No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

River's Edge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

9501 State Road, Philadelphia, PA 19114 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (215) 632-5700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 632-5700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0610) — most recent Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)$7,387 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $7,387 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Home MD0.9 mi
550 State Rd Ste 103 · (215) 882-8100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3808 Morrell Ave · (267) 329-4900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9910 Frankford Ave · (215) 637-1555 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(215) 637-5788 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
9617 James St · (215) 637-9009

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.1%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms51.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.3%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.1%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.2%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.3%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.821.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.601.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 152 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.0%CMS range 41.6–57.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 9.4–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 5.4–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.351.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.88
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
47.9%
Total nursing turnover
47.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one resident was allowed to exercise their right to make choices regarding daily activities for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R1)Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included primary osteoarthritis (condition where the cartilage in your joints slowly wears down over time without a specific injury or known cause, leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced movement), low back pain, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated March 20, 2026, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident is cognitively intact. Interview with Resident R1 on April 15, 2026, at 9:45 a.m. revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was maintained in safe and functional operating condition.Findings include:Observation on April 15, 2026 at approximately 9:15 a.m. of the dish machine revealed the conveyor belt was broken, requiring staff to manually push dishware through the machine to start the wash cycle. Interview with Director of Dietary, Employee E5, confirmed the dish machine was not functioning properly and required manual operation. Further interview revealed there was missing curtains and caps on jets for the dish machine. Review of email communication between Director of Dietary, Employee E5, and Administrator, Employee E6, dated March 12, 2026, revealed the Director of Dietary, Employee E5, had requested repair of the dish machine, stating, please approve asap (as soon as possible), dish machine needs to be fixed asap. Further review of email communication revealed the Administrator, Employee E6, approved the dish machine repair on March 12, 2026 and did not receive quote from repair company…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' advance directives and physician orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) were followed according to the residents' expressed wishes for 2 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R5 and R13). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directives Policy and procedure reviewed January 2026, revealed It is the policy of the facility to establish, implement and maintain written policies and procedures for advance directive. The resident has the right and the facility will assist the resident to formulate an advance directive at their option. The facility will inform and provide resident with a written description of the facility's policy to implement advance directives. Resident has the right to accept, request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the grievance forms were available and that residents had the right to file an anonymous grievance for two of two nursing units (first and second floor).Findings include: On March 24, 2026, at 11:38 a.m., observations were conducted with the Administrator, Employee E1 confirmed that grievance forms were only available at the front desk, and residents would need to request a form in order to receive one. No method had been established for residents to file anonymous grievances. Observation of the second floor revealed that no forms were readily available to residents; forms could only be obtained upon request and were located in the filing cabinet behind the nursing stations. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident Rights

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician documented either a 14-day stop date or a clinical justification for the continued use of PRN (as needed) psychotropic (alters mood, perception, and behavior) medication for two of four residents reviewed (Residents R7 and R5).Findings include: Review of facility policy Psychotropic Medication, dated 2026, revealed Resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used:a. In excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); orb. For excessive duration; orc. Without adequate monitoring; ord. Without adequate indications for its use; ore. In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; [NAME]. Any combination of the reasons. Further review of facility policy revealed PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days, except as provided if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered resident care plan for two of twenty-four residents reviewed (Resident R5 and Resident R25).Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Care plan dated September 2024. Under policy states It is the policy of the facility to participate in an individual, interdisciplinary plan of care for all residents. Under procedure states the plan of care shall be individualized to and based upon the assessment and diagnosis of a resident, To provide a comprehensive health care environment, all staff members should consider interdisciplinary collaboration to establish goals and appropriate interventions, and ongoing evaluations and revisions to resident care. Review of Resident R5's clinical record revealed resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Cerebral infarction (clot blocks a blood vessel that feeds the brain),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, facility documentation, observations, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident R9). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side (stroke) and muscle wasting and atrophy. A review of the physician orders dated October 26, 2025, indicated: Showers (Monday/Thursday on 3-11). Document if the patient/resident refuses shower in Health Status Note. A review of Resident R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, reflecting cognitive intact. The functional abilities section of the MDS indicated that Resident R9 requires partial/moderate assistance with showering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure enteral feedings were administered and monitored according to professional standards of practice, specifically related to labeling, for one of two resident's reviewed fed via enteral feeding (Resident R6).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral Feeding , last revised on 9/2025 under procedures, documentation bullet #16 stated Document administration of feeding on Medication Administration Record (MAR) including: Date, Formula, Rate, Continuous bolus. A review of the clinical record for Resident R6 indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, muscle wasting and atrophy, protein calorie malnutrition, cerebrovascular disease (long term weakness with speech and movement after a stroke), and immunodeficiency (immune system is weak). A review of the physician's order for Resident R6, dated March 20, 2026, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered in accordance with the physician's order for one of four residents reviewed for pain management (Resident R33).Findings Include: Review of Resident R33's clinical record revealed Resident R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, polyneuropathy (condition that damages multiple peripheral nerves in the body), and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident R33's clinical record revealed physician's order, dated February 16, 2026, for Oxycodone 5 milligrams give 5 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain 6-10. Review of Resident R33's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the as needed pain medication Oxycodone 5 milligrams was administered out of the parameter ordered by the physician as follows: March 1, 2026- Pain level 5March 2, 2026 at 8:38 a.m.- Pain level 5March 2,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and/or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of one residents sampled for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). (Resident R14).Findings include: Review of Resident R14's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of parkinsonism (group of movement symptoms found in several conditions, including Parkinson's disease), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental health condition that develops after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event, such as a natural disaster, war, violent crime, or personal loss), and anxiety disorder. Resident R14's care plan, dated February 15, 2026, revealed Resident R14 has a mood problem related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for six of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R3, R8, R12, R44, R80, and R112).Findings include: A review of facility policy titled food temperatures, undated, revealed foods will be served at the proper temperature to ensure food safety, Acceptable serving temperatures are: Meat, entrees- greater than 135 degrees but preferably 160 degrees to 175 degrees; potatoes greater than 135 degrees; vegetables greater than 135 degrees. Interview with Resident R112 on March 23, 2025, at 7:45 p.m. revealed food is always cold when it is served, it sits on the carts too long and it just doesn't stay hot. Observations during a test tray conducted on March 24, 2025, at 12:45 p.m. revealed that the last tray was passed at 12:45 p.m. Temperatures were taken by the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E11, which revealed that the hamburger served was only 130 degrees Fahrenheit (F),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility assessment and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the direct care staff and input from residents, resident representatives, and/or family members was included when conducting the facility assessment.Findings include: Review of the facility's facility assessment, dated January 29, 2026, revealed there was no indication that the facility involved direct care staff, input from residents, resident representatives, and/or family members. Interview with the Administrator, Employee E1, on March 25, 2026, at 12:00 p.m., confirmed there was no direct care staff, resident representatives, and/ or family members included in the facility assessment. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1) Nursing services

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement (a binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not) for three of five residents reviewed (Resident R135, R126, R7). Findings include: Review of Resident R135 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of disorder of kidney and ureter ( kidneys or the tubes that carry urine from the kidneys to the bladder are not working properly, which can affect how the body filters waste and removes urine), cerebrovascular disease (condition that affects the blood vessels in the brain, reducing blood flow and potentially causing brain damage, such as a stroke), and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident R135's Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for three residents reviewed who had a indwelling Foley catheter, wound and internal feeding tube. (Residents R6, R91, and R108).Based on a review of the facility's Infection Control requirements Influenza Vaccine for Unvaccinated Healthcare workers to be wearing a mask, the facility failed to ensure that unvaccinated healthcare workers are wearing a mask. Specifically, vaccinated record for one Licensed Practical Nurse, who refused the Influenza Vaccine was not wearing a mask. Findings Include: According to the facility policy titled Influenza Vaccine (reviewed December,2025) number 11, the use of source control for unvaccinated health care workers will be based on state guidelines or outbreak status. On the Mask Acknowledgement form, it states that during influenza season a surgical mask will be worn during direct resident contact, in common areas of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Food Storage undated, revealed, Food items will be stored, thawed, and prepared in accordance with good sanitary practice. Continued review revealed, All products shall be dated upon receipt or when they are prepared. Use Date shall be marked on all food containers . and all cooked meat shall be used within 3-4 days. A tour of the main kitchen was conducted with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E6, on March 25, 2025, at 10:05 a.m. Observations in the main refrigerator revealed two 10-pound ground beef links were unlabeled and undated; opened ham deli meat was dated March 10, 2025; two 10-pound ready to eat roast beef labeled with a received date March 17, 2025; and opened mozzarella cheese labeled with a recieved date December 10, 2024. Observations of the three-compartment sink revealed Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and an interview with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Findings include: A tour of the main kitchen was conducted with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E6, on March 25, 2025, at 10:05 a.m. revealed the following: Observations of the receiving area and loading dock, that are used by the facility to transport clean food, revealed hundreds of cigarette buds. Further observations revealed the garbage was not covered. Interview with Food Service Director, Employee E6 along duration of the tour confirmed observations of the receiving and dumpster area. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plan meetings were held for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident R55) Findings include: Review of Resident R55's person-centered plan of care indicated that the resident exhibited a decline in communication due to hearing deficit and impaired cognition and thought process related to diagnoses of dementia. Review of Resident R55's clinical records revealed a nursing note dated June 3, 2024, which indicated, care conference meeting was held and that the resident's daughter in law attended via phone. Further review failed no documented evidence of care conference meetings occurred after June 2024. Interview with the facility Administrator and Social Worker, Employee E8, conducted on March 27, 2025, at 10:55 a.m. confirmed that the last care conference was conducted in June 2024 with resident and their representative. Further interview confirmed that the facility failed to conduct a care conference meeting with Resident R55 and their representative in September 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer to the hospital in a timely manner, in writing and in a language and manner they understood for two of 24 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents R31 and R102). Findings Include: Review of nursing notes for Resident R31 dated November 20, 2024, at 11 p.m. revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with diagnosis of hematoma of the left kidney and abdominal pain. Further review revealed a note, dated on October 25, 2024, at 2:42 p.m. revealed that Resident R31 was discharged home. Review of nursing notes for Residents R102 dated March 20, 2025, at 4:35 p.m. revealed that resident was transfer to hospital for evaluation of gastro intestinal bleed. Review of clinical record revealed no evidence that Residents R31, R102, R27 and R99 representatives were notified of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and services for incontinence management for one of 24 residents reviewed.(Resident R11). Findings include: Review of physician order for Resident R11, dated March 24, 2025, indicated an order to change unrinary Foley Catheter with size 16fr/10ml; change monthly, and as needed, based on clinical indications such as infection, obstruction, or when the closed system is compromised, every night shift, every 4 weeks on Tuesdays, and as needed. On March 27, 2025, at 1:00 p.m., it was observed that Resident R11 had a Foley Catheter of 16fr/5ml Balloon, instead of the physician ordered size of 16fr/10ml Balloon. At the time of the finding, confirmed the same with a Licensed Nurse, Employee E5. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and modify interventions consistent with the resident's assessed needs to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R35). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Weight Loss indicated that any resident displaying a significant change in weight of greater than or equal to 5% gain/loss in one month will be reweighed. Review of facility policy Supplementation dated January 2025 indicated that if an increase in caloric or protein needs are identified, the Dietitian will determine which supplements are appropriate to meet the specific resident's needs. Further review indicated that Residents may benefit from a therapeutic supplement if the present with decreased PO intakes and unplanned weight loss. Review of Resident R251's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address a resident's dementia care needs for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R84). Findings Include: Reviewed facility dementia policy title Care Plan dated in September 2024 states that the plan of care shall be individualized to and based upon, the assessment and diagnosis of a resident. Review of the admission sheet of Resident R84, revealed that Resident R84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Dementia (Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Review the care plan dated April 21, 2022, revealed that of Resident 84's care plan revealed no care plan with measurable goals and interventions to address the care and treatment need related with dementia care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that mattresses and bed frames that were purchased separately were compatible with each other for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R99). Findings include: Observations of Resident R99's bed conduced on March 24, 2025, and March 25, 2025, revealed that the mattress appeared six inches smaller than the metal bed frame; the bedframe slats were exposed on each side. Increased entrapment concerns were observed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 99, dated October 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including neurological conditions, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness and atrophy. Interview with the Nurse Assistant, Employee E4, conducted don March 24, 2025, at approximately 12:20 p.m. confirmed that Resident R99 had been utilizing the current bed frame and mattress since admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders related to medication administration for two of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R3 and CL2). Findings Include: Facility Policy titled, Medication Administration Policy updated, January 2024 revealed under procedures J. Medication Administration 8. Ensure that the customer swallows all the medication(s). Medication Times BID (Twice a Day) = 0900-1700, TID (Three Times a Day) 0900-1300-2100, QID (Fourt Times a Day) =0900-1300-1700-2100; Before Meals=0600-11:00-1630, After Meals= 0900-1300-1800. Review of the resident's clinical record indicated resident R3 was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way your body processes blood sugar) with diabetic neuropathy, (nerve damage associated with diabetes), morbid severe obesity. A review of the physician order dated May 24, 2024, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents and /or their responsible parties were provided with the opportunity to participate in their care plan meetings for 4 out of 27 residents reviewed (Residents R64, R54, R85 and R69). Findings include: Review of the policy, Resident/patient/Family Care Plan Conferences, with a revision date of August 2023, indicated that it was the policy of the facility to ensure that the resident and his/her family and legal representative are part of the interdisciplinary team and participate in the development and ongoing review of the interdisciplinary plan of care. The policy also indicated that the resident/responsible party will be notified of the care plan conference and that that the method of documentation will be documented in the medical record. Review of the clinical record for Resident R64 indicated that he resident's last care plan meeting was on held on February 13, 2023. Review of the clinical record for Resident R54 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician was notified of a resident's refusal to take prescribed medication for 1 out of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy, Medication/Order Availability indicated that it was written to ensure that all residents have medications/orders administered as ordered. The policy also indicated that medications/orders are to be administered by physician order. Review of the physician orders for Resident R39 included the diagnoses of history of falling; hypertension (high blood pressure); seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause changes in an individual's behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness). and diabetes (a chronic condition that happens when you have persistently high blood sugar levels). Review of Resident R39's May 2024 physician orders included a physician's order for the medication, Lantus (a medication prescribed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of facility policy, review of clinical records and facility reports, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and through investigation for bruises of unknown origin for 1 out of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R69). Findings include: Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, policy with a review date of March 2024 indicated that the facility will consider factors indicating possible abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation of residents including, but not limited to: resident staff or family report of physical abuse; resident report of theft of property or missing property; psychological abuse of the resident observed, physical injury of a resident, of an unknown source. Review of Resident R69's May 2024 physician orders revealed the diagnoses of pain; delusional disorder (the individual has firmly held false beliefs); hypertension (high blood pressure) and peripheral vascular disease (a common condition in which narrowed arteries reduce the blood flow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers as required for four of four records reviewed related to hospital transfers (Residents R86, R23, R83 and R92). Findings include: Review of facility documentation, Hospital Tracking Portal received June 3, 2024, revealed that 21 residents were transferred to the hospital during February 2024, 18 residents were transferred to the hospital during March 2024, and 17 residents were transferred to the hospital during April 2024. Review of progress notes for Resident R86 revealed a note, dated February 11, 2024, at 6:48 a.m. which indicated that the resident was transferred to a local hospital emergency department via 911 due to a swollen tongue. Review of progress notes for Resident R23 revealed a note, dated March 20, 2024, at 10:43 p.m. which indicated that the resident had low blood sugar and was ordered by the physician to be transferred to a local…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, review of resident records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for three of 27 resident records reviewed (Residents R40, R62, and R65). Findings include Review of the facility's care plan policy reviewed January 2023 states, All residents admitted to the facility will have adequate person centered care plan that provide for all their needs in a timely manner. Review of Resident R40's physician order dated December 11, 2023, instructed to administer oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. Further orders instructed to clean the O2 (oxygen) concentrator filters on Thursdays during the 11-7 shift and as needed. Review of Resident R62's physician order dated April 30, 2024, instructed to administer oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula continuously for shortness of breath. Further orders instructed to clean the O2 concentrator filters on Thursdays during the 11-7 shift and as needed. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician order for neurology was followed for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R62). Findings include: Review of Resident R62 clinical records revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital for right arm weakness. Review of the hospital discharge instructions dated April 30, 2024, indicated a follow up with neurology was to be made in two weeks. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed no documented evidence the neurology appointment was scheduled. This finding was confirmed with the Unit Manager on June 3, 2024, at approximately 2:15 p.m. 28 Pa. Code 211.10 (d) Resident care policies. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(5) Nursing services.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for three of 27 residents reviewed, (Residents R40, Resident R62, Resident R65). Findings Include: Review of facility policy for Oxygen Administration revised in January 2024 indicates the purpose of this policy it to safely administer oxygen to the resident. Nursing staff will be responsible the correct administration of oxygen. The same policy states when a concentrator is used to wash the filter weekly. Review of Resident R40's physician order dated December 11, 2023, instructed to administer oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. Further orders instructed to clean the O2 concentrator filters on Thursdays during the 11-7 shift and as needed. Review of Resident R62's physician order dated April 30, 2024, instructed to administer oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula continuously for shortness of breath. Further orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and administration of medications to meet the needs of each resident for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R56). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Medication/Order Availability (undated) revealed all residents should have medications/orders administered as ordered. Per review of facility policy, in the case a medication/supply is not available, and to ensure comparable alternative is provided, staff should implement the following procedures: 1. Medication/orders are to be administered per MD order 2. If medication/supply is not available in the facility, MD is to be notified 3. Resident's plan of care is to be reviewed and suggested alternative ordered and provided. 4. Order to be updated accordingly in PCC to reflect any change 5. Discuss any change in order with IDT involved in plan of care Resident R31 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of one resident's digoxin levels per physician orders of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R55). Findings include: Review of Resident R55 clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with Atrial Fibrillation (irregular often fast heartbeat). Review of physician orders revealed the resident was ordered the medication Digoxin to treat the resident's Atrial Fibrillation. Review of Resident R55 clinical record revealed a plan of care for Digoxin therapy that included goals that the resident would be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to digoxin use. Interventions included serum digoxin levels monthly or as ordered by the physician and to report to the physician, suspect toxicity if anorexia, nausea, vomiting diarrhea and visual disturbances occur initiated in March 2020. Further review of Resident R55 physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify a resident's representative of a new pressure ulcer for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention. (Resident R1). Findings include: 1. Review of facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated, November 2019, revealed 2. A significant change of condition is a decline or improvement in the resident's status that: a. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions (is not self-limiting); b. Impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; c. Requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan; and d. Ultimately is based on the judgment of the clinical staff and the guidelines outlined in the Resident Assessment Instrument and 42 CFR 483.20(b)(ii). 4. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's family or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet care needs for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Pressure Ulcer Prevention/Management Program indicated that To provide a standardized action in the management of, and to aid in the prevention or the development of, pressure ulcers. The interdisciplinary team will discuss the evaluation, and a specific individualized plan of care will be developed to address the resident's needs and risk factors in accordance with nursing standards of practice. Review of admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], revealed tat the resident was using heel boots for prevention of skin issues. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated October 17, 2023, identified that the resident did not have a pressure ulcer/injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process including the resident's discharge goals and information to the resident's representative of the final plan upon resident's discharge for one of three resident reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated October 17, 2023, identified that the resident did not have a pressure ulcer/injury (Injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin), a scar over bony prominence, or a non-removable dressing/device. Review of wound care consult report dated November 2, 2023, revealed that the resident has unstageable pressure ulcers (ulcer involving loss of skin layers exposing muscle) to right and left heel which was not present on admission. Resident was ordered to receive Honey gel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician order as ordered by the physician for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of clinical record for Resident R1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of physician order for Resident R1 dated October 11, 2023, revealed an order for daily weight and to notify the physician with weight gain of 2 pounds in one day or 5 pounds in 3 days. Further review of physician order dated October 11, 2023, revealed an order to give Lasix (It can treat fluid retention (edema) and swelling caused by congestive heart failure, liver disease, kidney disease, and other medical conditions) 40 milligrams one tablet by mouth as needed for weight gain of 2 pounds in one day. Review of Medication Administration Record for Resident R1 for the month of October 2023 revealed that on October 28, 2023, resident weighed 154.5 pounds and on October 29, 2023, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's wound care recommendations to promote the healing of pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) were followed as ordered and failed to ensure that the pressure ulcer prevention interventions were consistently implemented for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Pressure Ulcer Prevention/Management Program indicated that To provide a standardized action in the management of, and to aid in the prevention or the development of, pressure ulcers. The charge nurse, on each shift, is responsible to assess, document and initiate the treatment based on the wound protocol, any changes in the skin integrity of each resident. He/she will document in the medical records in accordance with the facility's documentation policy. An incident report will be completed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$7,387 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAMOUNT CARE CENTERS — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KRAUS, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST75%since 05/31/2019
PANETH, MORTONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 05/31/2019
LANGAN, JUDEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/31/2019
LEINER, PINCHOSIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2019

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+16.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$732K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 19%Other / private 24%

This home reported $732K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$338per resident / day
operating cost
$10,285per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$403per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395843. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next