Manhattanview Ctr For Rehabilitation And Healthcar

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

25.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 121.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and a review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide oversight by a licensed Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in March 2024 for four (4) of five (5) residents, (Residents #17, #49, #75, and #80) and the entire month of April 2024, for five (5) of five (5) residents, (Residents #17, #22, #49, #75, and #80), b.) identify the irregularity with regard to physician's order for antipyschotic medication for one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #22) reviewed for unnecessary medications in accordance to facility's practice and policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/07/24 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #22 in the dayroom. The surveyor reviewed Resident #22's hybrid (a combination of paper-based and electronic medical records that primarily involves tracking and storing a patient's health records in several formats and places) medical record (HMR). According to the admission Record (AR, an admission summary), the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to a) maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices and clean equipment, b) properly store foods in a safe manner to prevent the development of food borne illness, and c) maintain three (3) of three (3) nursing unit pantry used for residents in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/07/24 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the FSD Trainer (FSDT) and the Regional FSD (RFSD), and observed the following: ~In the walk-in freezer, several boxes of opened food items that were opened, unlabeled and exposed to freezer with freezer burn and frost on them. Those items were as follows: chicken tenders, salisbury beef steaks, opened loose corn, and pizza. All listed items were opened, unsealed, unlabeled with open date or expiration dates. The FSD manager was unable to say when the packages were opened. ~The food preparation area had a trash can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0742 — pattern
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Reference F-756 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #80) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: Reference: 13:44G-3.3 PRACTICE AS A CSW; SCOPE c) A CSW shall not engage in clinical social work services. 13:44G-1.2 DEFINITIONS Clinical social work means the professional application of social work methods and values in the assessment and psychotherapeutic counseling of individuals, families, or psychotherapy group. On 5/07/24 at 11:05 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #80 resting on the bed, in a fetal position with a monitoring device [for residents at risk of wandering] on the left ankle. The resident spoke [language redacted]. At that time, the house…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) to consistently maintain accurate reconciliation, accountability of dispensed, and administered controlled dangerous substance (narcotic medication) for Resident #16, b.) ensure expired narcotic medications were detected, removed, and disposed from active inventory which was stored within the electronic back-up machine (EBM). The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) of the EBM observed during medication storage inspection. The evidence was as follows: 1.) On [DATE] at 8:57 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that she conducted the narcotic reconciliation (cycle counts) daily with a nurse supervisor or with the Infection Preventionist/Registered Nurse (IP/RN). The DON also stated she received a daily report of the narcotic inventory which detailed which the inventory on-hand, the nurse who removed the narcotic and for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital for two (2) of two (2) resident's (Resident #93 and #97) reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. A review of Resident #93's electronic medical record included the following: Resident #93's discharge assessment-return anticipated Minimum Data Set's (DRAMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 4/08/24 and 5/01/24, reflected that the resident was transferred to the hospital. A review of Resident #93's hybrid (a combination of paper, scanned, and computer-generated records) medical record did not include a written notification of the reason for transfer to the resident or resident representative for each transfer to the hospital. 2. A review of Resident #97's closed medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of the medical record and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative written notification of the facility's bed hold policy prior to transfer to the hospital for two (2) of two (2) resident's (Resident #93 and #97) reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice is evidenced by the following: 1. A review of Resident #93's electronic medical record included the following: Resident #93's discharge assessment-return anticipated Minimum Data Set's (DRAMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 4/08/24 and 5/01/24, reflected that the resident was transferred to the hospital. A review of Resident #93's hybrid (a combination of paper, scanned, and computer-generated records) medical record did not include a written notification of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident or resident representative prior to each transfer to the hospital. 2. A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable standards of nursing practice in regards to the documentation of a resident's expiration. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #126) reviewed for closed records and evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to post the accurate Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report daily. This failure could affect the knowledge of the availability of staff to care for the 120 residents, their family members, or their representatives. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/07/24 at 8:35 AM, the surveyors entered the facility (on a Tuesday) and observed that the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) posted in the front lobby was dated 5/02/24 (Thursday). The census (total number of residents) that was posted on 5/02/24 NHRCSR was 120. A review of the facility submitted Nurse Staffing Report for the week of 4/28/24 to 5/04/24 that was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) showed that the census on 5/02/24 was 119. Further review of the above revealed that the census posted on 5/02/24 NHRCSR in the front lobby did not match the submitted Nurse Staffing Report. On 5/09/24 at 11:56 AM, the survey team met with the Licensed Nursing Home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident was offered pneumococcal vaccination according to the current Centers for Disease and Control Prevention (CDC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for immunization status (Resident #75 and Resident 80). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: A review of the CDC guidelines for Pneumococcal vaccination included: For adults 65 years and older who only received the Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax/PPSV 23),Give (1) dose of Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV 15 or PCV20) at least one year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. Reference: A review of the ACIP included: On October 21, 2021, the ACIP recommended use of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20 [Prevnar 20) alone or 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ #170244 Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #46) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/07/24 at 10:19 AM, the surveyor observed the resident had a visitor who was discussing leaving the facility for a few minutes. The surveyor observed the resident lying in bed, awake, head of the bed was elevated, and was communicative. At 10:53 AM, the resident informed the surveyor that a nurse [name redacted] threw coffee at him/her. The resident narrated the following: She was snotty. The Resident recalled the nurse said to him/her I'm going to whip your ass. I pushed the table towards her then she threw coffee at my face, I called the police. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #46. According to the admission Record (or face sheet; an admission summary) reflected that the resident had been admitted with diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAMOUNT CARE CENTERS — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ