Hunterdon Care Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 491 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 216 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 185 beds and averages 167.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-14 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint: 2582599 Based on interview, review of the medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for a resident (Resident #3) with severe cognitive impairment, who lived in the community alone, and was denied at home nursing care services upon discharge. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #3). Resident #3, who was had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, indicating a severely impaired cognition with an admission diagnosis of cognitive impairment, was discharged from Medicare Part A services with a last date of coverage on [DATE]. Resident #3 lost an appeal and was discharged to the community on [DATE]. Resident #3 was assessed upon discharge to need at home nursing services, physical therapy (PT), and occupational therapy (OT). A review of a denial email from the home care nursing services (HCNS #1) [name redacted] indicated that since the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2582599Based on interview, review of the medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was written at the time a resident (Resident #3) was discharged from the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #3).The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #3.According to the admission Record (AR) face sheet, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: mild cognitive impairment, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C. diff; a bacteria infection that causes diarrhea and gastrointestinal cramping), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia (movement disorder).According to the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/25/25, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, which indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy to ensure that reference checks were completed for 10 of 10 employee files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/18/25 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed 10 randomly selected employee files, which revealed the following: 1. Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #3, with a hire date of 1/22/24, did not have a previous employee reference on file. 2. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, with a hire date of 11/25/24, did not have a previous employee reference on file. 3. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2, with a hire date of 1/25/25, did not have a previous employee reference on file. 4. Activity Aide (AA) #1, with a hire date of 1/22/25, did not have a previous employee reference on file. 5. LPN #3, with a hire date of 11/18/24, did not have a previous employee reference on file. 6. CNA #3, with a hire date of 4/24/23, did not have a previous employee reference on file. 7. CNA #4,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to honor a resident's choice to a.) get out of bed at the resident's preferred time and b.) attend preferred activities for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #79) reviewed for choices. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: On 3/13/25 at 9:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #79 lying in bed. The resident stated he/she preferred to be out of bed by 9:30 AM every morning. The resident further stated that there was a Coffee Social activity scheduled for 10:30 AM in the dining room that they wanted to attend. When asked about the resident's usual get up time, the resident stated that staff normally get them up around 11:00 AM which meant they missed their preferred activities. At 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed the Coffee Social activity in the dining room and Resident #79 was not present. On 3/17/25 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #79 lying in bed. The resident stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ #00172794 Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to submit the facility investigation to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) within five (5) days, specifically when a resident sustained a fracture of unknown origin for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: dementia, history of traumatic fracture, and polyarthritis (a condition characterized by inflammation and pain in multiple joints). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 2/17/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A review of the individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area, initiated on 11/10/17, that the resident had a cognitive loss with confusion, disorientation, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ00172794 Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for a resident who sustained a significant injury of unknown origin. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for abuse, and was evidenced by the following: On 3/17/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #53's electronic medical record (EMR). A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: dementia, history of traumatic fracture, and polyarthritis (a condition characterized by inflammation and pain in multiple joints). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 2/17/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A review of the individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area, initiated on 11/10/17, that the resident had a cognitive loss with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 1 of 34 residents (Resident #121) reviewed for MDS coding accuracy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/17/25 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #121. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that Resident #121 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, heart failure, depression, and anxiety disorder. A review of the comprehensive MDS assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/18/24, revealed under section K (Swallowing/Nutritional Status) that the resident was coded for a significant weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. The resident weight was documented as 128 pounds (lbs.). A review of the resident's documented weights revealed the following: 6/6/24: 133.2 lbs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure accurate documentation of the receipt of a controlled substance for three (3) of six (6) Schedule II controlled substance medications ordered and received by the facility for use as an emergency backup supply, on two (2) Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) 222 Forms (a form used to order controlled substances from a provider) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: 21 CFR 1305.13 Procedure for filling DEA Forms 222. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident did not receive an unnecessary medication for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #74). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #74's electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed the following. A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary), reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods) and diastolic congestive heart failure, (a condition that occurs when the heart muscle can't pump blood efficiently). A review of most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 1/22/25, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), score of 2 out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Section H…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control and sanitary practices for storing medical devices and equipment while not in use. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of three (3) observations during the Medication Pass observation (med-pass). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/17/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed medication being administered to Resident #91. The surveyor then observed an oxygen mask, tubing and a nebulizer machine (a device used administer liquid medications by inhalation) on the floor at the foot of the bed of Resident #9, the roommate of Resident #91. The mask, tubing and machine were not observed to be in a bag or other container. The surveyor completed the med-pass observation and contacted the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM#3) for that unit. The surveyor showed LPN/UM#3 the nebulizer, mask and tubing located on the floor and asked if that was the way the equipment should be stored when not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews on 3/13/2025 and 3/14/2025, in the presence of the Director of Maintenance (DOM), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all devices used to identify call bell notifications were properly functioning. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 6 of 170 residents and was evidenced by the following: An observation on 3/13/2025 at 12:22 PM, revealed that the call bell for resident room C-113 did not give audible notification of activation at the nurse's station when tested by the DOM. An observation at 12:25 PM, revealed that the call bell for resident room C-117 did not give audible notification of activation at the nurse's station when tested by the DOM. An observation at 12:30 PM, revealed that the call bell for resident room C-119 did not give audible notification of activation at the nurse's station when tested by the DOM. At the time, the surveyor interviewed the DOM who confirmed the observation and stated that the call bell system was recently upgraded and the section of the building that we were testing was part…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OCEAN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ