Compere Nh INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 35% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · F2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain food quality in accordance with professional standards for food safety related to overly ripe produce, exposed foods, undated and unlabeled foods, and expired foods and unsanitary meal preparation for two (2) of three (3) days of survey. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage Labeling, dated 3/24, revealed, .The facility will ensure the safety and quality of food by following good storage and labeling procedures .Procedure .2. All food items that are not in their original containers must be labeled with the common name of the food and the use by date. 3. Foods that are prepared and stored for later service must be labeled and dated .8. Rotation a . iv. Foods stored in storage units will be surveyed routinely to identify and discard foods that have passed its manufacturer use-by date or expiration date .10. Product Placement Food is stored in containers .that are .tightly sealed or covered and labeled . On 6/30/25 at 10:06 AM, during an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to reflect residents' assessments for anticoagulant and hypnotic medications for six (6) of eighteen (18) MDS assessments reviewed, Resident #5, Resident #14, Resident #21, Resident #38, Resident #44, and Resident #53. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled MDS Assessments, dated 5/2006, revealed, . It is the policy of this facility to follow the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) process as set forth by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) protocol . The facility will follow direction per federal and state guidelines for resident assessment protocol and will refer to the MDS RAI manual. A review of the RAI Manual 3.0 Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, revealed, . N0415: High-Risk Drug Classes: . N0415D1. Hypnotic: Check if a hypnotic medication was taken by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days) . N0415D2. Hypnotic: Check if there is an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #34. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, undated, revealed, . Residents' rights, policies, and procedures shall insure that each resident admitted to the center . 9. Is treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his dignity and individuality, . in care of his personal needs . On 6/30/25 at 10:55 AM, Resident #34 was observed to have noticeable long, white hairs on her chin. During the initial interview, she shared that she would like them shaved but mentioned it had not been done in quite some time. On 7/1/25 at 11:01 AM, in a follow-up observation and interview, Resident #34 still had long gray hair on her chin. The resident expressed that she wished to have it removed and shared that her Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights or choices, as evidenced by the resident having to remain in her room despite her request to get up and interact with other residents for one (1) of fifteen (15) sampled residents. Resident #13 Findings include: Record review of the fcility's Resident Rights dated 4/2012, revealed, . Residents' rights, policies, and procedures shall insure that each resident admitted to the center . 5. Is encouraged and assisted throughout the resident period of stay .9. Is treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his dignity and individuality .12.May .participate in activities .at his discretion . On 1/08/24 at 12:42 PM, during an observation and interview of Resident #13 revealed the resident was lying in bed with her head elevated watching television. In the interview, the resident stated that she wishes she could get out of her room every day, but staff do not get her up as often as she would like. On 1/9/24 at 8:54 AM, in an interview with Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the shower room was at a comfortable temperature while providing showers for three (3) of fifteen (15) sampled residents. Residents #8, #9, and #23. Findings Include: A record review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 4/2012, revealed, Policy Statement: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity . Policy Interpretation and Implementation .3. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident .is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity .9. Is treated with consideration .in treatment and in care for his personal needs . Resident #8 Observation on 1/8/23 at 1:00 PM, revealed Resident #8 lying in bed with the head of her bed elevated. The resident was alert and oriented, and able to make her needs known. During an interview with Resident #8 on 1/8/23 at 1:15 PM, revealed she doesn't go to the shower because it's cold in there. Resident #8 said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications were discontinued or limited to a 14 day duration without adequate clinical rationale for continued use for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #42 Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Monitoring of Antipsychotic Medication Therapy with revised date 06/2015 revealed . It is the policy of this facility to monitor the effectiveness and side effects for any resident that is taking an antipsychotic medication . The Pharmacy consultant will review these meds monthly and make dose reduction recommendations as indicated per CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) guidelines. These recommendations will be forwarded to the physicians for their response within 7 days . Record review of a statement on facility letterhead dated 1/12/24 and signed by the Administrator revealed, (Proper Name) Nursing Home does not have a specific policy that sites the 14 day rule for the new guidelines on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Resident Representative (RR) in writing the reason for a transfer to an acute care hospital for one (1) of one (1) sampled residents for hospitalizations. Resident #35 Findings include: Record review of the facility's Transfers and Documentation policy with a revised date of 11/2017, revealed . E. Documentation- . The documentation for all discharges and transfers, must include, as a minimum, and as they may apply: 1. The reason(s) for the discharge or transfer. 2. That an appropriate notice was provided to the resident and/or resident representative . On 07/18/22 at 01:45 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she explained Resident #35 is currently in the hospital and is on bed hold with plans to return to the facility. Resident #35's son was at the facility when she was transferred to the hospital and was aware of the transfer. The Social Worker is responsible for mailing transfer and bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to conduct a Level I Pre-admission Screening prior to the resident's admission to the facility to determine if the resident has a mental, intellectual disorder, or related condition for five (5) of 17 sampled residents. Resident # 3, Resident #5, Resident #12, Resident #22, and Resident #25 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy PASRR (Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review), revised 2012, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to do the Pre-admission Screening process .All persons requiring nursing facility level of care must have a PAS completed for admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility . Resident #3 A record review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed no Pre-admission Screening (PAS) had been completed. A record review of the admission Record for Resident #3 revealed the facility admitted her on 7/29/21 with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia. A record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/14/22 revealed a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TREND CONSULTANTS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS