Alameda Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 250 beds and averages 222.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: 2587228Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 12/29/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence of care provided to residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #7). This deficient practice occurred for 4 of 4 residents reviewed.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: dementia, diabetes, and muscle weakness.According to the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/4/2025, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS further revealed the resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).A review of Resident #1's POC flowsheet, a form utilized for documentation of ADL care by the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for November 2025 revealed missing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment that was clean, safe, and sanitary. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 5 unit pantries (Units 2, 3, and 4). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/30/2025 at 10:32 AM, the surveyor inspected the Unit 3 pantry in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse and Unit Manager #1 (LPN/UM #1) and observed the following: white debris was present inside of the microwave, a cabinet drawer panel was not intact and slid back and forth, and an aluminum pan containing white debris was found inside the cabinet. On 06/30/2025 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor inspected the Unit 4 pantry in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse and Unit Manager #2 (LPN/UM #2) and observed the following: light brown debris on the wall next to the refrigerator. On 07/02/2025 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor inspected the Unit 2 pantry in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse and Unit Manager #3 (LPN/UM #3) and observed the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 1 of 35 residents reviewed (Resident #120). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/30/2025 at 12:09 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #120 in the dining with a palm guard on left hand. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #120. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Generalized Muscle Weakness. A review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 3/28/25 included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severly impaired. Section GG identified that the resident was not coded for any upper extremity contractures. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan to include a positioning device. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for resident-centered care plans (Resident #208), and was evidenced by the following: On 06/26/2025 at 09:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #208 ambulating using a cane, the left arm was observed in the sling. According to the admission Record, Resident #208 was admitted with diagnosis that included, but were not limited to, cerebral vascular accident (a stroke) and hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) A review of Resident #208's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 05/06/2025, revealed that he/she was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #208's Care Plan with an effective date of 06/25/2025 reflected that this resident had limited physical mobility. The use of the sling was not included in the interventions. A review of Resident #208's Care Plan with an effective date of 01/28/2025 reflected that this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ00172928 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of clinical practice with following physician orders for the application of a treatment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 38 residents (Residents #378) reviewed for professional standards, and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. A review of the admission Record for Resident #378 reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order (PO) for an orthotic device for 1 of 2 residents (Resident#208) reviewed for positioning and mobility. On 06/26/2025 at 09:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #208 ambulating using a cane, the left arm was observed in the sling (an orthotic device). According to the admission Record, Resident #208 was admitted with diagnosis that included, but were not limited to, cerebral vascular accident (a stroke) and hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) A review of Resident #208's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 05/06/2025, revealed that he/she was cognitively intact. Review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 06/30/2025 did not reveal an order for Resident #208's sling. On 07/01/2025 at 09:10 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse/ Nurse Manager LPN/NM stated the Resident #208 utilized a sling. The LPN/NM stated that there should be a physician order for the use of the sling. On 07/02/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice specifically by A.) leaving a nasal cannula out of a bag, exposed to air and B.) not having a physician's order for oxygen administration. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 (Residents # 22, 215) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/26/2025 at 10:23 AM during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident # 215 in their room. At that time, the surveyor observed a nasal cannula (tube that delivers oxygen through the nares) wrapped and resting on top of an oxygen concentrator. The nasal cannula was not in a bag and it was exposed to air. At that time, Resident # 215 said he/she wears the nasal cannula only at night. On 6/27/2025 at 9:11 AM while in Resident # 215's room, the surveyor observed the nasal cannula left on top of the concentrator not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication in accordance with prescriber orders, specifically administering an intravenous antibiotic outside of the prescribed time of administration. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 328) reviewed for Antibiotics. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 328's physician's orders located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an orders for daptomycin intravenous solution reconstituted 500mg (milligram) and ceftaroline fosamil intravenous solution reconstituted 600 mg (Both antibiotics, medications used to treat infections) A review of Resident # 328's Care Plan located in the EMR revealed a focus that the resident is on IV (intravenous) medications related to bacteremia (bacterial infection of the blood). A review of the Medication Audit Report located in the EMR revealed the following administrations for daptomycin intravenous solution outside of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately dispose of medication in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 nurses observed during the Medication Administration task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 07/01/2025 at 8:57 AM during medication pass on the second floor, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1 poured one tablet of aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) and one tablet of clopidogrel 75mg (blood thinner medication). As LPN # 1 continued, the cup of tablets spilled and the tablets came to rest on top of the medication cart. At that time, LPN # 1 picked up the tablets with her gloved hand, turned the glove inside-out and threw it in the trash can. After LPN # 1 completed the medication administration, the surveyor asked LPN # 1 how should she dispose of medications that are not being administered. She replied, They have a jug for it in the cart. At that time, LPN # 1 showed the surveyor the bottle of Drug-Buster…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/30/2025 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor inspected the pantry refrigerator on Unit 4 in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse and Unit Manager #2 (LPN/UM #2) and observed the following: a 14-ounce container of sour cream with an expiration date of 03/19/2025, and a quart of half and half with an expiration date of 06/20/2025. Additionally, six containers of food brought in from outside the facility were found without any labels or dates. A plastic bag containing an unidentified whitish edible substance lacked both a label and a use-by date, and a 15-ounce open plastic container of soup was found without an open date or use-by date. On 06/30/2025 at 10:50 AM, On 06/30/2025 at 10:48 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the LPN/UM #2 said that expired food should not be stored in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAMOUNT CARE CENTERS — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ