Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 224 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 156 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 300 beds and averages 290.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.478 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 2629258Based on interviews, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation on 10/9/2025 and 10/10/25, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident (Resident #2) who was cognitively impaired with documented history of exit seeking behaviors; and who eloped out of the facility building on 9/28/2025. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). A review of Facility Reportable Event (FRE) revealed that on 9/28/2025, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) asked a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) to use her employee identification (ID) badge to swipe open the locked door on the second floor secured unit for Resident #2, which CNA #1 did provide. This allowed Resident #2 to exit the unit because both CNA #1 and LPN #1 thought the resident was a visitor. The FRE indicated that pictures of residents at risk for elopement, including Resident #2, were located by the same entrance door on the second-floor nursing unit to help staff identify at-risk residents and stop them from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-04-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ Complaint #159807 Based on interviews, review of closed medical records, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate care was provided with no delay in treatment for a resident with an indwelling pleural chest catheter/tube who had a change in condition with respiratory distress on [DATE] received a chest x-ray on [DATE], and was hospitalized via emergency services prior to chest x-ray results. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 45 residents (Resident #439) reviewed for quality of care, and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 8:52 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical records for Resident #439. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2022 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes difficulty breathing), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ176228 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow a physician's order to apply a urinary catheter stabilization device, b.) accurately identify a resident's urinary stabilization device was applied in the electronic medical record (EMR), c.) properly identify a resident's incontinence status in the EMR, and d.) monitor urinary output according to the physician's orders in the EMR. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 Residents (Resident #104 and #196) reviewed for urinary catheters and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, as required for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #275) system selected for MDS over 120 days. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The MDS is a comprehensive federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that should be completed and submitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must complete the assessment at discharge and electronically transmit the MDS no later than 14 days after completing the assessment. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #275. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but was not limited to, spinal stenosis (a condition where the spaces within the spine narrow, putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots), difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. Further review of Resident #275's EMR revealed that the resident was discharged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ165862, NJ184181 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility-provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to a dependent resident in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #247) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care and was evidenced by the following: On 4/30/25 at 10:16 AM, during the initial tour of the 2 East Unit, the surveyor observed Resident #247 awake and alert lying in bed, the bed sheets were wet and there was a strong odor of urine in the room. At that time, the surveyor requested Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM #3) to check the resident for incontinence care. The resident stated, I am sure I am wet. LPN/UM #3 checked the resident's incontinence brief which was saturated with urine and the bed sheet underneath was wet. LPN/UM #3 then stated, I will get the aide, and that the resident should have been changed in the morning during the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) morning rounds. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatment to prevent or reduce range of motion limitations were provided for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/6/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 lying in bed in watching television. The resident's left hand was resting on the bed without a hand roll in place (which is used to prevent the fingers from contracting tightly into the palm). On 5/7/25 at 11:22 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 lying in bed watching television. The resident's left hand was resting on the bed without a hand roll in place. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #11. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: osteoarthritis. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen was administered in accordance with a physician's order for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #146) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/30/25 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #146 who was seated in a wheelchair at the bedside. The resident was receiving 3.5 liters of oxygen from an oxygen concentrator (a medical device) via a nasal cannula (two prongs inserted into the nostrils with a tube that connects to an oxygen source). When interviewed, the resident stated that he/she was ordered two liters of oxygen but the oxygen concentrator was weak and they needed to turn it up. On 5/1/25 at 11:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #146 seated on the side of the bed with noted shortness of breath. The resident stated that he/she had been exercising and was trying to catch their breath. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set at 3.5 liters via nasal cannula. On 5/2/25 at 10:48 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medication according to the physician's order for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #155) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 5/7/25 at 9:21 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #155 sitting in their room. When asked about pain, the resident stated he/she had chronic pain in his/her lower back from an old injury. The resident further stated that their pain was typically a level 7 out of 10, but that they received as needed pain medication that brought the pain level down to a level three (3) which was effective for the resident. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #155. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, lumbar spondylopathies (arthritis of the spine), spinal stenosis, chronic pain, and low back pain. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ00176228 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure a.) weekly skin assessments were accurately documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and b.) the physician's orders were followed and accurately documented the medication administration on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This deficient practice was identified in 1of 2 residents (Resident #82) reviewed for pressure ulcer and 1of 1 resident (Resident #60) reviewed for communication and sensory problems and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 4/30/25 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #82 awake and alert, lying in bed with a pressure relieving mattress on the bed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #82. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, Parkinson's Disease (a progressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the pneumococcal vaccination was administered to a resident upon admission to the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #72) reviewed for immunizations and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Pneumococcal Vaccine for Adults Aged >19 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), United States, 2023 Recommendations and Reports / September 8, 2023 / 72(3);1-39 Adults aged >19 years who have received PCV13 only are recommended to receive a single dose of PCV20 at an interval >1 year after receipt of the PCV13 dose or to receive >1 dose of PPSV23 to complete their pneumococcal vaccine series. -When PPSV23 is used instead of PCV20, the minimum recommended interval between PCV13 and PPSV23 administration is >8…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-04-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appetizing and palatable temperature of food for 1 of 1 lunch meals observed on 1 of 6 nursing units (1 East). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/10/23 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting which included six residents (Residents #87, #118, #135, #208, #212, and #260). All six residents informed the surveyor that the food was served cold on all shifts to which they attributed to short staffing. On 4/14/23 at 8:35 AM, the surveyors informed the Assistant Food Service Director (AFSD) that they wanted to observe the lunch meal service for that day including food temperatures. The AFSD acknowledged the request and stated that lunch service began at 11:15 AM. On 4/14/23 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed the Chef Manager (CM) who had already began to serve food on the tray line. When interviewed, the CM stated that the food temperatures were already completed by the AM Cook. The CM stated that she obtained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) store, label, date and properly document and cool potentially hazardous foods to prevent food-borne illness; b.) discard potentially hazardous foods past their date of expiration; c.) ensure that dented cans were removed from storage; d.) ensure that serving trays were dried in a safe and sanitary manner prior to meal service; e.) ensure that food was served in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent contamination; f.) ensure that the dish machine in use maintained the appropriate temperature and sanitizer levels according to the manufacturer's specifications; and g.) maintain multiuse food-contact surface cutting board and can opener in a manner to prevent microbial growth. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/3/23 at 9:33 AM, the surveyors entered the kitchen and asked to tour with the Food Service Director (FSD). The surveyors met with the FSD who stated that both the hot water booster and chemical sanitizer were down on the dish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-10-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OCEAN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $25.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ