48 AM, during an observation, Resident #78 was lying in bed and receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula at two (2) liters per minute. There was no Oxygen in Use sign posted on or near the resident's door. On 11/17/25 at 11:50 AM, during an observation and interview, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 came to the doorway of Resident #78's room and confirmed the absence of cautionary oxygen signage. RN #1 stated that a sign had previously been present and must have fallen off. RN #1 acknowledged that clearly posted signage is necessary for safety.On 11/20/25 at 2:00 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated that oxygen is a highly flammable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) provided catheter care while wearing false fingernails that interfered with glove use and effective hand hygiene for one (1) of four (4) care observations, Resident #5.Findings included:A review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 7/1/24, revealed, .All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents and visitors .A review of the facility's Dress Code (undated), revealed, .Long nails should not be worn. Nails should be no longer than the tip of the finger. Fingernails should always be kept clean.On 11/19/25 at 10:39 AM, during an observation of catheter care for Resident #5, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was observed wearing artificial fingernails approximately two (2) inches beyond the fingertips. She had difficulty placing gloves over the nails, requiring four glove changes during the procedure. Each time gloves were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide wound care in a manner to prevent the possibility of wound infection for two (2) of (2) wound care observations. Resident #1 and Resident #4 Findings Include: A record review of the facility's policy titled Wound Care dated 1/2015 revealed Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Procedure: .After cleaning the wound as ordered, clean the tissue around the wound . On 4/10/25 at 11:12 AM during an observation of wound care for Resident #1 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1/Wound Care Nurse and assisted by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 revealed LPN #1 cleaned the stage IV pressure injury wound bed from the outer edge toward the inner aspect in a circular motion. She dried wound site with gauze from the outer edge toward the inner wound bed in a circular motion four times and applied clean dressing. On 4/10/25 at 1:55 PM in an observation of wound care for Resident #4 completed by LPN #1 and assisted by CNA #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to provide wound care and incontinent care in a manner to prevent the possibility of spreading infection by not wearing a gown for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care and failing to perform proper hand hygiene during incontinent care. This deficient practice was observed for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for infection control practices (Resident #1 and Resident #4). Findings include: A record review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy dated 8/2017, revealed It is a policy of this facility to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. 4 .b. Staff shall wash their hands before and after performing resident care procedures A record review of the facility's policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions, undated, revealed it is the policy of this facility to implement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to reasonable accommodation of needs regarding a call light for one (1) of 24 sampled residents. Resident #39. Findings Include: Review of the facility's booklet, A Matter of Rights: A Guide to Your Rights and Responsibilities as a Resident that is provided to residents upon admission, page four (4) revealed, Dignity and Respect . This includes the right .to expect care and a residential setting that .promotes your quality of life .reflects your individual needs and preferences . During an observation and interview, Resident #39 was observed lying on her side in bed on 6/11/24, at 9:10 AM, with the call light attached to her blanket just below her hands. The resident mentioned she frequently finds it difficult to get staff members to check on her. She admitted that she cannot operate her call light because the right and left fingers of her hands are contracted. The call light was observed to be a standard call light in which a button must be pressed for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a residents' right to privacy by posting a sign regarding resident's care in view, above the bed for one (1) of 24 sampled residents. Resident #28. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Resident's Rights dated 4/2012 revealed, . Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: . d. Privacy and confidentiality . On 06/11/24 at 10:35 AM, in an observation, Resident #28 was lying in bed and there was a sign above the bed which indicated, *Aspiration Risk* Please ensure pt (patient) is pulled up in bed and head is raised for all Meals- Speech therapy. Resident #28 reported he was not aware of the signage on the wall. On 06/12/24 at 5:00 PM, during an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 confirmed Resident #28 had a sign in view above his bed with private…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding pump was operated by licensed staff for two (2) of three (3) residents observed with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube feedings. (Resident #47 and Resident #93) Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Enteral Pump Alarm revised 1/2015, revealed It is the policy of this facility for enteral pumps to only be turned off and on by a licensed nurse. This procedure should never be delegated to assistive personnel .Procedure .Only licensed nurses will control the operations of the enteral feeding pump . Resident #47 During an observation, on 6/11/24 at 2:11 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 entered Resident #47's room to provide incontinent care. CNA #1 turned off the resident's enteral feeding pump. After the incontinent care was completed, CNA #1 turned the enteral feeding pump back on. During an interview on 6/12/24 at 3:00 PM with CNA #1, she confirmed she had turned the enteral feeding pump off and back on. She explained she was nervous and was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TREND CONSULTANTS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS