Hamilton Grove Healthcare And Rehabilitation, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 218 beds and averages 204.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #:178839 Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an abuse policy that addressed sexual abuse to ensure a resident was protected from staff-to-resident sexual abuse. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) residents (Resident #59) reviewed for abuse, and was evidenced by the following: On 10/22/24 at 1:00 PM, two surveyors interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) reported that on 10/15/24, the CNA#1 observed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) standing over Resident #59 in a compromising position. A review of the investigation revealed the Social Worker (SW) interviewed Resident#59, who stated, I gave him oral sex. Resident #59 stated that the sexual contact occurred in [Resident #59's] room and that Resident #59 told LPN #1, I'm scared because there are people around, and [LPN #1] shut the door. The resident began…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide preventive care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to residents who may be at risk for development of pressure injuries and ensure that air mattresses were accurately set according to the resident's weight.This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #6, #7, #106, and #151) reviewed for risk of pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following:1.On 3/6/26 at 10:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 in bed with the air mattress setting set to 330 pounds.On 3/10/26 at 11:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 in bed with the air mattress setting set to 180-230 pounds.A review of the admission Record (AR) (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; hemiplegia (the total or partial paralysis of one entire side of the body) and hemiparesis (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were transported from one area of the unit to another in a dignified manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for dignity and was evidenced by the following. On 3/10/26 at 11:45 AM, during the initial tour of the [NAME] unit, the surveyor observed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transport Resident #45 in a recliner chair facing backwards from the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER] to the lounge area across from the nursing station. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #45. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts over 3 months), localized edema…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow up on a physician's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for unnecessary medications.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/6/2026 at 11:32 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 sitting in a reclining area in the hallway near the nursing station. The resident had a splint on their left hand/wrist. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #5.A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily activities), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a treatable mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing terrifying,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, review of the facility's policy, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to complete a criminal background check prior to the first day of work for 1 out of 96 employees (Employee #4). This deficient practice was identified for newly hired employee files reviewed since last survey from 10/28/24 and was evidenced as follows:During the facility survey dates of 3/10/26-3/16/26, the survey team reviewed the newly hired employee files since the last survey which revealed the following:For Employee #4, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), with a date of hire (DOH) of 2/28/25 and first day of work as 2/28/25, there was no evidence of a background check prior to the start of employment.On 3/13/26 at 2:02 PM, the survey team presented this finding to the administration team including the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the Director of Nursing (DON), the Regional Nurse Consultant, and the [NAME] President of Clinical Services. The LNHA could not provide any additional information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, as required for 1 of 1 system selected residents with a MDS record over 114 days reviewed (Resident #208), and was evidenced by the following:On 3/11/26 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed the system selected MDS record over 114 days which revealed Resident #208 was overdue for a MDS assessment. A review of Resident #208's electronic medical record (eMR) revealed that the resident was discharged from the facility on 11/3/25. A review of the residents' MDS assessments revealed the last MDS completed was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. There was no assessment completed for the resident's discharge. On 3/11/26 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator, who confirmed Resident #208 was discharged from the facility on 11/3/25, and there was no completed MDS assessment for the discharge. The MDS Coordinator further stated that a discharge MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise an individual comprehensive care plan for a resident with an order for enteral tube feeding. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following:On 3/6/26 at 11:26 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #1 sleeping in their bed. The surveyor observed the enteral tube feeding running at 70 ml/hr (milliliters per hour). The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #1. A review of the admission Record face sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy (feeding tube inserted directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall to provide nutrition, fluids, and medications), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and causes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff appropriately follow a physician orders (PO) and acceptable standards of clinical practice in accordance with the New Jersey Board of Nursing Statutes. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #142) reviewed for smoking. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 3/06/2026 at 11:32 AM, during the initial tour of the secured Klockner unit, the surveyor observed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that incontinence care was provided to a dependent resident in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #147) observed during incontinence care rounds and b.) provide a resident with nail care during activities of daily living (ADL) care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for ADL care (Resident #195),This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1. On 3/11/26 at 7:54 AM, during incontinence rounds with Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) #1, the surveyor observed Resident #147's incontinence brief completely saturated with urine, and yellow urine-like stains on multiple areas on the top sheet. At that time, the surveyor asked RN/UM #1, if she had any concern with the observation. She stated that it was a concern because the resident was soaking wet. RN/UM #1 stated that the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy (a surgical opening directly into the trachea (windpipe) used to assist breathing) care was completed using sterile technique per facility policy and clinical guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #46) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following:On 3/11/26 between 10:20 AM and 10:37 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) perform tracheostomy care for Resident #46. During that time, the LPN was first observed performing hand hygiene, then placing a nonsterile drape over a bedside table. She was then observed opening and placing a tracheostomy care kit on the drape. She then opened a packet of 4x4 sterile gauze and a disposable inner cannula and placed them onto the drape. The LPN then used two single use sterile saline containers and emptied their contents into the open packet of sterile gauze. The LPN then reached into the packet (with bare hands) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate the performance of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on an annual basis.This deficient practice was identified for five (5) of five (5) CNAs whose randomly selected employee files were reviewed and was evidenced by the following:On 3/11/26 at 9:34 AM, the surveyor requested the education and performance reviews for five (5) randomly selected CNAs.The surveyor reviewed the education provided by the facility for the five (5) CNAs. No performance evaluations were provided.On 3/11/26 at 11:10 AM, the performance evaluations were requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) who could not provide them.On 3/13/26 at 12:00 PM, the performance evaluations were requested from the Human Resources Director (HRD) who could not provide them.03/13/2026 at 12:16 PM, the HRD stated to the survey team There are no performance evaluations for the last year for CNAs because they are unionized. There are also no facility policies for performance evaluations.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$54,275 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $54,275 — penalty dated 2024-10-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OCEAN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $8.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 37% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ