Windsor House At Champion

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 96.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #88 was provided with necessary and adequate care and services to prevent accidents with injury during staff assisted care. This affected one resident (#88) of three residents who were investigated for accidents. The facility census was 87. Actual Harm occurred on 08/30/25 when Resident #88, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living sustained a fractured distal medial femoral metadiaphysis when staff failed to ensure the resident's foot was not caught under her wheelchair while being transported by staff. Actual harm also occurred on 10/03/25 when staff members failed to secure Resident #88 in the Hoyer (mechanical) lift during a transfer, which resulted in a fractured right upper extremity/elbow. Findings include: Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program, including turning and repositioning to prevent the development of in-house pressure ulcers for Resident #19. The facility also failed to timely identify and treat pressure ulcers for the resident. Actual Harm occurred on 01/20/23 when Resident #19, who was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility and transfers, identified to have developed two in-house acquired unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the actual depth of the ulcer is completely obscured by slough [yellow, tan, gray, green or brown] and/or eschar [tan, brown or black] in the wound bed) pressure ulcers to the left buttock. Prior to the identification of the new pressure ulcers, on 01/02/23 and 01/09/23 the areas had been noted to be red, with no evidence of treatment or new interventions being in place. In addition, there was no evidence turning and repositioning was being provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-09 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were held at least quarterly. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 80. Findings include: A review of the facility documents titled QA Signature Sheet revealed QAPI meetings were held on 04/12/23, 05/17/23, 06/07/23, 08/16/23, 10/11/23, 04/17/24, 05/08/24, 06/05/24, 07/10/24, 11/13/24, and 12/18/24. There was no evidence a QAPI meeting had been held during the first quarter of 2024. An interview was conducted on 01/09/25 at 2:48 P.M. with the Director of Nursing who verified there was no QAPI meeting held in the first quarter of 2024 and verified the QA Signature Sheets reflected accurate dates of the QAPI meetings.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to provide a clean shower room on the north hall unit. This had the potential to affect 40 residents identified as utilizing the shower room (Residents #1, #4, #5, #6, #8, #11, #13, #14, #15, #18, #20, #22, #23, #24, #27, #29, #30, #31, #32, #36, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #46, #47, #49, #51, #57, #59, #61, #62, #70, #72, #74, #77, #133, #183, and #184). The facility also failed to maintain clean Hoyer (mechanical) lifts on the north hall unit. This had the potential to affect 12 residents (Residents #4, #8, #11, #20, #29, #32, #36, #44, #47, #70, #77, and #183) identified as utilizing the Hoyer lift on the north hall. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Observation on 01/06/25 at 9:00 A.M. during an initial tour of the facility revealed a shower room on the north hall. The shower stall had a black substance around the base of the shower where the walls connected to the base. The stall also had a build up of a slimy gray substance in the front right corner of the stall. There was a paper clip within the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on interview, observation, record review, review of social media post, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #254779 and review of the facility abuse policy revealed the facility failed to ensure Resident #67 was free from abuse. This affected one resident (#67) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 04/17/23 and diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, major depression disorder, heart failure, and anxiety disorder. Review of SRI #254779 with a date of discovery of 12/05/24 revealed the facility filed the SRI related to emotional and verbal abuse. On 12/05/24 at approximately 12:50 P.M. the Administrator was notified by Restorative Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #510 that she observed a social media video post involving Resident #67 and Activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to send written notice to Residents #18 and #81 or the resident's representatives after the resident transferred from the facility was and admitted to the hospital. This affected two of two residents whose records were reviewed for discharge to hospital. Finding include: 1. Review of the Nursing Note dated 11/01/24 timed 2:45 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #501 overheard Resident #18 yell help us. The nurse ran down to the room and observed Resident #18 laying on the floor on her stomach with her head resting on the wheel and bar of the roommate's bed with head bleeding. Resident #18 was unable to tell the nurse what happened; when asked she said, I don't know. Resident #18 was observed with large open wound on the left side of her head, a reddened left shoulder, a large skin tear to the left hand, and skin tear to the left leg. Resident #18's wounds were cleansed, and bandages applied, and vital signs were taken. Emergency Medical Services was called, and Resident #18 was transported to the hospital where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to provide meaningful activities as scheduled. This affected one resident ( #70) of two residents (#70 and #78) who were reviewed for activities. The facility census was 80. Findings include: A review of medical records for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 08/21/24. Significant diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, anxiety, Parkinson's disease, and congestive heart failure. Significant orders included activity as tolerated, Memantine 10 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for Alzheimer's disease, Divalproex 500 mg take two tablets at bedtime for Alzheimer's disease, chlorpromazine 50 mg one tablet at bedtime for anxiety, Donepezil 10 mg at bedtime for Alzheimer's disease, and Lamictal 100 mg one tablet daily for schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and review of facility policy, the facility to ensure residents were up to date with their influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. This affected three residents (Resident #2, #64 and #67) out of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 04/17/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, major depression disorder, heart failure, and anxiety disorder. Review of immunizations revealed the last influenza vaccine Resident #67 received was 10/13/23 and that she received the Pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23) on 04/27/17. Review of the facility consent form labeled, Influenza Vaccine dated 11/27/24 revealed Quality Assurance (QA)/ Infection Control/ Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #575 received a verbal consent for Resident #67 to have the influenza vaccine from Resident #67's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representative received the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) timely and as required. This affected one resident (#86) of three residents reviewed for billing. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #86's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 09/03/22 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, pulmonary hypertension, spinal stenosis and osteoarthritis. Resident #86 discharged from the facility on 02/13/14. Review of a discharge-return not anticipated minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 was discharging to hospice (home). Resident #86 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #86's census data revealed she was on skilled care starting on 05/04/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on closed medical record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory testing was completed to monitor medication use. This affected one resident (Resident #90) of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 09/03/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm). Resident #90 was discharged from the facility on 02/13/24. Review of the physician orders revealed an order to administer Depakote 250 milligram three times a day for unspecified mood disorder and glargine insulin 40 units subcutaneous daily at bed time, 23 units subcutaneous daily in the morning for diabetes. Further review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 10/13/23 for a valproic acid (also known as Depakote) (VPA) level on 10/16/23 and then again every three months. Further review of the physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and food items were properly dated. This had the potential to affect all 82 of 82 residents who consumed food items from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 02/12/23 from 6:26 P.M. to 6:48 P.M. with Dietary #518 revealed: • The stand mixer was observed to uncovered and had five spots of dried brown debris on the base and underside of the unit. • In the dried storage area was observed to be one opened half full bag of penne pasta resealed in a one storage bag undated; one fourth full bag of white cake mix opened and resealed in a storage bag undated; one half bag of bow tie pasta opened and resealed in a storage bag undated; one three fourth full bag of multi colored spiral rotini resealed in a storage bag undated; and one fourth full bag of cornflakes resealed in a storage bag undated. • In the walk-in cooler, one dried red colored drip of liquid was observed down the support pole of the shelving unit and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident's #15 and #25 were monitored for antipsychotic medication side effects. This affected two residents (Resident's #15 and #25) and had the potential to affect all 13 residents (Resident #15, #22, #24, #25, #29, #34, #49, #52, #61, #65, #71, #72, and #134) on antipsychotic medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/13/20 and diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, type two diabetes mellitus, dementia and dysphagia. Review of Resident #25's physician orders dated, 07/15/22, revealed Risperidone (anti-psychotic medication) tablet 0.25 milligram (mg), give one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to Alzheimer's Disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #25 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WINDSOR HOUSE, INC. — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH