Atlantic Coast Rehab & Health

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 128.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews and a review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure that a resident was protected from alleged abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, and b) failed to implement facility's abuse policy when they became aware of an allegation that CNA #1 pushed the resident knocking them to the floor on 12/11/25. According to an undated document titled reference 12/11/25, which the facility provided to the surveyor, on 12/12/25, the facility administration reviewed video footage and statements from CNA #1 and LPN #1; and after the review, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) agreed to obtain formal statements about the incident from both Residents #1 and #2. The document stated that LPN #1 was alerted by the noise coming from Resident #2's room and went to the room, where she saw Resident #1 grabbing CNA #1. The document further stated that when LPN #1 could not de-escalate the situation, she left the room; upon her return, she found CNA #1 still in the room; and that she saw Resident #1 getting up off the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of pertinent facility documents on 3/5/26 and 3/11/26, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health an allegation of physical abuse that occurred on 12/11/25, after the resident notified staff that a Certified Nursing Assistant pushed them and knocked them down. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Findings Include:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnose that included but were not limited to Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. According to the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 2/6/26, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. A Behavior Note dated 12/11/25 at 6:45 PM included that a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 heard yelling and shouting in Resident #2's room, where CNA #1 was providing care to Resident #2. The note further stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice by not storing nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) and Bilevel positive airway pressure device (BiPap- a breathing device that helps a person breathe easier) equipment in bags which resulted in environmental exposure for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen use (Resident #22, 34, 89) . The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.Upon initial tour of the facility on 2/10/2025 at 10:20 AM, surveyor #1 observed a nebulizer mask standing upright on a nebulizer machine located to the right of Resident #89 on the bedside table. The nebulizer mask was not bagged and exposed to the environment. Resident #89 was asleep and did not respond to surveyor #3's prompting. On 2/11/2025 at 9:16 AM, surveyor #3 observed a nebulizer mask standing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/10/2025 from 09:17 AM until 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen in the presence of the Prep [NAME] (PC) then the Regional Food Service Director (RFSD): 1.In refrigerator #1 on the bottom right shelf there were shelled eggs in a carton that were out of the cardboard box. The PC stated the eggs should be stored in the original container. 2. On a storage shelf, souffle cups were opened and exposed to air. The RFSD stated the cups should be covered. 3. In refrigerator #2 there were 20 small cups of mixed fruit that were labeled prepared 2/6/25 discard by 2/8/25 on a metal tray. The RFSD stated he is going to discard them as they are not labeled properly. 4. In freezer #4 there were hash brown patties that were opened and covered with plastic wrap. The hash brown patties…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was transported from one area of the unit to another in a dignified manner for 1 of 29 sampled residents, (Resident #109). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/10/2025 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transport a resident (Resident #109) backwards in his/her geriatric chair from the resident hallway to the nurse station. According to the admission Record Resident #109 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: dementia and muscle weakness. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate care dated 12/20/24, revealed that Resident #109 had long and short-term memory deficits. The MDS further indicated that the resident required maximal assistance with activities of daily living. During an interview with the surveyor on 02/10/2025 at 10:41 AM, the CNA said that transporting a resident backwards in a chair should be avoided for safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that identified furnished services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for a resident that required nebulized medications (liquid medicine that turns into a mist that can be easily inhaled) and a leg brace for 2 of 28 residents reviewed for care planning (Resident # 89 and 96). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. Upon initial tour of the facility on 2/10/2025 at 10:20 AM, surveyor #1 observed a nebulizer mask standing upright on a nebulizer machine located to the right of Resident #89 on the bedside table. The nebulizer mask was not bagged and exposed to the environment. Resident #89 was asleep and did not respond to surveyor #1's prompting. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #89. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care, based upon current standards of practice specifically by having a urinary catheter drainage bag in contact with the floor, not documenting urinary outputs, and not providing a privacy bag for 2 of 3 residents (Resident # 89, 100) reviewed for Urinary Catheters. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/10/2025 at 10:43 AM during the initial tour, Surveyor # 1 observed Resident # 100 in bed. At that time, Surveyor # 1 observed a catheter drainage bag in contact with the floor. A review of Resident # 100's Order Summary located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an order to, Monitor and document [trade name] catheter output every shift. If no output in 8 hours notify MD every shift. The order revealed a start date of 1/06/2025. A review of the Treatment Administration Record located in the EMR revealed blanks in the documentation portion for the following dates: 2/1/2025 - Day - Blank…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to establish a system of records for all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for the dispensing of controlled medications for 1 out of 3 medication carts inspected under the Medication Storage Task. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/12/2025 at 11:39AM in the presence of the Registered Nurse (RN)# 1, the surveyor inspected the medication cart on the subacute high side cart for storage and labeling of medications. During reconciliation of controlled medications, the surveyor observed 15 Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (a narcotic medication used to treat pain) in the blister pack in the narcotic box, but the Controlled Drug Sheet (CDS) documented 16 were left. At the same time on 02/12/2025 during the interview with the surveyor, RN #1 stated, I just gave that sorry, I should have signed that out. When asked to see what time the medication was given, RN # 1 pulled up the medication on the medication administration record and stated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all medical supplies were stored in accordance with professional standards by having expired supplies in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 11:13 AM the surveyor in the presence of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)# 1, observed the following in the subacute medication storage room: 1. 6 unopened boxes of probe covers with an expiration date of [DATE]. 2. 2 opened boxes of colostomy bags with an expiration date of 01/2025. 3. 1 unopened box of paper medical tape with an expiration date of 12/2024. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:13 AM with the surveyor LPN #1 said there should not be any expired medical supplies in the storage room and she removed the items. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:36 PM with the surveyor the Director of Nursing (DON) said he was unaware of expiration dates on supplies, and he would be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by failing to a.) keep the garbage container area free of debris and b.) have a closed cover over the opening the garbage container. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/11/25 at 01:09 PM, the surveyor observed the outside garbage area. There were wooden pallets, broken orange plastic pieces, a recliner chair with a rolled-up carpet on top of it, a geriatric chair, a medical glove, a gray container labeled trash, and a commode. These items were not in a container and were in proximity of vehicles. The surveyor observed a green garbage container filled with cardboard boxes. The garbage container was opened on one side exposing the cardboard boxes inside. On 02/12/25 at 11:27 AM, the surveyor observed the garbage area again. There were cardboard boxes spilling out of the garbage container, on the ground, and on top of the half-closed lid. On 02/12/25 at 11:53 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) stated that the trash is picked up twice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 29 residents reviewed, Resident #70 and was evidenced by the following: On 02/10/2025 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #70 in bed. Resident #70 states he/she feels great. The surveyor reviewed Resident #70's electronic health record and observed a Physician Order dated 1/29/25: hospice evaluation and treat. There was no other documentation in the electronic health record including the care plans and progress notes regarding hospice. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia and malnutrition. The 1/8/25 minimum data set, an assessment tool, reflected that this resident was not cognitively intact and was not on hospice. On 02/11/25 at 09:13 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hospice binder and the consultation binder at the nurse station no paperwork for Resident # 70 observed. On 02/12/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$101,112 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $101,112 — penalty dated 2026-03-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OCEAN HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ