Pataskala Oaks Care Center
144 East Broad Street, Pataskala, OH 43062 · For profit - Corporation · 86 certified beds · (740) 927-9888 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (18% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $11,858 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 61.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 10.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.4% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 51.7 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on open and closed medical record reviews, interviews with staff, review of side effects for Paxlovid (an antiviral medication), review of interaction warning for Paxlovid medication, review of fact sheet on Paxlovid, review of hospital records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor residents for signs and symptoms of bleeding while taking an anticoagulant medication. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm on [DATE] when Resident #56 was prescribed Paxlovid (an antiviral medication) twice daily for five days to treat COVID-19 infection while also taking Rivaroxaban (generic brand for Xarelto), an anticoagulant medication. The facility failed to monitor Resident #56 for signs of bleeding and the resident subsequently exhibited signs of internal bleeding on [DATE] without facility intervention including notification of the medical practitioner. The Immediate Jeopardy continued [DATE] when Resident #56 again had signs of internal bleeding and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-03-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of a fall investigation, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide effective pain management to Resident #23 following a fall on 05/21/22 that resulted in two fractured ribs. This affected one resident (#23) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 59. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #23 on 05/21/22 when the resident was not provided effective pain relief until being transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at 11:21 P.M. (nearly two days after the fall occurred) where subsequent additional treatment was provided to the resident for effective pain management. During the time period between the fall and the hospitalization the resident complained of increased pain, ineffective pain medication (Tylenol) and feeling fatigued due to an inability to sleep. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an original admission date on 04/05/22 and a readmission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen environment and store food in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who receive meals prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility identified four residents (#32, #73, #81, and #90) who received nothing by mouth. The census was 58.Findings include:1. Observation of the facility kitchen occurred between 10:29 A.M. and 11:58 A.M. on 06/23/26. The facility had both a walk-in freezer and walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen. A number of food items were observed in these areas opened and undated.Observation of the walk-in freezer found a bag of sausage links, bag of meat patties, Ziploc bag of waffles, bag of chicken wings, and a plastic tray of cupcakes all opened and undated. During an interview at 11:16 A.M. on 06/23/26, Dietary Aide (DA) #34 confirmed that the items listed in the walk-in freezer were opened and undated.Observation of the walk-in refrigerator found a bag of lettuce, bag of parmesan cheese, and crates of pasteurized eggs that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychotropic medications were educated on the risks/ benefits associated with the use of psychotropic medications, and informed consent was obtained from the resident and/ or their representative prior to use. This affected five (Resident #1, #5, #27, #30, and #35) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #35's physician's orders revealed she was receiving the following psychotropic medications: Aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medications) 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) once a day for bipolar disorder, Ativan (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 mg po twice a day for anxiety disorder, Trazadone (an anti-depressant medication) 100 mg po once daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain an assessment and physician order for a wander guard for one resident (#5) out of one resident reviewed for restraints. In addition, based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to timely change PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line access dressings as ordered for three residents (#2, #21 and #33) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 50.Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and congestive heart failure. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/06/25, revealed Resident #5's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 09 out of 15, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, observation and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement preventive pressure ulcer skin interventions for 5 residents (#33, #2, #18, #4, and #63.) of 5 reviewed. The facility census was 50. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33, revealed an admission date of 02/22/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer of sacral region, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications and sepsis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15. The resident was assessed to require total dependence on toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, bed mobility and transfers. This resident was also at risk for pressure ulcers and to have a stage 3 and stage 4 pressure ulcer. Review of the physician order dated 02/24/25 for Resident #33 revealed an air mattress to bed. Review of the plan of care revised on 04/25/25 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to accurately reflect the Resident code status in the electronic medical record and the paper copies in the facility binder used for emergencies. This affected two Residents (Resident #3 and #5) of the 22 residents reviewed for code status. The facility census was 50. Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #3 medial record revealed admission to facility 04/22/24 for diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type 1 with neuropathy (decreased sensation in nerve endings), high blood pressure, major depressive disorder, unspecified mood disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified disorders of adult personality and behavior, insomnia (inability to sleep), heart disease, chronic kidney disease. Review on 08/18/2025 at 11:53 A.M. of the code status binder at the nurse's station revealed an orange paper noting Resident #3 was a Full Code. Further review of the electronic medical record Point…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents accurately reflected diagnoses. This affected three (Resident #5, #3 and #8) of three residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 50. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and congestive heart failure. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/06/25, revealed Resident #5's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 09 out 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #5's PASRR document, dated 06/06/24, under Section E: Indications of Serious Mental Illness, revealed the answer No was selected for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plans included care plans to address all the resident's diagnoses that they received medications for. This affected one (Resident #35) of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 50. Findings include:Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #35's physician's orders revealed she had orders in place to receive Melatonin (a supplement used in the treatment of insomnia) 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every night at bedtime for insomnia. The resident also had orders in place for the use of Senna Plus (stool softener) 8.6 mg- 50 mg po every day and FiberCon (bulk forming laxative) 625 mg with the directions to take two tablets one time a day for constipation. Review of Resident #35's active care plans revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to maintain safe equipment for residents, which affected Resident #27. The facility also failed to maintain safety for Resident #10 identified as being a high fall risk. This affected two residents ( #10 and #27) out of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 50.1.Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/08/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: Unspecified Atrial Flutter; Pain; Rhabdomyolysis, unspecified fall; Essential Hypertension; Unspecified Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Lower Respiratory Infection; Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia without Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Ventricular Flutter; Malignant Neoplasm of Bladder; Acute on Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 of 15 which indicated cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to properly administer oxygen per nasal cannula as ordered by a physician. This affected three (Resident #12, Resident #27, and Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 50.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #12 , revealed an admission date of 08/07/25 . Diagnoses included but were not limited to: Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia; Dyspnea; Diarrhea; Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease without Esophagitis; Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease; Long term use of Anticoagulants; Essential Hypertension; Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure; Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation; Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3; and Pneumonia.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit.Review of Resident #12's orders indicated he was ordered oxygen at 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident observations, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to assess and implement trauma informed care for two Residents (Residents #5 and #24) of the two residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: 1. Record review of Resident #24 revealed admission to facility on 03/12/20 with diagnosis including chronic kidney disease, cerebral atherosclerosis (blockage of vessels in the brain), hearing loss of right ear, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic cough, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dementia (forgetfulness), diabetes mellitus type II, major depressive disorder, anxiety, mild cognitive impairment of unknown etiology, insomnia (inability to sleep), heart disease, and lung disease. Record review of Resident #24 most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS 3.0) assessment dated [DATE] revealed no diagnosis of trauma. Record review of Resident #24 most recent psychiatric visit notes by on 02/26/25 revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide proper cleaning/disinfection of equipment between resident use. This affected two (Resident #32 and #12) of eight residents (Resident #5, Resident #9, Resident #12, Resident #27, Resident #32, Resident #34, Resident #45, and Resident #61) identified on Middle Hall as requiring blood pressures prior to medication administration and one (Resident #19) of one reviewed for glucometer use. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: 1. On 08/20/2025 at 8:16 A.M., observation revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #33 took Resident #32's blood pressure using an electronic blood pressure monitor. She did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff at that time. RN #33 then completed the medication administration of this resident. On 08/20/2025 at 8:39 A.M., observation revealed RN #33 take Resident #12's blood pressure with an electronic wrist blood pressure monitor. This was the same cuff used on Resident #32 and was not cleaned between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program by not ensuring a resident was not started on an antibiotic for a suspected urinary tract infection until a urinalysis culture result was received to identify best course of treatment. This affected one (Resident #8) of four residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizophrenia, psychotic disorder with delusions, dementia, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #8's nurses' progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated 06/04/25 at 3:13 P.M. that indicated the resident was seen by the nurse practitioner that day for increased confusion and weakness. She was previously ordered to have laboratory test performed to included a complete blood count and a complete metabolic panel, but had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of manufacturer guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to date a multi-dose vial of Tubersol tuberculin solution when opened for use. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 12 residents who were newly admitted after the tuberculin solution was received from the pharmacy. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: An observation on 04/23/24 at 7:43 A.M. revealed an in use opened multi-dose vial of Tubersol tuberculin solution in the medication refrigerator located in the facility medication room. There was a yellow sticker on the bottom of the vial with the word date written on it. There was no opened date written on the sticker, on the vial or on the box were the vial was stored. The storage box had a label from the pharmacy with a delivery date to the facility of 03/07/24. Interview on 04/23/24 at 7:50 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Manager #400 confirmed the opened multi-dose vial Tubersol tuberculin solution did not have an opened date on the yellow sticker, the vial or the box where the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure five residents (#11, #27, #28, #37, and #49) on a mechanically altered diet were served food at an appropriate texture. This affected five residents (#11, #27, #28, #37, and #49) of 15 residents on a mechanically altered or soft diet. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 07/08/17 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #27's diet order dated 09/29/23 revealed an order for a soft texture diet. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 02/10/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, respiratory disorders, depression, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #37's diet order dated 09/09/23 revealed she was to receive a mechanically altered diet. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/21/23 with diagnoses including dysphagia, cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to use appropriate hand hygiene during meal service. This had the potential to affect 46 of 46 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified four residents (#25, #42, #46, #51) who were unable to eat by mouth. The facility census is 50. Findings include: Observation on 04/24/24 from 10:45 A.M. to 12:19 P.M. of the kitchen revealed Dietary Staff #466 doing a variety of tasks including the following: preparing puree food, putting gloved and ungloved hands into oven mitts to pull food out of the oven, setting up the steamtable, obtaining food temperatures, going in and out of the walk-in refrigerator, and serving food. Meal service included a bacon,lettuce,tomato (BLT) sandwich, Dietary Staff #466 was observed touching the bread for the BLT and the bread for grilled cheese sandwiches. During the entire observation Dietary Staff #466 was observed changing her gloves multiple times, however, she was not observed washing her hands during the entire observation. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a bed hold notice within 24 hours of a resident's discharge to the hospital. This affected one resident (Resident #55) out of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for evaluation of altered mental status and was discharged from the facility on 02/05/24. Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed Resident #55 primary payer was Ohio Medicaid which requires notification to resident's representative the option to hold the resident's bed at the facility following a discharge to the hospital. There was no bed hold notice found in Resident #55's medical record. Interview on 04/23/24 at 10:02 A.M. with the Business Office Manager (BOM) # 472 confirmed Resident #55 did not have a bed hold notification sent to the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to apply and document the use of a left elbow brace to decrease the decline of contracture. This affected one resident (Resident #5) out of two residents reviewed for position and mobility. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including Cerebral Palsy, high blood pressure, and type two diabetes mellitus. Resident #5 required assistance from staff to complete personal care tasks, transfers, and bathing. Resident #5 had mild cognitive impairment and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed in section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs splint or brace assistance was not marked. Review of Resident #5's signed physician orders for 04/2024 revealed an order dated 02/02/24 for Resident #5 to wear a left elbow extension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facilities investigative report, the facility failed to ensure Resident #39 received the appropriate assistance, resulting in a fall. This affected one resident (#39) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 03/09/23 with diagnoses including traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, anxiety, depression, epilepsy, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, quadriplegia, anoxic brain damage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of Resident #39's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed he had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #39 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #39's plan of care dated 10/16/23 revealed he was at risk for falls related to poor communication, impaired vision, impaired mobility, weakness, impaired cognition, anoxic brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to change oxygen and nebulizer tubing as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #14) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma, high blood pressure, dementia, and weakness. Resident #14 had severe cognition impairment, required staff assistance for personal hygiene cares, transfers, and bathing. Review of Resident #14's signed physician orders revealed an order dated 01/11/23 Oxygen at 2 liters (L) as needed to maintain blood oxygen levels (SP02) greater than 90%, an ordered dated 09/29/23 for Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3 milligrams (mg) per 3 milliliters (ml) via nebulizer every four hours as needed for congestion, and an order dated 02/04/24 for Oxygen (02) tubing to be change every week on Sunday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of medical records, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide non-pharmacological interventions, properly document pain location and indicators of pain, with the administration of as needed pain medication. This affected one resident (Resident #46) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24, diagnoses included ventilator dependent, pressure ulcer, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, insomnia, depression, dysphagia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, paraplegia, obstructive and reflex uropathy, pressure induced deep tissue damage of head, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Review of Resident #46's care plan dated 01/17/24, revealed Resident #46 was at risk for pain due to diagnoses of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple pressure ulcers. Interventions included administering medications as ordered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an end date was documented for an as needed psychotropic drug order, document behaviors and ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administration of as needed psychotropic drug for Resident #46, and to complete Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIM) assessments as scheduled for two residents (#19 and #38). This affected three residents (#46, #38, #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24, diagnoses included ventilator dependent, pressure ulcer, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, insomnia, depression, dysphagia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, paraplegia, obstructive and reflex uropathy, pressure induced deep tissue damage of head, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Review of Resident #46's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of facility policy, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure puree food was served according to the menu and at an appropriate texture. This affected one resident (#35) of one resident on a puree diet. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 03/24/23 with diagnoses including dementia, depression, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #35's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. Review of the physician's order dated 03/21/24 revealed Resident #35 was to receive a puree texture diet. Observation on 04/24/24 from 10:45 A.M. to 12:19 P.M. revealed Dietary Staff #466 preparing puree chicken lasagna for the one resident on a puree diet. Dietary Staff #466 added one serving of chicken lasagna to the food processor and an unmeasured amount of milk from a carton. She started the blender and added three more unmeasured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to accurately document a physician order by signing that an order had been completed when the order had not been completed by not changing oxygen and nebulizer tubing as documented. This affected one resident (Resident #14) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma, high blood pressure, dementia, and weakness. Resident #14 had severe cognition impairment, required staff assistance for personal hygiene cares, transfers, and bathing. Review of Resident #14's signed physician orders revealed an order dated 01/11/23 Oxygen at 2 liters (L) as needed to maintain blood oxygen levels (SP02) greater than 90%, an ordered dated 09/29/23 for Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3 milligrams (mg) per 3 milliliters (ml) via nebulizer every four hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care. This affected one resident (Resident #34) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted from a hospital stay on 04/19/24 with diagnoses including pressure injury to sacrum, bacteremia (blood infection), high blood pressure, depression, and bilateral above the knee amputations. Resident #34 had minimal cognitive impairment and required assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks, transfers, and medical treatments. Review of Resident #34's signed physician orders revealed an order dated 04/20/24 for sacrum pressure injury treatment of packing wound with half strength Dakins solution soaked kerlix gauze and secure with a foam dressing. Change daily and as needed when soiled, an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents when the front hallway and back hallway were cluttered providing an increased risk of falls or accidents for residents. This affected 12 residents (#3, #5, #11, #17, #19, #22, #25, #33, #44, #57, #87, and #89) of 52 residents in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 01/30/24 at 9:08 A.M. during a tour of the facility revealed in the back hallway by the vending machines and therapy gym there were four bedside tables, one bed frame, one shower chair, 12 boxes, a walker, a geri-chair, and a wheelchair all to the right side of the hallway. Additionally, there were three mechanical lifts, two over the bed tables, four nursing carts, and 13 wheelchairs to the right side of the hallway on the front hall. On one nursing treatment cart, the sharps container was approximately one and a half inches over the fill line and on one nursing medication cart, the sharps container was approximately half an inch over the fill line. Interview on 01/30/24 at 9:26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to store cold sandwiches and milk at the appropriate temperatures to prevent potential for food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 46 of 52 residents who consume food and beverages provided by the facility. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Observation on 01/31/24 at 11:14 A.M. revealed [NAME] #214 taking temperatures of lunch items available to residents. For an alternate option to the meal being served, a cold ham and turkey sandwich was provided from the walk-in refrigerator and [NAME] #214 took the temperature of the sandwich which was 45.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Additionally, [NAME] #214 checked the temperature of a carton of milk from the walk-in refrigerator which had a temperature of 48 degrees Fahrenheit. [NAME] #214 did use two separate thermometers to check temperatures and recalibrated both thermometers to ensure accuracy with the same results. Interview on 01/31/24 at 11:18 A.M. with [NAME] #214 confirmed the sandwich and milk should have been 41 degrees or less. [NAME] #214…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-23 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the staff vaccination matrix, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all staff were vaccinated against the COVID-19 virus or had a valid exemption on file prior to working in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who resided in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the Staff Vaccination Matrix dated 03/15/23 revealed Dietary #180 was listed as unvaccinated. The facility had a total of 84 staff and 83 staff were either vaccinated or had a religious exemption on file. Interview on 03/14/23 at 1:34 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility had a total of 84 staff; 19 staff had religious exemptions on file. One staff, Dietary #180 was unvaccinated. Dietary #180 was contacted on 03/13/23 and should be attending a vaccine clinic on 03/16/23. Interviews on 03/15/23 at 3:48 P.M. and 5:30 P.M. with the DON confirmed Dietary #180's hire date was 02/15/23. Dietary #180's first day of work was 02/18/23. Dietary #180 had worked a total of 19 shifts since her hire date unvaccinated against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for individuals with mental disorders was accurate. This affected four (Resident #14, #16, #19 and #42) of four residents reviewed for preadmission screening. The census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact. He required limited assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfer, and extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Record review revealed Resident #16 is non-verbal, answers with shaking head yes/no, however at times doesn't reply with non-verbal gesture - he will just stare with no response. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, revealed the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy reviews are completed. This affected six residents (#16, #25, #28, #30, #42, and #258) of 11 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact. He required limited assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfer, and extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. There was no evidence of monthly pharmacy review for January 2023. 2. Review of Resident #28's medical record review revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact. He required limited assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfer, and extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of the Pharmacy recommendation for 02/25/23 revealed Resident #16 has been taking Latuda 40 mg daily for bipolar disorder since March 2022. Please evaluate the potential for a dose reduction at this time to determine the lowest, effective dose. If contraindicated please provide a brief note. 5. Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anxiety, schizophrenia, dementia, severe protein malnutrition, depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information was present throughout the medical record. This affected one (Resident #19) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 59. Findings Include: Record review for Resident # 19 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, post- traumatic stress disorder, dysphagia, dementia, depression, [NAME] insufficiency, polyosteoarthritis, peripheral vascular disease, apraxia, anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not answer or did not cooperate with many sections of the assessment. Review of the physicians' orders for Resident #19 revealed an ordered dated [DATE] for full resuscitation code status signifying that cardiopulmonary resuscitative measures CPR is to be conducted in case of cardiac or respiratory arrest. The electronic medical record resident banner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify one resident's (Resident #30) nephrologist of laboratory test results as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #30) of one reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 59. Findings Include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an original admission date on 06/09/21 and a readmission date on 07/12/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperkalemia, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease with end stage renal disease. Review of lab orders revealed Resident #30 had the following lab orders: Complete Blood Count (CBC), Ferritin, Iron Pan, Protein total random urine with creatinine, urinalysis with microscopic, Vitamin D, renal function panel, Parathyroid Hormone (PTH), Folate, and Vitamin B12 dated 11/18/22 with instructions to fax results to nephrologist and CBC, Ferritin, Iron Panel, PTH, protein…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were completed for residents with cardiac and blood pressure medical conditions. This affected two residents (#30 and #42) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anxiety, schizophrenia, dementia, severe protein malnutrition, depression, diabetes, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was mildly impaired. He required extensive assistance of two plus staff members physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 03/08/22 for daily weight, one time a day related to congestive heat failure (CHF). Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation revealed the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatment and interventions were in place for two residents (#17 and #28) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 59. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record review revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychosis, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression, anxiety, anorexia, cerebral vascular accident with left sided hemiplegia and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #28's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact. He required total dependence of two or more staff members physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. He required extensive assistance of one staff member physical assistance for personal hygiene and dressing. Review of Resident #28's pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored appropriately to prevent infection. This affected one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of the left femur, high blood pressure, rheumatoid arthritis, dementia, anxiety and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was moderately impaired. She required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and extensive assistance of one staff member physical assistance for dressing and personal hygiene. She required total dependence of two or more staff members for toilet use. Review of the physicians orders dated 01/26/23 revealed an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-19 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of a personnel file, the facility failed to ensure the activity director met the minimum qualifications, training, and/or experience for an activity director. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The census was 61. Findings include: Review of the new hire information for Activities Director #141 revealed she was hired on 11/16/21 as the Dietary Manager. Review of the personnel file for Activities Director #141 revealed no evidence she met the minimum training, qualifications, and/or experience required to direct the activities program. Interview on 11/16/23 at 3:55 P.M. with Activities Director #141 revealed she took over as activity director when the new dietary manager was hired in June. She reported she did not have any official training, but she had worked in nursing homes for the last 20 years and felt she understood the position. Interview on 11/16/23 at 4:52 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Activities Director #141 did not meet the minimum qualifications, training, or experience for her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$11,858 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $7,625 — penalty dated 2023-12-26
- $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NURSING CARE MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FARLEY, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 25% | since 07/22/1987 |
| SCHARFENBERGER, C SUSAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 5% | since 02/14/2015 |
| SCHARFENBERGER, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 25% | since 07/22/1987 |
| WYNNE, TIMOTHY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 30% | since 07/22/1987 |
| ST. JOHN, KEVIN | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/08/2022 |
| SCHARFENBERGER, GEOFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/17/2018 |
| NURSING CARE MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/06/1990 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $960K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365794. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.