Liberty Health Care Center INC
1355 Churchill Hubbard Rd, Youngstown, OH 44505 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (330) 759-7858 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $83,401 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 43.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 143 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.6%CMS range 47.9–61.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.3–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 78.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.2–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 99.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent, accurately and timely assess, promote healing and prevent pressure ulcer/wound infection from occurring. This affected one (Resident #95) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 93. Actual Harm occurred on 07/03/25 when Resident #95 was assessed to have an acute change in condition requiring hospitalization. Upon hospital assessment, the resident was assessed to have a Stage II pressure ulcer to the sacrum with extensive gas forming soft tissue infection at the lower back extending to the tip of the coccyx measuring 9.0 centimeters (cm) by 2.3 cm by 16.1 cm. Prior to the development of the pressure ulcer infection, the facility failed to ensure effective ongoing monitoring and adequate interventions were in place to prevent the wound infection and subsequent hospitalization for treatment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of video recorded evidence, review of the facility self-reported incident, review of facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was free from humiliation, intimidation and verbal and physical abuse by staff. Using the reasonable person concept, actual harm occurred on 07/14/24 when Resident #16, who was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL), was forcefully rolled onto his right side for incontinence care by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #434 causing Resident #16's face to go into a pillow requiring him to move his head to yell let me breathe. STNA #434 repeatedly poked him in his ear with his dirty gloves he used to provide incontinence care causing Resident #16 to become agitated and yell get out of here. STNA #435 and #436 were present in the room and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #77 was free of an accident hazard during a staff assisted transfer. Actual Harm occurred on 01/30/24 when Resident #77 suffered a second-degree burn (a burn that involves the first two layers of skin which may present as deep reddening of the skin, pain, blisters, glossy appearance from leaking fluid, and possible loss of some skin) that measured 15 centimeters (cm) in length by 7.5 cm width to her left lower leg from a portable oxygen tank that had been placed on her bed while staff were transporting the resident from her room to the shower room. The improper transport of the oxygen caused the tank to freeze to the resident's leg causing pain/discomfort and the burn. The burn required treatment with Silvadene cream (medication used to help prevent and treat wound infections for serious burns) and Kerlix gauze to the area daily. This affected one resident (#77) of three residents reviewed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-04-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure therapy discharge recommendations were implemented in order to maintain a resident's mobility and range of motion (ROM) capabilities. This affected one (Resident #5) of 24 residents observed for limitations in range of motion. Actual harm occurred on 01/31/23 when Resident #5 presented with limitations in ROM after the facility failed to implement therapy recommendations for restorative nursing programs. Prior to 01/31/23, no ROM impairment had been identified and the resident was noted to be able to ambulate. On 01/31/23 an assessment noted a decrease in range of motion to the resident's right knee and bilateral ankles. An Occupational Therapy (OT) note, on 03/21/23 revealed Resident #5 had a significant decline in mobility and participation with activities of daily living with significant bilateral lower extremity contractures. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained for chronic wound ulcers. This affected one resident (Resident #273) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Record review of Resident #273 revealed an admission date of 03/31/26 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, and muscle wasting and weakness.Review of Resident #273's care plan revised 05/22/26 revealed goals and interventions for person-centered care included EBP related to the resident's chronic wound.Review of Resident #273's wound assessment dated [DATE] revealed a chronic one-centimeter left heel pressure ulcer which required daily dressing changes, and it was not a new area. Review of provider orders initiated on 06/04/26 revealed EBP every shift while Resident #273 had an indwelling medical device or chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI) investigation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records of transactions for resident funds accounts. This affected nine residents (#16, #45, #49, #59, #63, #68, #124, #125, #126) out of 15 residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 101.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified head injury, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder.Review of the resident trust transaction history for Resident #16 revealed there were cash withdrawals of $15.00 on [DATE], $6.00 on [DATE], and $6.00 on [DATE] with no receipts available for these transactions.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had no cognitive impairment.2. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled and per resident preferences for residents who required assistance with bathing. This affected five residents (#55, #81, #87, #90, and #98) out of five reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 101. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 03/22/16 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, hypertension, Barrett's esophagus, atrial flutter, muscle weakness, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the care plan dated 10/03/19 revealed Resident #81 would receive a person-centered care plan based on physician orders and resident choices. Interventions included assistance of one staff for bathing and sit to stand lift for transfers. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #45 was treated with dignity and respect by failing to provide appropriate clothing and coverings to maintain privacy and dignity. This affected one resident (#45) out of two residents investigated for dignity. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #45. This affected one resident (#45) out of eight residents investigated for call lights. The facility census was 101.Findings include:1. Record reviewed for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 06/29/25 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #45 was cognitively intact. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance for upper and lower body dressing. Observation on 03/02/26 at 2:56…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to identify and monitor bruises for one (Resident #76) of 42 residents observed for non-pressure related skin concerns and failed to implement bowel protocol and physician orders for Resident #85 and failed to change Resident #105's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressing changed weekly as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#76 and 3105) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 101. Findings include:1. On 03/02/26 at 10:53 A.M., ecchymotic (bruised) areas were observed on Resident #76's left upper arm and right wrist. Resident #76 was unable to provide any information related to the bruises. Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed diagnoses including displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the right femur (thigh bone), presence of a right artificial hip joint, repeated falls, and dementia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement pressure-relieving interventions for one (Resident #76) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 101.Findings include:Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed diagnoses including chronic anemia, dementia, and right hip fracture. Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an unstageable pressure ulcer (full-thickness wound whose depth cannot be determined because it is obscured by slough, eschar, or a non-removable dressing) to the right heel. Slough is dead tissue in the wound. Eschar is necrotic tissue. On 06/27/25, an order was written to offload heels in bed for preventative skin care. A plan of care initiated 07/07/25 indicated Resident #76 had potential/actual impairment to skin integrity related to incontinence, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, fracture, hypertension, hypothyroidism, dementia, deep vein thrombosis, depression and anemia.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control protocols during medication administration for Resident #19 and failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while administering intravenous (IV) medication to Resident #105. This affected two residents (#19 and #105) out of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 101.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 10/25/24 with diagnoses including adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, altered mental status, and dementia with agitation.Review of the care plan revised 11/25/25 revealed Resident #19 had impaired cognitive function and thought processes related to impaired decision making and dementia. Interventions included administering medications as ordered and monitoring for effectiveness.On 03/03/26 at 8:49 A.M., an observation revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #559 was administering medications to Resident #19. The pills…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene to prevent the cross contamination of germs during Resident #61 and Resident #44's medication administration and Resident #58's incontinence care. This affected two (Residents #61 and #44) out of seven residents observed for medication administration and one (Resident #58) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 93. Findings include:1. A review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/22/25 with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, gastroesophageal reflux disease, depression, high blood pressure, cerebral vascular disease with stroke, influenza, encephalopathy, high cholesterol, and urinary tract infection. Resident #61's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 09/01/25 to 09/30/25 indicated to administer the following medications orally during the evening: Multivitamin one tablet (supplement) Cyproheptadine hydrochloride 4 milligrams (mg) (antihistamine) 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website, the facility failed to allow Resident #95 to return to the facility after being sent out to the hospital. This affected one resident (#95) out of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date 06/20/24 and a discharge date of 07/17/24. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of medial condyle of left femur, delusional disorders, unspecified disorder due to known physiological condition, unspecified mental disorder due to known physiological condition, and bipolar disorder. Review of the discharge return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #95 was cognitively intact. The resident required set up or clean up assistance for eating and oral hygiene; supervision or touch assistance for upper body dressing and personal hygiene; and was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, schedule review, Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) review and Facility Annual Assessment review, that facility failed to ensure there was adequate Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D 10/01/23 though 12/31/23 revealed the facility had four or more days within the quarter with no RN coverage and had a one-star staffing rating. Review of the Nursing Assignment forms for 10/15/23, 10/29/23, 11/05/23, 11/11/23, 11/12/23, 11/22/23, 11/23/24, 11/25/23, 11/26/23, 12/02/24, 12/03/23, 12/10/23, and 01/20/24, revealed there were no RN's present working in the facility. Review of the Facility Annual Assessment, dated 03/01/24, revealed under licensed nurses the facility would have one full time Director of Nursing, two full time Clinical Directors and under the area of RN they would have two full time Minimum Data Set (MDS) RNs plus 200-336 hours of a RN per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, facility policy review and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance review, the facility failed to ensure Contact Precautions were implemented as ordered for Resident #22. This affected one resident (#22) of five residents reviewed for infection control and had the potential to affect all 50 additional residents (#3, #4, #7, #8, #10, #11, #13, #14, #16, #17, #19, #23, #24, #26 #29, #30, #31, #33, #37, #39, #41, #42, #43, #48, #50, #53, #55, #56, #58, #59, #60, #62, #63, #65, #68, # 69, #71, #75, #76, #79, #80, #85, #88, #96, #255, #256, #257, #305, #307 and #405) residing on the East Wing. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 07/24/18 with diagnoses including dementia, depression, diabetes, breast cancer, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was moderately cognitively impaired. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff spoke to Resident #15 in a dignified manner. This affected one resident (#15) of three residents reviewed for dignity had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus type two, depression, anxiety, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Resident #15 was also on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact and had occasional bladder incontinence and frequent bowel incontinence. On 04/30/24 at 9:15 A.M. an observation revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #561 standing at the doorway of Resident #15 and hollering into the room asking the resident what was needed. Resident #15 was requesting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding thoroughly investigating an injury of unknown origin for Resident #8 and an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse for Resident #77. This affected two residents (#8 and #77) of three residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired. She required limited assistance of one person for transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and hygiene. Review of the facility SRI tracking number 241607 dated 11/29/23 revealed on the afternoon of 11/29/24 a bruise was noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for Resident #8 and an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse for Resident #77. This affected two residents (#8 and #77) of three residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired. She required limited assistance of one person for transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and hygiene. Review of the facility SRI tracking number 241607 dated 11/29/23 revealed on the afternoon of 11/29/24 a bruise was noted under Resident #8's right eye and brought to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the care and maintenance of an enteral feeding tube for Resident #92. This affected one resident (#92) of two residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed an admission date of 10/20/23 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #92 received 51% or more calories per day and 501 ml or more fluid per day from tube feeding. Review of the order history for Resident #92 revealed she had consistently had physician's orders for enteral feedings or flushes since 12/18/23. Current physician's orders included nothing by mouth (NPO) effective 04/09/24, check enteral tube placement every eight hours effective 04/25/24, cleanse enteral feeding site with soap and water every night shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide oral care for Resident #23 and fingernail care for Resident #50. This affected two residents (#23 and #50) of 83 residents observed for assistance with personal care. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, diabetes mellitus type two, cerebral infarct, and muscle wasting. Review of the Medicare Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. A care plan dated 03/01/24 revealed Resident #23 needed the assistance of two people for bathing, grooming, and hygiene. A review of Resident #23 shower sheets revealed the most recent shower was 04/24/24. On 04/29/24 at 9:42 A.M. an observation and interview of Resident #23 revealed a white buildup between his lower teeth. Resident #23 stated staff had not assisted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide proper positioning in a wheelchair as ordered for Resident #10. This affected one resident (#10) of 34 residents reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction (a weakening of one side of the body following a stroke), epileptic seizures, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Significant orders included Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift used to transfer due to inability to transfer independently) for transfers, check residents left arm placement while in wheelchair to prevent being pinched inside of chair, and left arm to be elevated on pillow while in the wheelchair. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the plan of care dated 04/05/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hearing aides were ordered and available as needed for Residents #3 and #13). This affected two residents (#3 and #13) of three residents reviewed for communication concerns. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 12/11/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, depression, end stage renal disease, hypertension, and unspecified hearing loss. Review of the audiology visit dated 09/18/23 for Resident #3 revealed the resident was referred by the facility for decreased hearing. She was recommended for hearing aids with follow up in one to three months. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. She was independent with eating, required supervision for toileting, set up help for oral hygiene and personal hygiene and partial to moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of the dialysis agreements, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete dialysis assessments according to the physician's orders and failed to ensure residents had reliable transportation to and from the dialysis center. This affected two residents (#35 and #406) of two residents reviewed for dialysis treatments. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 11/10/22 and readmission date of 11/05/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus, and anemia in chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician's orders for April 2024 identified orders for dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 11:30 A.M. (ordered 01/04/24), pre-dialysis assessment on dialysis days every day shift on Monday, Wednesday, Friday (ordered 05/17/23), and post-dialysis assessment on dialysis days every evening shift on Monday, Wednesday, Friday (ordered 05/15/23). Review of the progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure clear instructions were in place for the use of narcotic pain medication and did not ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of pain medication. This affected two residents (#53 and #64) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 06/16/23 with diagnoses including heart failure, muscle wasting, hypertension, diabetes, depression, and insomnia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. She required partial to moderate assistance for eating and oral hygiene and was dependent for toileting, showering, and personal hygiene. Review of the physician's orders for April 2024 revealed an order for Acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg) (analgesic) every four hours as needed (prn)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate diagnoses and rationale for prescribed medications. This affected two residents (#22 and #53) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 07/24/18 with diagnoses including dementia, depression, diabetes, breast cancer, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was moderately cognitively impaired. She required set up help for eating, supervision for oral hygiene and personal hygiene, and substantial assistance for toileting and showering. Review of the physician's orders for April 2024 revealed an order for Klonopin (a sedative used to treat seizures, panic disorder, and anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) two times per day (BID) for dementia. The order began on 09/25/23. Interview on 05/01/24 at 12:53 P.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccination after consent was provided for Resident #77. This affected one resident (#77) of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 02/20/23 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #77's pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV 23) consent form revealed Resident #77 agreed to receive the vaccination on 03/07/23. Further review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed there was no documentation that the vaccination had been administered. On 05/02/24 at 11:04 A.M., interview with Corporate Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse #648 verified there was no evidence Resident #77 received the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding an allegation of potential staff-to-resident abuse for Resident #77. This affected one resident (#77) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 04/07/23 with diagnoses including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, arthritis, depression, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact. She required set up help for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene, substantial or maximum assistance for showing or bathing, and was dependent on staff for toileting. Interview on 02/06/24 at 11:35 A.M. with Resident #77 revealed State Tested Nurse's Aide (STNA) #203 had been rough with her twice on 01/30/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the state agency as required. This affected one resident (#77) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 04/07/23. Diagnoses included Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, arthritis, depression, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact. She required set up help for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene, substantial or maximum assistance for showing or bathing, and was dependent on staff for toileting. Interview on 02/06/24 at 11:35 A.M. with Resident #77 revealed State Tested Nurse's Aide (STNA) #203 was rough with her twice on 01/30/234. She revealed STNA #203 attempted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse as required. This affected one resident (#77) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 04/07/23. Diagnoses included Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, arthritis, depression, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact. She required set up help for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene, substantial or maximum assistance for showing or bathing, and was dependent on staff for toileting. Interview on 02/06/24 at 11:35 A.M. with Resident #77 revealed State Tested Nurse's Aide (STNA) #203 was rough with her twice on 01/30/234. She revealed STNA #203 attempted to move the Hoyer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received showers according to their preference. This affected three residents (#41, #70 and #77) of six residents reviewed for showers. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility as the facility identified all residents require assistance with showers. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 03/11/20 with diagnoses including heart disease, left eye blindness, hyperlipidemia, stroke, and urinary retention. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact. He required set up assistance for oral hygiene and personal hygiene and supervision for toileting, showering, and bathing. It was very important to him to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or a sponge bath. Review of the shower schedule revealed Resident #41 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete an accurate plan of care for Resident #52. This affected one resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 03/30/23 and a readmission date of 06/21/23. Diagnoses included aneurysm of unspecified site, benign prostatic hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's order dated 06/21/23 for Resident #52 revealed an order for him to have an indwelling urinary catheter due to urinary retention until he followed up with urology. Review of physician's order dated 07/12/23 for Resident #52 revealed an order for an indwelling urinary catheter for him and to change monthly and as needed for blockage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had mild cognitive impairment. Resident #52 had an indwelling urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices during blood glucose monitoring and medication administration to prevent the spread of infection. This affected five residents (#22, #26, #34, #56 and #68) out of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 02/10/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of the physician orders for August 2023 revealed Resident #26 was ordered Novolog injection (insulin Aspart) per sliding scale as follows: if 200 to 250 inject two units, if 251 to 300 inject four units, if 301 to 350 inject six units, if 351 to 400 inject eight units, if greater than 400 call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were timely administered upon admission to the facility. This affected one resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for new admissions. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 07/11/23, diagnoses included rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney failure, chronic heart failure, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively intact, required total dependence of two staff for toilet use, extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion, dressing, and personal hygiene and required limited assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the physician orders for Resident #35 revealed orders for allopurinol (uric acid reducer) 300 milligrams (mg) daily, aspirin (blood thinner) 81 mg daily, benazepril (anti-hypertensive) 10 mg daily, clopidogrel (anti-platelet) 75 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices and procedures were in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This affected six residents (#2, #5, #21, #44, #67, and #73) and had to potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 07/20/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, depression, anemia and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/04/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required limited assistance of two people for bed mobility, extensive assistance of two people for transfers and extensive assistance of one person for dressing and hygiene. Review of the lab results revealed a COVID-19 was administered and sent out 03/16/23. The test came back positive on 03/17/23. Review of the physician's orders dated 03/20/23 revealed the resident was to be placed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff to implement restorative nursing programs as recommendeded by therapy and to ensure showers were received as scheduled. This affected two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #5) of four residents reviewed for staffing, with the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility eligible for restorative services. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, and generalized muscle weakness. A nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 ambulated with two or more assistants. No impairment in ROM was noted. Resident #5 received Occupational Therapy (OT) from 07/21/23 to 08/31/22. An OT Discharge summary dated [DATE] did not reveal limitations in ROM. The discharge summary indicated recommendation for a restorative nursing program (RNP) for upper extremity strengthening and ROM. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were completed for Resident #2 per the resident's preferences and shower schedule. This finding affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for showers and activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed diagnoses including heart failure, end stage renal disease, generalized muscle weakness, spinal stenosis and chronic pain syndrome. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was able to make herself understood, was able to understand others and was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #2 did not walk and required physical help in part of the bathing activity. On 03/29/23 at 10:34 A.M., Resident #2 was observed lying in bed. Resident #2 stated she had not had a shower for three weeks and she was crying that morning because she felt so dirty and kept digging at her head. One of the aides asked her why she was crying and when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5's wound prevention intervention was implemented per the physician's orders. This finding affected one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/15/23 for Allevyn life dressing (foam dressing) to the right lateral ankle as a preventive intervention and the dressing was to be changed every Wednesday and Saturday. Observation on 03/27/23 at 12:50 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #802 revealed Resident #5 was lying in bed with his bilateral lower legs on pillows. The resident's right ankle area did not have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and review of manufacturer information and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for one (Resident #146) of five residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of Resident #146's medical record revealed diagnoses including stage 3 chronic kidney disease, anemia, type two diabetes mellitus, and history of a malignant neoplasm of the brain. A care plan initiated [DATE] indicated Resident #146 was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems and a history of falls. The goal was to be free of falls. Interventions initiated [DATE] included taking and/or assisting Resident #146 to a supervised area when/if he was noted to have increased confusion or agitation. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #146 was at high risk for falls. Risk factors included intermittent confusion, need for assistance with elimination, vision impairment, inability to rise without assistance, medication use and predisposing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-pain medication. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 03/08/23 with diagnoses including depression, sleep apnea, bilateral above the knee amputation, congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident #4's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. She required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and toilet use, limited assistance of two people for transfers, extensive assistance of one person for dressing, and supervision of one person for hygiene. Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed an order for Oxycodone, a medication used to treat pain, 5 milligrams (mg)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (prn) medication orders for anti-anxiety medications were limited to 14 days and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medication. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 03/08/23 with diagnoses including depression, sleep apnea, bilateral above the knee amputation, congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. She required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and toilet use, limited assistance of two people for transfers, extensive assistance of one person for dressing, and supervision of one person for hygiene. Review of the physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (Resident #74) of five residents reviewed for medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia and moderate intellectual disabilities. Resident #74 returned to the facility on [DATE] after a hospitalization. A Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential and Basal Metabolic Panel (BMP) were ordered every Wednesday for two weeks then every three months. Results were unable to be located. On 03/30/23 at 10:17 A.M., Corporate Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse #577 verified the laboratory tests were not obtained as ordered.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$83,401 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $66,600 — penalty dated 2025-09-16
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WINDSOR HOUSE, INC. — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMNI MANOR, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/01/2014 |
| MASTERNICK, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 12% | since 04/01/2014 |
| DALIMAN, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2014 |
| JAMES, KENNETH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2014 |
| WINDSOR HOUSE INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2014 |
| DELLIQUADRI, JOHN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/03/1996 |
| HAURIN, KIMBERLY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366113. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.