Trend Health And Rehab Of Natchez, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 59% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 64.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was implemented by leaving a dependent resident unsupervised while performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one (1) of 20 sampled residents. Resident #52 Findings include: Review of the facility's, Care Plan Policy, revised 8/17, revealed . The care plan must include measurable objectives and time frames and must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical mental, and psychosocial well-being. The care plan must be reviewed and revised periodically, on an ongoing basis to reflect the services provided or arranged, and must be consistent with resident's written plan of care. The facility shall use the results of the assessment to develop, review and revise the resident's comprehensive plan of care. The facility staff shall follow the care plan . Record review of the facility's Care Plan for Resident #52 revealed the resident had a Problem/Need identified on 3/2/22, as Resident has a DX…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to supervise and protect a dependent resident to prevent injury for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for accidents. Resident #52 Finding include: Review of the facility policy, titled Accident Prevention revealed, Each resident shall receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. The environment will be free from accidental hazards for all residents, staff, and visitors through: . Record review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights with latest revision date 11/17 revealed, All residents in a long term care facility have rights guaranteed to them under Federal and State Law. Residents residing at this facility will be guaranteed a dignified existence, self determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. These rights include: . 37. To a safe .environment. On 9/18/23 at 08:45 AM, an observation revealed Resident #52 sitting in bed with the head of the bed elevated and dry shaving himself. There was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, Payroll Based Journal review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services for the resident's highest practicable well-being for the third quarter of 2023 for eight (8) of 26 weekend days and for three (3) days in the past two (2) weeks. This has the potential to affect all 72 residents in the facility. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Nursing Services-Staffing with latest revision date 11/17 revealed 1. Staffing- The facility will have sufficient nursing staff twenty-four hours every day to provide nursing and nursing related services to attain or help maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as is determined in the comprehensive assessment and the resident care plan. 2. The facility will comply with established staffing requirements by the individual state governing agencies . On 09/18/23 at 09:06 AM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, he explained Resident #52 asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (one) of three (3) residents reviewed for dignity and respect was treated in a manner that maintained and upheld her personal dignity. This failure resulted in the resident feeling embarrassed and uncomfortable when two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) made an inappropriate comment during personal care. Resident #1. Findings include: A record review of the facility policy Resident Rights updated 4/4/25 revealed, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity.Resident #1:Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 5/20/25 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction.Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/21/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score is 13, indicating Resident #1 is cognitively intact.A review of the facility's investigation revealed that on 9/17/25 at approximately 12:17 PM, Resident #1 reported to Social Services that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent recurrence of previously cited deficiencies, specifically the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to smoke within the facility's designated smoke times during an annual recertification survey on 9/21/2023 and was cited again for the same deficiency during the current survey, demonstrating that QAPI failed to sustain ongoing monitoring and oversight to prevent recurrence for one (1) of 11 deficiencies cited. (F550) Findings included: A review of the facility policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan of Action 2025, revealed, Purpose Statement .Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement .guides our organization's efforts to proactively provide the highest quality of care and services for residents, families, and staff .Feedback, Data Systems, and Monitoring .Quality Assurance Program Tools .This facility's QAPI systems and processes are maintained with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's preference related to smoking during the scheduled smoking times, in accordance with the facility's designated smoking schedule, for one (1) of eighteen (18) residents reviewed for resident rights, Resident #15. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, A Matter of RIGHTS, undated, revealed, A Guide to Your Rights and Responsibilities as a Resident .Dignity and Respect .You have the right to dignity and respect in the care you receive and the setting you live in. This right includes the right: to be treated as an individual .It also means you have a right to expect care and a residential setting .reflects your individual preferences . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #15 on 7/5/24 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/12/25 revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive mail on Saturdays, which affected one (1) of one (1) resident council members reviewed and had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Resident #26. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, A Matter of RIGHTS, undated, revealed, A Guide to Your Rights and Responsibilities as a Resident . Dignity and Respect, you have the right to dignity and respect in the care you receive and the setting you live in. This right includes the right: to be treated as an individual . It also means you have a right to expect care and a residential setting . that reflects your individual preferences . On 4/23/25 at 10:30 AM, during a resident council meeting, Resident #26, the council president, reported that residents did not consistently receive mail on Saturdays. She stated that this concern had been brought up at every council meeting and confirmed that although some nurses would deliver the mail in the past, it was not received every Saturday. All residents in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Resident #45 PASARR Final Version Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update the Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) to reflect recent mental health diagnoses for one (1) of 18 residents sampled. Resident #45 Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Pre-admission Screening Application for Long Term Care (PASRR), 2/2024 revealed . A PASRR is required for every resident admission to long term care .There should be a Change In Status Form completed if resident is sent to a psychiatric hospital or other significant change . A record review of the facility's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #45 on 10/13/22 with diagnoses including Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (onset date 11/16/23) and Paranoid Schizophrenia (onset date 11/16/23). A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/23/25 revealed the staff's assessment of the residents' cognitive status was severely impaired. A record review revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to provide a nutritional supplement with meals to support nutritional status for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #27. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Initiation of Order Changes and Discontinuation of Medications, dated 2/2012, revealed, .Procedure .The nurse will assure that the order is complete with date, time, drug, dose, route, and how often to be administered . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #27 on 12/22/21 and she had current diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/22/25 revealed Resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. A record review of the Order Summary Report revealed Resident #27 had a Physician's Order, dated 8/29/24 for Regular diet .Add boast (Boost, a type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen-in-use signage was posted on the door for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for oxygen safety, Resident #39. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Safety (undated), revealed: .General Guidelines .5. 'No Smoking' signs must be clearly visible in areas where oxygen is stored or in use. On 4/21/25 at 11:00 AM, Resident #39 was observed lying in bed with oxygen flowing at three (3) liters per minute. There was no oxygen caution signage posted on the resident's door. On 4/21/25 at 1:42 PM, during an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, she confirmed there was no oxygen caution signage on Resident #39's door. She stated there should be one since oxygen was in use. On 4/22/25 at 11:15 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated, there had been signage on the doors and explained there is a resident who is a known wanderer and likely removed the signs. She stated they had run out of signage for a couple of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess residents' ability to safely self-administer medications for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #37 and Resident #50. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Self Administration of Medications, revised 11/2000, revealed, When a resident requests to self administer his/her medication, the resident will be assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine if this practice is safe. This decision will be made by the interdisciplinary team before the resident exercises this right .Determining factors regarding residents' capabilities for self administration of medication discussed by the interdisplinary (sic) team are: 1) Mental ability: A resident must be fully oriented to time, place and person. Cognitive skills for decision must be consistent and reasonable .3) Must be physically able to accept control of the medication .5) Must have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for medication storage and administration, Resident #37 and Resident #50. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised January 2018, revealed, .Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly .The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications .Procedures .B .Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access . Resident #37 During an observation and interview on 4/22/25 at 7:25 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 retrieved an inhaler from Resident #37's bedside drawer, where it had been stored. LPN #3 stated the resident always kept it in the drawer in case she needed it and stated the medication should probably be kept locked up in the medication cart when not in use. A record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety by not discarding expired items, failing to refrigerate opened perishable items, and improperly storing dry goods, for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Food Safety Requirements, dated 02/2023 revealed, Policy .Food will be stored . in accordance with professional standards for food service safety . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process .b. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms . 3. Facility shall inspect all food .for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely and proper storage .c. Refrigerated storage - foods that require refrigeration shall be refrigerated immediately upon receipt or placed in freezer .Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,770 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $4,885 — penalty dated 2023-09-21
• $4,885 — penalty dated 2023-09-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TREND CONSULTANTS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $68K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS