Logan Elm Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 88.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) was completed and updated to reflect a new qualifying diagnosis for a resident. This affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 88.Findings include:Record review for Resident #5 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, hallucinations, and depression. Review of current and active diagnoses included a new diagnosis of unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition was added on 03/18/25.Review of the most recent PASARR documentation provided by the facility for Resident #5 revealed it was completed prior to admission on [DATE], with no further documentation which reflected the addition of the new diagnosis.Interview with Social Services Director #370 on 03/09/26 at 3:32 P.M. verified the last PASARR for Resident #5 was completed on 08/07/24. She verified a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store their food in a manner that protects against contamination and spoilage. This had the potential to affect 78 out of 81 resident residing in the facility with three residents on nothing by mouth (NPO) diets. The facility census was 81. Findings include: During the initial kitchen observation on 02/03/25, from 9:30 A.M. to 9:55 A.M., conducted with Dietary Supervisor #39, the following unlabeled and undated food items were observed in the freezer: 16 frozen pizzas (unlabeled and undated) 2 unidentified logs of meat (unlabeled and undated) 3 bags of chicken strips (unlabeled and undated) 3 bags of vegetables (unlabeled and undated) Further observation of the dry storage area revealed: 13 open pie crusts (unlabeled and undated) 3 bags of granola (unlabeled and undated) 1 bag of marshmallows with a manufacturer's use-by date of 12/01/24 Interview with Dietary Supervisor #39 confirmed that all observed food items should have been labeled and dated according to facility policy. Review of the facility ' s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents attended activities that meets their needs. This affected one (Resident #13) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Record review of Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 06/08/21 with pertinent diagnoses of: hereditary ataxia, personal history of pulmonary embolism, dietary counseling and surveillance, acute pulmonary edema, vascular dementia, abnormal posture, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, frequency of micturition, dry eye syndrome, presence of functional implant, osteoarthritis, restlessness and agitation, hypothyroidism, hypertension, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, osteopetrosis, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, gastrostomy status, and vascular dementia. Review of the 12/09/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent for activities of daily living. Review of the 03/04/24 activity plan of care revealed Resident #13 needs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and resident observation, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for Resident #21. This affected one (Resident #21) out of 24 residents whose medical records were reviewed. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #21 ' s medical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/23 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder, cognitive communication deficit, essential tremor, cerebral infarction (unspecified), history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), history of other diseases of the nervous system, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed on 01/01/25, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders for Resident #21 revealed an order for honey zinc cream to the buttocks every four hours and with incontinence episodes, with a start date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect. The facility failed to ensure residents (Resident #22, #48, #76, and #94) received medication as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents (Resident #74 and #128) were assisted out of bed for scheduled smoking breaks, and residents were provided incontinence care in a timely manner. This affected six residents (Resident #22, #48, #76, #94,#74 and #128) out of six residents reviewed for medication administration and abuse/neglect. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/26/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the electronic medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on self-reported incident (SRI) review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report a staff member refusing to provide timely care and assistance out of bed. This affected two (Resident #74 and #128) of the six residents reviewed for timely reporting of incidents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 11/19/23. Diagnoses included anxiety, type two diabetes, and cellulitis of the left lower extremity. Review of Resident #74's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #128 revealed an admission date of 08/12/22. Diagnoses included muscle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during dressing changes. This affected one (#21) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an initial admission date of 07/01/22 with the latest readmission of 07/14/23 with diagnoses including sepsis due to methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, congestive heart failure, polyneuropathy, hypertension, encounter for palliative care, osteoarthritis, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, retention of urine, necrotizing fasciitis, anemia and cardiomyopathy. Review of the resident's admit/readmit assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a Stage III…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0608 — failed to report suspected crimes — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (1) employees report any suspicion of a crime against any resident, according to timelines; (2) post the notice of employee rights; and (3) prohibit and prevent retaliation for reporting.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, review of missing property report, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report suspicion of misappropriation of a residents property including money. This affected one (Resident #64) of the three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 05/20/21. Diagnosis included chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and adult failure to thrive. Interview on 03/29/22 at 10:29 A.M. with Resident #64 revealed a few months ago she noticed she had $60.00 dollars missing from her bag that was in her wheeled walker. Resident #64 claimed she reported to the management staff and a staff member took all her information. Review of the Missing Property Report dated 12/06/21 revealed a report was completed for Resident #64. Description of the item missing revealed $60.00 dollars in the form of three twenties. Resident states her daughter gave it to her in a envelope. The last place the money was seen was under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NURSING CARE MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH