No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sinai Post-Acute Nursing & Rehab Center

65 Jay Street, Newark, NJ 07103 · For profit - Corporation · 430 certified beds · (973) 483-6800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0603, F0604) — most recent Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)6 immediate-jeopardy citations$329,910 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0603, F0604) — most recent Jul 2024
  • inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $329,910 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
111 Central Ave · (973) 877-5000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
393 Central Ave · (973) 558-3794 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
291 Central Ave · (973) 482-5655 · Call to confirm hours
Park
154 Summit St · (973) 596-8461 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.1%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.1%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.1%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.5%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.2%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.4%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.2%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.4%8.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.102.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.811.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.9%CMS range 29.9–54.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.9–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge76.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.5–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
33.6%
Total nursing turnover
48.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 430 beds and averages 418.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.79 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.87 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-16)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-07-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 175415 Refer to F 550 K, Refer to F 557 K, Refer to F 561 K, Refer to F 603 K, Refer to F 604 K, Refer F to 679 E. Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to a.) ensure the facility implemented policies and procedures for Resident Rights and Self Determination as well as policies and procedures to prevent physical restraints and seclusion. The LNHA also failed to ensure 11 of 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) b.) signed admission Agreements on admission to the facility and c.) were afforded the autonomy to participate in group activities, community dining, serving meals in a dignified manner, freely communicate with visitors, and to leave rooms at will . The failure to ensure the facility established and maintained systems that were effective and efficient to operate the facility in a manner to safely meet residents' needs had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 175415 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 11 of 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIR) were afforded the autonomy to participate in group activities, community dining, serving meals in a dignified manner, freely communicate with visitors, leave rooms at will and be free from physical restraints for (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11). The failure to treat residents respectfully and in a dignified manner had the likelihood to cause serious injury and psychological harm. This was cited as a pattern that immediately jeopardizes the health and safety of the JIR residents, as well as all other residents that reside in the facility which resulted in an IJ situation. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 07/02/24, the date that the first JIR (Resident #1) was admitted to the facility and was secluded by law enforcement officers of the Bureau of Prison (BOP). The IJ was identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-29 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 175415 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a dignified and respectful manner 11 of 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIR) by physically restraining, secluding the residents from participating in group activities, community dining, intermingling with other residents, communicating with visitors and leaving the room at will. This was cited as a pattern that immediately jeopardizes the health and safety of the JIR residents, as well as all other residents that reside in the facility which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 07/02/24, the date that the first JIR (Resident #1) was admitted to the facility and was secluded to the room by law enforcement officers of the Bureau of Prison [BOP]. The IJ situation was identified on 07/12/24, when Residents #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 were observed being secluded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 175415 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to promote and facilitate 11 of 11 Justice Involved Residents' (JIR) (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) right to: 1) make their own choices regarding aspects of their life and care; 2) participate in activities and 3) interact with members of the community both inside and outside the facility. The failure to promote and facilitate a resident's self-determination had the likelihood to cause serious psychological harm. On 07/11/24 at 09:00 AM, Surveyor #1 and #2 interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated that she was notified by the facility's Corporate Office (CO) that JIRs were entering the facility. The DON stated that the CO instructed the facility's administration (DON, Administrator (LNHA), admission Coordinator, Social Services, Activities Director, and Unit Managers) that all JIRs would be shackled, guarded by law enforcement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-29 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 175415 Based on observation, interview, review of resident medical records and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 11 of 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) were free from involuntary seclusion. The JIR were secluded from having autonomy and to make choices to the maximum extent practicable regarding how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care with the same rights as nursing home residents. The failure to allow JIRs autonomy posed the likelihood to cause serious injury, psychological harm, and severe mental anguish which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The IJ began on 07/02/2024, the date that the first JIR (Resident #1) was admitted to the facility and was secluded to the room by law enforcement officers of the Bureau of Prison [BOP]. The IJ situation was identified on 07/12/2024 when Residents #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 were observed being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT # NJ 175415 Based on observation, interview, review of resident medical records and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to ensure that 11 of 11 residents involved in the Justice System [Justice Involved Residents] (JIRs) (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11) were free from physical restraints. The failure to treat residents respectfully and in a dignified manner had the likelihood to cause serious injury, psychological harm and mental anguish. These residents were restrained with ankle shackles that were attached to the beds with metal chains. This was cited as a pattern that immediately jeopardizes the health and safety of the JIRs, as well as all other residents that reside in the facility which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The IJ began on 07/02/24, the date that the first JIR (Resident #1) was admitted to the facility and was restrained with metal shackles by law enforcement officers of the Bureau of Prison [BOP]. The IJ situation was identified on 7/12/24 when Residents #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ2795447, NJ 2694655, and 2648314Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the physical environment was maintained in a safe, functional, and sanitary condition for residents and staff. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Findings include:During the observation on 04/08/2026 from 8:38 to 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed the following: At 8:38 AM, in the presence of the Director of Dietary (DOD) and the Assistant DOD (ADOD), gray water was observed standing on the floor under the sink in the dishwasher room on both the clean and dirty sides. A blanket with brown staining was noted on the floor, wet under the edge of the dishwasher. At 8:40 AM, mouse droppings were noted along the baseboards in the shower room of the third floor on the north wing. The surveyor observed a live trap under the sink in the soiled utility room and mouse droppings were noted along the baseboard and not within the trap. At 9:20 AM, mouse droppings were noted along the baseboards in the soiled utility room on the sixth floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's environment, equipment, and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified in 3 of 5 nursing units observed for environment and evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/9/25 at 10:12 AM, during initial tour of the 5th floor Nursing Unit, the surveyor observed Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The wall by the headboard had chipped paint, the cove base on the wall under the room sink was soiled with a dark black substance, there was a missing floor tile under the Tube Feeding pump, the bathroom walls had chipped paint, the floor tiles were broken and soiled and the cove base on the wall behind the toilet was heavily soiled and pulled out from the wall. On 06/09/25 at 12:21 PM, the surveyor observed Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The wall by the headboard had torn sheetrock with full thickness open holes, the chair rail was detached and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dental procedures were arranged as recommended by consulting dentistry for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #109) reviewed for dental care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/9/25 at 11:27 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #109 in their room watching television. The resident informed the surveyor that they had been wanting to see a dentist and have teeth extracted for months and felt that nothing was being done. The resident did not complain of any discomfort or pain, rather wanting to have rotten teeth extracted and be evaluated for dentures. On 6/10/25 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #109's electronic medical record (EMR) and the following was identified: A review of the resident's admission Record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but was not limited to type two diabetes and severe obesity. A review of the resident's quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #39), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/9/25 at 11:00: AM, the surveyor observed Resident #39 in bed, and observed that the resident's call bell was out of reach on the floor to left side of bed. The surveyor asked the resident how the resident gets help, the resident stated that they call out for help when needed. On 6/11/25 at 11:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 39 in bed, and observed that the call bell was still on left side of bed on floor, outside of the resident's reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #39. A review of the admission Record reflected that Resident #39 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to left sided weakness and paralysis due to cerebral infarction, difficulty walking, diabetes and depression. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) discharge care planning was developed by the interdisciplinary team and involved the resident to reflect their goals and preferences, the comprehensive care plan and discharge plan were updated in response to the information received from local contact agency (LCA) after a referral was made, and b.) the resident's discharge participation and goal setting were accurately assessed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for closed record (Resident #414) and was evidenced by the following: 1.)According to Resident #414's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass and strength) difficulty in walking, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 3/13/25, Resident #414 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow care plan interventions to provide safe transfer of resident utilizing mechanical lift. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. On 6/9/25 at 10:47 AM, during the initial observations and tour on the 5th floor of the facility, the surveyor knocked on the open door for 536-2 and entered the room. The surveyor observed Resident #2 in process of being transferred out of bed via mechanical lift by the Certitified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The CNA performed the procedure without a second staff member present to assist. On 6/11/25 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor interviewed the CNA, and the CNA acknowledged she was trained on mechanical lift use by the facility and that there should be two people when transfering a resident via a mechanical lift. The CNA acknowledged that she did not have 2 people during the observed transfer via a mechanical lift. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ00182662 Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide ostomy care for a resident who was dependent on staff for colostomy management. The deficient practice was cited for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1017) reviewed for the need of assistance with activities of daily living and was evidenced by the following. The surveyor reviewed the closed record for Resident #1017 which revealed the following information. The admission Record indicated the resident was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to colon cancer and colostomy (a surgical operation in which a piece of the colon is diverted to an artificial opening in the abdominal wall to bypass a damaged part of the colon). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool indicated the resident utilized an ostomy for bowel continence (Section H0400). The MDS indicated the resident was dependent upon staff for managing the ostomy (Section GG). The 12/22/25 toileting care plan for colostomy care included instructions for nursing to keep skin around the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 00175968 Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of clinical practice by not ensuring that a.) a resident with an Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) received care and services as recommended by the manufacturer's specifications (Resident #1018) and b.) a resident received passive range of motion (ROM) exercises as recommended by the physical therapist (Resident #39). This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 35 residents reviewed for care and services and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/12/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #1018. A review of the admission Record reflected that Resident #1018 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that may cause the heart to beat faster than usual) and the presence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards by ensuring; a.) the first dose of a medication (Fluconazole)(a medication used to treat fungal infections) was accurately administered and documented to one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #190), discovered by surveyor inquiry during the medication administration observation and b.) accurately clarifying the transcription and documentation of a physician's order for a medication (Coreg)(a medication used to treat high blood pressure) by one (1) of three (3) nurses for one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #190), observed during the medication administration observation. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) refrigerated medications were removed from active inventory when residents were discharged from the facility for two (2) of three (3) refrigerators inspected and b.) a medication (Tivicay)(an antiretroviral medication used to treat human immunodeficiency virus) was labeled appropriately with a resident's name found in one of eight (8) medication carts inspected. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: On 6/11/25 between 11:26 AM to 11:31 AM, the surveyor inspected the 5th floor medication room refrigerator in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). The surveyor observed two packaged pen injectors of Trulicity (a medication used to help manage blood sugar levels) 3 milligrams (MG) per 0.5 milliliters (ML) labeled for unsampled Resident #1. LPN #1 stated that unsampled Resident #1 had expired and the Trulicity pen injectors should have been removed from the refrigerator. At that time, the surveyor also observed an opened 10 ML vial of Lantus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to consistently maintain appropriate infection control practices to limit the spread of infection. The deficient practice was observed with 1 staff person and 2 residents, (#2 and #39) and observed in 1 resident room, (room [ROOM NUMBER]), and evidenced by the following. 1. The surveyor observed the lunch meal in the 3rd floor day room on 6/10/25 at 12:31 PM. An Activity Aide (AA) was observed as she passed out hand sanitizing wipes to 6 individual residents. The AA collected the 6 used wipes in her hand and disposed of them. Without performing hand hygiene, the AA wiped the hands of 3 additional residents. She did not perform hand hygiene in between residents. The AA proceeded to the pantry hand-wash sink, applied soap to her hands, lathered for 10 seconds and rinsed the soap from her hands. The surveyor spoke with the AA explaining the surveyor's observations to the AA. The AA stated she should have performed hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain a Tube Feeding (TF) pump and pole in, safe, sanitary and optimal condition for Resident # 349 and b.) maintain a geriatric chair in safe, sanitary and optimal condition for Resident #2. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 35 residents reviewed and was evidenced by the following: On 6/9/25 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #349 in bed on a specialty mattress. The Resident did not respond to the surveyor's greeting. The surveyor observed a TF Pump (used to deliver nutrition to patients who cannot obtain such by swallowing) at resident #349's bedside. The TF pump was soiled with a brown and white substance and the pole was soiled with a brown and white substance and was heavily rusted. On that same date, at that same time, during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Practical Nurse/ Unit Manager (LPN/UM) stated that Resident #349 received tube feedings which started in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ186463 Based on observation, review of the medical record and other pertinent facility documents on [DATE], it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for emotional services/support for a resident who witnessed the death of another resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident#2), and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 12:15 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #2, who stated Resident #1 and an unidentified resident came to their room and all three residents were smoking crack and cocaine. According to Resident #2, they observed Resident #1 in the chair falling to the side and Resident #2 notified the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), who told the resident and the unidentified resident to leave the room. Resident #2 observed LPN #1 perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; emergency life-saving procedure performed when someone's breathing or heart beat has stopped) on Resident #1. On [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ186463 Based on interviews, review of the medical records review and other pertinent facility documentation on [DATE] and [DATE], it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) adequate supervision for a Resident (Resident #1) with a known history of drug and drug paraphernalia (equipment needed for or connected with a particular activity) in the facility who had an unexpected death in the facility and was administered Narcan (drug used to reverse an opioid overdose) by nursing staff and b.) conduct and document a thorough investigation for incidents where Narcan was administered to prevent further accidents related to drug use. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 12:15 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #2, who stated on [DATE], Resident #1 and another unidentified resident came to Resident #1's room, and all three of the residents were smoking crack and cocaine.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ186463 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for a resident's pain management needs. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for resident needs (Resident #5), and was evidenced by the following: According to Resident #5's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary), the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (broken hip bone at the neck of the thigh bone causing the bone to shift or separate) and unspecified fracture of sacrum (lower back). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 05/14/2025, Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated that Resident #5 required assistance from staff for completion of their activities of daily living (ADLs). A review of Resident #5's Order Summary Report (OSR) with an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ186463 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on [DATE] and 5/2725, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with behavioral healthcare services after the resident (Resident # 2) witnessed the death of another resident in their room after allegedly using illicit drugs. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for resident care (Resident #2), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the progress notes revealed that on [DATE] at approximately 6:00 PM, adult emergency services was called to the 6th floor nursing unit to Resident #2's room, where Resident #1 was found unresponsive. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) entered Resident #2's room, and found Resident #1 unresponsive. Narcan (drug used to reverse opioid overdose) was administered twice by LPN #1, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; emergency life-saving procedure performed when someone's breathing or heartbeat has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    C #: NJ 175921 Based on record review, as well as review of pertinent facility documents on 7/31/24 and 8/1/24, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the care plan timely for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #2) reviewed for care plans. This deficiency is evidenced by the following: 1. The admission Record for Resident #2, showed that the Resident was initially admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Displaced Oblique Fracture of Shaft of Right Fibula, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Opioid Dependence, and Cocaine Abuse. The Minimum Date Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/3/24, showed that the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and required a partial/moderate assistance from staff with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Review of Resident #2's incident report (RI #1) and corresponding documentation from the progress notes (PN), revealed that on 7/1/24 at 2:20 p.m. resident was found on floor grunting, not responding to simple commands, Narcan was administered once, resident responded after 3 minutes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#: NJ 175921 Based on interviews and record review, as well as review of pertinent facility documents on 7/31/24 and 8/1/24 it was determined that the facility failed to follow the Physician's order and to implement the facility policy titled Medication Administration Policy for 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4), reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission RECORD (AR), Resident #3 was admitted with diagnosis that included but were not limited to Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery On The Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue. According to the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 5/7/24, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that the resident's cognition was intact. The care plan (CP), initiated on 5/1/24 and revised on 5/20/24, indicated that Resident #3 had an actual skin breakdown, potential for deterioration and further skin breakdown. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 175415 Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a meaningful group and individualized activity programs that reflected the resident's preferences. This deficient practice was identified for 11 of 11 Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11), reviewed for activities, and was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) updated Guideline to Surveyors on Federal Requirements for Providing services to Justice Involved individuals, revised 12/23/2016, S & C 16-21-ALL, documented Skilled Nursing Facilities must permit residents to have autonomy and choice to the maximum extent practicable regarding how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care with the same rights as nursing home residents. 1. According to the admission Record, Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident's equipment and living areas in a clean and home like manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #171) reviewed for environment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/14/23 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #171 sitting up at the side of their bed. The resident's bed was positioned against the wall. Behind the resident the surveyor observed a precise square cut hole in the wall. The surveyor observed wall insulation peering out and a wire running from the hole down the wall, behind the resident's bed. The surveyor could not see the floor behind the resident's bed. Resident #171 stated there was something in the hole previously and whatever was there fell out. The resident stated it may have been like that for about four months. Resident #171 could not identify which staff members were aware about the hole in the wall. A review of Resident #171's electronic medical record revealed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 2 of 38 residents, Resident #346 and #548 reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/18/23 at 12:38 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed hybrid medical records for Resident #346, who was documented on the 10/24/23 Discharge MDS section A as Discharge assessment-return not anticipated, Unplanned discharge to Short-Term General Hospital . Review of the admission Record (a one-page summary of important information about the patient) reflected Resident #346 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to Opioid Dependence, Anxiety Disorder, Anemia, Cocaine Dependence and Depression. Review of the 10/23/23 20:50 INTERDISCIPLINARY CARE Planning (IDCP) CONFERENCE NOTES Late…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (CP) for 3 of 35 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #171, #313, and #2). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/12/23 at 11:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #171 sitting up at the side of the bed in their room. The resident was alert, verbally responsive, and conversant. The surveyor observed the resident's bedside was cluttered with personal belongings, that included but were not limited to clothes, and food items. The windowsill was cluttered with clothing. The top of the resident's dresser was covered with items, including clothing and had a drawer partially open which was also filled with items. The resident's bedside table was filled with items, which included various containers and bottles. The resident stated they had other belongings that were in storage within the facility. Resident #171 verbalized no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan (CCP) for 1 of 35 residents reviewed, Resident #103. This deficient practice was identified by the following: On 12/12/23 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #103 in their room seated in their wheelchair. The resident was alert and verbally responsive. The surveyor reviewed Resident #103's hybrid medical records. The admission Record (AR) reflected that Resident #103 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but was not limited to Dependence on Renal Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 5 and Atrophy of Kidney (Terminal). According to Resident #103's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 10/20/23, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was conducted and revealed that Resident #103's BIMS score was 15 out of 15 indicating the resident had an intact cognition. The surveyor reviewed the residents CCP dated 11/2/23, which reflected a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that that facility failed to ensure that a follow up visit for an eye consultation was arranged for a resident with an eye impairment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision, Resident #2 and was evidenced by the following: On 12/12/23 at 11:59 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 seated in a recliner wheelchair inside the day/dining room. The surveyor further observed that Resident #2 had their right eye shut proving some impaired vision to the right eye. The surveyor reviewed Resident #2's hybrid medical records. The admission record (AR) reflected that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to Type II Diabetes Mellitus; Atrial Fibrillation; Bullous Keratopathy OD (right eye) and Cataracts OU (both eyes). A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (A/MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 9/10/23 reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication times were adjusted to accommodate their dialysis (a clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidneys) schedule for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #11 reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/12/23 at 11:58 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #11 was not in their room. The resident was at dialysis which was scheduled every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. A review of Resident #11's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following: According to the admission Record (an admission summary), Resident #11 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease, and Dependence on Renal [kidney] Dialysis. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a tool used to facilitate management of care, dated 11/3/23, indicated the facility assessed the resident's cognition using a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) test. Resident #11 scored 8 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents: a) wrote physician progress notes (PPN) at least every 30 days, b) wrote physician progress notes (PPN) at least every 60 days with alternating Nurse Practitioner (NP) visits, and c) accurately date physician progress notes (PPN). This deficient practice was observed for 9 of 35 residents, Resident #176, 141, 154, 11, 174, 255, 103, 22, and 104 reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/12/23 at 12:08 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #176 lying in their bed, awake, alert and verbally responsive. The resident verbalized no concerns. The surveyor reviewed Resident #176's hybrid (paper and electronic) medical records. According to the admission Record (an admission summary) (AR), Resident #176 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that foodservice equipment was stored properly when not in use. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 12/12/23 at 9:23 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following: On Chef prep table #3, the deli slicer was not in use and the slicing blade was not in locked position. When the FSD attempted to lock the slicing blade, the blade was not able to completely close, leaving the blade exposed. The FSD stated that the slicing blade needed to be in a locked position and in a nonexposed position when not in use for the safety of the dietary staff. On 12/19/23 at 9:57 AM, the surveyor team met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) to review areas of concerns in the kitchen, that included the slicer. The surveyor also requested policies on kitchen equipment and safety. On 12/19/23 at 10:15 AM, the FSD provided the surveyor with a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices as well as store and discard potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 12/12/23 at 09:23 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. In the food preparation area, two dietary aides with hair not fully restrained under their hairnet. 2. On the three shelf storage unit, one 32 ounce bottle of Gravy Master Grilling, Seasoning and Browning Sauce missing the top closing cap which provides an airtight seal on the bottle preventing contamination and freshness. The surveyor observed the bottle with plastic wrap around the top opening. 3. In walk in freezer #2, multiple boxes of ice cream were stocked to top of ceiling, not utilizing 18 inches below ceiling storage regulation. 4. In walk-in refrigerator #1, multiple boxes of creamer were observed stocked to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices for performing hand hygiene to decrease the possibility of spreading infection. This deficient practice was observed during wound treatment observation with 1 of 1 nursing staff on 1 of 5 units and was evidenced by the following: On 12/19/23 at 10:17 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN#1) perform wound treatment for Resident #154. On 12/19/23 at 10:29 AM, LPN #1 was observed preparing to wash her hands at the sink in Resident #154's room after preparing the supplies for the wound treatment at the bedside table. LPN #1 turned on the faucet, wet her hands with water from the sink, applied soap, lathered her hands for 15 seconds outside the running water prior to rinsing, dried her hands with a paper towel from the dispenser on the wall and used another paper towel to turn off the faucet. On 12/19/23 at 10:32 AM, LPN #1 removed and discarded her gloves after removing the resident's old wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents signed and dated monthly physician's orders. This deficient practice was observed for 6 of 38 residents (Resident #68, #139, #100, #134, #159, #321) reviewed. The deficient practice continued for several months and was evidenced by the following: On 8/10/21 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) if the physician's are signing the monthly orders electronically or hard copy in the the chart. The DON stated the physician's are signing the orders on the paper copy in the chart. 1. The surveyor reviewed the Physician Order's (PO) for resident #68 which revealed that the physician did not sign and date the monthly PO for the months of June 2021 and July 2021. On 8/12/21 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) who was assigned to Resident #68. LPN #1 stated the orders should have been signed by the physician. On 8/17/21 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor discussed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide pressure ulcer care in a manner to reduce the spread of infection for 2 residents, Resident #155 and #4, of 2 observed during pressure ulcer treatments. The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: 1. The surveyor observed Resident #155 on 8/10/21 at 10:54 AM reclined in a gerichair. The resident was awake, alert and orientated. At that time the Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RNUM) stated the resident had a sacral pressure ulcer. A review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: The admission Record included diagnoses of paraplegia, fracture of the thoracic spine, and hemiplegia. The 6/6/21 admission Minimum Data Set an assessment tool, indicated the resident had no cognitive deficits, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, had range of motion impairment on one side of the upper and lower extremities, and was admitted with multiple pressure ulcers. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow through with the resident's Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #306), according to the facility's policy and procedure and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/1/21 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #306 lying on the bed, with a left-hand splint in use, hemiwalker (a small, one-handed walker that is intended to be used by persons whose one-half of their body is weakened) at the bedside. On 8/12/21 at 10:02 AM, the surveyor observed the resident lying on the bed, with hemiwalker at the bedside. The resident was not wearing the hand splint. The resident informed the surveyor that sometimes the aide comes and applies the left-hand splint and at times, the resident was the one who put it on. The resident stated that he/she walks with the use of a hemiwalker from bed to the bathroom with staff assistance. The resident further stated that I don't think I declined, functionally regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to conduct post dialysis assessments for Resident #106, 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis care and services. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/10/21 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #106 in the day room in an activity. The resident was sitting in a regular chair with a walker in front of the resident. The resident was participating in the name that tune game. On 8/17/21 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Facility and Dialysis Communication Sheet. There didn't appear to be a section for the facility nurse to document a post dialysis assessment when the resident returned from dialysis. The surveyor asked the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who was assigned to Resident # 106 about the Facility and Dialysis Communication Sheet. The LPN explained that the top half of the sheet was filled in by the facility nurse prior to the resident leaving for dialysis and the bottom half of the sheet was filled in by the dialysis nurse at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow up on the Consultant Pharmacist's (CP) recommendations and report of a medication irregularity for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for a total of 15 months from June 2020 through August 2021. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/11/21 at 10:09 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #59 lying in bed with eyes closed. The surveyor reviewed Resident #59's medical records that revealed the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #59 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and Peripheral vascular disease. The 5/7/21 Comprehensive Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facilitate care management, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, which reflected that the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The August 2021 Order Summary Report showed an active order dated 5/5/20 for Morphine Sulfate (prescription medication used for moderate to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label, store and dispose of medications in 2 of 15 medication carts and 1 of 5 medication refrigerators inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/11/21 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor inspected the Three North medication cart in the presence of a Registered Nurse (RN) The surveyor observed an opened bottle of Pro-Stat solution and an opened Admelog Insulin vial that were not dated. At that time, the surveyor interviewed the RN who stated that both an opened bottle of Pro-Stat solution and an opened vial of Admelog Insulin should have been dated. On 8/11/21 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor inspected the fifth floor medication room refrigerator in the presence of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). The surveyor observed an opened vial of Admelog Insulin vial that was not dated. At that time, the surveyor interviewed LPN #1 who stated that an Admelog insulin vial should have been dated. On 8/11/21 at 10:40 AM, the surveyor inspected the Six North medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store potentially hazardous foods (PHF) in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/10/2021 at 10:55 AM, in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD), the surveyor observed the following: The surveyor inspected the walk-in produce refrigerator, which contained PHF as well as produce. The internal thermometer read 44 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The DD stated that the refrigerator doors are constantly opened by the food service workers and the temperature should adjust if the doors are closed for at least 15 minutes. The surveyor and the DD waited 15 minutes and re-checked the refrigerators' temperature. The internal walk-in produce refrigerator's temperature still read 44 degrees F. At this time, the DD used his calibrated thermometer to check the internal temperature of a PHF which read 48 degrees. The DD stated that he would need to discard the PHF foods which included three (3 pound containers) of pre-cooked hard boiled eggs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain Hospice Nurse Communication record for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident#59), and b.) maintain a plan of care that respected the resident's right to choose advanced directives for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #258). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 8/11/21 at 10:09 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #59 seated in a regular chair in their room. At 10:20 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse#1 (LPN#1) informed the surveyor that Resident #59 was on hospice care. LPN#1 stated that the hospice aide comes every Monday through Friday for an hour and the hospice nurse (HN) at least once a week. The surveyor reviewed Resident #59's medical record that revealed the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #59 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and Peripheral vascular disease. The 5/7/21 Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate measures to prevent and control the spread of infection for: a) hand hygiene for safe food handling during dishwashing and b) multiple residents' usage of a landline telephone in the unit day room. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1. On 8/10/21 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed a Food Service Worker (FSW#1) on the dirty side of the dish machine and FSW #2 on the clean side of the dish machine. FSW #2 was observed leaving the clean side of the dish washer and with ungloved hands, he took a crate with three soiled insulated plastic containers and placed them on the dirty side of the dish machine. Then, without washing his hands or putting on gloves, FSW #2 went back to the clean side of the dish machine and picked up a crate containing cleaned insulted soup bowls and placed them on top of a cart with other cleaned crates of insulated soup bowls. The surveyor stopped FSW #2 and asked what should have been done before picking up a crate of clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$329,910 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $329,910 — penalty dated 2024-07-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAMOUNT CARE CENTERS — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.3-2.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SAMUEL PANETH TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2017
SINAI CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2014
FRANKEL, ELIYAHUIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2014
KRAUS, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2014
PANETH, MORTONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2014
CAPITAL FUNDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 12/31/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$34.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 4%Other / private 9%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$265per resident / day
operating cost
$8,046per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$277per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315236. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next